• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Oct 27, 2017
427
Warships and shuttles becoming cryptocurrency wouldn't surprise me at this point.

You keep getting defensive and cherrypicking your examples. The majority of people in here are simply calling this a new low or speculating that this will drive a wedge between their backers that didn't exist before.

I didn't even ask you to condemn CiG for past behavior. I asked you to reflect on their newest action.

...I have stated several times now that this is a dumb, terrible move.
 

Flash

Member
Oct 27, 2017
377
I hope the Scam Citizen roller coaster never ends lol it's the meme that keeps on giving.
 

Eolz

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,601
FR
Well for one Blizzard's existence is not dependent of the money of people they're paywalling from.

For two Blizzard is a proven existence with plenty of highly acclaimed video games under their belt, both commercially and critically.
So it's ok to do it if you've released several games before but not otherwise?

What about Eve Online and their 80$ pub crawl ticket? Or their 140$ conference ticket? They got livestream and digital tickets too...
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/eve-fanfest-2018-tickets-38384202182?aff=webnews#tickets
 

KKRT

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,544
If you've backed the project you should have access to the live stream for free.
Period. This is awful optics.
The keynote should be free for everybody not only backers, rest of the show can be posted later.

--
Well for one Blizzard's existence is not dependent of the money of people they're paywalling from.

For two Blizzard is a proven existence with plenty of highly acclaimed video games under their belt, both commercially and critically.
This is argument? So it should be free, because its crowdfunded in comparison to Activision Blizzard that gets billions of dolars every year from their products?
 
Last edited:
Oct 27, 2017
11,505
Bandung Indonesia
So it's ok to do it if you've released several games before but not otherwise?

What about Eve Online and their 80$ pub crawl ticket? Or their 140$ conference ticket? They got livestream and digital tickets too...
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/eve-fanfest-2018-tickets-38384202182?aff=webnews#tickets

Dude, come on, even backers who basically helped make CIG's existence a reality are still getting paywalled over this. It's disrespectful as fuck for those people especially. Blizzard is not a crowdfunded company that relies on donations from people to exist, CIG basically requires money from people who supported their existence to get the latest update on the thing they're supporting.

And no, not interested in whataboutism. Even if whatever Eve Online or whatever other company are doing is wrong, it still doesn't make this magically right. It's shortsighted, and the near unanimous backlash this decision gets from their playerbase--just check their reddit--should tell you that this is not the right thing to do.

This is argument? So it should be free, because its crowdfunded in comparison to Activision Blizzard that gets billions of dolars every year from their products?

Because CIG wouldn't exist if not for the support of people they're now paywalling from. It's really bad optics no matter how you slice it.

I am honestly surprised--astounded, even--that there are people who are okay with this, to be honest, wow.
 

Eolz

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,601
FR
Dude, come on, even backers who basically helped make CIG's existence a reality are still getting paywalled over this. It's disrespectful as fuck for those people especially. Blizzard is not a crowdfunded company that relies on donations from people to exist, CIG basically requires money from people who supported their existence to get the latest update on the thing they're supporting.

And no, not interested in whataboutism. Even if whatever Eve Online or whatever other company are doing is wrong, it still doesn't make this magically right. It's shortsighted, and the near unanimous backlash this decision gets from their playerbase--just check their reddit--should tell you that this is not the right thing to do.



Because CIG wouldn't exist if not for the support of people they're now paywalling from. It's really bad optics no matter how you slice it.
I'm not saying that what CIG is doing is right for some bits, just that you're applying double standards for it.
If it's a big corporation, it's apparently fine to pay more than if it's one depending on backers.

I've still yet to see how about the streaming for the main presentation is behind a paywall btw, and not just the small side ones.

Otherwise, the onvention prices are cheaper or similar to other events like those shown (Blizzcon, eve fanfest...). It's just weird to say "look at those prices!" in those cases and just show how either uninformed some are, or how disingenuous they are...
 
Oct 27, 2017
11,505
Bandung Indonesia
I'm not saying that what CIG is doing is right for some bits, just that you're applying double standards for it.
If it's a big corporation, it's apparently fine to pay more than if it's one depending on backers.

I've still yet to see how about the streaming for the main presentation is behind a paywall btw, and not just the small side ones.

Otherwise, the onvention prices are cheaper or similar to other events like those shown (Blizzcon, eve fanfest...). It's just weird to say "look at those prices!" in those cases and just show how either uninformed some are, or how disingenuous they are...

It's not that "it's a big corporation so it's okay", it's "CIG depends on the funds from backers to continue operating, and yet they stil see fit to paywall the backers to get something they're supposed to get for free." Get it? It's really disrespectful to people who funded their company and game that they're still required to pay still even when right now CIG is running with their money.

It's a really tone-deaf move to pull, especially since they need to have all the support they can get and right now they are still unproven that they are capable of delivering a finished product.
 

Ceerious

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,189
Asian
It's a disingenuous marketing strategy. If you willing to pay to watch LiveStream, it means you are allready a big fan. So, it's ensured that the LiveStream gets good reviews.
 

KKRT

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,544
Because CIG wouldn't exist if not for the support of people they're now paywalling from. It's really bad optics no matter how you slice it.

I am honestly surprised--astounded, even--that there are people who are okay with this, to be honest, wow.
Why shouldnt anyone be ok with them charging for attending a live event where you are practically covered in terms of place and food and all presentations? I'm not talking about livestreaming, this is different topic and it would be also fine for everything except the Keynote.
This is standard for any conference.
 
Oct 27, 2017
11,505
Bandung Indonesia
Why shouldnt anyone be ok with them charging for attending a live event where you are practically covered in terms of place and food and all presentations? I'm not talking about livestreaming, this is different topic and it would be also fine for everything except the Keynote.
This is standard for any conference.

Oh then we are talking about different thing then, there's a miscommunication in there somewhere.
 

Deleted member 1589

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,576
Why shouldnt anyone be ok with them charging for attending a live event where you are practically covered in terms of place and food and all presentations? I'm not talking about livestreaming, this is different topic and it would be also fine for everything except the Keynote.
This is standard for any conference.
He was talking about the livestream, not a ticket to going to the keynote in person.

Having the events paywalled for people who didn't back the game? Fine. That's alright.

Having the events paywalled for your backers, when they essentially paid for the game to be made is a bad move.
 
Jul 17, 2018
480
I like how backers look at all these negative threads and instead of questioning their faith in the project they think "the Internet is prejudiced against Star Citizen!" just like Trump is saying google is prejudiced against him. There's a reason these threads pop up, guys. There's a reason one ex-SC investor is making a documentary series about all this on youtube.
 
Oct 27, 2017
427
I like how backers look at all these negative threads and instead of questioning their faith in the project they think "the Internet is prejudiced against Star Citizen!" just like Trump is saying google is prejudiced against him. There's a reason these threads pop up, guys. There's a reason one ex-SC investor is making a documentary series about all this on youtube.

There's people who legit want this game to fail.
 

KKRT

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,544
I like how backers look at all these negative threads and instead of questioning their faith in the project they think "the Internet is prejudiced against Star Citizen!" just like Trump is saying google is prejudiced against him. There's a reason these threads pop up, guys. There's a reason one ex-SC investor is making a documentary series about all this on youtube.
Because there are only negative threads posted, all positive stuff stays in community section. People think its all bad, because they only see bad information that many times are misinformed.
 
Oct 27, 2017
427
User Banned (1 Week): Hostility. Previous infractions for similar behaviour.
Just like there are people who want their hated sports teams to lose. If SC fails it'll be because of CIG, not some people on the Internet.


Do those sports fans want those teams to not exist? If so, they're just cunts. Like people in these threads who gleefully state that the game is a scam and that its failure is inevitable.
 
Last edited:

Cecil

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,445
Ok, its already changed. The keynote will be available to all with Star Citizen account.

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/spectrum/community/SC/forum/3/thread/citizencon-streaming

It's a bit weird to read this. He talks about the increasing costs for the event, because he wants to do more with this years CitizenCon and expand it with increating costs. And he talks about being "fiscally responsible".

How about not doing these things, or at least keep them modest, and focus on finishing the initial game?

ChrisRobets said:
What we didn't anticipate is how dearly some of you value watching the main CitizenCon presentation live.

I get that some of you may not be considering these nuances when you're whipping out your pitchforks, which is why I thought it would help to detail our thought process and decision process.

Wtf is that tone? :)
 

KKRT

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,544
What are the positive and thread-worthy news about SC?
Have fun reading through those:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/star-citizen-alpha-3-2-mining-rocks.7717/
https://www.resetera.com/threads/star-citizen-community-ot-long-term-investment.404/

Ps. There was free fly event last weekend due to Gamescom and it was not posted here ...

---
It's a bit weird to read this. He talks about the increasing costs for the event, because he wants to do more with this years CitizenCon and expand it with increating costs. And he talks about being "fiscally responsible".

How about not doing these things, or at least keep them modest, and focus on finishing the initial game?
I'm with you on that. I would prefer to have a live stream from their office.
 

Eolz

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,601
FR
It's not that "it's a big corporation so it's okay", it's "CIG depends on the funds from backers to continue operating, and yet they stil see fit to paywall the backers to get something they're supposed to get for free." Get it? It's really disrespectful to people who funded their company and game that they're still required to pay still even when right now CIG is running with their money.

It's a really tone-deaf move to pull, especially since they need to have all the support they can get and right now they are still unproven that they are capable of delivering a finished product.
Let me put it another way:
Is it stupid to put the main presentation behind a paywall (if true) instead of subscribers only for chat, and public for the rest? God yes.
Is it stupid to put other, smaller dev presentations behind a paywall? Not really, as it has no impact on the game's visibility and only fir fir the fans. That said it should be free for subscribers.
Is it stupid to make a 10$ digital bonus pack for those that couldn't make the trip? Or course not.
Are the prices for the physical event ridiculous? Lolno, but the ones complaining about it certainly are.

The price complaints are from people trying way too hard.
And again, is there any confirmation that the main keynote is behind a paywall (which would be ridiculous) or is that just the small ones?
 

KKRT

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,544
And again, is there any confirmation that the main keynote is behind a paywall (which would be ridiculous) or is that just the small ones?
Keynote was, it isnt anymore.
Also subscribers had access to the livestream for free. So basically you could subscribe for 10$ to get livestream access, still for keynote it was shitty.
 

massoluk

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,573
Thailand
I'm not an expert in the field, but the thought process of the dude seemed unnecessary convoluted about steam, no steam, and video quality, etc
 
Jul 17, 2018
480

These threads are just you guys posting screenshots and arguing whether a bigger ship will have an advantage over a smaller one. I'm asking what positive news there's been that's thread-worthy? Free weekend is a promotional event, kinda positive I guess but what else?
 

KKRT

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,544
These threads are just you guys posting screenshots and arguing whether a bigger ship will have an advantage over a smaller one. I'm asking what positive news there's been that's thread-worthy? Free weekend is a promotional event, kinda positive I guess but what else?
I'm not gonna walkthrough year of postings from ATV and RTV regarding different stuff from SC development. If you are interested, read some of those or watch some ATV and RTV, if not do not claim its all negative if you do not know.
Pretty much all RtV with Chris Roberts are worth watching as they give great inside of their development and design process.
Community stopped posting interesting stuff in new threads, because those threads were empty or filled with driveby posts. Its just not worth it.
 

Horse Armour

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
89
Do those sports fans want those teams to not exist? If so, they're just cunts. Like people in these threads who gleefully state that the game is a scam and that its failure is inevitable.
You're calling people cunts for not liking a videogame that you do. You need to step back and reassess your slavish devotement to this company who only see you as a money funnel.
 

StereoVSN

Member
Nov 1, 2017
13,620
Eastern US
These threads are just you guys posting screenshots and arguing whether a bigger ship will have an advantage over a smaller one. I'm asking what positive news there's been that's thread-worthy? Free weekend is a promotional event, kinda positive I guess but what else?
I backed this a long time ago to the tune of $60, which isn't that big of a deal. That said, it is still a buggy mess even for basic flight actions, even walking around in your garage, mining is iffy, so the "positive" news doesn't really exist.

Frankly I just can't see the whole thing actually launching as a viable commercial product but I really hope I am wrong as I would love to play the SP part at least (well, of its good).

The livestream stupidity just seems like another Tuesday for Roberts and Co though so I can't even say I was surprised.
 

Eolz

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,601
FR
Keynote was, it isnt anymore.
Also subscribers had access to the livestream for free. So basically you could subscribe for 10$ to get livestream access, still for keynote it was shitty.
Good, thanks for the info.
And yeah, not only it was shitty, but hurt their chances at promoting the game.