• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Kinthey

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
22,272
That's not what the poster means when he wants a politics subforum. People saying yes to that want any kind of politics banished to that thread so they can talk about games without having to read about game companies treat women like shit etc.

It's vastly different to what the mods attempted with an Entertainment and an Etcetera section that still allows politics overlap.
I don't see where the poster made an implication of that kind.
 

R0b1n

Member
Jun 29, 2018
7,787

ryseing

Bought courtside tickets just to read a book.
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,546
For lovers
Probably going to regret this post, but fuck it.

I'm one of the "prominent members", or one of the shadow cabal. Not going to name others because the amount of vitriol towards those folks I've seen in this thread and others is quite frankly disgusting. Do note that not everyone with my tag is a "prominent member", so please don't harass them.

In my case, it's odd because I create threads for a niche of a niche, in this case college football discussion on a gaming board. I've been doing so for the past couple years, and it's something I really enjoy doing. However, I had a long standing issue with GAF about the placement of our threads. College football is only an active sport for four months of the year, and so I thought it was reasonable to have us on the main off-topic board for the season while sticking us in the Communities section for the rest. We have a disproportionate amount of mods/admins compared to the size of our community who, when the switch happened, recognized my grievance and thus included me in input for the new site, hence the "advisor" tag when I really had very little to do with the creation of the new site.

Last week, I was PM'd to discuss this change, which was already set in motion. I was in favor for the reasons I just mentioned. To further clarify my reasoning, on both here and GAF we tended to have more discussion when on the main OT board. Americans relate to college sports quite a bit, and so while they might not seek out discussion on them when consigned to a secondary board, they might drop in and post about how their team is doing if the thread was already on a board they visited. Which was awesome! I love talking about college football with as many people as possible while also not being on a team specific board or reddit, which I think is why we have maintained a core community since that niche does exist.

While I don't think the change itself was a disaster, clearly the handling of it was, and I haven't been happy with how other site issues have been handled before y'all jump on me for being a mod puppet.

I dunno, AMA or whatever.
 

Deleted member 176

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
37,160
I feel like OTs contain a whole lot of people who would otherwise try to make threads about edgy/inflammatory opinions they have. The types people make threads for months later, but would be chaos upon release.

Also, without OTs, larger releases would dominate forums for weeks at a time. That alone makes them worth it.
It does the opposite as well- compare Poliera at any given time to the newest "Dems are now +12 on the general ballot instead of +14" thread. OTs are great because it gives a space for non-reactionary discussions AND things that aren't necessarily new news. Just don't put them on the same page as everything else.

Considering the feedback I saw, I think a stickied Community list on EtcetEra (not hangouts) would be good. We have watched threads too- when it comes to community threads the issue isn't finding the thread at the top of the page, it's finding it in the first place.
 

Syder

The Moyes are Back in Town
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
12,543
I can't believe The Event finally happened
DIExeYxXkAAUWB1.jpg
 

Rad Bandolar

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,036
SoCal
After reading through the relevant threads from Friday, last night, and today, I think this experiment has revealed a fundamental misunderstanding between a good potion of the membership and the Admins/Prominent Members™, about what this forum is and who it serves, and that these two groups are talking right past each other.

There's a large portion of the community whose primary interaction with the forum is through EtcetEra and maybe a couple of OT threads. These members view EtcetEra as its own community. These are the folks complaining about the forum split, having to go past a bunch of OTs to get to the content they care about, and ultimately putting a bunch of people on ignore so they can interact with their actual community again.

On the other side are the admins, who through all of their posts repeatedly state that they consider OTs to be the foundation of the forum and they tie the health of these OTs to the overall health of the forums, so they're taking actions to promote these OTs. In this instance, the action they took ran right into a large faction of users who don't see things the same way.

And the most frustrating thing to me as I read all of these posts is that a lot of people aren't picking up what the Admins are putting down: that the OTs are the thing that take precedence, and that the Admins either aren't aware of, or are dismissive of, the community that has coalesced around EtcetEra.

Which is fair -- they pay for the maintenance and upkeep of it, so they get to decide what their forum is and who it serves. I would just counsel that a community isn't static, and that it begins changing and transforming after the events that led to its creation, so perhaps recognizing that fact and trying to understand it might actually go a long way toward promoting a healthy & vibrant forum. After all, you inherited this community from somewhere else, and that community can just as easily decide to move on from here.
 
Last edited:

Shauni

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,728
I mean, it's funny, because the original announcement thread had a reassurance that they weren't doing this to separate politics into its own thing, but the people who came out in support of it in that thread were just like the people celebrating 'no more politics yay.' Even if that wasn't the intention, it was so obvious how it would go down that those people would do what they did with gaming and push as much politics away as possible.

Unfortunately, I think they will still end up splitting us up again just not as cluttered and as messy.
 

John Dunbar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,229
anyone compiled a list of posts suggesting the staff might be alt-right sympathizers? for the sake of community spirit and all.
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,405
When GAF recently made their split, they just got 2 disgusting subforums out of 1. Politics is 100% about how mean the left are, "changing demographics", and how racism is just a fictitious concept. The new Off-Topic is just some more of that, plus hating women that aren't rail thin.

And the elf still just bans anyone who disagrees with him, even respectfully, on his "no opinions are off limits" hugbox.

So, it could be worse guys.
 

Deleted member 45

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
338
I appreciate deltaplus and Nibel actually engaging with us over the last day or so, it's a marked change from what has been happening over the last six months or so. Please continue, and encourage all other admins to do so as well.

I do hope the suggestions in the pre-fiasco thread are being considered, as they are much less drastic and contribute to a better user experience. I don't really have a problem with people who contribute more on the site (and not just post counts) to have a voice in potential changes, but you also need a representative poll to counter bias.

Separating Entertainment and everything else isn't even the worst idea, but I thought it would have been obvious that sports threads would have been de-facto stickied threads because of how active they are. It was a case of the rich getting richer, not actually solving the stated issue. One way to help drive traffic to community threads that don't get exposure is to ask those creators if they'd like their threads stickied in the main forum for a week, and choose three at a time and move them over and sticky. When the week is up, the next set moves in. If a week goes by and no traffic happens, then the community needs to just be. We can also help drive traffic in related threads by merging. Let's face it - not everything needs a thread. There's already a ton of great discussion going on in threads, and the constant want to fracture a string of communication by having an offshoot thread is one of the bizarre aspects of this forum - I can't think of another forum that I've been on that works that way, and I'm talking since the CompuServe days. I'm an old.

Thanks, they definitely are being considered (no point in me having read the entire thread otherwise lol). We're going back to the drawing board, taking feedback from that thread and here, and seeing what we can do. I wouldn't expect any major changes in the near term future though, since we're working on other things like 2.0 which are taking the majority of our time. Some of the smaller suggestions (the stickies, etc.) I think we can play around with pretty easily.

deltaplus

During the short-lived Entertainment-era a useful listing was made of all the hangout threads currently around, a sticky thread with that list could be made in Etcetera to shine a light on them.

Yeah, I really liked that thread. I'll see if we can get it back. Bear with us though, I'm on a plane and my wifi is literally ther worst. :)
 

jawzpause

Member
Nov 7, 2017
2,229
I don't understand why anything needs to change anyway? Things seem fine the way they are, segregating into entertainment/politics/etc seems pointless
 

Euphoria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,509
Earth
Probably going to regret this post, but fuck it.

I'm one of the "prominent members", or one of the shadow cabal. Not going to name others because the amount of vitriol towards those folks I've seen in this thread and others is quite frankly disgusting. Do note that not everyone with my tag is a "prominent member", so please don't harass them.

In my case, it's odd because I create threads for a niche of a niche, in this case college football discussion on a gaming board. I've been doing so for the past couple years, and it's something I really enjoy doing. However, I had a long standing issue with GAF about the placement of our threads. College football is only an active sport for four months of the year, and so I thought it was reasonable to have us on the main off-topic board for the season while sticking us in the Communities section for the rest. We have a disproportionate amount of mods/admins compared to the size of our community who, when the switch happened, recognized my grievance and thus included me in input for the new site, hence the "advisor" tag when I really had very little to do with the creation of the new site.

Last week, I was PM'd to discuss this change, which was already set in motion. I was in favor for the reasons I just mentioned. To further clarify my reasoning, on both here and GAF we tended to have more discussion when on the main OT board. Americans relate to college sports quite a bit, and so while they might not seek out discussion on them when consigned to a secondary board, they might drop in and post about how their team is doing if the thread was already on a board they visited. Which was awesome! I love talking about college football with as many people as possible while also not being on a team specific board or reddit, which I think is why we have maintained a core community since that niche does exist.

While I don't think the change itself was a disaster, clearly the handling of it was, and I haven't been happy with how other site issues have been handled before y'all jump on me for being a mod puppet.

I dunno, AMA or whatever.

I respect you coming forward.

Why couldn't we just have a separate section just for sports?

Was that a possibility? It makes sense and wouldn't interfere in anything else.
 
Nov 2, 2017
3,723
Lenovox is talking about the post-shower period up until the last week or so when they intoduced a Politics subforum, I think. GAF has a ton of racist stuff these days.

Okay, I see I haven't been there in a while.
Nobody was ever banned here, or at GAF, for supporting Trump.

People have been banned here, or at GAF, for making disingenuous/trolling/circular and tireless arguments about things that either were, or dogwhistled/deliberately walked the edge of, things that were racist/sexist/xenophobic/etc and not coincidentally, exist within the Trump and current spectrum of conservatism.

According to comments on Resetera I see frequently, you largely can't defend Trump support without that broad category of offenses under your belt. Trump support is premised on these kinds of infractions. Am I wrong?

During the primaries, Bernie supporters were in that same position.

I remember that as well.


The change happened a few weeks ago.

When you speak of a few weeks ago do you speak in the present tense?

Yeah, I missed the context. I went a few pages back to get it proper. I thought we were talking pre-Exodus. My mistake.
 
Oct 25, 2017
21,442
Sweden
  • gaming
  • etcetera
  • gaming hangouts
  • entertainment hangouts
  • miscellaneous hangouts
if there's a perceived problem in the hangouts section, proposed solutions should affect only those sections, and not other parts of the forum
 

Shodan14

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
9,410
The thing about that, though, is that we had a feedback thread about a month ago (like a real, 'hey, give us feedback' thread). The suggestion was brought up there to very mixed feelings. So it's not like they didn't already know splitting the forum was a controversial idea. Maybe they thought there would be more support overall though, I dunno. I was in that thread, too, though, and I recall more negative on the idea than positive though.
The last official feedback thread I remember got locked right quick.

If you have a poll and it ends up 50/50, you go back to the drawing board and come up with an idea that has more support instead of experimenting on the main (only) branch.
 

BlackJace

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
5,450
This is completely honest jarate right here

We did not decide on anything. We were presented an idea that they were going to do something, and we were asked what we thought and given a small form to fill out. Most people's response was, "eh whatever let's see what happens" more then us going, "hell yeah this is going to help our community thread so much"

I've always been the mindset of just to try it out and see what happens. I think that was also told to us in a reasonable way that the changes they were planning weren't entireley set in stone. I think the initial push should've just been a lot more open about that aspect. I think it would've limited a lot of the meltdowns people had.

Again, why not have an open poll about what to do? Why get such a small sample size of a forum that's 40k strong?
 

Cochese

Banned
Nov 14, 2017
6,960
Probably going to regret this post, but fuck it.

I'm one of the "prominent members", or one of the shadow cabal. Not going to name others because the amount of vitriol towards those folks I've seen in this thread and others is quite frankly disgusting. Do note that not everyone with my tag is a "prominent member", so please don't harass them.

In my case, it's odd because I create threads for a niche of a niche, in this case college football discussion on a gaming board. I've been doing so for the past couple years, and it's something I really enjoy doing. However, I had a long standing issue with GAF about the placement of our threads. College football is only an active sport for four months of the year, and so I thought it was reasonable to have us on the main off-topic board for the season while sticking us in the Communities section for the rest. We have a disproportionate amount of mods/admins compared to the size of our community who, when the switch happened, recognized my grievance and thus included me in input for the new site, hence the "advisor" tag when I really had very little to do with the creation of the new site.

Last week, I was PM'd to discuss this change, which was already set in motion. I was in favor for the reasons I just mentioned. To further clarify my reasoning, on both here and GAF we tended to have more discussion when on the main OT board. Americans relate to college sports quite a bit, and so while they might not seek out discussion on them when consigned to a secondary board, they might drop in and post about how their team is doing if the thread was already on a board they visited. Which was awesome! I love talking about college football with as many people as possible while also not being on a team specific board or reddit, which I think is why we have maintained a core community since that niche does exist.

While I don't think the change itself was a disaster, clearly the handling of it was, and I haven't been happy with how other site issues have been handled before y'all jump on me for being a mod puppet.

I dunno, AMA or whatever.

Everything about what you said was completely reasonable. If people jump on you for this, it's a them problem.

I, personally, think the leaving in the main forum for the first couple of weeks or so is fine, as pretty much any sports thread is super active. After that though, the sports threads aren't going to drown in Hangouts. They are the good swimmers.
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,857
I would just like to clarify that not all community resettlers are "prominent members".

It was most likely just resettlers for etcetera OTs, for example neither me or Kyolux were asked about this as resettlers with threads in the gaming section.
 

BossAttack

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,954
We probably never will, overall, this forum is less 'fun' than old neogaf, which is where those memes came from, and with the climate of the US right now, all we talk about is politics.

I don't mind all the political talk, we live in serious, dangerous times. But, I agree that this place is less fun. It's a feeling I've been having for a while now and had considered making a thread about before. Now, the only fun places seem to be Community Threads.
 

Ominym

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,068
This is all solid advice.

I think before this type of experimental design is even considered though, they need to work on seeing if this is even worth it by looking at qualitative information from the community, which requires a whole different set of methodologies. AB testing might be really difficult to implement technically, but qualitative research methods can be really easy to pick up and don't require testing hypotheses and not violating assumptions that you might with an AB test (or t-test, as we call in my discipline). That information is readily available and can be done so long as mods are willing to actually read and code feedback in these sorts of threads.
Entirely correct. I'm assuming that they did some legwork given their messaging around wanting to improve OT community engagement. But they probably should've collected more data on why people weren't engaging with them and whether or not it was even because of their location in Hangouts.

If we're totally redoing the process, a few intercept surveys (using either SurveyMonkey, SurveyGizmo, Google Forms, or if you have the money for it, Qualtrics) over the rest of the year would've worked wonders in when comparing them to site usuage data.

From there you could do a few follow up interviews and then move on to some usability tests with platforms like Lookback, UserZoom, even Skype.

All of these things could've been done for cheap, over the internet, and would've given you the feedback you needed before progressing into either a more expansive A/B test, or a site redesign.
 

Muffin

Member
Oct 26, 2017
10,342
I don't see where the poster made an implication of that kind.
Almost every time in the past I've read people want that kind of subforum it was something along those lines. Very rarely I just see somebody argue for that because they're specifically tired of Trump threads, I give you that. But that doesn't really warrant a structure change, and instead a hide thread function based on keywords.

When I say politics I mean US politics, EU response to Britain in regards to Brexit etc. you know actual politics
I don't really see the merit in that. It seems like arbitrary splitting to me. Video games and non-VGs works well. You could justify comic or movie sections as well, but many past forums have not benefitted from that kind of structuring. As said above I think what you guys want is a native thread hide function.
 

Deleted member 176

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
37,160
I thought it was reasonable to have us on the main off-topic board for the season while sticking us in the Communities section for the rest.
Isn't this the way things have always been? It was like this this past weekend yeah? Like that makes total sense, but even then it gets completely undone when all of the constantly active threads are sharing the same platform.

It's like how My Hero gets an anime thread on EtcetEra during the new season but then goes to hangouts when it's done, or how Smash basically has a community thread on the front page now.
 

ry-dog

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,180
What hilarious revisionist history. GAF was a near-extreme leftist echo chamber that blew up because it couldn't withstand the community's purity testing and hypocritical moderation practices. You were banned just for hinting at Trump support there - just like here.

And just like there, people fail to provide examples when talking about bans like this. You could be a Trump supporter, you just couldn't be racist. GAF was not extreme left, people just aren't use to being called out or liberal opinions on the internet because so much of it is a conservative and alt right safe space.
 

R0b1n

Member
Jun 29, 2018
7,787
Again, why not have an open poll about what to do? Why get such a small sample size of a forum that's 40k strong?
The change is supposedly meant to target OTs, specifically those with little activity. I guess they wanted to see what their target thinks more than they want to see what the rest do?
 

Lackless

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,137
Probably going to regret this post, but fuck it.

I'm one of the "prominent members", or one of the shadow cabal. Not going to name others because the amount of vitriol towards those folks I've seen in this thread and others is quite frankly disgusting. Do note that not everyone with my tag is a "prominent member", so please don't harass them.

In my case, it's odd because I create threads for a niche of a niche, in this case college football discussion on a gaming board. I've been doing so for the past couple years, and it's something I really enjoy doing. However, I had a long standing issue with GAF about the placement of our threads. College football is only an active sport for four months of the year, and so I thought it was reasonable to have us on the main off-topic board for the season while sticking us in the Communities section for the rest. We have a disproportionate amount of mods/admins compared to the size of our community who, when the switch happened, recognized my grievance and thus included me in input for the new site, hence the "advisor" tag when I really had very little to do with the creation of the new site.

Last week, I was PM'd to discuss this change, which was already set in motion. I was in favor for the reasons I just mentioned. To further clarify my reasoning, on both here and GAF we tended to have more discussion when on the main OT board. Americans relate to college sports quite a bit, and so while they might not seek out discussion on them when consigned to a secondary board, they might drop in and post about how their team is doing if the thread was already on a board they visited. Which was awesome! I love talking about college football with as many people as possible while also not being on a team specific board or reddit, which I think is why we have maintained a core community since that niche does exist.

While I don't think the change itself was a disaster, clearly the handling of it was, and I haven't been happy with how other site issues have been handled before y'all jump on me for being a mod puppet.

I dunno, AMA or whatever.

Any thoughts on this post?

I'm wondering why it's allowed to insult the mod team and insinuate their bigots in not so subtle terms?

It happens often enough without any bans handed out that I've made note of it. I have my own issues with moderation here, and quite a few posters find the time to vent their frustrations in good faith. But the many who don't go below the belt often and get away with it, honestly makes me not take any moderation here seriously. Especially since the posters in question tend to start shit with everyone knowing full well there won't be repercussions coming their way.

Saw that mods were replying here so thought I'd ask about this, as in spite of my own issues with moderation you are a very much a diverse mod team and go out of your way to be inclusive in my view. So when I see this not being addressed by you, I don't see the point in participating in other threads because of said vocal and volatile minority. And I assume more widespread participation is what you were looking for in what is now a failed update.
 

PeskyToaster

Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,312
I'm glad it's back because as was said, it made it hard to find current threads to discuss new news. I think the intentions are good but the solution needs to be implemented in a way that doesn't adversely affect core functions.
 

Euphoria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,509
Earth
Everything about what you said was completely reasonable. If people jump on you for this, it's a them problem.

I, personally, think the leaving in the main forum for the first couple of weeks or so is fine, as pretty much any sports thread is super active. After that though, the sports threads aren't going to drown in Hangouts. They are the good swimmers.

I see this point as well.

Sports threads always seem to stay afloat. I've never had issue finding a thread for NHL playoffs or anything NFL related.
 

bangai-o

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,527
A lot of Etc OTs are dying and/or need some new blood in them simply because a lot of users don't visit that sub forum specifically, so I thought the idea was good because it would give communities another chance to live.

And if that results in James Gunn thread #143 being bumped from page 1, do be it

I think one of the issues that is causing the community threads
You can also use the pork rinds to make "chicharrón guisado" tacos.

Just grab a bag of pork rinds, a bottle of Mexican salsa, put both in a pan until it boils, and and then put it in a tortilla. Easy recipe.

EeZZtyy.jpg


u94ETKT.jpg

I went to the taco stand down my block to hoping for this specifically. Unfortunately, they didnt have them. I guess I can go ahead and make it myself. It looks really good, but I would probably add something more for nutrients, like fish perhaps.