• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Platy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
27,703
Brazil
I'm trans and I feel this entire thing is a tad silly. Transphobia means 'A fear or hatred of transgender people', and the CDPR comment is neither fearful or hateful. It's a derpy meme/comment and nothing else. There's no malice to it. I mean sure, some people use it as a means to be offensive, but it's certainly not the majority. And it's certainly not how I perceive CDPR to have used it. I think people should just calm down. There's no point raging over such harmless comments. Honestly, getting so outraged just hurts trans people like me. So many folks are just rolling their eyes at this anger, and it reflects poorly on people struggling with their gender identity. It just makes us look weak. According to polls, the acceptance of LGBT folk is going down, and while it's easy to blame it on the current administration, there needs to be some self reflection to see that this stuff isn't helping. People are just exhausted by the outrage of the week, especially in cases where what's creating the anger is far from being 'that' bad. This stuff pushes people away from our cause to find acceptance. It's just making us look like whiny and emotionally unhinged individuals. And making us look weak is not what we should be doing. Save the rage for things that are actually hurtful/harmful.

Hello, my name is platy, I am also trans and you have ... issues.

Focusing on the dictionary definition of transphobia is not only a transphobic 101 tactic but also stupid if you as a trans person probably knows that lots of shitty things that happens to people who are trans (or at least not insanely privileged people) cannot be exactly define as fear or hatred. Disgust, bad information, a simple "not believing our identity is real because religion". Neither of these enter the "hatred" or fear and yet, are SUPER in the transphobia umbrella.

The majority of people use it as malice against us. You might think you are "not like the other girls" but they are still thinking about you the same way they think about me when they think it is hilarious to joke about how some people wanted to use diferent pronoums.
YOUR EXISTENCE hurts trans people like you. For those people, trans people EXISTING hurts trans people like you.
The same people who rolls their eyes in anger is the same that rolled to Kaytlin Jenner and will roll to EVERY OTHER TRANS PEOPLE, don't matter how Joane Crow she or you look to them.

Language is important. People have to understand that. And by people I include you on it because I saw that you support lots of things that goes 100% against us in your twitter. The "things that are actually harmfull hurtfull" kind

Brain scans of trans folk show differences much more in line with the gender they identify as. Depending on a person's identity some of these differences are a thinner subcortical area, thinner cortical regions in the right hemisphere, and a larger/smaller hypothalamus.

Often transgendered people use the expression a "man trapped in a woman's body" (and vice-versa) and in many ways that's true. But sadly we don't have the body of the gender we identify as and with that comes limitations.

If you are implying trans women have a mental illness than this quote only implies that ALL WOMEN have a mental illness. But having a healthy brain is not a mental illness, no matter what body it is in.
 

Datajoy

use of an alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
12,081
Angola / Zaire border region.
And if I set up a student organization that excluded black people that would be ok too? What about Asian people? How does that seem ok to you?
No that wouldn't be the same. Black people and Asian people are marginalized groups in our society. People of color have a history of being excluded, dehumanized, and denied basic rights based on the fact that they are people of color. And the oppressors in all of these situations were white people. White people excluding people of color from society and positions of power and success has a long history in the country and needs to be challenged. People of color coming together to form groups and networks of support that exclude white people is totally fine.
 

Atrophis

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,172
I suspect the reason Snorwich doesn't want to answer my question is because she made her thoughts known already in her Daily Caller article:

http://dailycaller.com/2018/05/12/linguistic-minefield-of-politically-correct-tranny/

http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/07/crazy-dumb-gay-people-want-no-cops-at-pride-parades/

"There is no longer any reason to be proud of the gay community."
"Due to the infiltration of groups like "Black Lives Matter," law enforcement nationwide has been villainized by the gay community."
"As a massive flaming faggot myself, this new reality makes me uncomfortable."

"When tribalistic queers start telling straight people they're not welcome in the festivities, the reaction will be a defensive one, and they'll start to look down on gay people from the walls they have constructed.

The biggest threats to LGBT acceptance are other gay people."

Ok.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/23/the-radical-lefts-inclusiveness-is-obviously-a-dumb-lie/

"Take for example gaming. Never mind the fact that being a gamer basically makes you a Nazi in today's leftist lexicon — though it's hard to keep track of who isn't one in their eyes at this point. People who work in the gaming journalism medium are actively slandering the people they supposedly write for."

Huh, someone studied real hard at the Milo Yiannopoulos school of identity politics.
 

Snorwich0747

Banned
Mar 22, 2018
19
Fuck off with this bullshit.

Your post reeks of the "gays for Trump" or Black for Trump" or "Muslims for Trump" mentality. Idiots that put other people from their minority groups under the buss because of some stupid mentality.

Trans people want to be treated normally without being threatened or hated for existing.

If you get banned (and you will), you 100% deserve it.

I didn't vote for Trump. And why should I be banned? I've been replying to everyone with respect. It's you all who keep calling me a "self loather", an "idiot", "stupid", etc...

I came in here with a well reasoned response in which I did my best to make it the least offensive as possible. I shared my view as to why I thought the joke wasn't transphobic, and it's you all who jumped down my throat and bullied me.
 

hanmik

Editor/Writer at Popaco.dk
Verified
Oct 26, 2017
1,436
I didn't vote for Trump. And why should I be banned? I've been replying to everyone with respect. It's you all who keep calling me a "self loather", an "idiot", "stupid", etc...

I came in here with a well reasoned response in which I did my best to make it the least offensive as possible. I shared my view as to why I thought the joke wasn't transphobic, and it's you all who jumped down my throat and bullied me.

dailycaller? isn't that the site Ian Miles Cheong writes for..?
 

Eumi

Member
Nov 3, 2017
3,518
I didn't vote for Trump. And why should I be banned? I've been replying to everyone with respect. It's you all who keep calling me a "self loather", an "idiot", "stupid", etc...

I came in here with a well reasoned response in which I did my best to make it the least offensive as possible. I shared my view as to why I thought the joke wasn't transphobic, and it's you all who jumped down my throat and bullied me.
You came into this thread to call the trans posters of this forum weak.

That is not respectful. It is incredibly offensive.
 

FeistyBoots

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,506
Southern California
I suspect the reason Snorwich doesn't want to answer my question is because she made her thoughts known already in her Daily Caller article:

http://dailycaller.com/2018/05/12/linguistic-minefield-of-politically-correct-tranny/

Which contains stuff like this:










Now, I made a serious mistake earlier in the thread by playing detective, and I do apologize for that. But I can't let this shit slide. I'll still accept punishment if the mods don't like it, though.

Ho

Ly

SHIT
 
Oct 27, 2017
39,148
I didn't vote for Trump. And why should I be banned? I've been replying to everyone with respect. It's you all who keep calling me a "self loather", an "idiot", "stupid", etc...

I came in here with a well reasoned response in which I did my best to make it the least offensive as possible. I shared my view as to why I thought the joke wasn't transphobic, and it's you all who jumped down my throat and bullied me.
This is what you understood from my post?

You are literally doing the same thing as the minority groups who voted for Trump. Defending a known racist and bigot for some reason. You are doing the samething when you start your post with "as a trans person" then go on to justify the tweet because it might not affect you that much. This fuck you got mine mentality is the reason so many Trans folks keep getting bullied.

People called you out for your bullshit and if this is "bullyng" then you haven't been bullied as much as the other people. And you will be banned, all the shit you have been spewing isn't acceptable here.
 

Mr Punished

Member
Oct 27, 2017
597
OUTER HEAVEN
I didn't vote for Trump. And why should I be banned? I've been replying to everyone with respect. It's you all who keep calling me a "self loather", an "idiot", "stupid", etc...

I came in here with a well reasoned response in which I did my best to make it the least offensive as possible. I shared my view as to why I thought the joke wasn't transphobic, and it's you all who jumped down my throat and bullied me.
The way you choose to peddle your horseshit is irrelevant. Your abhorrent views are so misguided and rotten that there's no debate to be had. You argue in support of continued transphobia and thankfully that type of disgusting shit is moderated here. Good luck, and goodbye.
 

ckareset

Attempted to circumvent ban with an alt account
Banned
Feb 2, 2018
4,977
I receive a lot of respect. Occasionally i get replies that are transphobic and tell me I'm unatural, but quite a few times I've explained the role of DNA Methylation in the gendered development of the brain and I've gotten literal far right transphobic dudes to admit that I'm proobably right. My articles are angry and abrasive but I'm not actually a bad person and if you actually read the ideas I'm trying to portray they're not all that terrible.

I'm a trans person, I believe I'm a woman and I believe all trans people should be respected as the gender they identify as. As people are doing in this thread. It's easy to take a post where I say "I'm not 100% female" and spin it as some form of self loathing. But read my words. Not being 100% female doesn't mean I'm not female, I just hate the linguistic trap that it sets. I have masculine attributes and a male genome. I'm a *trans* woman. My brain is certainly female, but my body isn't. That's why I wrote my brain is a developmental anomaly. I'm not saying trans people are mentally ill as someone above is trying to portray me as. I'm writing that my brain is a developmental "error" (not used offensively) caused by a malfunction of DNMT while in the womb.
I was mainly talking about from your bosses and contemporaries.

I mean if you have to clarify they are "all terrible" lol, there is some level of awareness.

As for the science of it all, well I mean you keep posting it but I dont exactly see your reasoning for doing so. What is the argument against it?
 

Deleted member 41271

User requested account closure
Banned
Mar 21, 2018
2,258
I promise you it's much more likely they were simply repeating a joke that they didnt think was offensive

No, it's actually far more likely they are transphobes making transphobic jokes knowingly. The chance for anyone to a)not know what the "joke" was about and b)to not research it as a social media person are next to none.

My articles are angry and abrasive but I'm not actually a bad person and if you actually read the ideas I'm trying to portray they're not all that terrible.

No, actually your ideas are generally terrible, but then you're somebody peddling the "never mind the fact that being a gamer basically makes you a Nazi in today's leftist lexicon" gamergate nonsense and other gamergate bullshit, spread homophobia, gleefully participate in and defend transphobia tells me all I need. Of course, since you're writing for a white supremacist audience, you also peddle racism, as seen with your comments on BLM.

Your own words are enough to indeed see that you're a terrible person peddling terrible ideas. You can't whine about being "bullied" for having your own ideas criticized. Ideas that are FAR more vitriolic and insulting than anything anyone said about you here, by the way.

This is you talking about non-binary people:

bald-headed, hairy-arm-pitted, pink-dyed-pubic-haired, non-binary friends (a gender identity, or lack thereof, by the way, that has no scientific backing)

Your first post here? Calling other transpeople "weak". You're a gross, vile bully. No amount of crocodile tears will change that.
 

aerie

wonky
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
8,036
Excluding anyone from anything based purely on sexual preference, gender or race is disgusting.
Its a good thing that isn't what happened then, people who work as police were welcome to attend off duty or out of uniform.
Instead of cherry picking quotes why don't you add in the full context. I said "there isn't a reason to be proud" because I found it highly offensive that people were trying to stop lgbt friendly cops from attending pride. Excluding gay people from an event isn't something to be happy about.
They were not preventing LGBT+ people from attending, they were preventing police as an organization from attending. You are being very disingenuous.
 
Last edited:

Platy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
27,703
Brazil
I didn't vote for Trump. And why should I be banned? I've been replying to everyone with respect. It's you all who keep calling me a "self loather", an "idiot", "stupid", etc...

I came in here with a well reasoned response in which I did my best to make it the least offensive as possible. I shared my view as to why I thought the joke wasn't transphobic, and it's you all who jumped down my throat and bullied me.

no, you LITERALLY downplayed transphobia. Like you LITERALLY said that there are more important matters for the trans comunity to deal with. That is the reason half of the bans on this thread exist.
 

Waddle Dee

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
3,725
California
I'm a bit late to the commenting party but the initial joke really disgusted me, and the apology was a complete non-apology. It was a huge bummer in terms of timing, for me personally--literally a few hours before I posted about how I felt non-binary best described me and was greeted with such validation that it sucked to wake up to this shitty joke a few hours later and have to remember that the real world super sucks when it comes to gender.

I'm sorry you gotta deal with all this bullshit after an accomplishment like that. The closest I can relate to anything like this is being on the autism spectrum and being treated as a lesser human for it but that honestly can't even compare to the amount of hate people such as yourself have to deal with on a daily basis. I don't understand how even so many so-called progressive people don't seem to care. It's like people don't actually know what being a progressive should be about and still have these toxic hangups that attached to them when they were younger. If you're a progressive person, you don't "pick" who you want to support. You're supposed to treat everyone in need as a human being.

Replying to this to just remind people that while mods may be away or asleep, the report button exists to report users and their dumb or disingenuous or hateful or self loathing claims, whatever and whomever they may be.

Yeah, this is definitely an important reminder. Mods can't police every thread all day long so make sure you use the report button. It exists for a reason! Me and other users from the previous thread about this topic used it a ton and we got a good deal of trash perma-banned so it does work!
 

Muad'dib

Banned
Jun 7, 2018
1,253
While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.
 

Seda

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,070
I'm trans and I feel this entire thing is a tad silly. Transphobia means 'A fear or hatred of transgender people', and the CDPR comment is neither fearful or hateful. It's a derpy meme/comment and nothing else. There's no malice to it. I mean sure, some people use it as a means to be offensive, but it's certainly not the majority. And it's certainly not how I perceive CDPR to have used it. I think people should just calm down. There's no point raging over such harmless comments. Honestly, getting so outraged just hurts trans people like me. So many folks are just rolling their eyes at this anger, and it reflects poorly on people struggling with their gender identity. It just makes us look weak. According to polls, the acceptance of LGBT folk is going down, and while it's easy to blame it on the current administration, there needs to be some self reflection to see that this stuff isn't helping. People are just exhausted by the outrage of the week, especially in cases where what's creating the anger is far from being 'that' bad. This stuff pushes people away from our cause to find acceptance. It's just making us look like whiny and emotionally unhinged individuals. And making us look weak is not what we should be doing. Save the rage for things that are actually hurtful/harmful.

Let me know if I am reading this right. Your argument is that trans people should just accept normalization of the prejudice against them because confrontation is uncomfortable?
 

ckareset

Attempted to circumvent ban with an alt account
Banned
Feb 2, 2018
4,977
No, it's actually far more likely they are transphobes making transphobic jokes knowingly. The chance for anyone to a)not know what the "joke" was about and b)to not research it as a social media person are next to none.
I think you need to step outside your bubble because this is just not true. They knew about the joke, they just didnt mentally reason why it's offensive. Hell I didnt do that until I thought about it from this thread. And you can clearly see the majority of people still dont understand why.

And a social media person has little to no training on the matter. If they did, they wouldnt have made the joke in the first place
 

Eumi

Member
Nov 3, 2017
3,518
While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.
You don't think calling trans people weak is inflammatory?
 

Platy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
27,703
Brazil
While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.

It has EVERYTHING inflamatory.

1) It starts saying it is not transphobic which was proved 4 times just in the OP
2) It goes to victim blame lgbt for transphobia in current society
3) It goes back to say it is not "that bad" therefore implying it has transphobia
4) say trans people should have to focus on "more important issues" which again, makes the transphobia as a smaller one.

Her posts would be instabanned by a site's code or something it didn't started with "i am trans"
 
Last edited:
Oct 25, 2017
6,927
While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.
That user, without the words "I am trans" in their initial post, peddled the same banned sentiments in this thread, and then when discovered they were a daily caller contributor, doubled down, and so that outside stuff seems relevant. A post that starts "I am black" and then spews anti-black rhetoric, complains about Black people being the cause of their oppression because they are constantly outraged, would be met with the same skepticism or treatment. If there's any weirdness going on, it's that after several reports, a mod jumps into the conversation and the user isn't banned yet.
 

Deleted member 41271

User requested account closure
Banned
Mar 21, 2018
2,258
While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.

"offsite drama" is one hell of an euphemism for hatespeech and demagogery. And "dogpiling" is an hell of an euphemism for "replying to continuous posts in a forum".
 

aiswyda

Member
Aug 11, 2018
3,093
I'm sorry you gotta deal with all this bullshit after an accomplishment like that...

Thank you! I have a very nice support system which helps a lot!

While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.

Her original post referred to trans individuals upset by this as "weak" and "whiny and emotionally unhinged". She also blamed trans folx for rising homophobia and transphobia. I think that might constitute being inflammatory.
 

Waddle Dee

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
3,725
California
While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.

No. People do not have to put up with hateful, idiotic posters that insult entire groups of people.

Outing people like Snorwich0747 is a good thing as these kinds of posters, who oppress innocent people and display hurtful and hateful views, don't belong on a site that should ideally feel like a safe space (relatively in comparison to many other places on the web, at least) for people that are victims of abuse and hate.

I don't care how it's done. If someone can find evidence that a poster is a sack of crap, even if it's outside the forum, then it's something worth showing to people on the site.
 
Oct 25, 2017
12,018
While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.

Do you wanna take a moment to assign the one person who's allowed to respond to them so as to avoid a dogpile?
 

Mr Punished

Member
Oct 27, 2017
597
OUTER HEAVEN
While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.
I hate that sort of stuff as well. But holy fuck, that shit is so toxic that I can't blame people for bringing it up. It saved people from wasting their time with someone so disingenuous.
 

Boy Wander

Alt Account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
2,126
UK
Personally I would have had no idea that this phrase is considered transphobic at all. But I would expect a PR/marketing dept to be all over that type of thing given the sensitivity of it.
 

Shark

Member
Oct 28, 2017
8,126
Raleigh, NC
While I vehemently disagree with Snorwich0747 viewpoint on this matter, I would just like to say that I find the tactic of bringing offsite drama, dog piling on her and trying to bait/report her to get banned is childishly stupid, her post which I disagree with was nothing inflammatory to begin with.
No, they've done enough to bury themselves just with what they've posted on here. If you're writing politically charged articles containing some of the stuff that has been quoted on places like The Daily Caller and using your Twitter handle on here as a username, that is going to follow you.
 

FeistyBoots

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,506
Southern California
I'm a bit late to the commenting party but the initial joke really disgusted me, and the apology was a complete non-apology. It was a huge bummer in terms of timing, for me personally--literally a few hours before I posted about how I felt non-binary best described me and was greeted with such validation that it sucked to wake up to this shitty joke a few hours later and have to remember that the real world super sucks when it comes to gender.

Take heart in one thing, you woke up still valid! :)
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,659
Hull, England
You're effectively asking that we take the battered housewife's mindset and forgive our aggressors for "minor" transgressions,
Exactly, if you forgive minor transgressions they will only feel they can get away with it more and then move on to far more serious things like assault and murder, which of course already happens, but I could see it getting much worse. These types of insults needs to be stamped out right now.
 

itshutton

Member
Nov 1, 2017
546
People are just ignorant. Unfortunately, we like to think we are progressive in the 21st century, but we have a long long way to go.
 

Deleted member 41271

User requested account closure
Banned
Mar 21, 2018
2,258
I think you need to step outside your bubble because this is just not true. They knew about the joke, they just didnt mentally reason why it's offensive. Hell I didnt do that until I thought about it from this thread. And you can clearly see the majority of people still dont understand why.

And a social media person has little to no training on the matter. If they did, they wouldnt have made the joke in the first place

You definitely need to step outside your bubble, my dude. I know social media interns - fresh from university - that know to always google memes they use if they don't know what they are about. It's one of the first things they learn. yes, really. It's kinda basic internet. That they made the joke anyway shows they thought marketing by transphobia was acceptable, or were fine with transphobia and thought it wasn't a problem.

This is doubly so true, because this isn't the first time someone in the overall company went into trouble for meme jokes of this kind. It's embarassing to see you make claims about marketing/social media platform usage by companies that even start ups know are nonsense.


I know, you're desperate to defend them and grasp at any straw to excuse them. Problem is: It just doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
 

Muad'dib

Banned
Jun 7, 2018
1,253
It has EVERYTHING inflamatory.

1) It starts saying it is not transphobic which was proved 4 times just in the OP
2) It goes to victim blame lgbt for transphobia in current society
3) It goes back to say it is not "that bad" therefore implying it has transphobia
4) say trans people should have to focus on "more important issues" which again, makes the transphobia as a smaller one.

His posts would be instabanned by a site's code or something it didn't started with "i am trans"

No. People do not have to put up with hateful, idiotic posters that insult entire groups of people.

Outing people like Snorwich0747 is a good thing as these kinds of posters, who oppress innocent people and display hurtful and hateful views, don't belong on a site that should ideally feel like a safe space (relatively in comparison to many other places on the web, at least) for people that are victims of abuse and hate.

I don't care how it's done. If someone can find evidence that a poster is a sack of crap, even if it's outside the forum, then it's something worth showing to people on the site.

"offsite drama" is one hell of an euphemism for hatespeech and demagogery. And "dogpiling" is an hell of an euphemism for "replying to continuous posts in a forum".

I'm all for debating and counter debating and snorwich has so far maintained civility in face of hostility, while some have counter argued in good faith some are just actively encouraging the use of the report button hoping a mod is nearby to drop the banhammer, I find that tactic just childish, this isn't some drive by shitpost being shared.
 

ckareset

Attempted to circumvent ban with an alt account
Banned
Feb 2, 2018
4,977
You definitely need to step outside your bubble, my dude. I know social media interns - fresh from university - that know to always google memes they use if they don't know what they are about. It's one of the first things they learn. yes, really. It's kinda basic internet. That they made the joke anyway shows they thought marketing by transphobia was acceptable, or were fine with transphobia and thought it wasn't a problem.

This is doubly so true, because this isn't the first time someone in the overall company went into trouble for meme jokes of this kind. It's embarassing to see you make claims about marketing/social media platform usage by companies that even start ups know are nonsense.


I know, you're desperate to defend them and grasp at any straw to excuse them. Problem is: It just doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

You think of these choices

1) Some intern made a joke he didnt think was offensive
2) They planned this controversy for marketing

That 2 is more likely?
 

Platy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
27,703
Brazil
I'm all for debating and counter debating and snorwich has so far maintained civility in face of hostility, while some have counter argued in good faith some are just actively encouraging the use of the report button hoping a mod is nearby to drop the banhammer, I find that tactic just childish, this isn't some drive by shitpost being shared.

Which is why I only quoted this person's actual posts

That being said, I am sad the actual message is "Series of posts rationalizing and excusing bigotry" and not "seriouysly wtf where do I even begin" or something xD
 

Mendrox

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
9,439
I'm all for debating and counter debating and snorwich has so far maintained civility in face of hostility, while some have counter argued in good faith some are just actively encouraging the use of the report button hoping a mod is nearby to drop the banhammer, I find that tactic just childish, this isn't some drive by shitpost being shared.

I can see why people wanted her banned, but she was really civil. Reading through her Twitter though I can see why many other people hate her for it because she undermines a problem which is big for many of them and not as big for her.

Well she is banned now, but I also think that stalking her like this and everything was also disgusting.
 

aiswyda

Member
Aug 11, 2018
3,093

FeistyBoots

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,506
Southern California
I'm all for debating and counter debating and snorwich has so far maintained civility in face of hostility, while some have counter argued in good faith some are just actively encouraging the use of the report button hoping a mod is nearby to drop the banhammer, I find that tactic just childish, this isn't some drive by shitpost being shared.

Total prima facie bullshit. She was toxic from jump. Her views are hateful garbage that ooze toxins when she performs her oh-so-innocent act. We can see right the fuck through her.
 

Amiibola

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
2,255
I'm starting to think CDPR are not what they want us to think. Sure, they have their way with words and are fast to react when they shit the bed, but still they shat the bed twice, and both times with a common denominator.

I think Era should start to think that maybe CDPR is not as sacred as they seem to be now

And their apology tweet read like "its just a joke, breh"
 

BDS

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,845
Fuck civility, fuck the idea that typing out big long essays on bigotry is somehow more acceptable than drivebys. Fuck that user, they deserved to be banned and I hope they run back to their Nazi shithole site and type a big article about the meanies on ResetERA drove her away. Find another hill to die on, Jesus. That piece of shit is not worth defending. More shitty "allies" show their faces, I guess.
 

Muad'dib

Banned
Jun 7, 2018
1,253
I can see why people wanted her banned, but she was really civil. Reading through her Twitter though I can see why many other people hate her for it because she undermines a problem which is big for many of them and not as big for her.

Well she is banned now, but I also think that stalking her like this and everything was also disgusting.

Yeah I found her views regressive, an uncle Tom attitude for Transgendered persons, but I just disagree with the tactic used to force a ban here.

It's pointless now since people got what they want and Snorwich is banned, so whatever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.