...what?A moron with access to way more data and sales figures than we do. But yeah he must be...lying or something? Because of reasons?
Some of y'all need to learn how to take bad Nintendo news gracefully.
A moron with access to way more data and sales figures than we do. But yeah he must be...lying or something? Because of reasons?
Some of y'all need to learn how to take bad Nintendo news gracefully.
If he means US, that sounds about right. If he means worldwide, he's being a complete dunce.
A moron with access to way more data and sales figures than we do. But yeah he must be...lying or something? Because of reasons?
Some of y'all need to learn how to take bad Nintendo news gracefully.
He only says it's currently tracking which means what numbers he has seen now. That's not his personal prediction on what it could sell.
A moron with access to way more data and sales figures than we do. But yeah he must be...lying or something? Because of reasons?
Some of y'all need to learn how to take bad Nintendo news gracefully.
A moron with access to way more data and sales figures than we do. But yeah he must be...lying or something? Because of reasons?
Some of y'all need to learn how to take bad Nintendo news gracefully.
You are in for a ride.
They changed the charts after the criticism, but I am sure someone will be able to furnish the original
I thought so too but nope. Go to 8:55 in the video.
The first one is the same the second one was one of the worst pie charts I've ever seen.Do you recall what they looked like originally? I find the analysis of this version a little off myself, and the charts don't read great to me but they're still understandable.
Last I heard, Pachter was no such thing. He is indeed a financial analyst, but his job is NOT focused on gaming. The entire reason he publicly comments on gaming is because it isn't his real job. If you wanted to know his analysis for his actual professional focus, you'd have to hire his company and pay him.To my knowledge Pachter is an Gaming Industry Analyst, so my question to the people of Era is if this assessment is sound ?
That isn't possible. Switch couldn't have possibly sold eight millions so far this fiscal year.
It's tracking "to" 8m. Based on what numbers he's seen atm. It's not a prediction.
That's still nonsense. It implies his tracking model is complete and utterly bunk which is just as bad.It's tracking "to" 8m. Based on what numbers he's seen atm. It's not a prediction.
The first one is the same the second one was one of the worst pie charts I've ever seen.
The man knows his math I must say!I thought so too but nope. Go to 8:55 in the video.
He literally looked at this page https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/finance/hard_soft/number.html and saw "Welp 2m in Q2 guess that's gonna be 8m total!"
He only says it's currently tracking which means what numbers he has seen now. That's not his personal prediction on what it could sell.
Patcher said:Nintendo committed to 20m switches this year. They are tracking to 8m. They are missing by a mile.
Do you recall what they looked like originally? I find the analysis of this version a little off myself, and the charts don't read great to me but they're still understandable.
Yes far worseThe one of the content in each game? Yeah that didn't really get explained at all and seems sort of irrelevant. Both of these charts are bad to read, was the second even worse to begin with, though?
He's a financial analyst but not a games one. Games are something he sort of does on the side and his comments on games analysis should never be taken 100% seriously as he more often than not, gets things totally wrong.To my knowledge Pachter is an Gaming Industry Analyst, so my question to the people of Era is if this assessment is sound ?
It's tracking "to" 8m. Based on what numbers he's seen atm. It's not a prediction.
He means ww, mentioned the 20 milion. Personally believing Pachter in anything non-Sony related is pretty much useless: he has proven to be very bias towards them - I have read in spanish videogame websites that he holds Sony stock, not sure if it is true, but if true it gives him a reason to bash Microsoft and Nintendo.If he means US, that sounds about right. If he means worldwide, he's being a complete dunce.
Do you recall what they looked like originally? I find the analysis of this version a little off myself, and the charts don't read great to me but they're still understandable.
But like all he did was multiply the number of shipments in one quarter by four. It's super lazy and makes no sense. That was about how much they sold at that time last year and it sold way more than that.People still shitposting ablut Pachter https://kotaku.com/revisiting-michael-pachters-2013-predictions-for-2016-1790520436
like every analyst he gets some things wrong, some right
Why would any console maker have linear growth during the holiday?But why would he apply linear growth to a Nintendo console, when Nintendo regularly sells around 50% of their yearly HW stock during Q3 of the fiscal year? Is there any console maker who display a linear growth during their fiscal year?
This isn't getting stuff wrong, this is having absolute no idea what your talking about. That's far more erroneous.People still shitposting ablut Pachter https://kotaku.com/revisiting-michael-pachters-2013-predictions-for-2016-1790520436
like every analyst he gets some things wrong, some right
Sure, but this prediction is literally the worst. He projected by taking Q2 shipments and extrapolating them over an entire year, even a forum poster can tell you why that's wrong.People still shitposting ablut Pachter https://kotaku.com/revisiting-michael-pachters-2013-predictions-for-2016-1790520436
like every analyst he gets some things wrong, some right
Are we sure he said 8 and not "18" ? It'd make more sense. Can't watch the video right now.
Its normal. People here just want to hear to what they want. I remember old neogaf analysts make damn right predictions, but some not so right.People still shitposting ablut Pachter https://kotaku.com/revisiting-michael-pachters-2013-predictions-for-2016-1790520436
like every analyst he gets some things wrong, some right
....what? Why?