Members was warned for disingenous posting
Again, you are completely and utterly missing the point. It is irrelevant that the armor set provides the same armor statistic across gender in the game. That is not the point. You conveniently leave out this part of the post you keep going back to;
" In a game where you can choose your gender like Skyrim, it annoys me when the armors for females aren't nearly as protective as the male version. If you are female and equip the ancient nord armor, the chestplate completely disappears. Most of the other armors change shape upon picking them up, sprouting boob plates, or in the case of the vampire armor, adjusting to provide a boob window."
The criticism is that the same armor set when worn by female characters sprout boob plates or otherwise change shape to exaggeratedly accentuate the female form. The criticism is that a lot of female armor is 'unrealistic' in the sense that there is a disconnect between their visual design and the actual protection they (would) provide whereas that disconnect is not present for most male armor. None of your claims negate any part of those criticisms.
Yeah, I just edited back in and bolded the context of the entire post. He didn't talk about the female form, he talked about protection.
Also "there is a disconnect between their visual design and the actual protection they (would) provide"
And what is this disconnect based on? The real world? So argument is realism...