Do we know the price of this?
How many people don't own any of them and want to buy all of them at once at full price though? I would have thought they'd price it to appeal to people who already own at least one of the games.
My Switch battery info and it being Pascal-based are the main misses. It happens.Nothing personal against Nate Drake (who is a moderator to boot) but as far as I remember he's had some things regarding the Switch very, very wrong back in the past (unless I am mixing him up with someone else, in which case I deeply apologize), and so I would take this with a huge grain of salt. Also, his sources could be speculating (or heard someone speculating). Then again it could of course also be true, but networking is what most were speculating before all this came up, so...
Ok, but why does that matter? Honest question. This will just give extra exposure to the serie. Its already released games just bundled together.- Too many DS re-releases on such a short time-frame;
- Launching the same day as DS Remastered on Switch and possibly even cheaper (for sure it will sell less now)
I too, am angry about this weird af decision by bamco. But you can't really think a platform will only thrive with the exclusive output of a single company do you? Quit that toxic mindset, third parties ARE welcome and more importantly, give the Switch an additional place in the market by playing them in handheld mode, no need to go any further than Fortnite.
I too, am angry about this weird af decision by bamco. But you can't really think a platform will only thrive with the exclusive output of a single company do you? Quit that toxic mindset, third parties ARE welcome and more importantly, give the Switch an additional place in the market by playing them in handheld mode, no need to go any further than Fortnite.
Ok but still, why releasing it the same day? it seems such a greedy move, and i'm sure it will impact DS Remastered sales. (how can you advertise both, people will ask themselves why buying it DS1 on Switch when you can have all 3 on one single package)
Ok but still, why releasing it the same day? it seems such a greedy move, and i'm sure it will impact DS Remastered sales. (how can you advertise both, people will ask themselves why buying it DS1 on Switch when you can have all 3 on one single package)
Ok but still, why releasing it the same day? it seems such a greedy move, and i'm sure it will impact DS Remastered sales. (how can you advertise both, people will ask themselves why buying it DS1 on Switch when you can have all 3 on one single package)
It's not a toxic mindset lol, it's just reality. Of course third parties are welcome on the platform, but Nintendo still isn't getting anywhere near the third party support that the other two are getting. They should be prepared to have a lineup that fills in those gaps and the third parties that want to come along for the ride are more than welcome.I too, am angry about this weird af decision by bamco. But you can't really think a platform will only thrive with the exclusive output of a single company do you? Quit that toxic mindset, third parties ARE welcome and more importantly, give the Switch an additional place in the market by playing them in handheld mode, no need to go any further than Fortnite.
I'm not sure this would do anything for Switch sales. If people want to play on the go, they'll get that version.
Why are people angry of this release? People are afraid that the Switch version will sell less?
My Switch battery info and it being Pascal-based are the main misses. It happens.
Personally I don't care if it sells less, but I have more incentive to pick up the Trilogy on another console. Namco Bandai has handled this release about as poorly as they possibly could and with the Trilogy available for a little more, I'll probably just get that now so I have everything on a single system, DLC, and that Steelbook.
You can't get shafted if the game doesn't exist on the system...huh. Switch owners getting shafted again, the other consoles get all games while they get DS1 only
Surely someone at Nintendo is making a phonecall right now and giving someone abuse? Bandai Namco are basically giving Switch owners the finger and asking them to suck on it.
Yeah, this.The people who want it on Switch and have waited this long likely want it for the portability/flexibility. They can get all the Souls games on PS4 or Xbox for this same price now if they wanted to, this changes nothing. Skyrim was available on everything and for much cheaper for years and that didn't stop the $60 Switch version from selling. It's a different audience. It's legitimately blowing my mind that people are getting so bent out of shape about this.
Maybe Bamco think Switch owners don't own other consoles and will buy whatever given to them.
Thats fair enough, but in that case it doesnt sound lik this is anything negative for you. You just have more options, and you choose to get the one that you feel fits your choice the best.Personally I don't care if it sells less, but I have more incentive to pick up the Trilogy on another console. Namco Bandai has handled this release about as poorly as they possibly could and with the Trilogy available for a little more, I'll probably just get that now so I have everything on a single system, DLC, and that Steelbook.
Doubtful. Nintendo is run by sensible business people, not irrationally angry console warriors.
My first thought when I read the title is "I thought this was already out."
Were the remasters sold separately and this is bundled in a single purchase?
Surely someone at Nintendo is making a phonecall right now and giving someone abuse? Bandai Namco are basically giving Switch owners the finger and asking them to suck on it.
Nintendo: We're pissed, Bandai Namco!!
Bandai Namco: We're developing Smash Bros Ultimate, Metroid Prime 4, and Ridge Racer 8 for you. Deal with it.
Nintendo: Ok.
huh, this is like the time EA released mass effect 3 for the wiiu and the whole trilogy for the other consoles. couldn't they have picked a later date? it definitely makes the switch remaster seem like a less appealing product.
Pretty much this.maybe the price accounts for the same, because the trilogy will be 80s bucks
but dont try to deny that this looks bad on the head of the masses, switch is getting 1 game and the other platforms are getting a trilogy, it doesn't matter if those game are already available, people will only see, 1 game vs 3 games.
Nintendo: We're pissed, Bandai Namco!!
Bandai Namco: We're developing Smash Bros Ultimate, Metroid Prime 4, and Ridge Racer 8 for you. Deal with it.
Nintendo: Ok.
how much is this trilogy?The issue with the Mass Effect fiasco is that ME3 on Wii U was launched at $60 and the Trilogy on the other platforms was like $30 or something like that. That's not the case here at all.
yep, hard to not see this as a fuck youYeah, this is a big fat middle finger to Nintendo here. There's definitely some sort of publishing dispute going on behind doors that we're not privy to here.
What's wrong with 3?
The corporate equivalent of abuse then. There's no doubt in my mind someone at Nintendo is sitting in a room and thinking 'WTF?'.