• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

How do you like your puddles?

  • The entire game should take place inside a huge puddle

  • As big as Insomniac's artists want them to be

  • As deep as my knowledge of game development

  • I prefer oceans tbh

  • Don't go chasing Waterfalls


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

darrec

Banned
Feb 14, 2018
118
That's definitely and clearly a downgrade, neither the first or last time something like this will happen to any game. I don't know why Insomniac couldn't just admit or better yet, just kept their mouth shut about it.
 

Mr. Fantastic

Alt-account
Banned
Apr 27, 2018
3,189
User warned: Baselessly accusing developers of lying.
Nothing to get pissy about but it's an obvious downgrade. The developers lying about it is kinda suspect though.
 

dFORCE

Member
Dec 7, 2017
296
For the people that have been around for a bit longer, I give you a throw back to a previous Time of Day Downgrade discussion:
0dRO7Oq.gif

Yeah, this is very bad when someone is trying to prove there's no shadow when there's obviously character shadows in both scenes. lol
 

Take5GiantSteps

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,291
Ohio
if it wasn't downgraded at all, wouldn't that be clear just from looking at the picture

but insomniac representative had to survey the whole team?

hmmm kind of suspicious no?

bur fine. show us the receipts, post before and after pictures of the code

wait, let me guess, "we didn't archive the E3 code"

heh

#gamernationriseup

Pls be trolling
 

chezzymann

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,042
How can anyone look at this specific scene and say there's absolutely no difference? Seriously?

Of course there is, and the E3 version clearly looks better.

Now you can say that you don't care about the difference... that's up to you. But don't tell me the two shots are identical.
Theres no difference in the quality of the lighting or geometry or textures. The sun was moved so that now that building is in shadow, so you dont see as much contrast or the highlights on spideys uniform. You can dislike the artistic choice but youre objectively wrong if you think its graphically worse.
 

Windrunner

Sly
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,500
This is great for outing the muppets, seeing what they want to see.

Insomniac have already debunked this nonsense, that should be the end of discussion right there.
 

Lo-Fi

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 30, 2017
184
I would agree if games usually looked better than what a vertical slice showed. That's not the case and i don't see how you can argue that developers, usually, make them in good faith either and due to that deserve the benefit of the doubt. Despite what videogames show, typical software development does not progress with it gradually becoming worse over time. It's awfully convenient way of marketing a product with a superior demo version and shield yourself from critique by saying "it's a work in progress".

See, the problem is that your definition of "worse" isn't accurate.

1) Visual changes, if they get worse, are typically made to effect the game in other areas. Better optimization, legibility, etc.
2) You only play one version of the game, the final one. You can't say the pre-release version was better. You can say it looks better, but that's it. But that's not the only aspect of a game.
 

The Artisan

"Angels are singing in monasteries..."
Moderator
Oct 27, 2017
8,132
Dumbest shit ever....idiots.
I wouldn't go that far. I've seen dumber shit.
I mean, we had our own thread that was incredibly embarrassing as well.

It had to be locked.
From the looks of this thread though it seems everyone agrees there was no downgrade.
What does this even mean?
I think he means that this type of scrutiny happens particularly often with Ps4 exclusives. It happened with Infamous Second Son, Uc4, gow4, now it's happening with Spider-Man
 

Bunta

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
2,270
That's definitely and clearly a downgrade, neither the first or last time something like this will happen to any game. I don't know why Insomniac couldn't just admit or better yet, just kept their mouth shut about it.
Nothing to get pissy about but it's an obvious downgrade. The developers lying about it is kinda suspect though.
Except there's nothing for them to admit to or lie about.
 

cb1115

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,347
For the people that have been around for a bit longer, I give you a throw back to a previous Time of Day Downgrade discussion:
0dRO7Oq.gif
oh man, I had almost forgotten about this foolishness

it's especially stupid in retrospect since Second Son is still one of the best looking games of the generation
 

Venom

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,635
Manchester, UK
In that case look at the shadows under the henchmen. That looks a difference in strength of the light (hard light vs soft light) and position. They're not in the same spot.
If the sun has moved position how are the shadows still in the same place? FFS this is basic stuff that gets taught when you're 8 years old in primary school.

5Ode.gif


The henchmen shadows have been changed from actual outlines to blobs.
 

Orb

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,465
USA
i'm not saying there's anything wrong with a downgrade, it happens all the time, but people saying people who are seeing it are crazy are too quick to defend something they have no stake in imo.
difference =/= downgrade

many things can change, it could be time of day, it could be lighting model, it could be textures

you can't sit here and look at these screenshots and immediately know that "oh they had to remove stuff to make it run!"

things fucking change
 

nbnt

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,813
The stark difference between the reaction to this and the usual reaction you get when it's Ubisoft is just hilarious.

I do hope we can all be this mature about any "downgrade" instances in the future.
 

Deleted member 12447

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,173
User Banned (1 Week): System warring, trolling, and accumulated infractions
This doesn't look like a downgrade, move along folks...

but... I do know how to upgrade the game...

Replace Peter Parker with...

vyxl3cJ.png
 

Diego Renault

Member
Nov 1, 2017
1,339
This kind of thing makes me pretty happy I work on games which, frankly, don't receive this level of attention from so many ridiculously entitled gamers. I can't even imagine the stress of having to show a game, years early, knowing that the graphics can't appear to worsen in any way.

How about not showing them "years early" at all, then? The whole downgrade-gate thing started because developers showed games or supposed "in game graphics" that didn't match the final product plenty of times in the past, which got people angry and made them sensitive to any kind of supposed downgrade (this sensitivity is entirely understandable)

I'm an advocat of not showing a game until it's ready to be shown.
 

Shark

Member
Oct 28, 2017
8,126
Raleigh, NC
It's a really bad look how casually people on here throw out the word 'lying' to describe devs making artistic changes and optimizing their game.
 

Deleted member 862

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,646
I really thought the thread about swearing in cyberpunk was going to be the stupidest shit on this site today
 

Deleted member 4970

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,240
LOL at saying the traffic and ped density is reduced

It is easily the most crowded and busy npc count and traffic I've seen this gen
 

Lo-Fi

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 30, 2017
184
How about not showing them "years early" at all, then? The whole downgrade-gate thing started because developers showed games or supposed "in game graphics" that didn't match the final product plenty of times in the past, which got people angry and made them sensitive to any kind of supposed downgrade (this sensitivity is entirely understandable)

I'm an advocat of not showing a game until it's ready to be shown.

If a game should not be shown yet because there might be changes to it in the future, then a game will only be ready to be shown when it ships.

how do you know that? should we trust our eyes or what the dev says?

Have you played the build? If not, I'd trust the people who have played the build. Visuals are not the only part of a game.
 

Doskoi Panda

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
14,970
It's a really bad look how casually people on here throw out the word 'lying' to describe devs making artistic changes and optimizing their game.
It's crazy, these children don't even consider context anymore. They jump straight to 'Insomniac was lying to us! They must be trying to cheat us!' because they don't understand what they're seeing. Congrats, kids, you make this place worse.
 
Oct 27, 2017
5,247
How about not showing them "years early" at all, then? The whole downgrade-gate thing started because developers showed games or supposed "in game graphics" that didn't match the final product plenty of times in the past, which got people angry and made them sensitive to any kind of supposed downgrade (this sensitivity is entirely understandable)

I'm an advocat of not showing a game until it's ready to be shown.

By your standards they wouldn't show the game until it has gone gold then?
 

Deleted member 10737

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
49,774
The stark difference between the reaction to this and the usual reaction you get when it's Ubisoft is just hilarious.

I do hope we can all be this mature about any "downgrade" instances in the future.
exactly what i was thinking, obviously i did expect the response, but will be cool to remind people of this thread the next time there's a thread about a downgraded game from another company and everyone jump on the bandwagon of it being super clear and oh my god how could the do this.
 

Khanimus

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
40,212
Greater Vancouver
I would agree if games usually looked better than what a vertical slice showed. That's not the case and i don't see how you can argue that developers, usually, make them in good faith either and due to that deserve the benefit of the doubt. Despite what videogames show, typical software development does not progress with it gradually becoming worse over time. It's awfully convenient way of marketing a product with a superior demo version and shield yourself from critique by saying "it's a work in progress".

Didn't really look at this particular game too much but that's how i see the situation in general.
The "superior version" in this case being that one has more puddles...I mean forget about wanting to maintain a level of performance for the entire rest of the game in-mind.

Clearly they are trying to pull one over on you.


And as I said, developers showing genuine works in progress for their game have only been lambasted for it. Maybe, just maybe, this was a target they wanted to hit but couldn't in the end. There's nothing "convenient" about that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.