This analysis on the popularity of Era's favorite intellectual is doing major rounds on social media.
Essentially it's about how many young voters' silent rejection of identity politics will lead to more Trumps.
Not sure I agree with the correlation - the alt-right is also obsessed with identity politics (for the opppsite reasons obviously), but food for thought with election coming up and polls almost always being wrong:
https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/567110/
Edited in quotes for the lazy:
Essentially it's about how many young voters' silent rejection of identity politics will lead to more Trumps.
Not sure I agree with the correlation - the alt-right is also obsessed with identity politics (for the opppsite reasons obviously), but food for thought with election coming up and polls almost always being wrong:
https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/567110/
Edited in quotes for the lazy:
Two years ago, I walked downstairs and saw one of my teenage sons watching a strange YouTube video on the television.
"What is that?" I asked.
He turned to me earnestly and explained, "It's a psychology professor at the University of Toronto talking about Canadian law."
"Huh?" I said, but he had already turned back to the screen. I figured he had finally gotten to the end of the internet, and this was the very last thing on it.
The alarms sounded when Peterson published what quickly became a massive bestseller, 12 Rules for Life, because books are something that the left recognizes as drivers of culture. The book became the occasion for vicious profiles and editorials, but it was difficult to attack the work on ideological grounds, because it was an apolitical self-help book that was at once more literary and more helpful than most, and that was moreover a commercial success. All of this frustrated the critics. It's just common sense! they would say, in one arch way or another, and that in itself was telling: Why were they so angry about common sense?
Last edited: