• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

ned_ballad

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
48,248
Rochester, New York
They love to weaponizing identity and imply someone is racist or sexist.
It's hard not to raise an eyebrow when Pelosi is blamed for a lack of a public option, when she got one passed through the House. It died in the Senate.

But you don't see Harry Reid having multiple page topics where people call him out for his center right Obamacare. Even if it was his fault for not ending the filibuster or securing 60 votes, not Pelosi. She did her job and got the public option passed through her branch
 

Cyanity

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,345
Pelosi may be effective, but the democratic party needs new leadership. Full stop. Step aside and help mentor the next generation of leaders in your party, Pelosi.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
It's not "hopelessly naive" to think that you don't win a negotiation by starting with a compromise and playing by norms your opponents don't. The Democrats lose because they are naive about the nature and motivation of the Republicans. They will never pay back a compromise. They will never play fair. They will never respect you or appreciate you giving them ground. Yet Nancy Pelosi's Democratic party wants to play softball with them. You call it compromise, but it's just giving up.
...what? Do you not understand how numbers work or something?

I frankly don't care either way about Pelosi, the Rep I'm voting for this year wants her out but it isn't the reason I'm voting for her.

This isn't about playing fair with Republicans, this was about passing a healthcare bill... like, what are you talking about? I agree with your quote taken out of context, but in this context it makes zero sense.
 

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
So Democrat control any branch of government currently?
Or state legislatures?

So you think "less corrupt" is a winning strategy?

You think calling people you don't like randomly corrupt means anything or gets anyone to support you?

All and all of your fellow posters about all just feelings about Pelosi and have rewritten history to feel better about yourself.
 

Papaya

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
2,474
California
Nancy Pelosi lost the 2010 election for the Democratic party single-handedly? Locking the Democrats out of state legislatures and the House for a decade due to weaponized gerrymandering. I had no idea she had so much power.
Wat lol? I didnt say she "single-handedly" ruined everything. Did you need to change what I said to argue against it?
 

Double 0

Member
Nov 5, 2017
7,449
ITT: A whole lot of progressives want the House to run a wholly progressive agenda, but don't know how any of it gets done. So they blame a "Centrist" who has a damn good history knowing how. Essentially being in their feelings because she isn't as progressive as we want...

Which is a big reason she even got the job, being able to bridge the divide in the Dems.

Never seen half that energy for Reid who lost the public option, nevermind Schumer. Deny it or not, we know why.


If there is a "real progressive" in the house that can do what Nancy does even better, I want them there forever. But just like there isn't a Blue Dog who can do it, there isn't a "real progressive".

Not yet, and I hope someone can groom one.
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
Pelosi may be effective, but the democratic party needs new leadership. Full stop. Step aside and help mentor the next generation of leaders in your party, Pelosi.
She probably is mentoring someone behind the scenes. She's not going to come out and say it because that dilutes her own power and makes her protege an easy target.

Who do you think will replace her when she steps down, Tim Ryan? That guy's a fuck.

ITT: A whole lot of progressives want the House to run a wholly progressive agenda, but don't know how any of it gets done. So they blame a "Centrist" who has a damn good history knowing how.

Never seen half that energy for Reid who lost the public option, nevermind Schumer. Deny it or not, we know why.


If there is a "real progressive" in the house that can do what Nancy does even better, I want them there forever. But just like there isn't a Blue Dog who can do it, there isn't a "real progressive".

Not yet, and I hope someone can groom one.
Ted Lieu would be a fantastic follow-up. He can't run for President anyway, might as well go for the next best thing.

A congressional leader with actual spine is more powerful than the President anyway.
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
9,999
The ACA that was passed in the House matched what Obama campaigned on. He told people what it was going to look like. So yes, people did go out and vote for it.

The senate gutted the bill.

That has nothing to do with my post.


So Democrats should continue representing the interests of the health insurance industry?
 

PMS341

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
6,634
User Banned (3 Days): Antagonizing other users, history of contentious content
Pelosi is one of the best assets the Democratic Party has. She shouldn't go anywhere.

You dumbass.





This is not a person who needs to be representing or leading ANYONE in this country. She only cares about the status quo which existed 8 years ago, and even that was far from perfect. She can't even talk about racial injustice without trying to find a way to put centrism in the mix.
 
Last edited:

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
9,999
You think calling people you don't like randomly corrupt means anything or gets anyone to support you?

All and all of your fellow posters about all just feelings about Pelosi and have rewritten history to feel better about yourself.

So it's a good thing for elected Representatives to represent corporate donors and not constituents?

That's what you're defending??
 

jackissocool

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
738
Ohio
...what? Do you not understand how numbers work or something?

I frankly don't care either way about Pelosi, the Rep I'm voting for this year wants her out but it isn't the reason I'm voting for her.

This isn't about playing fair with Republicans, this was about passing a healthcare bill... like, what are you talking about? I agree with your quote taken out of context, but in this context it makes zero sense.
Instead of starting negotiations with a progressive health care bill, Obama and Pelosi started with a compromise. It's what they brought to the table: a right-wing plan. They thought that would earn them favor with Republicans. That's hopelessly naive. And now Republicans want to do destroy their own idea because they see the Democrats will always start with the compromise, and that's how things move further to the right.
 

LegendofJoe

Member
Oct 28, 2017
12,086
Arkansas, USA
It's not "hopelessly naive" to think that you don't win a negotiation by starting with a compromise and playing by norms your opponents don't. The Democrats lose because they are naive about the nature and motivation of the Republicans. They will never pay back a compromise. They will never play fair. They will never respect you or appreciate you giving them ground. Yet Nancy Pelosi's Democratic party wants to play softball with them. You call it compromise, but it's just giving up.

You are making the assumption that the Democratic caucus is much more progressive than it actually is. As a leader of a legislative body you also have to compromise with members of your own party to pass legislation.

That said the House has become even more progressive since 2010, and when the time comes I expect to see that reflected via legislation. The problem again will be the much more conservative Senate.
 
Last edited:

Gotchaye

Member
Oct 27, 2017
702
It's worth noting that, setting ideology aside completely, Pelosi has been clearly the best Speaker going back to at least 1995 and maybe further (I don't know much about Speakers before that). Probably everyone here remembers Boehner and can see how Ryan's doing currently. This is not actually an easy job, especially when your party isn't completely unified. Both were completely incapable of getting stuff done even with sizable majorities and saw their own political careers totally destroyed in the process. Boehner's retired and Ryan is never gonna be president now. Going back further, Hastert was a pedophile. Gingrich oversaw the Clinton impeachment (which backfired) and resigned one step ahead of getting thrown out by his own party. Meanwhile I'm unaware of any Democratic policy priority that has failed because Pelosi could not muster the votes in the House, she's avoided personal scandal, she's a great fundraiser, and other Democrats in Congress seem to like her.

Surely the better strategic move here for Democrats is to keep Pelosi as Speaker and try to elevate the voices of other House Democrats in other ways. I don't know why you'd risk putting someone else in the job while Pelosi's alive since they probably won't be nearly as good at it and there's a good chance it will destroy any future they have in politics.
 

MonoStable

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,052
Also I'm excited to see how much she can get done without also dealing with a financial collapse.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
Instead of starting negotiations with a progressive health care bill, Obama and Pelosi started with a compromise. It's what they brought to the table: a right-wing plan. They thought that would earn them favor with Republicans. That's hopelessly naive. And now Republicans want to do destroy their own idea because they see the Democrats will always start with the compromise, and that's how things move further to the right.
Cool. They didn't bring that to the table because they wanted to earn favor with the Republicans. They brought it to the table because they needed to get a healthcare bill passed...
 

Cyanity

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,345
She probably is mentoring someone behind the scenes. She's not going to come out and say it because that dilutes her own power and makes her protege an easy target.

Who do you think will replace her when she steps down, Tim Ryan? That guy's a fuck.


Ted Lieu would be a fantastic follow-up. He can't run for President anyway, might as well go for the next best thing.

A congressional leader with actual spine is more powerful than the President anyway.

I just want the democratic party to have some teeth, for once.
 

Ukraine

Banned
Jun 1, 2018
2,182
I never understood why she is hated when people like Bernie are loved. Maybe there is a reason, but she got so much more done... I do have suspicion that it's simply because she is a woman.
 

Soul Skater

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,201
That has nothing to do with my post.


So Democrats should continue representing the interests of the health insurance industry?
It has everything to do with it. You said that she and her agenda are to blame for people not turning up to vote when that same agenda was explicitly what Obama campaigned on an won decisively on in 2008

A lot has changed in the last ten years. And I don't believe the next democratic president will be as politically cautious as Obama was back then. And regardless of her personal beliefs, she'd create an agenda that matches whoever the next democratic president will be because that's what she did last time. She's not going to obstruct president socialist just to be an asshole.
 

Teh_Lurv

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,098
If Beto and AOC get elected (one of those is a sure thing), those should be the faces of the party. Young, progressive, energetic, cool, etc.

When a Democratic-majority House falls into quagmire because the leaders with the experience and force-of-will to turn the gears got tossed out, the base can console themselves that Beto and Cortez looked young and cool the whole time.

Don't get me wrong, the Democratic party does need young blood. Too many of the big players in the party are getting old and there aren't enough heir apparent representatives. But people wishing Pelosi out is crazy talk. She's one of the best speakers and majority leaders the party ever had, and the party would be foolish to let her go before she's ready. By then, younger reps like Beto and Cortez will hopefully have the experience and connections to be ready to take the reins.
 

Shake Appeal

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,883
You guys are living in a fantasy land if you think initial Obamacare before it was gutted is right of center in the USA lmfao.

Like do you not realize the country we live in?
Yes, but it's important to have a global perspective on America's viciously constrained right-wing politics.

I respect the passage of Obamacare as a legislative feat, if that's what people want to hear!
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
Yes, but it's important to have a global perspective on America's viciously constrained right-wing politics.

I respect the passage of Obamacare as a legislative feat, if that's what people want to hear!
It just gets tiring to hear "oh you think x candidate/y policy is left? Hahaha silly Americans it's ACTUALLY..." etc. Over and over again. We know.
 

Ukraine

Banned
Jun 1, 2018
2,182
Instead of starting negotiations with a progressive health care bill, Obama and Pelosi started with a compromise. It's what they brought to the table: a right-wing plan. They thought that would earn them favor with Republicans. That's hopelessly naive. And now Republicans want to do destroy their own idea because they see the Democrats will always start with the compromise, and that's how things move further to the right.
I mean I agree with you in spirit, but especially NOW you have to give them some credit. Their plan actually survived for eight years under Republican control of the legislative branch. It's kind of impressive. And if democrats get back in power in November there's a good chance that this law will be irreversible and then you can work on next steps.
 

jackissocool

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
738
Ohio
Cool. They didn't bring that to the table because they wanted to earn favor with the Republicans. They brought it to the table because they needed to get a healthcare bill passed...
Which is not how negotiation works. You don't start with what your opponent wants. You start with what you want.
You are making the assumption that the Democratic caucus is much more progressive than it actually is. As a leader of a legislative body you also have to compromise with members of your own party to pass legislation. That said the House has become even more progressive since 2010, and when the time comes I expect to see that reflected via legislation. The problem again will be the much more conservative Senate.
Polling on policies shows that Democratic voters (and even Republican voters on some topics) are far, far more progressive than the party leadership. But the Democrats don't want to follow their voters because they threaten their power. They are more interested in maintaining the party status quo and their position within it than achieving leftward change.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
Which is not how negotiation works. You don't start with what your opponent wants. You start with what you want.
They started with the most liberal option they could and it still failed. They could have started with an even farther left option but it would have been a super flop... your argument is pointless tbh
 

Ithil

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,390
The idea of her being Speaker smacking Trump around legislatively is an enjoyable one.
 

lmcfigs

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,091
You know. I'm tired of this Bernie bro crap. 90 percent of the women I know went for Bernie so it absolutely isn't a sexism thing, not to mention, most of us showed up for Hillary when it came time. So knock it off.
Yeah I think one single poster above him said something critical and did not even mention Bernie and somehow Bernie bros are a problem. Also it would be news to me if Bernie was not supporting Nancy Pelosi anyways. I've only ever seen him defending her. Like in this quote:

"I think Nancy has done a good job," Sanders said. "Let me say what she may not say, I think it's also the fact that she is a woman. I think they have demonized her. The Republican Party is bankrupt intellectually. They are not going to campaign on their views of giving tax cuts to billionaires and cutting Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid, so they have to come up with some demon and I guess their demon now is Nancy Pelosi."
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
9,999
It has everything to do with it. You said that she and her agenda are to blame for people not turning up to vote when that same agenda was explicitly what Obama campaigned on an won decisively on in 2008

A lot has changed in the last ten years. And I don't believe the next democratic president will be as politically cautious as Obama was back then. And regardless of her personal beliefs, she'd create an agenda that matches whoever the next democratic president will be because that's what she did last time. She's not going to obstruct president socialist just to be an asshole.

I do blame weak, gop lite, centrist policies for the failure of the Democratic party. Absolutely.

People voted for Obama because of hope. Hope that never materialized.

Who's "president socialist? " :/
 

legacyzero

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
4,252
It's funny how so called progressives on his forum don't know, understand or want to understand history.

So they make up a reality of history in their brains to attack people they don't like.
You're not debating in good faith. I posted legit history that you failed to address, strawmanned, and then acted like you accomplished something.

They love to weaponizing identity and imply someone is racist or sexist.
Not only that, but then they'll scream shit like "SUPPORT FEMALE CANDIDATES!" And then endorse the male incumbents those ladies are running against. See Crowley v Ocasio Cortez, and Cuomo V Nixon.

Pelosi's cold shoulder to AOC was fucking shameful
 

LegendofJoe

Member
Oct 28, 2017
12,086
Arkansas, USA
Wat lol? I didnt say she "single-handedly" ruined everything. Did you need to change what I said to argue against it?

You need to go back through and read your own posts. Your main criticism of Pelosi is that the Democratic party has been out of power under most of her tenure, which you said she bears responsibility for. The primary reason for that is partisan gerrymandering (and I'd argue Obama as well for not going after Wall Street). The Democratic House vote totals outnumber Republicans every time, but thanks to gerrymandering they are able to maintain control.

How is it Pelosi's fault that the game is rigged and our Supreme Court is complicit?
 
Last edited:

Curufinwe

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
8,924
DE
I do blame weak, gop lite, centrist policies for the failure of the Democratic party. Absolutely.

People voted for Obama because of hope. Hope that never materialized.

Who's "president socialist? " :/

People also voted for a Republican House and Senate for six of Obama's eight years.

Of course, a lot of the House seats are gerrymandered to hell, but a Republican congress was a huge impediment to Obama's policies.
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
9,999
It just gets tiring to hear "oh you think x candidate/y policy is left? Hahaha silly Americans it's ACTUALLY..." etc. Over and over again. We know.

What does current polling say about healthcare preferences in the US?

The public option was taken out of obamacare as a massive handout to health insurance companies. It made obama care weaker and it was worse for Americans.
 

The Albatross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
39,038
It was sarcasm.

How about the fact that it was based on a plan from the Heritage Foundation.

How about the fact that this is an absurdly reductive statement?

The Heritage Foundation has published articles on the legalization of marijuana. Does that magically make legalization, suddenly, a right-of-center idea...? Sure, you could make a libertarian case for that, but largely, no, the contemporary American right does not vociferously endorse marijuana legalization. John McCain cosponsored the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform bill, McCain is a right-of-center conservative. Does that make campaign finance reform and opposition to the People's United ruling that overturned McCain-Feingold as ... conservative, right of center policy? No. And of course, obviously, the Heritage Foundation railed against Obamacare in 2010, 2011, and 2012.

The history of single payer health care reform as a major issue in American government predates the Heritage Foundation by some 30+ years. It predates what you're referring to, the ~1990s Republican Health Care reform platform which the Heritage Foundation would have contributed to, but some 60+ years. That Obamacare/ACA ended up becoming a more centrist policy to get through a Senate that was nearly split 50/50 at the time doesn't make it "right of center idea," it's relationship to "Romneycare," a bill written by the liberal Democratic Massachusetts legislature and signed by moderate-right Mitt Romney, doesn't make it a center-right bill. Further (and more relevant to the discussion at hand), It also doesn't make it's sponsors and advocates -- people who fought for far more progressive health care reform like Ted Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi -- right of center conservatives.
 

Ukraine

Banned
Jun 1, 2018
2,182
I do blame weak, gop lite, centrist policies for the failure of the Democratic party. Absolutely.

People voted for Obama because of hope. Hope that never materialized.

Who's "president socialist? " :/
Democrats were fully in control for 2 years out of the last 10. You can blame them for not getting enough done in those 2 years, but you expectations seem out of whack.
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
9,999
People also voted for a Republican House and Senate for six of Obama's eight years.

Of course, a lot of the House seats are gerrymandered to hell, but a Republican congress was a huge impediment to Obama's policies.

There's a lot of factors.
White lash racism. Voter suppression. Etc.
But the Democratic party has a huge share of the blame too.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
What does current polling say about healthcare preferences in the US?

The public option was taken out of obamacare as a massive handout to health insurance companies. It made obama care weaker and it was worse for Americans.
...that wasn't Pelosi's fault what are you even talking about
 

The Albatross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
39,038
Respond? Or deflect?

Sorry I hit submit too soon and added more in the next few minutes before you replied. In case you replied before:

There's a never ending drone (HYPERBOLE, SOUND THE ALARMS!!) that "if we compare X politician in America to X politician from [some further left leaning country in Europe] then X politician in America is not really a liberal, so therefore it's right to call them all conservatives!"

It's a stupid, pointless cop-out of a narrative. It's one thing to say, "Nancy Pelosi is not liberal enough for me," or "I'd prefer someone more progressive than Nancy Pelosi," that's fine (!!). But she's not a center-right conservative in American politics (which is the political realm that she exists in), that's factually untrue. Maybe we want her to be because we wished that Democratic leadership was more progressive, or more leftist, or more something else, but contrary to what the President says words have meaning, and context is still important.
 

LegendofJoe

Member
Oct 28, 2017
12,086
Arkansas, USA
Polling on policies shows that Democratic voters (and even Republican voters on some topics) are far, far more progressive than the party leadership. But the Democrats don't want to follow their voters because they threaten their power. They are more interested in maintaining the party status quo and their position within it than achieving leftward change.

That's true and it's why passing a bill to neuter the Citizens United ruling is a Democratic priority. We can't move this country leftwards if corporations and the ultra wealthy have unlimited power to bribe politicians and gaslight voters.

Hillary Clinton learned that lesson the hard way when she tried to pass a more progressive healthcare bill than the PPACA ending up being in the early 90s.
 

Deleted member 22490

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
9,237
Not only that, but then they'll scream shit like "SUPPORT FEMALE CANDIDATES!" And then endorse the male incumbents those ladies are running against. See Crowley v Ocasio Cortez, and Cuomo V Nixon.
I remember some (not here thankfully) jumped down AOC'd throat because she endorsed a straight white man over a lesbian Native American despite their policies being different.
 

Ukraine

Banned
Jun 1, 2018
2,182
Not until it's properly replaced by a sane UHC plan, just because it's shit doesn't mean it's not an improvement but it's still a half assed center right "solution".
It's still solution (without quotes). And it survived 8 years of Republican control of legislative branch. You can hate the law, but still realize that it's probably the best that can be done at this time without destroying economy.