Can't you just stand for your (deplorable) principles instead of making shit up? I wouldn't even have a big problem with you supporting Trump. I mean I wouldn't want to talk to you or anything, but I'd also not try to dogpile you or any of the sort. What pisses me off is this low key stanning and then denying of your political convictions.Not necessarily pro-Trump news, usually just positive news. I'd post negative ones but you guys are so quick to post those! Hah, this was published an hour ago and I searched a few pages back but didn't see anything posted.
None of this means fuck all to the regular person because nobody's wages are going up.
How does people living properly help the shareholders?
Not necessarily pro-Trump news, usually just positive news. I'd post negative ones but you guys are so quick to post those! Hah, this was published an hour ago and I searched a few pages back but didn't see anything posted.
Hope ya'll are stuffing your savings accounts while this lasts...
Since 80% of all wealth in the stock market is owned by 10% of Americans, I just have to sigh every time someone uses the stock market as a measure for economic health.
Takes time, like all things related to the economy.I still don't understand how the tarrifs haven't had a major impact yet
That's a different situation, it's down to the way employment is recorded in the UK, they massage the fuck out of the employment figures here.Is it like the UK....record employment (if believed) ....all on shit wages
None of this means fuck all to the regular person because nobody's wages are going up.
My entire staff saw huge (25%+) salary increases this year. But I live in a booming city and a booming industry. I have wondered how the other industries are doing.
I saw the earlier one where the initial numbers were released. The revised numbers (slightly higher growth) was just released today though, didn't see a thread on that. I think next quarter's numbers will be very interesting. I'm expecting growth to definitely drop (partly due to the reason you stated). Oh and no argument there, the previous administration did an amazing job with the economy!There was a thread on the GDP growth. Pretty much every economic article says it was because of companies stockpiling because of the tariffs, which means the effect is a one-time thing. And even then there were better quarters under Obama.
My retirement accounts are way up with the way the market has been performing. Seriously considering selling my current investments and moving my money to more conservative "safer" funds... on the other hand, I'm wondering if I should wait until after the holidays... It's entirely possible the market will continue upwards for a bit longer if holiday spending is up... decisions, decisions...
Did a revision really warrant an entirely new thread? Stock market isn't as excited about this as you are.I saw the earlier one where the initial numbers were released. The revised numbers (slightly higher growth) was just released today though, didn't see a thread on that. I think next quarter's numbers will be very interesting. I'm expecting growth to definitely drop (partly due to the reason you stated). Oh and no argument there, the previous administration did an amazing job with the economy!
Most didn't see much of anything. Most went to shareholders and not the workers. I got about $5 extra every two weeks, not really worth the whole in the debt and decreased regulations to prevent another Great Recession.
It is positive news no matter how you want to see it though.
The news itself and what happened is positive and rich people will see the positive effect.
Its like someone winning the Jackpot at the Casino.
Good news for that person on the receiving end but i don't benefit from it.Still doesn't turn the event itself into a bad news.
RogerK, I'm curious how you feel about these statistics40% of Americans "struggle" to pay for basic needs such as groceries or housing
Wages are stagnant.
$500 medical bills put people into debt.
At least we're getting low-wage jobs and inflation that overpowers wage growth.
Your boss's retirement is going great, though.
The market's been shit this year all things considered. Only up less than 5%. That being said you really shouldn't sell out of investments completely. Long term you'll be fine regardless.
I'm at 35%. But that's not because of general market performance. But sure, transferring your money around to other investments isn't a terrible idea. Keep in mind that the market averages over-time(including recession) 10%.I'm at 14% return year-to-date, so... I'm quite happy with that. And I'm not saying sell out of investments... I'm considering transferring my investments to more conservative funds.
"wow why you gotta be so negative I only post good news"
They're definitely not good. Wage growth has been a problem for years and years now. With the economy and job market the strongest it's been in a while you'd expect wages to pick up as businesses increase pay to compete for employees. That is happening (very, very slowly):
The reason for this is that to get ahead of the tariffs, firms bought a shitton of things they'd need. Steel and aluminum especially, which are inputs for basically any product we still make in the US.
The next quarter though, will not be so good, because while they bought enough inputs to last them through short term, they can't really buy at the same rate with tariffs instituted.
I would not be surprised to see a GDP shrink.
Yes, it's just like that. If the casino represents the USA/economy, the shareholders of the casino are the average taxpayer, and the people getting the jackpots are the 1%. The casino has been making money for ten years, despite the expected 1% winning jackpots that are accounted for in the business plan. Now it turns out the 1% also make the rules for the casino and vastly increased the odds of a jackpot. How many jackpots can a year handle before the casino is in financial trouble? If only there were someone in an important position with vast knowledge about bankrupting casinos.Its like someone winning the Jackpot at the Casino.
Good news for that person on the receiving end but i don't benefit from it.Still doesn't turn the event itself into a bad news.
Yes, it's just like that. If the casino represents the USA/economy, the shareholders of the casino are the average taxpayer, and the people getting the jackpots are the 1%. The casino has been making money for ten years, despite the expected 1% winning jackpots that are accounted for in the business plan. Now it turns out the 1% also make the rules for the casino and vastly increased the odds of a jackpot. How many jackpots can a year handle before the casino is in financial trouble? If only there were someone in an important position with vast knowledge about bankrupting casinos.
Yes, it's just like that. If the casino represents the USA/economy, the shareholders of the casino are the average taxpayer, and the people getting the jackpots are the 1%. The casino has been making money for ten years, despite the expected 1% winning jackpots that are accounted for in the business plan. Now it turns out the 1% also make the rules for the casino and vastly increased the odds of a jackpot. How many jackpots can a year handle before the casino is in financial trouble? If only there were someone in an important position with vast knowledge about bankrupting casinos.