always took it as a commentary at how times have changed, both in gender roles and sexuality/gender identity.I'm pretty sure it's supposed to read "I want more [information, coverage], Guys!" Note the important comma.
It does, yea. If you think it's not punching down at transgender people, then whats the punchline otherwise?
Should give this a read then. CDPR has come a very long way since their first game in terms of sexuality.Disagree with the bolded. Which would be the ones analogous to the topic on hand here.
but how many days it took you to write that? apologizing is so hard!!
No, even this, while well intended, can implicitly push accountability to the offended party. "Considered to be transphobic" implies it's not transphobic, you just think it is. The proper verbiage would be "Earlier today we tweeted a meme that is transphobic". Don't beat around the bush with it, accept it, own it, apologize.
People that are "shy" and that rarely feel the need to comment, suddenly feel the urge when it comes to trans related topics. It's totally a coincidence though.
Jokes don't get a pass at bigotry, racism, or transphobia just because they are jokes. Jokes absolutely can cause harm and do. It's quite obvious the trans community on ERA were offended by it and are not laughing. Who's finding it funny exactly?It's not there. It just mentions it was a joke and talks about a meme. What was the context was it an attack or a joke. Most jokes are going to offend someone but don't mean harm. A verbal attack meant to harm is a different story. Sorry, i'm not familiar with the meme and the op doesn't provide much context
I know they have improved relative to where they were, that does not have to mean I find where they are now acceptable.Should give this a read then. CDPR has come a very long way since their first game in terms of sexuality.
A lot of the issues in TW3 are contextualized, and contextualized well, so fine, as problematic as they are, art shouldn't shy away from depicting problematic or taboo elements. I get that stuff. It's a part of the story they want to tell, and at least they don't glorify it.Well in Witcher 3 the oppressed would be the elves and dwarves and halflings, and also the sorceresses.
I mean the sorceresses get put on a fucking stake and burned depending on how the game goes.
It's that classic allegory stand in though where there are no actual POC etc - dunno about the homosexuality though.
Explain to me why the joke is funny.
Literally the only way to find it funny is to be a transphobic piece of shit who gets the context of trans people's gender identities and finds it ridiculous.
I love this post. You are a good personWhat the fuck did I miss? Out of morbid curiosity I had to go hunt down the two previous threads preceding this and what an absolute dumpster fire. Were it not for the sea of red banners and struck out usernames I would have had to check to see if I hadn't accidentally clicked on NeoGAF. And I think I'd rather drill a hole into my cranium than to actually go on GAF and see what the troglodytes over there are saying, though I can easily guess. I was expecting to see a good number of gaming side posters do the usual thing and immediately jump to defend the sanctity of one of their favourite video games developers, but I wasn't expecting the sort of graveyard it's turned out to be. It's also heartbreaking to see the responses of a good handful of transgender posters on this very board, because to say they're dismayed and disappointed is genuinely an understatement.
Absolute poor show, CDPR. I wanted to give you guys the benefit of the doubt, but you just make that increasingly difficult for me and for many others as the months go by. I wouldn't bat as much of an eyelid if it's just some dick responding in his own personal account and met with rebuke by CDPR themselves, but this shit was coming from the official Twitter account where presumably the person(s) in charge of their social media would be savvy enough to be able to read the room and understand basic context surrounding the very phrase put out in that particular word counter. As for that apology of theirs, what on earth? "Sorry you were offended" is the laziest, weakest, most insincere shit they could crank out. It displaces the blame onto the people who are rightfully upset by the joke and it displays little to no awareness on CDPR's part as to WHY their joke elicited the reaction it did. Goddamn. I'm seriously assessing whether I just drop GOG now and just not bother with any more of their products for the foreseeable future. I think I'll live without Cyberpunk 2077.
Fuck the "it's just a joke" defence. Comedy isn't on life support just because plenty of people rightfully take serious umbrage with jokes that deliberately punch down, mock and marginalise minority groups that already face endemic mockery and marginalisation in everyday society on multiple levels. I think any comedian worth their salt and who isn't a sociopathic prick recognises that else I'd justifiably boo them off the stage for making something like this the punchline of one of their routines.
And especially fuck the "everyone is so easily triggered/offended these days" response that I've had such an unfortunate time of seeing prop up again and again across these three threads and likely everywhere else on the internet, because Christ, it's apparently really hard to not be some empathy-lacking shell who can't see past their own nose and spare any thought for their fellow human beings who already face insidious everyday mockery and marginalisation. To think, I used to think like this. LGBTQ+ marginalisation and the assortment of jokes and dogwhistles that came with it? None of it affected me and I didn't immediately understand why offence was even caused. Because I lacked that crucial understanding and the sufficient empathy that only came after a period of introspection, growing up and listening, I didn't think the concerns of the LGBTQ+ community were valid.
"Sorry you were offended" literally blames the victim(s), it assumes that the victims are too thinskinned to take the joke, and they're apologizing on behalf of the victims for not finding the joke funny.
Well i honestly read the twitter picture posted by the OP and all i thought was they were just pointing out Ryan for assuming gender, didn't even see it as a joke. It wasn't till i read the rest of the post and googled it to realize that it was alluding to a meme against the transgender society. Guess that's some insight?I still don't understand what the joke would be to people supposedly unaware of context
Nah, a Miucin apology would have included them daring Twitter to find other instances of their transphobia.
I don't know. That's why I was asking for context on what the whole tweet was and if it was a joke or more of an attack. I'm not familiar with the meme at all.Jokes don't get a pass at bigotry, racism, or transphobia just because they are jokes. Jokes absolutely can cause harm and do. It's quite obvious the trans community on ERA were offended by it and are not laughing. Who's finding it funny exactly?
It probably helps seeing the tweet they're responding to.Thank god for the mod edit at the start explaining the context of the "joke", like can some good soul explain how the PR guy's tweet is a joke and how that not transphobic?
Like if you don't know it's transphobic how is this a joke?
Would you be saying the same thing if the joke had been at the expense of black people? Would that have been a teachable moment as well?I would just like to say - the whole world hasnt caught up. I am not making any excuses but that is just the matter of the case. The outrage (not sure how genuine) is kind of perplexing because how are persons to respond if they are genuinely ignorant or just dont share that viewpoint
It seems some here want them to go into crisis mode and put out a whole PR campaign to show that this is an isolated case and Project Red's devs dont hold any of these views so those persons can go back to fawning over their game.
The world is filled with many people that may hold different views and sometimes the content they produce, we love and we have to make the choice to still consume it or not. I dont think we can expect them to do mea culpa's (sp) until everyone is placated. If they are moved and want to then so be it but expecting that seems....
Yes it can be a teachable moment, maybe it will still be but I think some of the outrage is far out ahead of the incident and then the clean-up (if the apology was the end of it) so far.
I'll wait to see what happens further but at least I did learn something.
Thank you.What the fuck did I miss? Out of morbid curiosity I had to go hunt down the two previous threads preceding this and what an absolute dumpster fire. Were it not for the sea of red banners and struck out usernames I would have had to check to see if I hadn't accidentally clicked on NeoGAF. And I think I'd rather drill a hole into my cranium than to actually go on GAF and see what the troglodytes over there are saying, though I can easily guess. I was expecting to see a good number of gaming side posters do the usual thing and immediately jump to defend the sanctity of one of their favourite video games developers, but I wasn't expecting the sort of graveyard it's turned out to be. It's also heartbreaking to see the responses of a good handful of transgender posters on this very board, because to say they're dismayed and disappointed is genuinely an understatement.
Absolute poor show, CDPR. I wanted to give you guys the benefit of the doubt, but you just make that increasingly difficult for me and for many others as the months go by. I wouldn't bat as much of an eyelid if it's just some dick responding in his own personal account and met with rebuke by CDPR themselves, but this shit was coming from the official Twitter account where presumably the person(s) in charge of their social media would be savvy enough to be able to read the room and understand basic context surrounding the very phrase put out in that particular word counter. As for that apology of theirs, what on earth? "Sorry you were offended" is the laziest, weakest, most insincere shit they could crank out. It displaces the blame onto the people who are rightfully upset by the joke and it displays little to no awareness on CDPR's part as to WHY their joke elicited the reaction it did. Goddamn. I'm seriously assessing whether I just drop GOG now and just not bother with any more of their products for the foreseeable future. I think I'll live without Cyberpunk 2077.
Fuck the "it's just a joke" defence. Comedy isn't on life support just because plenty of people rightfully take serious umbrage with jokes that deliberately punch down, mock and marginalise minority groups that already face endemic mockery and marginalisation in everyday society on multiple levels. I think any comedian worth their salt and who isn't a sociopathic prick recognises that else I'd justifiably boo them off the stage for making something like this the punchline of one of their routines.
And especially fuck the "everyone is so easily triggered/offended these days" response that I've had such an unfortunate time of seeing prop up again and again across these three threads and likely everywhere else on the internet, because Christ, it's apparently really hard to not be some empathy-lacking shell who can't see past their own nose and spare any thought for their fellow human beings who already face insidious everyday mockery and marginalisation. To think, I used to think like this. LGBTQ+ marginalisation and the assortment of jokes and dogwhistles that came with it? None of it affected me and I didn't immediately understand why offence was even caused. Because I lacked that crucial understanding and the sufficient empathy that only came after a period of introspection, growing up and listening, I didn't think the concerns of the LGBTQ+ community were valid.
Honestly had no idea that was a transphobic term, I thought it was ridiculing SJW's as a whole.
Well the mods have done a fantastic job weeding out the grossness to eras creditConsidering like half the responses in this thread have been assholes making excuses for extremely obvious transphobia can we stop having ppl brag about how ERA is this bastion of progressiveness now?
It probably helps seeing the tweet they're responding to.
The person doesn't use a comma and the C2077 account decides to use the confluence of the grammar mistake plus the gender ambiguous appearance of the person in the image was the impetus of the tasteless joke. I can see this as them wanting to do a friendly ribbing on the guy. Problem is they fell back on an unoriginal, harmful joke.
The impression I'm getting from people still not seeing why this is a problem is that they lack that context.
I work in marketing and that's definitely not true of all companiesThe insistence that social media interns get the keys to the castle without prior approval is kind of wild. These companies usually have teams manning these large accounts. If this was their sad attempt at a "joke," it represents the company and I doubt it was just an intern making that choice. The non-apology doesn't help.
Honestly had no idea that was a transphobic term, I thought it was ridiculing SJW's as a whole.
It probably helps seeing the tweet they're responding to.
The person doesn't use a comma and the C2077 account decides to use the confluence of the grammar mistake plus the gender ambiguous appearance of the person in the image was the impetus of the tasteless joke. I can see this as them wanting to do a friendly ribbing on the guy. Problem is they fell back on an unoriginal, harmful joke.
The impression I'm getting from people still not seeing why this is a problem is that they lack that context.
What's an "SJW"?Honestly had no idea that was a transphobic term, I thought it was ridiculing SJW's as a whole.
Yeah, with a generic "Sorry you were offended" "apology".
Even if it's a joke ridiculing so called SJW, it's ridiculing them for people for standing up for the transgender community.Honestly had no idea that was a transphobic term, I thought it was ridiculing SJW's as a whole.
It's still beating around the bush. "Harming anyone". "Anyone"? No, there was a very specific group of people whom your tweet targeted, have the courage to apologize to them directly.I would say though everybody, and I'm not trying to invite a ban or anything, but I would say that while the apology isn't that great, a lot of people are focussing on the first sentence but not on the second:
"Harming anyone was never our intention"
Which I think balances it out slightly, person running the account may genuinely have not intended to cause offence (or maybe they did, who knows).
Not saying they didn't, because they did, and the apology is a bit crap, but it's not the worst apology I have seen.
There is some room for benefit of the doubt, but also understand the skepticism.
Unfortunately, this also simultaneously reinforces their "goodwill" with a very vocal, very large group of shitty people in the same fell swoop.
Honestly had no idea that was a transphobic term, I thought it was ridiculing SJW's as a whole.
"Sorry you were offended" literally blames the victim(s), it assumes that the victims are too thinskinned to take the joke, and they're apologizing on behalf of the victims for not finding the joke funny.
Trans people who put up with bigotry and discrimination on a daily basis, and had to wake up to seeing something like that from a creator of games they presumably might have loved?
The difference is that on this site it catches you a ban in short order, it's specifically baked into the TOS. We might have a load of sock accounts and trolls just waiting to shitpost and then boast about it elsewhere, you get those everywhere, but moderation is both fast and transparent.Considering like half the responses in this thread have been assholes making excuses for extremely obvious transphobia can we stop having ppl brag about how ERA is this bastion of progressiveness now?
Trans people..