• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Skittles

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,257
Dumb to make a statement like this when there was no need for any in the first place. Although could just be a tactic to get more views.


This thread once again proves how out of touch Era is with every other community on the internet and the world though. Legal action, lmao. Someone needs to update the "old man yells at clouds" with "Era yells at ___"
ITT: ERA memebers try to justify sexism
 

tommy7154

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,370
Oh only now?

Not from the get go when dudes have been tripping over themselves to proclaim excluding women entirely to be rational while also tip toeing around acknowledging that gaming is sexist?
Are people actually arguing that though (the bolded)? There are clearly problems and I think anyone actually arguing otherwise has some learning to do. I just haven't seen anyone arguing that here.

And let's talk about "rational" for a minute. Excluding women in this case does make sense, and that explanation is in the article. His reasons for his choice are based on reason and logic. That's the very definition of "rational". So while it's fine for you to disagree with his decision, it is clearly a rational one.

As for the defense of that position, it too is rational for basically the same reason. It's easy for me to think about what may happen if he does stream with women, and realize that it could easily create a much bigger issue (for he/his wife) than if he did not.
 

DigitalOp

Member
Nov 16, 2017
9,276
If Ninja feels that streaming with women would cause unnecessary drama for his marriage that streaming with a man won't do, is "gamer/streamer" culture toxic in general for women?

This thread basically means the answer is yes.
 

devSin

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,194
So you admit streaming culture is sexist then yes?
Where it intersects with video games, fuck yes, it is.

But I imagine there are some lifestyle and niche streams where it's not as big a deal. Women can (and often do) go out in public and appear with all sorts of people (I found it hard to believe at first too).
 

spman2099

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,891
He's married and doesn't want millions of people potentially accusing him of flirting. Simple. I get it.

Saying he believes that girls have cooties would also be a simple explanation. It would also be just as dumb as the one he gave. Once again, that is a brutally unhealthy attitude to have.

So what, he is a sexist cause he doesn't like rumours and tabloid-like news about him?

Okay.

It probably has more to do with him excluding women...
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
Yes. Extremely. Just go to any stream chat. Still does not mean streamers have to stream with people they don't want to stream with. That's absurd. Its not a traditional workplace.

Of course that's absurd, the one singular person pushing that is wrong, but like 90% of this thread is dudes pretending sexism doesn't exist or only using it to call the guy excluding all women from his stream rational and logical... though you're one of the first to actually respond to my direct inquiry by admitting that the culture is sexist so I give you props.
 

Wololo

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Nov 20, 2017
1,564
You make a statement to the public, you invite the public to respond.

Calling him out for keeping his dating life and work life seperate is unfair. Ninja has a very public job with many eyes on him. Better to just avoid potential controversy all together it sucks bit its the reality of the current worls we live in. If ninja even does one thing wrong hell be scrutinized for it. Just look at the reaponses in this thread.
 

Giever

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,756
how so?

The threat of rumors exist anywhere, at anytime.

Hey ERA, I saw Giever pick his nose yesterday on stream. Should you stop interacting with Black Males as a result, Giever?


The whole thing is nonsensical. Writing off an entire gender because "rumors". That shit makes sense to you?
I don't know what the answer is, and my gut feeling is Ninja's solution is probably excessive, but it's a personal call to make and I'm not about write off the very real harassment and effects thereof by thinking of them as just "rumors". It's some real shit, and you can see above from Dodger's tweets the kind of stuff that can happen.

EDIT: And in response to your question of how I find your Mom example irrelevant, it's because obviously this is only the issue that it is because of the sexism and toxicity in the Twitch, and more broadly, gaming community. There aren't thousands of people 'bout to think I'm dating my Mom, but that isn't the situation here.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
Are people actually arguing that though (the bolded)? There are clearly problems and I think anyone actually arguing otherwise has some learning to do. I just haven't seen anyone arguing that here.

And let's talk about "rational" for a minute. Excluding women in this case does make sense, and that explanation is in the article. His reasons for his choice are based on reason and logic. That's the very definition of "rational". So while it's fine for you to disagree with his decision, it is clearly a rational one.

As for the defense of that position, it too is rational for basically the same reason. It's easy for me to think about what may happen if he does stream with women, and realize that it could easily create a much bigger issue (for he/his wife) than if he did not.

So do you acknowledge that gaming has a sexist problem, that this guy was himself perpetuating?
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,293
He said "no one" is making that argument lol.
Wow, what an incredibly important distinction to make.

????

Calling him out for keeping his dating life and work life seperate is unfair. Ninja has a very public job with many eyes on him. Bettee to just avoid potential controversy all together it sucks bit its the reality of the current worls we live in. If ninja even does one thing wrong hell be scrutinized for it. Just look at the reaponses in this thread.

He's not being called out for that. He's being called out for gatekeeping women and prioritizing his own discomfort over supporting people who face infinitely tougher hardships in this context. He's well within his rights to do that, of course. I understand. I still think he's a piece of shit for it, though.
 

Ploid 6.0

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,440


Honestly, I can see where Ninja is coming from with shit like this.

Omg what, Dodger isn't even immune? I was going to bring up how she streams with a ton of people all the time, and I never seen any rumors about stuff like this about people she work with. I follow her on twitch because she plays games I usually plays, does a podcast, does interesting stuff, and plays FFXIV (I don't like to play it, but I like to watch people doing the new content to see if I'd be interested). I also remember the times she would do videos with Husky Starcraft, and the person that cook on youtube now (nerdy nummies or something).

Now I wonder what ever happened to Huskystarcraft.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,649
Calling him out for keeping his dating life and work life seperate is unfair. Ninja has a very public job with many eyes on him. Bettee to just avoid potential controversy all together it sucks bit its the reality of the current worls we live in. If ninja even does one thing wrong hell be scrutinized for it. Just look at the reaponses in this thread.
so sexism ahoy?
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
He said "no one" is making that argument lol.

If you want to be that pedantic sure, but getting up in arms because one literal person is pushing something.... when it's pretty clear that is not the narrative of the general discourse..

I mean we've had someone here already associate that one person with "Era" so that's funny I guess.
 

MrConbon210

Member
Oct 31, 2017
7,647
Of course that's absurd, the one singular person pushing that is wrong, but like 90% of this thread is dudes pretending sexism doesn't exist or only using it to call the guy excluding all women from his stream rational and logical... though you're one of the first to actually respond to my direct inquiry by admitting that the culture is sexist so I give you props.

Dude, I said that there's a sexist culture so many times and you blatantly ignired that and tried to make me look like I was being sexist for understanding his decision.
 
Nov 12, 2017
715
If Ninja feels that streaming with women would cause unnecessary drama for his marriage that streaming with a man won't do, is "gamer/streamer" culture toxic in general for women?

This thread basically means the answer is yes.
Anyone versed in Twitch culture should say yes, but what I don't like is the notion that streamers should be forced to play with people they don't want to play with, which some users are saying since it's a "workplace"
 

Xaszatm

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,903
Speaking of deflection.

Ok, yes, I participate in marches for Pride, protest Trump, vote, and regularly get involved in local politics to change things. Now can we return to the topic at hand or do I need to actually run for office before I'm allowed to talk about problems in the hobby I love so much?

Calling him out for keeping his dating life and work life seperate is unfair. Ninja has a very public job with many eyes on him. Bettee to just avoid potential controversy all together it sucks bit its the reality of the current worls we live in. If ninja even does one thing wrong hell be scrutinized for it. Just look at the reaponses in this thread.

Calling him out for a very misogynistic reasoning for not streaming with women because of the sexism in the gaming community is absolutely fair.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
Because fighting real fights is much harder than complaining about shit like this. True fact.

Brah you act like talking about this on this board means we're out there attacking him and harassing him.

He made it public so now he's being criticized... that's what happens when you make a public statement declaring you won't ever game with women.
 

Lyon N. Laap

Member
Oct 27, 2017
364
Calling him out for keeping his dating life and work life seperate is unfair. Ninja has a very public job with many eyes on him. Bettee to just avoid potential controversy all together it sucks bit its the reality of the current worls we live in. If ninja even does one thing wrong hell be scrutinized for it. Just look at the reaponses in this thread.

Yes, exactly, he's being scrutinized! Of course he is! He deserves it and is the personal author of this scrutiny! Not only because he is clearly being a hypocrite when it comes to this situation, but because of what he claims he wants to be.

He wants to be seen as a positive role model for his young audience, he has outright said it. If he wants to be a role model, then he absolutely must be prepared for the magnifying glass that entails.

You can't just call yourself a role model and then expect people to not put further examination on the type of role you are modeling.
 

Sarcastico

Member
Oct 27, 2017
774
That doesn't change anything though. Just because it's his channel doesn't suddenly exclude it from being a sexist decision, and thus doesn't exclude it from criticism. He can do what ever he wants, but that doesn't mean every single one of his decisions is just dandy.

The reason this shit would never fly on a talk show which is ran by one person in a similar vein is not just because that one person doesn't personally "own" the show. It's because the other people who play a part in the said talk show (ie the production company, network or whatever) absolutely fucking realise that if they came out and said "Oh we're not having any female guests on this show at all" that it wouldn't fly at all, and people would call it out for the sexist rubbish that it is. It doesn't matter if it's about his marriage, because it's still sexist.

How are people not getting this?

Because it's a false equivalence. Some guy running a stream of him playing games isn't the same as a show hosting celebrities around the world. If an actual TV show doesn't invite women (or POC for that matter) and people pick up on that there will certainly be some backlash. However, on Twitch, there are literally hundreds of channels of people streaming solo and no one bats an eye. The two things are not comparable.
 

spman2099

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,891
Calling him out for keeping his dating life and work life seperate is unfair. Ninja has a very public job with many eyes on him. Better to just avoid potential controversy all together it sucks bit its the reality of the current worls we live in. If ninja even does one thing wrong hell be scrutinized for it. Just look at the reaponses in this thread.

You are right, sexism is always the answer. Don't want to have to deal with those obnoxious instances of your employees sexually assaulting your female employees? The answer is simple, don't hire women. It is so simple, sexism solves everything!
 

NoName999

One Winged Slayer
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
5,906
Why are the defenders STILL ignoring that he does.... the.... exact.... same.... thing to other streamers?

Like you say it's his right to not want aimed at him but skirt around the glaring issue that he does this to others?

Why?

Why are you guys making yourself look like asses by silently supporting the fact that he contributes to said toxic culture?
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
Dude, I said that there's a sexist culture so many times and you blatantly ignired that and tried to make me look like I was being sexist for understanding his decision.

Right you said there was some nebulous sexism but conveniently nothing here happened to be that. You called everything here dramatic,

I explained to you that one of the core sexist attacks used against women is that they play or stream to get laid....and you denied that was sexism.
 

DigitalOp

Member
Nov 16, 2017
9,276
Are people actually arguing that though (the bolded)? There are clearly problems and I think anyone actually arguing otherwise has some learning to do. I just haven't seen anyone arguing that here.

And let's talk about "rational" for a minute. Excluding women in this case does make sense, and that explanation is in the article. His reasons for his choice are based on reason and logic. That's the very definition of "rational". So while it's fine for you to disagree with his decision, it is clearly a rational one.

As for the defense of that position, it too is rational for basically the same reason. It's easy for me to think about what may happen if he does stream with women, and realize that it could easily create a much bigger issue (for he/his wife) than if he did not.

This makes no sense.

If Ninja is so afraid of his viewership affecting his marriage if he streams with women, then the viewership itself is toxic as fuck. Its inherently sexist. Gaming is sexist in general.

ITT we have smack dab proof of this happening in real time and how these biases manifest against women doing the same exact shit as Ninja mind you, and everybody is trying to backflip out of the idea that them supporting such an idea makes them pretty damn sexist in general.

If the community is such a problem, you don't blanket ban women with the fucked up backwards idea that you're protecting them, how about you target the exact same community thats causing and perpetuating such bullshit to begin with.....

Oh... they pay his rent, thats why.

Hiding you sexism and or racism behind "Rational Thought" so rational! is such a Alt-Right bullshit dogwhistle thing. Dumb annoying to read. Comes across as anyone opposing you is unsound or emotional because they don't buy your bullshit.
 

Wololo

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Nov 20, 2017
1,564
User Banned (1 Month): Misogyny + Delegitimizing equality movements
Yes, exactly, he's being scrutinized! Of course he is! He deserves it and is the personal author of this scrutiny! Not only because he is clearly being a hypocrite when it comes to this situation, but because of what he claims he wants to be.

He wants to be seen as a positive role model for his young audience, he has outright said it. If he wants to be a role model, then he absolutely must be prepared for the magnifying glass that entails.

You can't just call yourself a role model and then expect people to not put further examination on the type of role you are modeling.

Well its his call to make and i think its a fair one given the #MeToo era were in.
 

Sandfox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,743
If you want to be that pedantic sure, but getting up in arms because one literal person is pushing something.... when it's pretty clear that is not the narrative of the general discourse..

I mean we've had someone here already associate that one person with "Era" so that's funny I guess.
I wouldn't call my post "getting up in arms". It's not like I made a big stink or anything.
 

D i Z

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,085
Where X marks the spot.
Why are the defenders STILL ignoring that he does.... the.... exact.... same.... thing to other streamers?

Like you say it's his right to not want aimed at him but skirt around the glaring issue that he does this to others?

Why?

Why are you guys making yourself look like asses by silently supporting the fact that he contributes to said toxic culture?

Maybe they keep missing all of the posts about this scattered within every twenty or so posts over the thread. I'll bump this to see if we can get past the blindspot.
 

Dark Ninja

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,070
User banned (3 days): making excuses for sexism
If he feels that is the best move to juggle business and personal life then I don't see the problem he's not promoting hate or is secretly a racists hateful person (that we know of yet). If that is what he has found best for his business then its fine. If other streamers feel that the opposite works than they will surpass him. I wouldn't want to navigate the minefield that is Twitch streaming. Also people don't idolize anyone it just leads to problems everyone is a human and has faults.
 

Wololo

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Nov 20, 2017
1,564
You are right, sexism is always the answer. Don't want to have to deal with those obnoxious instances of your employees sexually assaulting your female employees? The answer is simple, don't hire women. It is so simple, sexism solves everything!

Theres probably a reason why Ninja is taking this stance. I bet nhes has had woman try to date him for his money and fame.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
If he feels that is the best move to juggle business and personal life then I don't see the problem he's not promoting hate or is secretly a racists hateful person (that we know of yet). If that is what he has found best for his business then its fine. If other streamers feel that the opposite works than they will surpass him. I wouldn't want to navigate the minefield that is Twitch streaming. Also people don't idolize anyone it just leads to problems everyone is a human and has faults.

Is this seriously arguing that excluding women is fine if it makes him more money and that if excluding women is actually wrong the free market will prove it?
 

Kite

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
670
lol is it streamer culture that is toxic or shippers in general. Just look at the nutty fans going after the real life girlfriends of the Supernatural cast member's wife cus they believe the two male leads are gay, same fans going after the wives/girlfriends/exes of One Direction and Benedict Cumberbatch cus they don't want them to be in a relationship so they can fantasize.
 

MegaSackman

Member
Oct 27, 2017
17,699
Argentina
I think it's a little unfair to ask this guy to solve society issues, we are the problem I don't expect of Ninja to have the capacity to educate us, it's unfortunate. I won't make popular people responsable from our shitty behavior. Toxicity exist outside Ninja's bubble and I don't think he's encouraging it, he might not be trying to solve the problem but he probably doesn't know how to do it. Page 14 already showed why what he does is alarmingly understandable.