• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Xaszatm

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,903
No. If that is what the company decides to do that is their choice, but no one should be demanding someone be fired because they were tone deaf, especially without intending malice.



Except I disagree. It was an apology and I see it as such.



Then I don't what to tell you. I can't live life that way. Sometimes saying sorry is saying sorry. And we move on. If they do it again, then that's different. You want blood, then fine. You love your life that way.

But yes it is.



No. Not end of story. Again, that's up to the company in the end, but I don't think nor call for someone to be fired for a lack of judgement. What will firing this person accomplish? Nothing. It's rheir livelihood but if just want punishment, then rock on. I don't see that as a way to live one's life. They said sorry.

And you may not feel that's an apology, but this is where we disagree.

Except this isn't even the first time they have done this. How many times are we to give a person repeated chances, especially since people here were out for blood when it was a women mocking a forum poster. But now, twice the twitter feed has done something insensitive at best and issued nothing more than a non-apology and people are falling on their swords to protect them.
 

Rehevkor

Member
Oct 31, 2017
123
Then you should familiarize yourself with the ERA community a bit better before presuming they aren't speaking for themselves on here.

?

I literally said that it just means that you are ok with them receiving your money and that, to me, that's a sign of poor integrity. Those are the standards I hold myself to.

I completely agree with you that there are many others ways to fight this shit and I might even say that "voting with your wallet" is entirely futile in terms of changing companies. To me, it's more a matter of showing solidarity with people I care about instead of leaving them to fend for themselves. If that isn't more important to you than playing a specific video game, OK I guess? I'm not saying that's unacceptable, just don't expect any pats on the back from me specifically, that's all.

I'm not leaving anyone to "fend for themselves" by buying a videogame, and doing so says nothing whatsoever about my integrity. You might want to take a closer look at where your own money goes if it truly means that much to you. You're in real moral trouble if you pay taxes to any government.
 

Icemonk191

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,814
ERA: This woman who is employed by Arenanet got angry at a man on her personal Twitter account. Her behavior shames her entire company, and she must be immediately terminated and blacklisted from the industry to save face

Also ERA: The comments on the official CDProjekt Twitter account, made by a CDProjekt employee while on the clock, do not actually represent anyone working at CDProjekt and no consequences should befall the company as a result

It's amazing how low some people will sink to when you say anything even remotely negative about a game they like.

Like for some people here it's Games>Humans.

(Also what a shit response from CDPR. Fuck out of here with that "sorry you were offended" bullshit.)
 

SaberVS7

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,234
User Banned (3 Days): Inflammatory generalisations. Spreading misinformation.
So, any bets here on how many more "Polish game studio makes shitty statements" threads we'll need before people finally start to realize that this is Pattern, not Coincidence?

Because I would have thought by this point people would start to put two and two together after Destructive (Hatred) and Warhorse (Kingdome Come). Both Polish.

Bollocks like this (and the other stuff shit that came out of the other two infamous Polish studios) is Mainstream Thought in Poland. You guys need to pay attention more, there's a reason that Poland is considered the toxic Problem-Child of the EU.

The only thing seperating CD Projekt from Destructive and Warhorse is that CD Projekt has (had?) a much more strict and internationally-minded PR-Team making sure that noone of importance gets seen wearing/brandishing White Nationalist paraphernalia or saying anything too overtly controversial - Ultimately at the end of the day CD Projekt is still a Polish studio full of a lot of fucked up Polish sociopolitical-views.
 

StuBurns

Self Requested Ban
Banned
Nov 12, 2017
7,273
What I don't get is what benefit firing the person or a more 'aggressively apologetic' further statement would serve. You'd know it's not sincere, since it wasn't the gut reaction. It would just be caving to pressure. It wouldn't be a display of a certain stance or sensibility, it would just be to silence people. How is that preferable?
 

Xaszatm

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,903
I'm not leaving anyone to "fend for themselves" by buying a videogame, and doing so says nothing whatsoever about my integrity. You might want to take a closer look at where your own money goes if it truly means that much to you. You're in real moral trouble if you pay taxes to any government.

Ok, your trolling has been annoying at best but now you're just using such tired troll techniques that I don't feel like actually explaining why what you just said is wrong when I can just use a comic that does it for me:

cad7pdaxprBfd2YcgaRKxVHBWqVakVHw3mMLNi12fGU.jpg
 

Jecht

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,650
What I don't get is what benefit firing the person or a more 'aggressively apologetic' further statement would serve. You'd know it's not sincere, since it wasn't the gut reaction. It would just be caving to pressure. It wouldn't be a display of a certain stance or sensibility, it would just be to silence people. How is that preferable?

Wouldn't serve anything. The damage is done now.
 

MattWilsonCSS

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,349
The unfortunate problem with talking on a forum is it's difficult to provide the entire context of what I'm trying to communicate.

I think you're right to feel hurt, angry and anxious over the way society is acting and I believe the natural reaction is to fight all signs of discrimination aggressively. What I saw earlier in this thread was people putting others who didn't understand "the big deal" in their place. My belief is there are far more people who don't understand than do. Many of these people who don't "get it"...can get it.

It's not about giving bullies a platform. I'm not saying to ignore them. There are leaders of these movements that understand all of it but out of selfishness and hatred, lead the charge against those who are different. There are others who don't have strong opinions who simply don't understand because they've never met someone LGBTA and only watch Fox News.

Point is I want to know who those ignorant people are and try to educate them. The bullies who are lost causes...I'm good with smashing them.
The problem there is that hateful people will pose as "confused" people "just asking questions". This happened all the time when GamerGate was at its peak. And you can go into post histories and see that people haven't posted here for months. There are no doubt subreddits that send people here whenever big issues like this come up, in an attempt to shift the overton window. It's only by taking a hardline stance that we can keep our inclusive atmosphere.
 

Eumi

Member
Nov 3, 2017
3,518
What I don't get is what benefit firing the person or a more 'aggressively apologetic' further statement would serve. You'd know it's not sincere, since it wasn't the gut reaction. It would just be caving to pressure. It wouldn't be a display of a certain stance or sensibility, it would just be to silence people. How is that preferable?
Transphobes should be silenced.

Seeing that transphobia gets you fired is an effective way to do that.
 

Giever

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,756
ERA: This woman who is employed by Arenanet got angry at a man on her personal Twitter account. Her behavior shames her entire company, and she must be immediately terminated and blacklisted from the industry to save face

Also ERA: The comments on the official CDProjekt Twitter account, made by a CDProjekt employee while on the clock, do not actually represent anyone working at CDProjekt and no consequences should befall the company as a result
Regarding the bolded, was any remotely significant amount of people saying this? I don't recall severe sentiments like that, and I think you can make a comparison for the sake of pointing out presumed hypocrisy without resorting to hyperbole (but maybe I'm wrong and a bunch of people were saying this).
 

Mesoian

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 28, 2017
26,426


Trivial things? Like making fun of trans people just for being trans people? And then she claims that people who support these "jokes" are only giving more fuel to the people who complain about them... It's pretty clear who she's blaming here.

Fuck off.

HAHA
FUEL IT she says.

Amazing that letting people fucking live is something that requires to constantly be fueled.

Fuck this lady. The only people making excuses by this kind of behavior are the ones trying to downplay it because they know they do it themselves and don't want the clapback to eventually hit them.


Yeah you fucked up.

Sit down, log off.

I'm not leaving anyone to "fend for themselves" by buying a videogame, and doing so says nothing whatsoever about my integrity. You might want to take a closer look at where your own money goes if it truly means that much to you. You're in real moral trouble if you pay taxes to any government.

Translation: I don't care, and I will be EXTREMELY vocal about how much I don't care.
 

MattWilsonCSS

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,349
Regarding the bolded, was any remotely significant amount of people saying this? I don't recall severe sentiments like that, and I think you can make a comparison for the sake of pointing out presumed hypocrisy without resorting to hyperbole (but maybe I'm wrong and a bunch of people were saying this).
Ohhh boy were there ever!! The Price threads were a shitshow full of people angry at her.
 

Deleted member 5491

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,249
Well, this discussion would be more informative if trans people spoke for themselves.
You mean the trans people who already get mocked and harrassed fucking everywhere and are scared of being open about it?
Those trans people that are called PC and thin skinned because a game is more important than a human being?
Trans people that are a minority, that have the highest rate of suicide and need the help and acceptance of non trans people so that they are not treated like shit and human 2nd class?

Sorry but I don't need to be part of the minority to stand against all this toxic bullshit and it has been discusses for YEARS what these "jokes" are and mean.
 

Kinsei

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
20,519
HAHA
FUEL IT she says.

Amazing that letting people fucking live is something that requires to constantly be fueled.

Fuck this lady. The only people making excuses by this kind of behavior are the ones trying to downplay it because they know they do it themselves and don't want the clapback to eventually hit them.
She was referring to the people complaining that there was an apology in the first place. I agree it's hard to tell in that tweet, but she cleared it up in future ones.
 

StuBurns

Self Requested Ban
Banned
Nov 12, 2017
7,273
Transphobes should be silenced.

Seeing that transphobia gets you fired is an effective way to do that.
I meant it would be to satiate the people who are vocally upset about it, silence the complaints, not silence the perpetrator.

But I see your point, certainly. In terms of a net positive, I can see it, but in terms of people's relation to CDPR, I don't see that it should logically matter. Regardless of any further moves they make, the initial response was soft enough that their stance seems pretty transparent, and any further developments will be a result of purely PR fallout.
 

Otnopolit

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,590
How hard is it to say "Sorry about the tweet earlier! We will work to do better in the future"

Short, simple, to the point. There is no need for the sorry you were offended crap and over complication.

Yeah, the apology is junk and does not validate the number of people that weren't happy seeing that come from what is seen as an ambitious developer.
 

Billy Palmer

Member
Nov 4, 2017
125
London
Not impressed by the official follow up. How about 'sorry for what we tweeted' rather than 'sorry to those offended'.

You can say the original tweet is the result of the poor-judgement/transphobia of one individual on the marketing team and does not reflect the devs. But then, I have to ask you, how many other companies would you make such an allowance for?

Also have to point out, CD Projekt were already viewed as being 'pro-gamer' (I'd say more pro-consumer but meh).
I can already see the cogs turning in gamergaters: 'Pro-gamer CD Projekt make HILARIOUS JOKE and SJW get #TRIGGERED.
Reality: someone makes transphobic joke on company twitter, company issues milk-toast response, those aware of why the remark is transphobic criticise company.
 

Deleted member 1656

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,474
So-Cal
I fucking hate that joke and I see it all the time on gaming subreddits. I wish I saw that tweet earlier before I was feeling jazzed about Cyberpunk at Gamescom, but I try not to follow marketing accounts.

The apology is so weak.
 

entrydenied

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
7,557
Regarding the bolded, was any remotely significant amount of people saying this? I don't recall severe sentiments like that, and I think you can make a comparison for the sake of pointing out presumed hypocrisy without resorting to hyperbole (but maybe I'm wrong and a bunch of people were saying this).

A lot of people said she is on twitter with her company name attached to the profile. So whatever she says is representative of her company and hence she needs to be fired.

I mean if it is revealed that the Cyberpunk account is run by a woman, you will suddenly see people coming in to say that she should be fired. We've already seen a wave of people asking us to move on after the non-apology and very few people actually wanting the Cyberpunk person to be fired.
 

k1x-

Member
Oct 28, 2017
199
So, any bets here on how many more "Polish game studio makes shitty statements" threads we'll need before people finally start to realize that this is Pattern, not Coincidence?

Because I would have thought by this point people would start to put two and two together after Destructive (Hatred) and Warhorse (Kingdome Come). Both Polish.

Bollocks like this (and the other stuff shit that came out of the other two infamous Polish studios) is Mainstream Thought in Poland. You guys need to pay attention more, there's a reason that Poland is considered the toxic Problem-Child of the EU.

The only thing seperating CD Projekt from Destructive and Warhorse is that CD Projekt has (had?) a much more strict and internationally-minded PR-Team making sure that noone of importance gets seen wearing/brandishing White Nationalist paraphernalia or saying anything too overtly controversial - Ultimately at the end of the day CD Projekt is still a Polish studio full of a lot of fucked up Polish sociopolitical-views.

Sorry, but Warhorse Studios is located in the Czech Republic. Different country.
 

Clix

Banned
Are you transgender or do you have close friends that are transgender? Maybe then you'd realize why it's not enough, because unless the "joke" doesn't affect you I can't think of any other way that you could "move on" and think that it's enough, and doubling down on that.

No, I'm not transgender but as a minority I have been on the receiving end of a "joke" that I found insensitive or tone deaf. And I have called them on it and most have apologized and I accept it when they do so. I don't demand for blood after that. Now if it's not enough, then don't support the company. No need to call out for someone to be fired.

Except this isn't even the first time they have done this. How many times are we to give a person repeated chances, especially since people here were out for blood when it was a women mocking a forum poster. But now, twice the twitter feed has done something insensitive at best and issued nothing more than a non-apology and people are falling on their swords to protect them.

And I didn't think it was right for them to go out for blood then either. The company had every right to dismiss her of course and I can understand why they did even if I would have taken a different approach in the matter (warning her to keep her social media as professional as possible and an apology for example). But I also heavily disagreed with people going out for blood on her. That was also not right.
 

Deleted member 42055

User requested account closure
Banned
Apr 12, 2018
11,215
This thread started this morning and it's already 34 pages ( I'm on mobile) ?!? What happened here , I'm dreading going through this ...
 

OneBadMutha

Member
Nov 2, 2017
6,059
The problem there is that hateful people will pose as "confused" people "just asking questions". This happened all the time when GamerGate was at its peak. And you can go into post histories and see that people haven't posted here for months. There are no doubt subreddits that send people here whenever big issues like this come up, in an attempt to shift the overton window. It's only by taking a hardline stance that we can keep our inclusive atmosphere.

I feel like that's letting the terrorist win. People who know what they're doing pretend to be confused and hope you smash all confused people. They want collateral damage because collateral damage helps them recruit. They want to be able to make the case that white straight people are being victimized by "SJW". They hope by saying that, people get angry and start swinging wildly. They hope Antifa shows up and acts violently at their rallies.

It's like when Islamic terrorist hide amongst innocent poor people. The US bombed non violent Muslims and created new terrorist. We said it was necessary collateral damage. It helped the terrorist make their case and keep recruiting off of it.

My point is don't bomb people (figuratively or literally) based on justified assumptions.

This isn't choosing confused people causing harm over LGBTA being victimized. This is about trying to reduce the amount of harm caused to discriminated groups long term.
 

T.Slothrop

Member
Jan 21, 2018
176
I think you have to come at the game (not the tweet) from the perspective that this is a foreign product. It will be reflective of a viewpoint that, though superficially similar to an American's is profoundly different to our own.

Poland's taking a turn to the hard right politically. That the developer may have many staff members in line with this is not at all surprising. That some of their viewpoints might spill over into their marketing communications is also not surprising. That they aren't particularly bother by this is even less surprising still. Even though this is an international game, politics are in profoundly local and I think they're making the game they, as Polish people, want to play and not necessarily one we'd want to play.

I'm going to buy it and probably love it, but caveated heavily in my own mind with all the slightly distasteful stuff probably peppered throughout. And that's true of 90% of my media consumption.
 

Billy Palmer

Member
Nov 4, 2017
125
London
ERA: This woman who is employed by Arenanet got angry at a man on her personal Twitter account. Her behavior shames her entire company, and she must be immediately terminated and blacklisted from the industry to save face

Also ERA: The comments on the official CDProjekt Twitter account, made by a CDProjekt employee while on the clock, do not actually represent anyone working at CDProjekt and no consequences should befall the company as a result

Lol.

I'll say it again: how many other companies would people make this allowance for?
 

subpar spatula

Refuses to Wash his Ass
Member
Oct 26, 2017
22,080
I don't remember anyone saying she should be blacklisted, but I didn't participate exhaustively in the thread, so ok! Seems beyond excessive.
No one really said anything about blacklisting, but the majority of it was men arguing over her professionalism and how that COULD NOT BE IGNORED.

I don't know the crossover between the two but it's pretty obvious that a lot of folks don't care, and they make their bias against women and minorities subletly or outright known.
 

MP!

Member
Oct 30, 2017
5,198
Las Vegas
User Banned (1 Month): Downplaying transphobia. History of dismissive behaviour in sensitive discussions.
I didn't think this was very insensitive
just my thought
 

deepFlaw

Knights of Favonius World Tour '21
Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,493
I feel like that's letting the terrorist win. People who know what they're doing pretend to be confused and hope you smash all confused people. They want collateral damage because collateral damage helps them recruit. They want to be able to make the case that white straight people are being victimized by "SJW". They hope by saying that, people get angry and start swinging wildly. They hope Antifa shows up and acts violently at their rallies.

It's like when Islamic terrorist hide amongst innocent poor people. The US bombed non violent Muslims and created new terrorist. We said it was necessary collateral damage. It helped the terrorist make their case and keep recruiting off of it.

My point is don't bomb people (figuratively or literally) based on justified assumptions.

This isn't choosing confused people causing harm over LGBTA being victimized. This is about trying to reduce the amount of harm caused to discriminated groups long term.

If you waste your time treating people acting in bad faith like they mean well, they win that way too.

They want you to accidentally hit people who meant well so that they can point at that and go "look how mean they are!", but... they do that even when you hit people who didn't mean well. And if you don't hit anyone, you waste your time and energy having to patiently explain every little thing while garbage flourishes, preventing you from building communities where it's not tolerated to begin with, and if you ever so slightly step out of line and get frustrated they're still going to point and shout rather than give you the same extreme benefit of the doubt.

At some point you can't just play nice for the sake of it not being fuel for bad people to make a fuss about, because they're going to find ways to make that fuel no matter what.
 

Fletcher

Member
Oct 25, 2017
747
Love past CDPR games and was/am greatly looking forward to Cyberpunk, but this has left a horrible taste in my mouth with them. The initial tweet was enough to make me question who they are as a company and who they have working for them. Their response leads me to believe their company holds these shitty ideas and views and not just a single person. I mean how can you put that statement out to reflect your entire company unless you really don't give a shit.

Super bummed by this.
 

Gotdatmoney

Member
Oct 28, 2017
14,487
The half baked apology is a tactic. Companies don't do this mistakenly. People in general don't do this mistakenly. If someone is actually sorry they don't say "sorry if you were offended" lol.
 

MattWilsonCSS

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,349
People who know what they're doing pretend to be confused and hope you smash all confused people.
I don't disagree with your points on recruitment but I do disagree with this premise. Generally 'just asking questions' is a way to slide into a discussion and then muddy the waters... it's not about collateral damage but trying to obfuscate the discussion. For example, in threads about harassment of women, someone would come in and say "I don't know much about this, but didn't Zoe Quinn do X and Y?" based off of a gamergate talking point, in an effort to derail the thread and "they're no angel" the victims.

You saw it in here last night a little bit with some posters saying "isn't this just a meme making fun of SJWs?" where the intent is to try and find middle ground with the moderates on here who may not have an opinion yet, and get them to think of this situation as trivial or "outrage culture". Intentionally trying to ret-con the origin of the meme and redefine it so as to belittle the concerns of the actual targets of the joke, and get people on their side in the process.
 

Pelagic II

Banned
Jan 8, 2018
215
I don't think CDProjectRed intentionally meant anything hurtful. They just used an internet meme without fully understand it.

Still a stupid thing to do, but not the end of the world honestly.
I have full confidence in Cyberpunk 2077 and the story of the game. Can't wait for an amazing Cyberpunk experience!
 

Gestault

Member
Oct 26, 2017
13,356
It's honestly not that hard:

"Earlier today we replied to a tweet with a joke we meant playfully, but was actually insulting to the trans community. What's not what we wanted, and it's not how we feel. We removed it once we realized how it came out."

"The tweet brought more baggage than we realized, and we need to apologize for that. The team doesn't support bigoted attitudes toward the transgender community."

"A tweet we sent out earlier (now removed) paraphrased a joke made in bad taste, and the team will hold itself to higher standards in the future. It wasn't our intention, and the community deserves an apology."

"An earlier joke meant playfully landed like a brick, and it came across hostile to the trans community. We've erased it, and we apologize. We'll do our best never let it happen in the future."
 
Last edited:

Akronis

Prophet of Regret - Lizard Daddy
Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,450
Not impressed by the official follow up. How about 'sorry for what we tweeted' rather than 'sorry to those offended'.

You can say the original tweet is the result of the poor-judgement/transphobia of one individual on the marketing team and does not reflect the devs. But then, I have to ask you, how many other companies would you make such an allowance for?

Also have to point out, CD Projekt were already viewed as being 'pro-gamer' (I'd say more pro-consumer but meh).
I can already see the cogs turning in gamergaters: 'Pro-gamer CD Projekt make HILARIOUS JOKE and SJW get #TRIGGERED.
Reality: someone makes transphobic joke on company twitter, company issues milk-toast response, those aware of why the remark is transphobic criticise company.

I agree with you, but it's not milk-toast it's milquetoast :P
 

BDS

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,845
Status
Not open for further replies.