The idea isn't Joe Redneck is gonna stand up to a military that spends $650b a year, the idea is that Joe Redneck or Liberal Larry can keep local politicians in check by being armed. And its not a weird theory, its been shown to be effective time and time again in recent history.
Just 4 years ago Cliven Bundy and his armed militia friends made the Dept of Interior stand down from seizing his cattle, then there was the incident in Oregon where armed militia holed up in some wildlife refuge building for a few months. By contrast any non violent protest - ICE protests, Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, etc - get the citizens arrested within a matter of hours or days.
The most famous examples of course that are now part of federal government DNA are the Waco and Ruby Ridge incidents which resulted in many deaths including children when the FBI stormed armed militia/cult groups. After that its been more or less federal policy to de-escalate those kind of situations rather than go in guns blazing, but only in the cases when the targets are heavily armed.
The exception people might say is what happens if a minority, Muslim, etc armed militia resisted the government but since the Black Panther days (when the feds were more than willing to execute everyone involved) it hasn't really come up yet.
The US's world view is really something else. How are people able to completely and knowingly ignore all the shooting/violence reports and comparisons with other countries while still finding excuses to carry their precious guns in 2018.I will play devils advocate and say that by taking guns away you are technically giving even more power to the police in this country. That being said, I still am down for banning anything that isn't a pistol, and slapping huge mental health checks on any sort of weapon purchase
Any other rights you don't like? Free speech? States rights? Protection from unlawful search and seizure?
The 2nd amendment was specifically written to protect the people from those in power who may have such flippant views of our other rights as you do of the 2nd.
My point is that you will never have a politician that is able to flick their fingers and ban all guns. The point of the push for banning rifles is that it is a huge first step. Our country is steeped in gun culture, we need to dig away at it slowly to make any sort of progress.The US's world view is really something else. How are people able to completely and knowingly ignore all the shooting/violence reports and comparisons with other countries while still finding excuses to carry their precious guns in 2018.
First, "technically giving more power to the police". It's the point of the police being "given power" to act in the name of public law. Whether a specific law is needed or useful is a whole other discussion, same as proper qualification of police members. These are not problems you solve with "well, give everyone else guns, too!", but with sincere observation, reevaluation and reorganisation of police staff. This is a huge problem in the US, too, but it's not within the context of prevention of mass shootings and the question of gun legislation, if you want to have a real talk about it. If you own a rifle, how does this take away power from the police/the state, and if you don't, how does it give "them" more power, except in the context of literally killing police officers or making them unpredictably scared of the general populace, giving them more reason to shoot first, ask questions later, because anyone might be armed?
Banning everything but a pistol: Why do people keep making this weird assumption that rifles are bad, pistols are completely fine? Yes, you can technically kill even more people with a rifle, but yo, what kind of view on things is it to think "Pistols are fine, you can only kill about 5-6 people per minute with this"? Yes, if you ban rifles you should ban all guns. And yes, if you ban all guns, it wouldn't hurt to ban combat-class knives, swords and other deadly weapons that solely exist for killing and hurting either, especially but not limited to public areas and events. It's a thing other countries do, actually.
Checks for health, mental health, psychological issues should be the absolute MINIMUM, like the absolute basic groundwork for allowing deadly weapons in civilians' hands.
Given what happened in the last few years alone, I lost all hope the US will ever change this world view. Too many parties, finances, politics and private interests rest in standards hold up by the gun industry. People who could change something are quite literally too scared of backlash and/or too egoistical when it comes to their own, mostly financial interests to change anything. No politician would agree to "simply ban guns", and they'll have a shitton of excuses every single time, while essentially still saying "well I'd help if I could, but I don't wanna".
But why? Quite literally, what is stopping Congress to execute a gun ban right now, of not immense fear of voter loss, sponsoring loss and the seemingly more important role of "but it's always been like this"?My point is that you will never have a politician that is able to flick their fingers and ban all guns. The point of the push for banning rifles is that it is a huge first step. Our country is steeped in gun culture, we need to dig away at it slowly to make any sort of progress.
For one, Bundy and his crew were not feuding with the local government. As you point out, (ironically right after you state it's about keeping local politicians in check) he was actually dealing with the feds.
But more importantly, they were fucking white and actually friends with the local law enforcement. If you really think that BLM would be better off arming their protests, then I don't know what to tell you. You're naive and should really look at the state of the country closer.
Also the person who shot up the gay bar in town was a confused Muslim who is rumored to have gone mad over his religion versus his sexuality. This absolutely does not excuse the guns in our country though, of that we both agree
The members of Congress would never go for it. You need to change who's in power, and even then it could never be instantaneous. Trust me, I would love it to be as wellBut why? Quite literally, what is stopping Congress to execute a gun ban right now, of not immense fear of voter loss, sponsoring loss and the seemingly more important role of "but it's always been like this"?
This is one of the major underlying issues of all America's problems.Say it with me:
AMERICA ISN'T SPECIAL.
Other societies work just fine with sane gun laws. "American exceptionalism" is a cancer that is literally killing Americans.
I don't even I understand what the hell you are trying to pull here, especially when Libanon is a country that seperates religion from the state.Not gonna argue anymore, kind of hilarious to me that you actually think dumb rednecks are as bad as actual torture of lgbtq individuals. Also the person who shot up the gay bar in town was a confused Muslim who is rumored to have gone mad over his religion versus his sexuality. This absolutely does not excuse the guns in our country though, of that we both agree
Yes, I actually do. Most of these mass shootings are done by white males, that one he mentioned wasn't so I made a distinction, especially since it directly correlated to the type of lgbtq hate you see in Lebanon.You seem like a real piece of work mate. What does that have to do with anything that is being discussed here?
Do you mention the religion of all the white men that go on shooting sprees across the US? Or only this one example?
Not even sure how that relates to Lebanon as I think only 54% of the population are Muslim so what is it you want to say?
This is a terrible event, wishing all those effected by this all the best.
As an Australian, it is still crazy to me how so many people think it is more important to have toys or deterrents for a unlikely government taking over than it is to save lifes now.
Any other rights you don't like? Free speech? States rights? Protection from unlawful search and seizure?
The 2nd amendment was specifically written to protect the people from those in power who may have such flippant views of our other rights as you do of the 2nd.
What are you on about? What part of my post set you off?Ow fuck off. You dont need the second amendement for that. You see what the cost of your fetish is? You bettet make fucking sure you are right.
This hits me kind of hard, together with bataclan in Paris, these are now both my favorite hobbies that have been targeted. Damn.. i was already looking over my shoulder at concerts..
What you do have is rampant political murder, mistreatment of women and lgbtq individuals, and religious murder. If we are going to talk mentally deranged, we have to address Lebanon's "Anal inspections" performed on suspected homosexual men up until about 2012
I don't even I understand what the hell you are trying to pull here, especially when Libanon is a country that seperates religion from the state.
Edit: I still don't understand how the fuck that guy who shot up the bar in the US is supposed to be linked to Libanon.
Maybe we're gonna get his magnum opus and we'll all be shocked when he 'owns the libs' here and schools us on the Constitution.
Yes, I actually do. Most of these mass shootings are done by white males, that one he mentioned wasn't so I made a distinction, especially since it directly correlated to the type of lgbtq hate you see in Lebanon.
wrong quote man, sorry.
You do realise that guns are useless against the government, yeah?Any other rights you don't like? Free speech? States rights? Protection from unlawful search and seizure?
The 2nd amendment was specifically written to protect the people from those in power who may have such flippant views of our other rights as you do of the 2nd.
What kind of gun ban? A blanket ban on all guns? The 2nd Amendment is stopping that. It quite literally says " The right to bear arms shall not be infringed". The whole thing needs to be repealed and Congress alone can't do that. You need 3/4ths of all state houses across the country to repeal and we will never have that.But why? Quite literally, what is stopping Congress to execute a gun ban right now, of not immense fear of voter loss, sponsoring loss and the seemingly more important role of "but it's always been like this"?
Apparently you have no clue what "pot calling the kettle black" meansMooch seems shocked or surprised that someone from Lebanon dare critique people or policies in the US; as if only he or Americans are entitled to sit stop their pedestal and cast judgement on all nations.
I have a feeling he is an alt. Low posts, only coming out to spew this bullshit.Mooch seems shocked or surprised that someone from Lebanon dare critique people or policies in the US; as if only he or Americans are entitled to sit stop their pedestal and cast judgement on all nations.
What you do have is rampant political murder, mistreatment of women and lgbtq individuals, and religious murder. If we are going to talk mentally deranged, we have to address Lebanon's "Anal inspections" performed on suspected homosexual men up until about 2012
Ah yes, Lebanon is a famous bastion for freedom of sexuality, my mistakeStop right here, first Mateen was from Afghanistan not Lebanon, second he didn't even know it was a gay bar, and he swore allegiance to ISIS, now unless Lebanon is run by ISIS hellbent on eradicating LGBT people I don't see how you can compare Lebanon to ISIS. Your entire correlation is bullshit, even tho Lebanon is an ME country it is vastly more open to LGBT people than the rest of the region, it is considered a hub for Arab LGBT tourism and our courts recently deemed same sex relations not illegal, but hey we share the same hate as ISIS.
You seem to be massively ill informed about my country to say the least.
It also says "well regulated militia" but that part seems to be ignored.What kind of gun ban? A blanket ban on all guns? The 2nd Amendment is stopping that. It quite literally says " The right to bear arms shall not be infringed". The whole thing needs to be repealed and Congress alone can't do that. You need 3/4ths of all state houses across the country to repeal and we will never have that.
He was comparing the society of both countries, you guys are acting like I pulled the comparison out of my assThis kind of whatbaboutism doesn't help, people being murdered because guns are freely available has nothing to do with homophobia by another countries governement.
My, what a limited line of thinking you have.Apparently ou have know clue what "pot calling the kettle black" means
Isn't that 'the Americas' on the left? There is no America, there's North and South America.
He was comparing the society of both countries, you guys are acting like I pulled the comparison out of my ass
Never once did I compare them to ISIS, stop spewing literal liesYou literally compared Lebanon which fought ISIS and suffered from horrific suicide car bomb attacks, has gay bars, women who can wear whatever the fuck they want, legal brothels and doesn't prosecute drug users to ISIS itself.
So yes I would say you're pulling info out your ass.
Yeah real sad that we have to talk about how to solve this gun issue...Prayers to the victims and their families. Sad this thread has turned into this predictable political debate.....
Why else would you bring up the gay bar shooter when talking about Lebanon?Never once did I compare them to ISIS, stop spewing literal lies
It depends, there is such thing as "America" in Spanish, Japanese, French, Italian, German, etc.:Isn't that 'the Americas' on the left? There is no America, there's North and South America.
Saying America for the US seems very common.
Never once did I compare them to ISIS, stop spewing literal lies
Yes, I actually do. Most of these mass shootings are done by white males, that one he mentioned wasn't so I made a distinction, especially since it directly correlated to the type of lgbtq hate you see in Lebanon.
He brought it up and I was replying. People still get arrested and targeted for being gay in Lebanon, the shooter in the bar had been seen there multiple times by staff before the incident, and clearly knew it was a gay bar. I lived in Orlando at the time.Why else would you bring up the gay bar shooter when talking about Lebanon?
That's not me saying that Lebanon is ISIS backed, I was comparing barbaric treatment of the lgbtq community, if you're fine with that treatment than fuck youYou said:
You're insinuating that an ISIS affiliate killing 50+ shooting up a gay bar in Florida correlates to the type of LGBTQ hate you see in Lebanon, stop backpedaling.
Well, literally people use The Americas, because I just did and I knew the term because I've heard others use it.It depends, there is such thing as "America" in Spanish, Japanese, French, Italian, German, etc.:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/América
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アメリカ州
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amérique
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/America
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerika
Actually, no one else uses "The Americas".
Why shouldn't it? When's the right time for debate?Prayers to the victims and their families. Sad this thread has turned into this predictable political debate.....