This is where I'm at
For real. People have to deliberately put blinders on and ignore everything that isn't a top 10 hit to make an argument that 2010's hip hop isn't amazingly diverse. Listen to Kids See Ghosts, To Pimp a Butterfly, Big Fish Theory and Flower Boy back to back and tell me with a straight face that the 90's is more diverse in production and lyrical subject matter.I will say that now is seriously the most diverse period for hip hop.
Your last line basically contradicts everything. Variety in the underground and even mid level artists is at an all time high, and the number of releases is ridiculous at the moment. There is sub genres for all types of fans. And yes mumble rap is over saturated in the mainstream, but s9me of its great and outside of a few artists, there are very few successful 'stupid coloured dread and shitty face tatoo artists' as you call them.
You could use the exact same argument for older generations. 'Hip Hop is just boom bap / G Funk'. Only difference is you liked those sounds that are being copied and pasted innthe mainstream. Cant seriously suggest that the 90's west cost wasnt filled to the brim with dr dre production knockoffs.
But hey, whatever floats your boat. Its all subjective.
What variety. Mumble rap dominates and they all have the exact same triplet flow over the exact same trap beat with the exact same autotune with the same stupid coloured dreads and shitty face tattoos.
Or it's Drake and Kanye.
Mainstream rap is easily the most stagnant and homogeneous it's ever been.
Like obviously if you look beyond the mainstream there are tons and tons of diverse and awesome artists but as far as what's popular across the board?
What I really loved about the 90s is the songs that dominated the charts/airwaves/cultural landscape were songs that were actually the "good" songs of the genre. Sure every now and then there was a garbage track that became popular but for the most part, what was hot and classic was the same thing. You didn't have to go digging for obscure shit nobody has heard of or plays in the club or at BBQs to find great shit.
The problem is there wasn't one homogeneous sound that dominated hip hop in the 90's due to the segregated nature of regional radio and clubs. Top Hip hip songs had not only a diversity of sounds musically due to cities/regions wanting their own identity but also style wise as a rapper being that biting was still looked down upon by the Hip Hop community/fans and you couldn't rhyme or sound like anybody elseYour last line basically contradicts everything. Variety in the underground and even mid level artists is at an all time high, and the number of releases is ridiculous at the moment. There is sub genres for all types of fans. And yes mumble rap is over saturated in the mainstream, but s9me of its great and outside of a few artists, there are very few successful 'stupid coloured dread and shitty face tatoo artists' as you call them.
You could use the exact same argument for older generations. 'Hip Hop is just boom bap / G Funk'. Only difference is you liked those sounds that are being copied and pasted innthe mainstream. Cant seriously suggest that the 90's west cost wasnt filled to the brim with dr dre production knockoffs.
But hey, whatever floats your boat. Its all subjective.
EDIT: As OP said above, every generation is looked back with rose tinted glasses, happens with music, movies, games etc.
Everyone remembers the 2Pacs and Biggies. Very few remember the vanilla ices
My bigger issue is that the people acting like modern hip-hop is complete trash are also actively throwing the majority of 90's legends under the bus considering those that are still alive are largely still having productive careers. Like look at 4:44, Sir Lucious Left Foot, Thank You 4 Your Service, Key to the Kuffs, all of Ghostface's output, all of E-40s output, Compton, etc, etc. These guys are all still around putting out good shit on top of all the releases from newcomers.For real. People have to deliberately put blinders on and ignore everything that isn't a top 10 hit to make an argument that 2010's hip hop isn't amazingly diverse. Listen to Kids See Ghosts, To Pimp a Butterfly, Big Fish Theory and Flower Boy back to back and tell me with a straight face that the 90's is more diverse in production and lyrical subject matter.
For real. People have to deliberately put blinders on and ignore everything that isn't a top 10 hit to make an argument that 2010's hip hop isn't amazingly diverse. Listen to Kids See Ghosts, To Pimp a Butterfly, Big Fish Theory and Flower Boy back to back and tell me with a straight face that the 90's is more diverse in production and lyrical subject matter.
The problem is there wasn't one homogeneous sound that dominated hip hop in the 90's due to the segregated nature of regional radio and clubs. Top Hip hip songs had not only a diversity of sounds musically due to cities/regions wanting their own identity but also style wise as a rapper being that biting was still looked down upon by the Hip Hop community/fans and you couldn't rhyme or sound like anybody else
No doubt, there's still a lot of excellent hip hop being made it's just way too many wack ones that have legit careers now and are the faces of hip hop. In the 90's, a wack rapper may've had a huge hit but their careers wouldn't last, and they were overshadowed by the sheer amount of talented rappers. Also let's use Trap Music and Migo's Triplet flow/mumble rap as an example, if that came out in the 90's; it may've influenced other regions and rappers but you wouldn't outright have a bunch of New York, Cali, Midwest, etc... rappers merely imitating the sound and style of Atlanta because rappers in their own cities/regions preferred having their own identity and repping that. I think that's the biggest difference to back then to today. Biting is no longer looked down upon and the sound of mainstream hip hop has gotten more homogeneous than in the past.Of course, it helped create diverse mainstream music due to competitiveness and how it became a profitable genre of music. Plus peak of east vs west (plus noice from the south) beef.
Dont get me wrong i love 90's, i just find alot of arguements to dismiss 2010's as trash music super flawed, dismissive, and cynical.
Hip Hop as a consumable form of media didn't start until 1979 so it didn't have a chance as a decade.
Hip Hop as a consumable form of media didn't start until 1979 so it didn't have a chance as a decade.
What specific rappers do you think are biting? The only notable example I can think is is Desiigner vs Future.No doubt, there's still a lot of excellent hip hop being made it's just way too many wack ones that have legit careers now and are the faces of hip hop. In the 90's, a wack rapper may've had a huge hit but their careers wouldn't last, and they were overshadowed by the sheer amount of talented rappers. Also let's use Trap Music and Migo's Triplet flow/mumble rap as an example, if that came out in the 90's; it may've influenced other regions and rappers but you wouldn't outright have a bunch of New York, Cali, Midwest, etc... rappers merely imitating the sound and style of Atlanta because rappers in their own cities/regions preferred having their own identity and repping that. I think that's the biggest difference to back then to today. Biting is no longer looked down upon and the sound of mainstream hip hop has gotten more homogeneous than in the past.
No doubt, there's still a lot of excellent hip hop being made it's just way too many wack ones that have legit careers now and are the faces of hip hop. In the 90's, a wack rapper may've had a huge hit but their careers wouldn't last, and they were overshadowed by the sheer amount of talented rappers. Also let's use Trap Music and Migo's Triplet flow/mumble rap as an example, if that came out in the 90's; it may've influenced other regions and rappers but you wouldn't outright have a bunch of New York, Cali, Midwest, etc... rappers merely imitating the sound and style of Atlanta because rappers in their own cities/regions preferred having their own identity and repping that. I think that's the biggest difference to back then to today. Biting is no longer looked down upon and the sound of mainstream hip hop has gotten more homogeneous than in the past.
True. Artists in all genres find it hard to make money nowadays, and if you try something new and it ends up being wack ? Well your whole career down the toilet. For some its safer to just stick to trends and keep there heads down.
But i dont really think those rappers become the face of hip hop. Alot of them are more disposable then people think. Fetty wap was the face of mainstream rap in 2014 ( with bangers admittedly), now look at him. He's almost nonexistant.
Eh there were 5 options, so why not?
My personal take is that we're in a golden age this decade.
If I list my favourite hip hop albums of the decade, they're so varied and different. I'd argue none of these could have come out in an earlier decade - either due to style, themes, or content.
And these are just the albums I personally love.
- My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy
- Good Kid M.a.a.d city
- Flower Boy
- To Pimp a Butterfly
- Kids See Ghosts
- Big Fish Theory
- Summertime '06
- We Got It From Here, Thanks for your service
- XXX
- Damn.
- Saturation III
- 4eva is a mighty long time
- Atrocity Exhibition
Unsurprisingly the people who only think hip hop is good in the 90s are coming across as the most insufferable.