I can't prove that life is meaningless and in fact, better not to have happened other than you are born with no choice, you will feel pain emotionally and physically guaranteed, and then death. You get 85 years on average - then bye. What was the point? Other than being a slave to evolution and having children, which I am of course against if you couldn't guess - I an am antinatalist, you potter about doing very little with very little for very little reason and then you pop it. Imagine the planet with no two-legged sentient violent maniacs walking about like they own the place, killing themselves and subjugating themselves and abusing themselves. Sounds like a damn fine planet. I am in the minority of course and people keep having babies. Pop pop pop. Out they pop in ever-increasing numbers. A proof isn't really required I feel to say life is inherently meaningless and painful to the vast majority. Yes, I am no fun at parties.
Since I don't believe this at all, I'd like to hear more about the how/why/...
Not to ridicule you (which one might assume, this being the internet), but because I'm interested in the thoughts and views of someone who believes in something that's impossible from my point of view.
You'll basically feel the same way you felt before you were born.
I never saw anything when I'd stay there except for the very first night I ever stayed there. I was in their guest room, and something sat down son the end of the bed on my feet. I could feel the weight, and I will be honest and say I couldn't look to see what it was, I was frozen stiff.
You'll basically feel the same way you felt before you were born.
I'll just say that our brains do amazing and sometimes strange things. If you're curious, read up on (or listen to science podcasts) dealing with the brain, psychology, memory, perception. It is much more fascinating and definitely more enlightening than ghosts and demons, promise!I just think that there are too many unexplained phenomena for there not to be some unseen ethereal beings. Too many stories of possessions, haunting a, etc for there not to be something, but I've never seen concrete evidence.
My brother swears the house they owned in kansas was haunted. Here's one story: my brother was out working in the yard, his wife was in the kitchen. She saw him walk by out of the corner of her eye and called out to Jim but he kept waking. She followed him down the hall into her bedroom. She kept calling his name and was getting mad he wasn't responding. He turned the corner in there room and wen rinto the bathroom. She followed him in and he wasn't there. It wasn't him at all. He was still outside working.
He also says that something would slam the doors in their hallway in the middle of the night. One night he even got the family and got in their closet, and something kept trying to get in. DVDs flying off shelves, etc.
I never saw anything when I'd stay there except for the very first night I ever stayed there. I was in their guest room, and something sat down son the end of the bed on my feet. I could feel the weight, and I will be honest and say I couldn't look to see what it was, I was frozen stiff.
Yeah, there is life, sure. There probably are a huge amount of planets with goldy-locks circumstances. But then there is evolution, amount of catastrophic events, level of intelligence, ways of communication, and a shitload of accidental stuff. And the distances are just inconceivably huge and impossible to reach.I believe there are hundreds of thousands if not millions forms of intelligent life out there (i.e. we're quite rare). And because of the massive distances and time scales involved noone will ever meet.
Along these lines: I believe some of those accounts exist to gather data on preferences of users, and that data is then used for things like tailoring goods and services, and gauging the threshold of what the public will tolerate.
I get a little suspicious every time I see a thread that asks a shallow question that encourages a bunch of short responses over detailed discussion (ie "what's your favorite fast food restaurant").
If one were so inclined, it'd be pretty easy to create a database of users and profile them based on their responses to certain topics. You might not get names, but you could pretty easily get preferences and even physical location. It's not very efficient but it would work if a particular forum, for whatever reason, was your target audience.
And what is life's purpose in all this. Is life/intelligence an end product (seems contrived)? Or are we simply rust? If there is a higher "power" I doubt it cares, or even knows, about us.That there is, not to say a higher "power" (that insinuates control, although I also can't rule that out), but something beyond our plane of existence.
And what is life's purpose in all this. Is life/intelligence an end product (seems contrived)? Or are we simply rust? If there is a higher "power" I doubt it cares, or even knows, about us.
To survive and multiply.And what is life's purpose in all this. Is life/intelligence an end product (seems contrived)? Are we simply rust? If there is a higher "power" I doubt it cares, or even knows, about us.
Our 3 dimensional reality is literally a piece of fiction within a 7 dimensional reality.
I'm sorry, it's only near infinite. Only the guy with the bigger one exists.If space is infinite, then there's a near perfect copy of me out there that has a smaller dong.
we don't talk about the guy with a bigger one, fuck him
I'm sorry, it's only near infinite. Only the guy with the bigger one exists.
If you were a dot living on a large enough piece of paper, you would believe the world is in two dimensions. Even if that piece of paper was rolled into a tube.
We can only experience dimensions with what our body sense. Who's to say there aren't more?
What's the difference?It's more likely that we're in a simulation than it is God existing.
Pretty much every big name director on the planet defended Polanski. Steven Spielberg on down.
The title of the topic is things you believe that you can't prove. If I could prove he did anything it would defeat the purpose of the topic. I believe it, though.Pretty much every big name director on the planet defended Polanski. Steven Spielberg on down.