I take the reaction of someone who is actually offended more serious than of somebody who is hypothetically offended.
You do know that transgender people have been posting on this thread right?
I take the reaction of someone who is actually offended more serious than of somebody who is hypothetically offended.
No. If that is what the company decides to do that is their choice, but no one should be demanding someone be fired because they were tone deaf, especially without intending malice.
Except I disagree. It was an apology and I see it as such.
Then I don't what to tell you. I can't live life that way. Sometimes saying sorry is saying sorry. And we move on. If they do it again, then that's different. You want blood, then fine. You love your life that way.
But yes it is.
No. Not end of story. Again, that's up to the company in the end, but I don't think nor call for someone to be fired for a lack of judgement. What will firing this person accomplish? Nothing. It's rheir livelihood but if just want punishment, then rock on. I don't see that as a way to live one's life. They said sorry.
And you may not feel that's an apology, but this is where we disagree.
You do know that transgender people have been posting on this thread right?
Then you should familiarize yourself with the ERA community a bit better before presuming they aren't speaking for themselves on here.
?
I literally said that it just means that you are ok with them receiving your money and that, to me, that's a sign of poor integrity. Those are the standards I hold myself to.
I completely agree with you that there are many others ways to fight this shit and I might even say that "voting with your wallet" is entirely futile in terms of changing companies. To me, it's more a matter of showing solidarity with people I care about instead of leaving them to fend for themselves. If that isn't more important to you than playing a specific video game, OK I guess? I'm not saying that's unacceptable, just don't expect any pats on the back from me specifically, that's all.
ERA: This woman who is employed by Arenanet got angry at a man on her personal Twitter account. Her behavior shames her entire company, and she must be immediately terminated and blacklisted from the industry to save face
Also ERA: The comments on the official CDProjekt Twitter account, made by a CDProjekt employee while on the clock, do not actually represent anyone working at CDProjekt and no consequences should befall the company as a result
I'm not leaving anyone to "fend for themselves" by buying a videogame, and doing so says nothing whatsoever about my integrity. You might want to take a closer look at where your own money goes if it truly means that much to you. You're in real moral trouble if you pay taxes to any government.
If I've learned one thing from this administration, it's that no one should be fired for the stupid shit that gets tweeted on the internet.
What I don't get is what benefit firing the person or a more 'aggressively apologetic' further statement would serve. You'd know it's not sincere, since it wasn't the gut reaction. It would just be caving to pressure. It wouldn't be a display of a certain stance or sensibility, it would just be to silence people. How is that preferable?
The problem there is that hateful people will pose as "confused" people "just asking questions". This happened all the time when GamerGate was at its peak. And you can go into post histories and see that people haven't posted here for months. There are no doubt subreddits that send people here whenever big issues like this come up, in an attempt to shift the overton window. It's only by taking a hardline stance that we can keep our inclusive atmosphere.The unfortunate problem with talking on a forum is it's difficult to provide the entire context of what I'm trying to communicate.
I think you're right to feel hurt, angry and anxious over the way society is acting and I believe the natural reaction is to fight all signs of discrimination aggressively. What I saw earlier in this thread was people putting others who didn't understand "the big deal" in their place. My belief is there are far more people who don't understand than do. Many of these people who don't "get it"...can get it.
It's not about giving bullies a platform. I'm not saying to ignore them. There are leaders of these movements that understand all of it but out of selfishness and hatred, lead the charge against those who are different. There are others who don't have strong opinions who simply don't understand because they've never met someone LGBTA and only watch Fox News.
Point is I want to know who those ignorant people are and try to educate them. The bullies who are lost causes...I'm good with smashing them.
Transphobes should be silenced.What I don't get is what benefit firing the person or a more 'aggressively apologetic' further statement would serve. You'd know it's not sincere, since it wasn't the gut reaction. It would just be caving to pressure. It wouldn't be a display of a certain stance or sensibility, it would just be to silence people. How is that preferable?
Regarding the bolded, was any remotely significant amount of people saying this? I don't recall severe sentiments like that, and I think you can make a comparison for the sake of pointing out presumed hypocrisy without resorting to hyperbole (but maybe I'm wrong and a bunch of people were saying this).ERA: This woman who is employed by Arenanet got angry at a man on her personal Twitter account. Her behavior shames her entire company, and she must be immediately terminated and blacklisted from the industry to save face
Also ERA: The comments on the official CDProjekt Twitter account, made by a CDProjekt employee while on the clock, do not actually represent anyone working at CDProjekt and no consequences should befall the company as a result
Trivial things? Like making fun of trans people just for being trans people? And then she claims that people who support these "jokes" are only giving more fuel to the people who complain about them... It's pretty clear who she's blaming here.
Fuck off.
I'm not leaving anyone to "fend for themselves" by buying a videogame, and doing so says nothing whatsoever about my integrity. You might want to take a closer look at where your own money goes if it truly means that much to you. You're in real moral trouble if you pay taxes to any government.
Ohhh boy were there ever!! The Price threads were a shitshow full of people angry at her.Regarding the bolded, was any remotely significant amount of people saying this? I don't recall severe sentiments like that, and I think you can make a comparison for the sake of pointing out presumed hypocrisy without resorting to hyperbole (but maybe I'm wrong and a bunch of people were saying this).
No, they're Czech.
Well in this case it's literally someone's job to be good at tweeting and saying things that welcome people, not drive them away. I don't care if they get fired but it makes good business sense.If I've learned one thing from this administration, it's that no one should be fired for the stupid shit that gets tweeted on the internet.
You mean the trans people who already get mocked and harrassed fucking everywhere and are scared of being open about it?Well, this discussion would be more informative if trans people spoke for themselves.
She was referring to the people complaining that there was an apology in the first place. I agree it's hard to tell in that tweet, but she cleared it up in future ones.HAHA
FUEL IT she says.
Amazing that letting people fucking live is something that requires to constantly be fueled.
Fuck this lady. The only people making excuses by this kind of behavior are the ones trying to downplay it because they know they do it themselves and don't want the clapback to eventually hit them.
I meant it would be to satiate the people who are vocally upset about it, silence the complaints, not silence the perpetrator.Transphobes should be silenced.
Seeing that transphobia gets you fired is an effective way to do that.
I don't remember anyone saying she should be blacklisted, but I didn't participate exhaustively in the thread, so ok! Seems beyond excessive.Ohhh boy were there ever!! The Price threads were a shitshow full of people angry at her.
How hard is it to say "Sorry about the tweet earlier! We will work to do better in the future"
Short, simple, to the point. There is no need for the sorry you were offended crap and over complication.
Regarding the bolded, was any remotely significant amount of people saying this? I don't recall severe sentiments like that, and I think you can make a comparison for the sake of pointing out presumed hypocrisy without resorting to hyperbole (but maybe I'm wrong and a bunch of people were saying this).
So, any bets here on how many more "Polish game studio makes shitty statements" threads we'll need before people finally start to realize that this is Pattern, not Coincidence?
Because I would have thought by this point people would start to put two and two together after Destructive (Hatred) and Warhorse (Kingdome Come). Both Polish.
Bollocks like this (and the other stuff shit that came out of the other two infamous Polish studios) is Mainstream Thought in Poland. You guys need to pay attention more, there's a reason that Poland is considered the toxic Problem-Child of the EU.
The only thing seperating CD Projekt from Destructive and Warhorse is that CD Projekt has (had?) a much more strict and internationally-minded PR-Team making sure that noone of importance gets seen wearing/brandishing White Nationalist paraphernalia or saying anything too overtly controversial - Ultimately at the end of the day CD Projekt is still a Polish studio full of a lot of fucked up Polish sociopolitical-views.
Are you transgender or do you have close friends that are transgender? Maybe then you'd realize why it's not enough, because unless the "joke" doesn't affect you I can't think of any other way that you could "move on" and think that it's enough, and doubling down on that.
Except this isn't even the first time they have done this. How many times are we to give a person repeated chances, especially since people here were out for blood when it was a women mocking a forum poster. But now, twice the twitter feed has done something insensitive at best and issued nothing more than a non-apology and people are falling on their swords to protect them.
Right click --> Save asOk, your trolling has been annoying at best but now you're just using such tired troll techniques that I don't feel like actually explaining why what you just said is wrong when I can just use a comic that does it for me:
The problem there is that hateful people will pose as "confused" people "just asking questions". This happened all the time when GamerGate was at its peak. And you can go into post histories and see that people haven't posted here for months. There are no doubt subreddits that send people here whenever big issues like this come up, in an attempt to shift the overton window. It's only by taking a hardline stance that we can keep our inclusive atmosphere.
ERA: This woman who is employed by Arenanet got angry at a man on her personal Twitter account. Her behavior shames her entire company, and she must be immediately terminated and blacklisted from the industry to save face
Also ERA: The comments on the official CDProjekt Twitter account, made by a CDProjekt employee while on the clock, do not actually represent anyone working at CDProjekt and no consequences should befall the company as a result
No one really said anything about blacklisting, but the majority of it was men arguing over her professionalism and how that COULD NOT BE IGNORED.I don't remember anyone saying she should be blacklisted, but I didn't participate exhaustively in the thread, so ok! Seems beyond excessive.
This thread started this morning and it's already 34 pages ( I'm on mobile) ?!? What happened here , I'm dreading going through this ...
I thought it was completely insensitive.
Well you are wrong. Read the OP and learn why it was insensitive.
I feel like that's letting the terrorist win. People who know what they're doing pretend to be confused and hope you smash all confused people. They want collateral damage because collateral damage helps them recruit. They want to be able to make the case that white straight people are being victimized by "SJW". They hope by saying that, people get angry and start swinging wildly. They hope Antifa shows up and acts violently at their rallies.
It's like when Islamic terrorist hide amongst innocent poor people. The US bombed non violent Muslims and created new terrorist. We said it was necessary collateral damage. It helped the terrorist make their case and keep recruiting off of it.
My point is don't bomb people (figuratively or literally) based on justified assumptions.
This isn't choosing confused people causing harm over LGBTA being victimized. This is about trying to reduce the amount of harm caused to discriminated groups long term.
I don't disagree with your points on recruitment but I do disagree with this premise. Generally 'just asking questions' is a way to slide into a discussion and then muddy the waters... it's not about collateral damage but trying to obfuscate the discussion. For example, in threads about harassment of women, someone would come in and say "I don't know much about this, but didn't Zoe Quinn do X and Y?" based off of a gamergate talking point, in an effort to derail the thread and "they're no angel" the victims.People who know what they're doing pretend to be confused and hope you smash all confused people.
Well, they didn't.If someone is actually sorry they don't say "sorry if you were offended" lol.
You don't think jokes mocking trans people are insensitive?
Not impressed by the official follow up. How about 'sorry for what we tweeted' rather than 'sorry to those offended'.
You can say the original tweet is the result of the poor-judgement/transphobia of one individual on the marketing team and does not reflect the devs. But then, I have to ask you, how many other companies would you make such an allowance for?
Also have to point out, CD Projekt were already viewed as being 'pro-gamer' (I'd say more pro-consumer but meh).
I can already see the cogs turning in gamergaters: 'Pro-gamer CD Projekt make HILARIOUS JOKE and SJW get #TRIGGERED.
Reality: someone makes transphobic joke on company twitter, company issues milk-toast response, those aware of why the remark is transphobic criticise company.
I don't think CDProjectRed intentionally meant anything hurtful. They just used an internet meme without fully understand it.
I can't think of literally any context where an "assuming my gender" joke makes sense except as an insult to trans people. The comment literally makes no sense without that context and is very obviously intended as a transphobic insult.