I mean, this really should be up to the person he is streaming with, no? if they are okay with it, then I dont see why he should care.
If he isn't, then there shouldn't be an issue playing with women.
Protect his wife from what? Internet drama?It's not about him wanting to protect himself. It's about him wanting to protect his wife.
If Ninja said, "I'm not going to stream with black people, because when I do, the chat fills up with TriHard and Chicken emotes, it's distracting and hurts my image to be associated with those comments," would that be okay? Because it sounds like that would be okay to some people here. You can't rile up the mob, best to stick to only associating with white, heterosexual cis-males.
Dude you can't even admit it's sexism... you had to change sexist to dramatic lol.
You're defending outright and total exclusion of women but can't even say the word sexist... dramatic ... lol.
And then the article continued to say, "She had nothing to do with it. That was me being, 'I love our relationship,' and, 'No — I'm not even gonna put you through that.'"
Wow. What a sexist PoS /s
Uh, yes? If you say you want to protect a woman who never even asked for your protection, and you do so by actively engaging in sexist and exclusionary behaviour, you are indeed being sexist. Blatantly so.And then the article continued to say, "She had nothing to do with it. That was me being, 'I love our relationship,' and, 'No — I'm not even gonna put you through that.'"
Wow. What a sexist PoS /s
Or how about you stop dictating on other's personal lives? He's not handing anyone. Neither is his wife.
Sometimes in a marriage you compromise to account for someone else's feelings. Most of my friends because of were I worked and the university I went to are women, and when I got married I made compromises out of my own choice due to her feelings.
That's what I'm saying. It makes.me.sad that so many are in relationships where Fidelity and honestly don't matter. :(If he isn't, then there shouldn't be an issue playing with women.
Uh, yes? If you say you want to protect a woman who never even asked for your protection, and you do so by actively engaging in sexist and exclusionary behaviour, you are indeed being sexist. Blatantly so.
It shouldn't, they aren't kids, they are both adults and I'm sure they know how the internet works.Constant harraent about how her husband is having an affair from thousands of people nonstop.
You can't seriosuly think how that wouldn't cause some friction in a marriage?
Becasue the word isn't sexist? What did I change exactly? It was my thoughts.
He's doing this to protect his privacy and keep his marriage as stable as possible. He's not doing it becasue he hates women and doesn't want them on his channe.
Dude literally does the thing he's claiming he's protecting his wife from lol....
To me, this is very well said. Including people is a personal choice and there is nothing malicious about his decision.He has a choice to play with whomever he wants. If he doesn't want to play with certain people because of his own reasons, that's his choice. It's easy to hate on someone on the internet for no reason at all. Some of you need to grow up.
Your first and second paragraphs are absolutely on the money.
But given what we definitively know, can you see how a negative reaction to his position might be justifiable?
Because we know the reason why he avoids female streamers, because he does and he outright admitted it. And we know that this toxic environment he is trying to avoid is one he has actively contributed to. Again, this is something we can say for certain. He is saying that he doesn't want to be a target of a culture that he has promoted.
And he wants to be a role model, which, again, he has publicly stated. Can you see where I view his position as problematic?
Who are you to say how a relationship should or shouldn't work? Have you been in the position this guy is in or something?It shouldn't, they aren't kids, they are both adults and I'm sure they know how the internet works.
So if he didn't want to play with black.people or gay people it's his business too I guess.He has a choice to play with whomever he wants. If he doesn't want to play with certain people because of his own reasons, that's his choice. It's easy to hate on someone on the internet for no reason at all. Some of you need to grow up.
I was talking about sexist gaming culture and you dog whistled it down to "dramatic". My point is you can't even acknowledge that the very reason he's using to defend not having women on his stream is sexist gaming culture.... you described it as people being dramatic instead.
This is not about "a married guy not playing with women". It's more about "a married guy not playing with women in front of a live audience of hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom have the toxic mentality that they are owed something by the streamers they watch". There is a difference between the two.So the solution to sexist gamer culture, that he participates in, is to exclude women to protect women?
He has a choice to play with whomever he wants. If he doesn't want to play with certain people because of his own reasons, that's his choice. It's easy to hate on someone on the internet for no reason at all. Some of you need to grow up.
It is. How is that so hard to understand? It doesn't make it right, but it's a personal freedom.So if he didn't want to play with black.people or gay people it's his business too I guess.
So the solution to sexist gamer culture, that he participates in, is to exclude women to protect women?
So if he didn't want to play with black.people or gay people it's his business too I guess.
No, because those situations are alike in exactly zero ways.So if he didn't want to play with black.people or gay people it's his business too I guess.
Because i never intended to use the word sexist because that's not what I feel the move is. It's a dramatic step to take to protect him from the dramatic people who would see there is some big hidden affair where there isn't one.
Replacing the word dramatic with sexist doesn't even make sense in the context I'm speaking. People don't need to be sexist to think there's an affair where there isn't one
It shouldn't, they aren't kids, they are both adults and I'm sure they know how the internet works.
Did you read the post I was replying to? Please explain to me how people online saying he is having a relationship with other women would affect their marriage? You shouldn't be married if such a silly thing affects you.Who are you to say how a relationship should or shouldn't work? Have you been in the position this guy is in or something?
??? He literally says, She had nothing to do with it. That was me
This thread is mad, if he isn't flirting etc with the womrmen then there is no problem with working with them. Guys and girls can just be friends you know...
This jump in logic.So if he didn't want to play with black.people or gay people it's his business too I guess.
How I kinda feel, also don't blame him the twitch community is toxic af. If he doesn't feel comfortable streaming with female for his reasons cause of his marriage so be it.
Brah I'm not talking about the dude, I'm talking about the people the dude is not streaming with women to avoid... Those dudes are sexist as fuck but all you could do is call them dramatic.
You just did it again "dramatic people" no sexist people, they're not dramatic they're sexist.
Jesus Christmas, all ya'll insinuating or straight up calling him sexist are really showing your asses here.
Extremely embarrassing.
And you obviously don't. Its precisiely because he knows how the internet works that he doesn't want a scenario that causes more strain of any part of his personal life.
Jesus...
Some of the replies in this thread are easily some of the most dumb crap i've read on era in a long while >.>
FYI, this doesn't mean it can't be sexist. Sexism and misogyny are different things, though one frequently affects the other. You can engage in sexist behaviour without being misogynistic, but it doesn't make it not sexist.
It is. How is that so hard to understand? It doesn't make it right, but it's a personal freedom.
It's not about him wanting to protect himself. It's about him wanting to protect his wife.
??? He literally says, She had nothing to do with it. That was me
What are you doing?
He's not protecting women in general. He's protecting his wife and his relationship. I don't know if his exclusion of women in his stream can be even called sexist, when he's doing it for practical purposes because of the toxic community. He's not doing it because he thinks ill of women.
But really he can't come out good out if this, he either makes the moral call to allow women on his stream and suffers whatever he and his wife thinks they could suffer or makes the 'easier' call and risks being called a sexist and a coward.