-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
For me. PS5 or XBX. We need 60fps looking left/right
- Thread starter Any Questions
- Start date
You can relax, OP. I've informed the King of Video Games and he assures me that your butter situation is the highest priority.
I don't know what this says. I do not really know what I just read. I don't understand what you're saying. I'm not receiving your intent through your words. What I'm saying is.....I don't get it.
So you want less motion blur, which is exasperated by quick panning. I get it (though it took some work).
Higher fps certainly helps but the screen you're playing on is even more important for this. The majority of modern TV screens have a heap of motion blur. Motion clarity is an illusive beast that has not been treated with priority for a while in the TV arena because most people don't seem to be super sensitive to it.
If that's what you're after you're better off using a high end PC monitor with blur reduction than a TV screen.
I hear the PG279Q is pretty good for balancing picture quality with motion clarity.
This right here is my favorite post on Era in while.
Higher fps certainly helps but the screen you're playing on is even more important for this. The majority of modern TV screens have a heap of motion blur. Motion clarity is an illusive beast that has not been treated with priority for a while in the TV arena because most people don't seem to be super sensitive to it.
If that's what you're after you're better off using a high end PC monitor with blur reduction than a TV screen.
I hear the PG279Q is pretty good for balancing picture quality with motion clarity.
This right here is my favorite post on Era in while.
Last edited:
This is my employee's coming to me with their thoughts.
OP - You are. Lucky. They don't butter the corners of your profile with. Junior member. When you. From left to right.
I think without motion blur, moving the camera around at sub 60fps (which will most likely still be the case next gen) will look like a jittery mess
I'm only on page 2 but I'm literally sitting in my bedroom cracking up. My god, I needed this.
More on topic I really wish I could help you OP.
More on topic I really wish I could help you OP.
a locked 30fps wont give you that issue.Id personally like to see more uncapped fps options (more options in general ala Xbox One X)
Variable refresh TV's with console capability as well, will eliminate the imagry spasaming when you turn the camera. As long as the Tv refresh can run in sync with the games fps, the 30 hz game will stay sharp like the 60 fps game. I'm piqued for the next gen hardware, as i perfer the feel and more languid presentation rate of 30 fps games - just without the image quality taking a severe hit when the camera changes angle too fast.
They don't need to be 60 fps for me. Variable refresh, adaptive sync and i'll be set. You'll see.
Aren't these lyrics for some R'n'B song? ;-)
Do you have some concrete examples so that we can test this "butter issue" in a less inebriated state. :-)
Common guys, no need to bash his English skills.
and yes, we do need 60 FPS as standard going forward. No excuses.
and yes, we do need 60 FPS as standard going forward. No excuses.
Drunk thread? If you want 60 fps get a PC. It's not happening for consoles.
That's not how it works. FPS depends on CPU, resolution depends on GPU. You can't make a 4K/30 title that is CPU limited run at 60 fps at lower resolution. You would have to cut physics and other stuff in that mode.
On consoles you're out of luck, but on PC you can use a monitor that supports ULMB (Ultra Low Motion Blur) to get a really crisp image when you pan the camera.
Blur Busters – Motion Blur Reduction
Blur Busters – Motion Blur Reduction
I knew I wasn't seeing this for the first time!
It's relatively more comprehensible now I guess, and the whole butter thing is a real breakthrough in terms of communication. Can see how it took two months to craft such an intricate and elegant example for us.
Eeeeeehm... Console will always have limitations, so try going for a PC in which you can alter your graphics settings in the games .dll file.
I can't help you with the butter nonetheless.
I can't help you with the butter nonetheless.
You mean those nintendo 64 graphics when you move the camera in directions? As in motion blur. Or fps slow down?
Look left or right. Your eyes do the same thing.
Can I get a next-gen brain that is butter?
EDIT: But seriously, motion blur is important. It can get overbearing at times, like in the Dark Souls remaster which you mentioned last time, but it's way more noticeable when it isn't there.
I still remember how cheap the 48fps version of The Hobbit looked without the natural motion blur you get at a typical 24fps >.<
Last edited:
So one thing worth asking is if you're playing on 1080i instead of 1080p. Of course the screen blurs more when you start moving the view left and right due to deinterlacing.
Your totally right about movies, but I want butter in my games
Is this what happens when you watch one digitalfoundry video and thing you're a graphics rendering expert?
Wow, before some of you guys go making fun of an OP, maybe look into the issue to see if it's a real thing? Some of y'all are really acting ignorant in here, poking fun at OP when you have no idea what he's talking about. He is not referring to motion blur. What he is referring to is judder, the phenomenon of frames being left on a screen longer than they should be due to the FPS of said content not matching the refresh rate of the screen in question. It is also much more prevalent on TV's such as plasmas without any inherent motion blur.
Here is what Any Questions is referring to: https://youtu.be/CuEZIJDEQyo
Here is an old thread from AV S forum on the matter as well. It manifests in games as a sort of double image. https://www.avsforum.com/forum/40-o...ts-frame-doubling.html#/topics/1107325?page=3
Here is what Any Questions is referring to: https://youtu.be/CuEZIJDEQyo
Here is an old thread from AV S forum on the matter as well. It manifests in games as a sort of double image. https://www.avsforum.com/forum/40-o...ts-frame-doubling.html#/topics/1107325?page=3
Ha, you're going to get spam everywhere when you turn the camera and you're going to like it. No butter 'til next gen.
How will a new generation of consoles change that issue?
But a new tv and new console both supporting freesync might help with that?
Well one thing we definitely know. Assburgers of ERA are not butter fried.
On topic: I can't believe it's not butter.
Panning the camera sideways is more like old warm milk.
I wish more developers didn't go for the graphics porn and instead put more effort in to performance.
On topic: I can't believe it's not butter.
Panning the camera sideways is more like old warm milk.
I wish more developers didn't go for the graphics porn and instead put more effort in to performance.
It's nice that you're trying to learn a second language op. Doing way better than I am on that front
However I couldn't understand a single post you've made in this thread.
If what you want is less motion blur, I can agree with that. But that's not directly tied to the fps of a game onturning.
However I couldn't understand a single post you've made in this thread.
If what you want is less motion blur, I can agree with that. But that's not directly tied to the fps of a game onturning.
He's talking about the inherent blur in sample-and-hold displays, i.e. display motion blur.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_motion_blur
Use your noggins and try to apply some reading comprehension.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_motion_blur
Use your noggins and try to apply some reading comprehension.
Your television is the cause of the blur when turning the camera around. This will never be solved until new display technology is created.
Yeah, you're right. New Consoles would really only be a solution if 60 FPS was standardized. Your suggestion is probably a better solution to this issue.