There probably would have been a dozen more. It was a opening up entertainment for the first time.Lol, but hey if you hadn't made that thread who knows where we'd be at right now
Reminder that back in the day GAF had all of the OT's in the public discussion forums, I had no issue with it then. OT threads would surface to the front page when there was interesting discussion happening, you knew something cool was happening if it stayed up. Mods on this forum are way too controlling of everything. Just let things happen naturally sometimes and it will work itself out. If a thread has grown too long eventually people will get bored and leave for another. If the Op is silly, people will mock them and eventually it will slip away or the community will come together to make something fun.
This forum is depressing and it's not because of political threads.
I mean, this is literally a Video Game forum and the Video Game section is more active than the Off Topic section. So that is kind of all the citation you need right there. The admins' push for this move is also evident of it with the VG hangouts being greater in number and more active than the Etcetera Hangouts.
I'll say one last thing to the staff before I bow out of this thread: I said some things previously in the other thread last night that implied that you were separating Etc in order to please the alt-right/incels/whatever. I shouldn't have said those things, it wasn't cool and I regret it. Just the lack of communication just made the whole thing frustrating. Plus it was late and I was tired.
Anyways, later guys. Love you all.
Also, I will give cred to deltaplus for being in here and answering questions. It's a good change of pace from how you guys handled this originally. Well done.
I mean, you ignored my question, but that's okay, I'm used to being ignored by admins ;)
Every thread is already about politics.
But no, that's not the argument and you know that.
Cool. What are the political implications of Khalil Mack being traded to the Bears?
Is the ignore thread function still coming? The script really doesn't help if you're on mobile and even after the changes were reverted, I'd still like to see this.<3
Apologies if I missed it, it certainly wasn't intentional. The thread was moving really fast and I have 28k airplane speeds so going back pages takes forever.
Cool. What are the political implications of Khalil Mack being traded to the Bears?
I don't really care either way but there are a bunch of suggestions for site changes in the Version 1.5 thread that really should be acknowledged in some way instead of people just talking to thin air. 3 posts from admins after the OP isn't enough. From that thread:Quick question for yall - how do you feel about Discussion being ordered over Announcements? This was something I'd been wanting to do for a long time since it puts everything above the fold on mobile.
Can the communication in this thread be better now after the backlash of the forum restructuring please?
Careful, that kind of makes perfect sense talk will get you labeled here.Nailed it. I mostly avoid Etc because of the constant political talk. There's enough of it that a sub forum makes sense.
Is the ignore thread function still coming? The script really doesn't help if you're on mobile and even after the changes were reverted, I'd still like to see this.
I think this would solve everyone's problems.
- Gaming
- Hangouts
- Entertainment
- Hangouts
- EtcetEra
- Hangouts
Khalil Mack |OT|Cool. What are the political implications of Khalil Mack being traded to the Bears?
The goal isn't to marginalize or alienate anyone. This is a discussion forum. Everyone interested in any given discussion is allowed to participate. There is no discrimination or segregation in any given thread. Some peoples' viewpoints may get them banned, but that's an entirely separate matter. No one here cares what color your skin is or what gender you identify as. They care about what you think about the new Zelda game, or how excited you are for an upcoming movie, or whatever. That is one of the good things about Internet anonymity.I don't know for sure what's being referred to, but if I were to guess it's that the designed would obviously be made in a way to marginalize politics (whether intentionally or not), therefore marginalizing and alienating those communities that are already part of an oppressed class, and they would just all leave.
Someone as part of an oppressed group being able to make money way out of the usual ability of their class while also being used unfairly in a game that is stroking political divisions in the country.
See? I can do this shit all day.
My point is there is no such as political/non-political. It's all just life and what is happening in life.
Nailed it. I mostly avoid Etc because of the constant political talk. There's enough of it that a sub forum makes sense.
This post is so disingenuous I don't even know where to start. VG hangouts are greater in number because more games come out than TV shows this forum cares about, and there aren't fourteen new sports leagues being invented every Tuesday..I mean, this is literally a Video Game forum and the Video Game section is more active than the Off Topic section. So that is kind of all the citation you need right there. The admins' push for this move is also evident of it with the VG hangouts being greater in number and more active than the Etcetera Hangouts.
what a very privileged thing to say /sNailed it. I mostly avoid Etc because of the constant political talk. There's enough of it that a sub forum makes sense.
So I sat through hours of maintenance with nothing to read and then they reversed everything a few hours later?
The literal reason he was traded was because his previous team's new coach refused (either because they couldn't afford it or because he didn't want to) sign him to a new contract so he could be properly compensated for his work and have long-term job stability. Job security and proper compensation are political topics, ask any union-member
Careful, that kind of makes perfect sense talk will get you labeled here.
Cool your jets. I'm not trying to be "disingenuous" and frankly that word gets tossed around like crazy here.This post is so disingenuous I don't even know where to start. VG hangouts are greater in number because more games come out than TV shows this forum cares about, and there aren't fourteen new sports leagues being invented every Tuesday..
I know right? Its moments like these that cement my belief that there is no God.So I sat through hours of maintenance with nothing to read and then they reversed everything a few hours later?
This is well written and very reasonable. I understand mods are volunteers, no one should yell at them, and so on. But there has to be a better way to handle situations like this. I was hoping to reply in the original feedback thread and it got hidden before I ever had a chance to read through it, so I didn't even know about the staff threat you mention.deltaplus
My biggest concern going forward is that I think many don't feel like we have an active avenue to discuss situations and provide criticism or feedback with the staff. I think this situation and thread is a perfect example. The forums came back up and there was a single message saying everything was reverted and then multiple topics were locked when attempting to complain or provide feedback over the situation until this thread popped up and apart of that was the very poor messaging in that post about 'prominent members' which has some people concerned if not outright upset despite the intent clearly not meant to do so but it was an exceptionally poor choice of words and made the situation even worse. Then you have yourself here answering questions in this thread alone when this is clearly something I think all of the staff should be willing to talk about not just you alone.
Part of the problem is a general lack of transparency, something that was a key thing that was promised wouldn't be an issue when these boards were first launched. I don't want to go into a ton of situations but new mods spring up from out of no where, others are demoted out of no where, and then you had that one Feedback thread before which had a member of the staff (I don't even remember who) making one hell of a post that made the entire staff look bad and threatened that the person they were responding to that they would be the reason the thread got locked when the entire point of the thread was feedback. That thread did get locked and has since been either removed or at least moved to a place normal users can't see it. That is a massive lack of transparency, even if it wasn't your intent the removal of that thread looks like you are trying to hide the poor actions of one of the staff members instead of just dealing with it out in the open.
I can understand if the situation was more complicated then that but by shutting down that person, that thread, it looks to us like what you weren't really looking for was feedback, you were wanting praise and when all you generally got was criticism you guys just said 'fuck it' and closed the whole thing down and haven't made a statement about it sense as far as I'm aware. How is anyone suppose to trust the staff and their decisions when things like that happen? Why should we be encouraged by whatever changes you guys try and make for this board when we don't see the transparency that you guys yourselves were suggesting the staff would have from the very beginning? I have felt like there should have been big topics like this one before about the previous thread and other things but personally I didn't feel like risking a ban by making one and any others I had seen pop up were immediately locked like the ones that popped up today before you jumped into this thread. I shouldn't have to worry about being banned when I'm trying to provide criticism in a polite manner but here we are and if you don't get why I and many others feel that way the look at the actions being frequently taken and then you might start to see part of the problem.
As for a solution... I think we need a board for feedback and suggestions that has all members of the staff involved in and engaged in. If a topic is about something that staff member covers they should be posting in that topic. No I'm not saying you need to listen to people just yell at you endlessly but if someone is writing a post like mine that I think people would consider well thought out I would expect the staff to be involved in one way or another in responding to it. I also think taking community suggestions on ways to change the board would generally be a better response then just forcing the changes on everyone with only a few days warning. I'm sure a lot of the community has suggestions on various things they'd like to see for these boards going forward but I don't feel and those I've talk to don't feel like we have a way of really telling you guys that. I'm not saying this is a perfect answer but I think if we had a place where everyone could discuss things like this then we could come up with at least a better answer then none at all.
800 years ago, 20 OTs came together and founded the ERA Government. The descendants of these OT creators, the Prominent Members, live in the holy land mERAjois. For a commoner to even defy one will carry the cost of a Admin from mod headquarters descending to dole out punishment.
This is such nonsense. Of course you can make things political. That's the not the fucking point and that's not what we're talking about in terms of politics
The goal isn't to marginalize or alienate anyone. This is a discussion forum. Everyone interested in any given discussion is allowed to participate. There is no discrimination or segregation in any given thread. Some peoples' viewpoints may get them banned, but that's an entirely separate matter. No one here cares what color your skin is or what gender you identify as. They care about what you think about the new Zelda game, or how excited you are for an upcoming movie, or whatever. That is one of the good things about Internet anonymity.
I personally love politics, but I certainly don't come here to discuss them. I think a lot of people are the same way. If you want to discuss politics then great, I am glad that there is a place for you here to do that. But I don't think separating it out into its own forum would hurt it in any way.
It would allow more political issues to stay relevant while also allowing more Entertainment discussion to stay active by nature of having two different front pages (and let's be honest, very few people click past Page 1).
So I sat through hours of maintenance with nothing to read and then they reversed everything a few hours later?
Two board was foundational to the success and development of GAF and the OT side along with the moderation. OT forced everyone to be together and discuss everything under the sun that wasn't videogames. The convergence of topics, users and ideas was integral to the identity and viewpoint of the community and is integral to the continuation of that. Intentional or not splitting politics off into its own separate forum will change the perception and identity of this forum and community allowing user to retreat into their preferred subdivision, something you already see with stark differences between VG and Etc sides when more serious topic and discussions are brought up in gaming. Many people come here because the experience is different from pretty much anywhere else on the net. More division will only serve to diminish that fact and make the site and community more like everywhere else.The goal isn't to marginalize or alienate anyone. This is a discussion forum. Everyone interested in any given discussion is allowed to participate. There is no discrimination or segregation in any given thread. Some peoples' viewpoints may get them banned, but that's an entirely separate matter. No one here cares what color your skin is or what gender you identify as. They care about what you think about the new Zelda game, or how excited you are for an upcoming movie, or whatever. That is one of the good things about Internet anonymity.
I personally love politics, but I certainly don't come here to discuss them. I think a lot of people are the same way. If you want to discuss politics then great, I am glad that there is a place for you here to do that. But I don't think separating it out into its own forum would hurt it in any way.
It would allow more political issues to stay relevant while also allowing more Entertainment discussion to stay active by nature of having two different front pages (and let's be honest, very few people click past Page 1).
Why not just do this?
Everything is one 1 page, eliminates tons of wasted empty space, and keeps everything super organized. Obviously design it to actually fit the theme and not look like my 2 second gaudy thing, but there you go. No more forum segregation or separation since it's all on 1 page and OT's dont get hidden in a non-used subforum. Let users change the default amount of threads shown in each section, so if you want 50 regular threads, you can do that. Also have an option to just hide the hangouts section for people who really have no interest in ever using it.
Of course it's the point lol. You just don't like that it's true.
People are not upset over the change itself anymore, but they are upset over how the whole thing was handled....I'm not understanding why people are upset about this change after it got reverted?
Yeah, I think it was a poorly thought out idea, but they listened and undid it, so no harm done! I'm just happy that staff listened.