• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Who is the most manly man in Super Smash Bros. Ultimate?

  • Snake

    Votes: 176 20.4%
  • Simon Belmont

    Votes: 176 20.4%
  • Captain Falcon

    Votes: 328 38.0%
  • Ryu

    Votes: 69 8.0%
  • Ike

    Votes: 114 13.2%

  • Total voters
    863
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
OP
IntelliHeath

IntelliHeath

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,183
yXMk6l8.gif


DO YOU SMELL WHAT THE ROAR IS COOOOOOKKININNGGG
 

GreenMamba

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,305
Incineroar is like a parody of the awful trend of fire/fighting starters from Gen 3-5 but not self aware (and also not *technically* fighting type, but basically designed as one). Just a terrible character design.
 

lvl 99 Pixel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,685
Incineroar is like a parody of the awful trend of fire/fighting starters from Gen 3-5 but not self aware (and also not *technically* fighting type, but basically designed as one). Just a terrible character design.

Ill gladly take you up on this one if you're willing to speak in design terms. What about it is terrible outside of just personal preference?
 

Neiteio

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,128
I really want to see Incineroar rendered in the Smash style, I imagine they'll give him a nice subtle fur texture
 

Baby Bird

Member
Nov 5, 2017
1,453
Incineroar is like a parody of the awful trend of fire/fighting starters from Gen 3-5 but not self aware (and also not *technically* fighting type, but basically designed as one). Just a terrible character design.

I don't think Incineroar's design by itself is bad, it's just the awful circumstances around it. What you said is very true, but IMO the most offending thing is the fact that they finally have a perfect opportunity to make a quadrupedal, amazingly designed fire starter (going by litten and torracat), but they just go for the incredibly overdone "Fighting Bipedal Fire Starter". It pissed the hell of me.
 

DrArchon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,485
I don't think Incineroar's design by itself is bad, it's just the awful circumstances around it. What you said is very true, but IMO the most offending thing is the fact that they finally have a perfect opportunity to make a quadrupedal, amazingly designed fire starter (going by litten and torracat), but they just go for the incredibly overdone "Fighting Bipedal Fire Starter". It pissed the hell of me.
This is where I'm at.

In a vacuum it's a fine design and I'm not going to hate on it for ripping off Tiger Mask when I love Infernape who's just the Monkey King, but every single fire starter fights on 2 legs.
 

lvl 99 Pixel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,685
I don't think Incineroar's design by itself is bad, it's just the awful circumstances around it. What you said is very true, but IMO the most offending thing is the fact that they finally have a perfect opportunity to make a quadrupedal, amazingly designed fire starter (going by litten and torracat), but they just go for the incredibly overdone "Fighting Bipedal Fire Starter". It pissed the hell of me.

I get that fighting is more common but its not like the other lines weren't almost entirely bipedal designs

personal preference is one thing, but calling something a terrible design just sounds like someone does not understand character design at all

every single fire starter fights on 2 legs.

again, this is a common trend for almost every starter
 

NeonZ

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 28, 2017
9,376
Ill gladly take you up on this one if you're willing to speak in design terms. What about it is terrible outside of just personal preference?
It comes out of nowhere compared to its earlier stages, basically just to reinforce the "fire/fighting" archetype (Yes, it's technically dark, not fighting, but it was clearly designed just with a fighting archetype in mind, and the dark type has no presence in other senses there).
 

Deleted member 46641

User requested account closure
Banned
Aug 12, 2018
3,494
It's time for "I want to imagine smells so I can ignore the smell of blood" again

What would newcomers smell like?

EG Wonder Red, Incineroar, Chibi Robo. You can pick your favourite newcomers.
 

TriggerShy

Member
Mar 26, 2018
1,602
I know it was already known, but I can't stand how TLink's Final Smash is still Triforce Slash.

"Hey, if we're changing Link's Final Smash to be something he actually does in one of this games, should we change Toon Link's?"

"Nah, fuck that noise."

What I can't stand is that Toon Link doesn't have any of his unique abilities from his games (or at least the handheld games). Like for example: wouldn't it be cool if he could move across the ground with his spin attack:

latest


He could use the Deku Leaf to recover or blow people away, maybe we could have the grappling hook instead of the hookshot. Maybe he could use the hammer, maybe he could charge at people with the running shoes, maybe flip people with the Cane of Pacci. He just kind of feels like wasted potential, especially now that Young Link is back with little change.
 

r_n

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,534
Guess who got interested in if we could see anything else interesting from site update numbers!!!!!

It seems the first days were pretty hectic. There's several strange gaps.
-The amiibo post was the 8th post on the site (japan), but the url says its the 10th. Every update following this accounts for this, so the next one is 11 and so forth.
-Except for the 12 post. This update is about the gamecube controller, but it has no standard numbering whatsoever https://www.smashbros.com/data/bs/ja_JP/img/ba97f11a84f0a67157f6a945859f591f.jpg as opposed to say https://www.smashbros.com/data/bs/ja_JP/ko_KR/img/132_1.jpg This update is as such ignored by subsequent posts unless it's meant to be one of the otherwise skipped numbers, such as #9
-The 20th post on the website is, according to its numbers, labeled as the 8th. This is the post about the smash invatational. Interestingly, it's labeled as "8_1" implying there was going to be multiple images in the update that weren't put up.
-Launch star is labeled properly, but the image shown is 19_3, implying they only put up the third image of a set. Presumably images 1 & 2 were meant to show the item as it apepars, then as it is set up.
-Daisy's memory is 3 images, but the first is mislabeled. It's shown as 27_1. The other 2 images are proper: 21_2 & 21_3
-Gamecube controler oddities aside 10-22 are normal, so imagine my surprise when Mario's Memory was 27! As such Mario would be 26. Incidentally, the first image in Mario's memory is labeled as "21_1". Looks like someone accidentally got SML & SMB1's box images mislabeled, but they caught it before it went up.
-Intriguingly, the japanese only post about the RAGE demo (between Vulpix & Mario) had an image without the standard update scheme, just like the gamecube controller. Since the GC update was "ignored" it's possible this one was as well.
-Battlefield is 28, Bombrushblush should be 29 but Bomberman's post is 31. Despite this, subsequent numbers account for this until...
-Noisy Note Book shoudl be 38, but Sukapon is 41!
-After Sukapon, however, they seemed to get their act together. 41 (Sukapon) to 120 (Ness' Memory) are all accurate, with no missing posts.
-That said, do you remember that weird time where the NoA Nintendo VS Twitter tweeted out Krystal earlier in the day even though Young Link was that night's post? Turns out that she was intended for that night. Krystal is 53 but was posted the day after YL's memory which is labeled 55.
-While nothing else is mislabeled in these 80 posts, the numbering implies there was supposed to be multiple images for Captain Falcon's, Richter's and Dark Samus' memories.
-Richter's memory post on the japanese smash bros twitter does have a manual page!
-The japan side reposted a reminder for the Smash Direct (#91 by its image number, then posted again for 94) but this isn't accounted for. It's the exact same post so far as I can tell.​
-There is, however, a 1 update gap between Ness' Memory (120) & Rathalos (122). iirc, this was the night where the twitter psoted about rathalos early on and then the website didnt update until hours later. Maybe someone posted Rathalos a day early and they just ran with it?
-Rathalos to Alolan Exeggutor are all normal, however. Some images reference the korean site in their links https://www.smashbros.com/data/bs/ja_JP/ko_KR/img/132_1.jpg references the korean site? Kinda strange?

In other words updates 9, 23, 24, 25, 30, 39, 40 & 121 are the only instances of "skipped" updates. And it's feasible 2 of those might havbe been intended to be the RAGE & gamecube controller updates?

I don't think any of this makes the 3 conspicuous skipped updates mean less, especially since in the stretch from Sukapon to Rathalos there was one (1) missed update. But those gaps are pretty interesting to me, implies they had some changes scheduled early on.
 

Baby Bird

Member
Nov 5, 2017
1,453
I get that fighting is more common but its not like the other lines weren't almost entirely bipedal designs


personal preference is one thing, but calling something a terrible design just sounds like someone does not understand character design at all



again, this is a common trend for almost every starter

Venusaur, Meganium, Torterra, and Serperior are not Bipedial. Sceptile, Chesnaught and Decidueye are. A fine balance.

Swampert, Samurott and Primarina are not bipedal. The remaining water starters are. Again, a decent balance.

Meanwhile, all the fire starters (maybe with the exception of Typhlosion, depending on rendition) are bipedal. We are just asking for a bit of variety, and the Litten line was the perfect opportunity for it. But no, let's go for the boring design that's been done a lot already.
 

GreenMamba

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,305
Ill gladly take you up on this one if you're willing to speak in design terms. What about it is terrible outside of just personal preference?
I thought I explained myself pretty well. It looks like something that a fan artist would come up with as a parody of the fire/fighting trend. It's not a logical conclusion to the preceding evolutions and does nothing interesting with what had been previously established. Its design takes so few cues from cats that you could nearly swap its head and hands out and it could be any animal you wanted (and the less said about its oversized, out of proportion hands the better).

In a vacuum it's uninteresting, but compared to what it comes from and the sad legacy of samey fire/fighting starters it's following it's disappointing. It's a slightly different shade of a range of Pokemon that have been done to death, and when there are nearly one-thousand of these things Pokemon stand out by being different.
 

Dyle

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
29,933
Someday Game Freak will listen to our criticism and make a 3 legged Fire starter and we will be able to unite in our disgust of such an abomination of nature
 

lvl 99 Pixel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,685
It comes out of nowhere compared to its earlier stages, basically just to reinforce the "fire/fighting" archetype (Yes, it's technically dark, not fighting, but it was clearly designed just with a fighting archetype in mind, and the dark type has no presence in other senses there).

You mean like Samurott suddenly becoming 4 legged, or Serperior losing its limbs or Chikorita becoming a brontosaurus?
Its pokemon, and lots of them have pretty crazy evolutions.

None of what you're saying makes the design bad. The colour palette, values, animations, silhouette is done with the expected polish that Pokemon (especially the starters) generally have and the concept was executed well in general. Its still a striking and memorable design even if it doesn't personally resonate as much as some others.

They're all better than fire though. Take a look at grass.

Gen 1: 4 legs
Gen 2: 4 legs
Gen 3: 2 legs
Gen 4: 4 legs
Gen 5: No legs
Gen 6: 2 legs
Gen 7: 2 legs

Much more even spread between quadrupedal and bipedal.

Grass has more than the other 2, but its still pretty common. I dont know why you're saying no legs for Gen 5 when the first 2 forms did.

I thought I explained myself pretty well. It looks like something that a fan artist would come up with as a parody of the fire/fighting trend. It's not a logical conclusion to the preceding evolutions and does nothing interesting with what had been previously established. Its design takes so few cues from cats that you could nearly swap its head and hands out and it could be any animal you wanted (and the less said about its oversized, out of proportion hands the better).

In a vacuum it's uninteresting, but compared to what it comes from and the sad legacy of samey fire/fighting starters it's following it's disappointing. It's a slightly different shade of a range of Pokemon that have been done to death. Move on.

I cant understand this rhetoric at all
 

mopinks

Member
Oct 27, 2017
30,575
Chibi-Robo has an odor-absorbing lining inside his head to prevent the smell of trash from seeping out
 

Baby Bird

Member
Nov 5, 2017
1,453
Why is being bipedal a bad thing?
Again, being bipedal is not a bad thing. The issue is being bipedal when every other fire starter was bipedal, plus having three of them being Fire/Fighting, plus having the latest one follow much of the same Fire/Fighting stereotype, when neither of its pre-evolutions follow it.

It is not surprising people don't like the design, really.
 

DrArchon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,485
Grass has more than the other 2, but its still pretty common. I dont know why you're saying no legs for Gen 5 when the first 2 forms did.
If the look of the first two forms mattered, no one would be complaining about Incineroar.

Most people only care about the final form because that's what you're going to spend the most time looking at.
 

drclaw411

Member
Mar 22, 2018
517
Still no new direct date. I'm wondering if they're just gonna cancel it, out of respect for the victims and their families.
 

lvl 99 Pixel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,685

"it looks like fan art" is not any kind of discussion about the design elements.

Again, being bipedal is not a bad thing. The issue is being bipedal when every other fire starter was bipedal, plus having three of them being Fire/Fighting, plus having the latest one follow much of the same Fire/Fighting stereotype, when neither of its pre-evolutions follow it.

It is not surprising people don't like the design, really.

I saw Braixen as entirely different from say Blaziken because it has digitigrade legs rather than plantigrade.
Why on earth are people so fussed about how many legs they stand on in a series about magical creatures that benefit from being unique?
 

DrStrange87

The Fallen
Feb 8, 2018
637
Its design gives off a Fire/Fighting type and that will rub people the wrong way right off the bat based off previous fire starters.
 

GreenMamba

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,305
"it looks like fan art" is not any kind of discussion about the design elements.
Hey, I am not degrading the art by comparing it to fan art, I'm a fan artist myself, I mean in the sense that it looks like a joke a fan would make. Like what I said at first, it looks like a parody of what came before but lacks any of the self awareness it should carry.
 

lvl 99 Pixel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,685
Hey, I am not degrading the art by comparing it to fan art, I'm a fan artist myself, I mean in the sense that it looks like a joke a fan would make. Like what I said at first, it looks like a parody of what came before but lacks any of the self awareness it should carry.

When you say something is terrible you need something more substantial or it just sounds like you're bragging about having better taste. I don't think any of them can even qualify as being terrible.
 

Deleted member 46641

User requested account closure
Banned
Aug 12, 2018
3,494
I thought Ridley getting rid of the "too big" debate would mean we wouldn't have any more inane debates about character design. Evidently I was wrong.
 

TriggerShy

Member
Mar 26, 2018
1,602
Guess who got interested in if we could see anything else interesting from site update numbers!!!!!

It seems the first days were pretty hectic. There's several strange gaps.
-The amiibo post was the 8th post on the site (japan), but the url says its the 10th. Every update following this accounts for this, so the next one is 11 and so forth.
-Except for the 12 post. This update is about the gamecube controller, but it has no standard numbering whatsoever https://www.smashbros.com/data/bs/ja_JP/img/ba97f11a84f0a67157f6a945859f591f.jpg as opposed to say https://www.smashbros.com/data/bs/ja_JP/ko_KR/img/132_1.jpg This update is as such ignored by subsequent posts unless it's meant to be one of the otherwise skipped numbers, such as #9
-The 20th post on the website is, according to its numbers, labeled as the 8th. This is the post about the smash invatational. Interestingly, it's labeled as "8_1" implying there was going to be multiple images in the update that weren't put up.
-Launch star is labeled properly, but the image shown is 19_3, implying they only put up the third image of a set. Presumably images 1 & 2 were meant to show the item as it apepars, then as it is set up.
-Daisy's memory is 3 images, but the first is mislabeled. It's shown as 27_1. The other 2 images are proper: 21_2 & 21_3
-Gamecube controler oddities aside 10-22 are normal, so imagine my surprise when Mario's Memory was 27! As such Mario would be 26. Incidentally, the first image in Mario's memory is labeled as "21_1". Looks like someone accidentally got SML & SMB1's box images mislabeled, but they caught it before it went up.
-Intriguingly, the japanese only post about the RAGE demo (between Vulpix & Mario) had an image without the standard update scheme, just like the gamecube controller. Since the GC update was "ignored" it's possible this one was as well.
-Battlefield is 28, Bombrushblush should be 29 but Bomberman's post is 31. Despite this, subsequent numbers account for this until...
-Noisy Note Book shoudl be 38, but Sukapon is 41!
-After Sukapon, however, they seemed to get their act together. 41 (Sukapon) to 120 (Ness' Memory) are all accurate, with no missing posts.
-That said, do you remember that weird time where the NoA Nintendo VS Twitter tweeted out Krystal earlier in the day even though Young Link was that night's post? Turns out that she was intended for that night. Krystal is 53 but was posted the day after YL's memory which is labeled 55.
-While nothing else is mislabeled in these 80 posts, the numbering implies there was supposed to be multiple images for Captain Falcon's, Richter's and Dark Samus' memories.
-Richter's memory post on the japanese smash bros twitter does have a manual page!
-The japan side reposted a reminder for the Smash Direct (#91 by its image number, then posted again for 94) but this isn't accounted for. It's the exact same post so far as I can tell.​
-There is, however, a 1 update gap between Ness' Memory (120) & Rathalos (122). iirc, this was the night where the twitter psoted about rathalos early on and then the website didnt update until hours later. Maybe someone posted Rathalos a day early and they just ran with it?
-Rathalos to Alolan Exeggutor are all normal, however. Some images reference the korean site in their links https://www.smashbros.com/data/bs/ja_JP/ko_KR/img/132_1.jpg references the korean site? Kinda strange?

In other words updates 9, 23, 24, 25, 30, 39, 40 & 121 are the only instances of "skipped" updates. And it's feasible 2 of those might havbe been intended to be the RAGE & gamecube controller updates?

I don't think any of this makes the 3 conspicuous skipped updates mean less, especially since in the stretch from Sukapon to Rathalos there was one (1) missed update. But those gaps are pretty interesting to me, implies they had some changes scheduled early on.

So basically, there were times we should have gotten a certain update but didn't? Not really sure I get the significance of this, but this is a nice find.
 

JakeNoseIt

Catch My Drift
Verified
Oct 27, 2017
4,535
Hyped for Incineroar to get revealed so we can have all those "I didn't like the idea, but Sakurai sold me!!!!" posts.

K. Rool's reveal sold me on that disgusting creature. Anything is possible
 

GreenMamba

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,305
When you say something is terrible you need something more substantial or it just sounds like you're bragging about having better taste. I don't think any of them can even qualify as being terrible.
I also did explain myself outside of the one comment on fan art that you pointed out. To repeat myself:

It draws from the same well that the Pokemon designers have gone to three times already for Fire starters. There's more to character design than just the fundamentals and no character exists in a vacuum--character design should be about showing people new things, not slightly different versions of what they've seen before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.