Good luck!
My interpretation was bagelsthe rap's about donuts, Don ate the donuts with chocolate, cream, etc. rather than just going for the plain donut.
Raps?All 3 raps are still stuck in my head. I have them on some sort of mental rotation
Remix Don's rap to Don's ballad to GAIA.Raps?
I still got "Ian and Don hit the beach" stuck in my head.
the rap's about donuts, Don ate the donuts with chocolate, cream, etc. rather than just going for the plain donut.
Both wrong, this was a Master Sifo-Dyas apology rap.
Raps?
I still got "Ian and Don hit the beach" stuck in my head.
Don's was definitely the catchiest. The chorus melody has been stuck in my head too.im working on a full blown song for don's rap. i really really liked it. it's gonna take me a few days tho. but seriously, why didn't i eat the plain?
Completely agree, it felt incredibly good-humored and slightly loopy. Damiani's Dragon Ball FighterZ story had me rolling. Only criticism would be Jones comparing EA's implementation of micro-transactions to Kickstarter just after Podcast Halftime. Nah.Kyle said himself he didn't prep as much this week as he was writing his rap. So I think we can let him off with how that turned out.
Not that I had a complaint. The fast and loose nature made for some hilarious moments.
The lowest I'd ever see him going for it even listening to his FT thoughts was a half star from what he gave it.Excellent Battlefront 2 review, though I did expect the end score to be lower based on both the Frame Trap episode and the review itself.
Negative, critical Huber needs to be more of a thing though. Can't always be jolly about video games!
you're not alone.All 3 raps are still stuck in my head. I have them on some sort of mental rotation
Guys, its a 5/10.
Any lower, and you get into shovelware type games.
EZA are never going to bother reviewing shovelware though, which is potentially restricting their rating system by half. I personally think a 5/10 equivalent should mean "average" and if a game is bad you should use the full scale to reflect that.
The graphics are incredible. The sound design is incredible. The core gameplay is solid, but the campaign is uninspired, and the dystopian business practices sink the whole ship significantly.The word "inferior" really sticks out to me. The only good things said about the game were the sound design and that the heroes were fun. The progression system is broken and pay to win. That's a bit more than "inferior" to me.
I would give tons of games less than that and nobody would say they are shovelware. Jade Empire, for instance.Guys, its a 5/10.
Any lower, and you get into shovelware type games.
I would give tons of games less than that and nobody would say they are shovelware. Jade Empire, for instance.
Yeah, I also thought it was a fair score. Like, it could have been 2 stars or 2.5 stars and I would have accepted it either way.
Also, one thing I greatly appreciate about EZA reviews in general is that they take the time to explain the mechanics and how it affects the gameplay experience. Blood's GT Sport review was like that too.
They're different genres so I don't really compare the scores in my mind. Mostly I just pay attention to the text of the review and whether it matches with the final review score.
The scoring systems don't quite scale 1:1. The Allies themselves have said that 3 stars is about the same as a 7, not 6. Seems like Battlefront II still landed in the 6.X territory, which isn't very flattering.Guys, its a 5/10.
Any lower, and you get into shovelware type games.
The scoring systems don't quite scale 1:1. The Allies themselves have said that 3 stars is about the same as a 7, not 6. Seems like Battlefront II still landed in the 6.X territory, which isn't very flattering.
It's not that strange IMO. Many outlets that use or have used a 1-10 rating system only ever use something like a 4-10 rating system in practice, with 7 being "decent" or "average". When scoring with 5 stars, it's visually easy to see that 3 stars should be about the average since it's in the middle, and this also allows EZA to make use of the whole scale.Thats strange.
So a 3 star is a 7, but a 3.5 star isn't a 7, its an.....8?
They reviewed Umbrella Corps (1 star) and Mighty No 9 (2 stars), so no, sometimes they do review shovelware.EZA are never going to bother reviewing shovelware though, which is potentially restricting their rating system by half. I personally think a 5/10 equivalent should mean "average" and if a game is bad you should use the full scale to reflect that.
It's not that strange IMO. Many outlets that use or have used a 1-10 rating system only ever use something like a 4-10 rating system in practice, with 7 being "decent" or "average". When scoring with 5 stars, it's visually easy to see that 3 stars should be about the average since it's in the middle, and this also allows EZA to make use of the whole scale.