Brett Kavanaugh's Sexual Assault Victim steps forward, takes lie detector to confirm

The Republicans are going to push through the nomination no matter what, we've been shown time and time again, truth, morals and ethics have no place for them. The next weeks worth of assassination on the woman who has already had to endure so much will be proof of that.

Mercury Fred said:

This woman is a hero. Gigantic props to her for coming forward.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

If you can't tell from the surrounding circumstances that she is a fraud then I have a bridge I want to sell you. SMH

GoldenTrichome said:

If you can't tell from the surrounding circumstances that she is a fraud then I have a bridge I want to sell you. SMH

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

She sure paid off a lot of people. Must be Soros cash.

GoldenTrichome said:

If you can't tell from the surrounding circumstances that she is a fraud then I have a bridge I want to sell you. SMH

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

If you want to reserve judgement, that's fine, but calling people frauds when you have no idea what the truth may be is out of line.

GoldenTrichome said:

If you can't tell from the surrounding circumstances that she is a fraud then I have a bridge I want to sell you. SMH

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

and that's why she said mark judge was in the room with them, someone who could easily exonerate kavanaugh

and why she spoke with her therapist about this years ago, yep this was totally all planned just in case kavanaugh was going to be chosen for the supreme court years down the line

oh wait, that makes absolutely zero fucking sense

she's even been chased out of her home by death threats for speaking up! which us incidentally why many women do not speak up about being sexually assaulted

the only thing it would take to sell you a bridge is an appeal to your inflated sense of intellectual self worth and reflexive contrarianism

GoldenTrichome said:

If you can't tell from the surrounding circumstances that she is a fraud then I have a bridge I want to sell you. SMH

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Are these surrounding circumstances her years of documented corroborating evidence, the Everest-sized mountain of lies that Kavanaugh has already effluented, or some combination of the two?

Why are you all giving the time of day to an account with only 9 posts?

calling victims liars, how low can you go

Brinbe said:

calling victims liars, how low can you go

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Simultaneously calling liars victims?

Brinbe said:

calling victims liars, how low can you go

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Do you really want an answer to that?

HStallion said:

Do you really want an answer to that?

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

no, we already know. at least douche got banned. can run along back to GAF to complain

Sianos said:

and that's why she said mark judge was in the room with them, someone who could easily exonerate kavanaugh

and why she spoke with her therapist about this years ago, yep this was totally all planned just in case kavanaugh was going to be chosen for the supreme court years down the line

oh wait, that makes absolutely zero fucking sense

she's even been chased out of her home by death threats for speaking up! which us incidentally why many women do not speak up about being sexually assaulted

the only thing it would take to sell you a bridge is an appeal to your inflated sense of intellectual self worth and reflexive contrarianism

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

That's nothing compared to what Obama did. Apparently he was born in Kenya but when running for President he realized he had to go back in time and change his birth certificate to say Hawaii. It's the long con and these dumbocrats would go to whatever lengths to fool the good people of America.

I remember very little from HS. I remember two of my teachers names, a few fuzzy classroom memories, and if you asked me to name who specifically attended any party I went too, I don't think I could make that happen. I'm not sure if my memory or lack thereof is normal. It's been over 20 years since I graduated.

Edit: i'm referring to the potential witnesses who could vouch he either was or wasn't at the party since he vehemently denies even being at the event.

Stouffers said:

I remember very little from HS. I remember two of my teachers names, a few fuzzy classroom memories, and if you asked me to name who specifically attended any party I went too, I don't think I could make that happen. I'm not sure if my memory or lack thereof is normal. It's been over 20 years since I graduated.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Do you remember that one time you almost got raped though

JeTmAn said:

Do you remember that one time you almost got raped though

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

I'm not talking about her. I am referring to the others who may or may not have been at the party.

Stouffers said:

I remember very little from HS. I remember two of my teachers names, a few fuzzy classroom memories, and if you asked me to name who specifically attended any party I went too, I don't think I could make that happen. I'm not sure if my memory or lack thereof is normal. It's been over 20 years since I graduated.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Have you experienced something traumatizing, like being locked in a room and about to be raped? Because that's what the victim experienced.

RustyNails said:

Have you experienced something traumatizing, like being locked in a room and about to be raped? Because that's what the victim experienced.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

See my comment above. I wasn't referring to her.

Stouffers said:

I'm not talking about her. I am referring to the others who may or may not have been at the party.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Yes, less dramatic experiences are less likely to survive the years

JeTmAn said:

Do you remember that one time you almost got raped though

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Or how about the one time you (not you) tried to rape somebody? It's almost as if there are certain things you remember more than other. Not remembering the name of every teacher you had in high school shouldn't even be brought up with not remembering something like this. Yet here we are.

rjinaz said:

Or how about the one time you (not you) tried to rape somebody? It's almost as if there are certain things you remember more than other. Not remembering the name of every teacher you had in high school shouldn't even be brought up with not remembering something like this.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

I was talking about finding other witnesses who would know if he was at the party or not

The issue is that this night could have been a regular one for everyone but the people who underwent memorable trauma. Asking someone if they were at a party 30 years ago, especially if they went to a lot of them, is pretty difficult.

Stouffers said:

I'm not talking about her. I am referring to the others who may or may not have been at the party.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

But would you remember attempting to rape someone? Seems like a before/after moment in a persons life.

-Le Monde- said:

But would you remember attempting to rape someone? Seems like a before/after moment in a persons life.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

I'm not talking about him or her. I'm talking about the potential witnesses who can vouch that he was or was not at the party

Stouffers said:

I was talking about finding other witnesses who would know if he was at the party or not

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

The friend that saw him try to rape her would probably remember.

Also the people there that night are not the only potentially important people to talk to. Anyone who was told at the time or since would be extremely important to talk to because they can corroborate or not details as they've been told today.

RustyNails said:

That's nothing compared to what Obama did. Apparently he was born in Kenya but when running for President he realized he had to go back in time and change his birth certificate to say Hawaii. It's the long con and these dumbocrats would go to whatever lengths to fool the good people of America.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

well he did have The Chaos Emeralds at the time, and there is this voice recording of him using Chaos Control and thus demonstrating that he had the ability to travel through time, so that one's a little more plausible

/s

Stouffers said:

I remember very little from HS. I remember two of my teachers names, a few fuzzy classroom memories, and if you asked me to name who specifically attended any party I went too, I don't think I could make that happen. I'm not sure if my memory or lack thereof is normal. It's been over 20 years since I graduated.

Edit: i'm referring to the potential witnesses who could vouch he either was or wasn't at the party since he vehemently denies even being at the event.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Honestly, the degree to which Kavanaugh has denied the accusation, it shouldn't be too hard for somebody to poke a hole in some of his defense. He claims to not even have been at the party, but she never said where or when the party was. So if there is anybody that remembers he and his friend Judge went to a few house parties, he comes off as a liar. His denial went too far.

This doesn't make any sense at all. He says he's been identified but if not publicly then how?

Stouffers
I get what's you're saying . I don't remember shit from high school in detail or even from 2 years back . But I do remember times ppl told
Me about assault/ something similarly serious or I heard about assault or something serious that level .


Do I remember them absolutely verbatim no . Do I remember everything important about the story yes I do .


Once again before ppl draw conclusions I meant assault or something as serious not attempted rape as in this case .

Airing of Grievances said:

This doesn't make any sense at all. He says he's been identified but if not publicly then how?

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

it sounds to me like someone doth protest a little too much, a little too soon

chezzymann said:

Its pretty hilarious its still used. Almost as silly as using a ouija board to catch criminals.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Now THATS a TV show i'd watch.

The lie detector thing isn't all that convincing to me. I believe her story, but that aspect is fluff. What IS convincing is Republican's clearly prepared and preemptive response to her allegations.

Mitch McConnell warned against nominating Kavanaugh. He said there were "Too much documents" for him to get through the process. What documentation? Now 1. Mitch would never care if Kavanaugh was a bad guy. 2. Mitch would have no problem with Kavanaugh's ruling history so it's not like they'd find out he voted pro Roe v Wade once and that would piss off the base. So clearly they new something was up with the guy.

Second, the list of 60+ women Kavanaugh knew came out the day this woman's allegations came out. Now, in a hypothetical situation where I need to have 60 women I knew in high school to sign off on my being an okay guy, I could do that but it would take time to find people I knew. Days. Weeks. Months even. They dropped that list the day the allegations came out. I think they showed their hand there in their rush to the defense. They clearly knew something like this was coming and were not only trying to push Kavanaugh through before this stuff could get out and had prepared this specific defense in advance if it did.

So what did Republicans like McConnell know and when did they know it?

Also all the writing Kavanaugh's friend did about them getting black out drunk together were scrubbed from all the publish works he's doen mentioning it.

The insistence that she was ready to testify or cooperate in any way but no one had contacted her to do so, then when they did contact her suddenly she refuses to testify...this doesn't look good. At this point this is going to go nowhere. Kavanaugh and the other guy in the room both deny it, the alleged victim won't testify and hasn't gone to the police....what else is there to do/say?

If she wants something to happen she needs to go to the police at this point, there is no statute of limitations in Maryland. It's not like Kav can't be removed once he's in office if a crime is uncovered. People act like once he's in, he's safe.

Jesus the GOP really wants to push this through ASAP before another shoe drops. They're so gung ho about putting another conservative on the bench that they'll brush aside A FUCKING ATTEMPTED RAPE rather than have another Anita Hill situation.

Deplorables from the top to the bottom.

Sianos said:

it sounds to me like someone doth protest a little too much, a little too soon

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

The whole thing really does fucking reek of everyone knew about this and were preparing for the fallout before it happened. Leave it to Trump to try to push forward with a nominee who's pretty obviously guilty anyway because why not?

The only redemption here is if women actually get their fuck you moment and this man goes down

steejee said:

Jesus the GOP really wants to push this through ASAP before another shoe drops. They're so gung ho about putting another conservative on the bench that they'll brush aside A FUCKING ATTEMPTED RAPE rather than have another Anita Hill situation.

Deplorables from the top to the bottom.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Pro-rape party

Her not testifying is honestly the best outcome the Republicans could have hoped for. It's a gift.

Stouffers said:

i'm referring to the potential witnesses who could vouch he either was or wasn't at the party since he vehemently denies even being at the event.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

He doesn't even know what party he is categorically denying being at.

You just keep asking questions, tho

I'm not really sure what to make of this, but Democrats are going to end up with serious egg on their faces if this lady turtles up and doesn't testify. It was a dirty move (not that I necessarily disapprove of it) to pull this stunt to begin with, and a foolish one to not be prepared to follow through with.

Doober said:

I'm not really sure what to make of this, but Democrats are going to end up with serious egg on their faces if this lady turtles up and doesn't testify. It was a dirty move (not that I necessarily disapprove of it) to pull this stunt to begin with, and a foolish one to not be prepared to follow through with.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

What was the dirty move? Explain.

Doober said:

I'm not really sure what to make of this, but Democrats are going to end up with serious egg on their faces if this lady turtles up and doesn't testify. It was a dirty move (not that I necessarily disapprove of it) to pull this stunt to begin with, and a foolish one to not be prepared to follow through with.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Considering Democrats (and by Democrats, I mean one single person, Feinstein) almost didn't report this at all, I'd like to know how this is considered a 'dirty move'.

GrapeApes said:

What was the dirty move? Explain.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Categorically blocking any hearing for a supreme court nominee. Oh...

Doober said:

I'm not really sure what to make of this, but Democrats are going to end up with serious egg on their faces if this lady turtles up and doesn't testify. It was a dirty move (not that I necessarily disapprove of it) to pull this stunt to begin with, and a foolish one to not be prepared to follow through with.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Sexual assault is not a stunt.

Doober said:

I'm not really sure what to make of this, but Democrats are going to end up with serious egg on their faces if this lady turtles up and doesn't testify. It was a dirty move (not that I necessarily disapprove of it) to pull this stunt to begin with, and a foolish one to not be prepared to follow through with.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Why would she not at this point? Her life is now hell on all fronts. Might as well go through with it and make it for something. She's brave as can be to do this.

Haha, the fuck is this. The woman in question didn't mention what party, but Kanavaugh and some dude out of no where just came out and said they weren't at/acted so at this unidentified party?

GrapeApes said:

What was the dirty move? Explain.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Bringing up a three-decade-old case of alleged sexual assault in the eleventh hour that's next to impossible to verify. Like I said, I don't exactly disapprove of it - Republicans certainly aren't above such measures - but it's a very McConnell-esque move without McConnell's preparation and foresight.

Doober said:

Bringing up a three-decade-old case of alleged sexual assault in the eleventh hour that's next to impossible to verify. Like I said, I don't exactly disapprove of it - Republicans certainly aren't above such measures - but it's a very McConnell-esque move without McConnell's preparation and foresight.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Democrats had fuck-all to do with this getting out. In fact, they sat on it entirely out of respect for the woman, who asked for anonymity.

Stop watching Fox News.

Shadowrun said:

Democrats had fuck-all to do with this getting out. In fact, they sat on it out of respect for the woman, who did not want to be identified.

Stop watching Fox News.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

He's just going to tell you that Feinstein literally sat on this until the 11th hour just to use it as a gotcha despite when it released not mattering if sexual assault happened.

Shadowrun said:

Democrats had fuck-all to do with this getting out. In fact, they sat on it out of respect for the woman, who did not want to be identified.

Stop watching Fox News.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Not to mention this is only the 11th hour because the GOP is trying to ram through this nomination. We've had nowhere near the due process for a SC Justice

Doober said:

Bringing up a three-decade-old case of alleged sexual assault in the eleventh hour that's next to impossible to verify. Like I said, I don't exactly disapprove of it - Republicans certainly aren't above such measures - but it's a very McConnell-esque move without McConnell's preparation and foresight.

Click to expand...

Click to shrink...

Hoo boy.