Man y'all fucking confuse me.
Why would he be bitter? His response to the firing was anything but bitter. Also, Guardians was a very personal project and he just finished the script on it and was probably going to begin filming in a few months. I'm returning would be tough, but I doubt this would be something he'd no longer want to do.
Hint: Sanjuro isn't saying she should be fired. It's okay to have said trashy jokes in the past.
Come on man, you know what people mean when they say facts just came out, let's not play that naive game. I don't doubt Disney knew but again, they have a rep. Further, using RDJ, his problems were personal in the sense he wasn't bringing up kids/rape/pedo. And IIRC didn't Iron Man begin PP before Disney bought Marvel? Doesn't really matter just a thought. People can definitely change and I don't think he should be lynched but it's just not a good look for Disney, a company catering to kids, even more so nowadays than in the past.Facts came out a long time ago, like you know, when he posted them. Some alt-right pieces of trash bumping it back up into the news should have little effect.
And Disney might be for kids, but they hired Gunn. They likely knew about this before he even started with the original GOTG. And they kept RDJ around despite his history with drugs and alcohol. People can change, become better. That's what Gunn did, and he deserves to be praised for maturing into a respectable adult, not reprimanded.
I thought they cut ties with James Woods a while ago and the only thing he does is KH which is more on SEs plate? I don't think any of those peoples transgressions were kid/rape/pedo related either, sadly not that it makes it any better, but I get why Disney went about this like this, Do I agree? Eh, do I understand, yep. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. And I think the others should be shitcanned to as any form of abuse is fucked. This is lesser in comparison since he's just talking but again, Disney = Kids, thats just the way the cookie crumbles.But people keep telling you, and they've even linked stuff, that people like Gunn are still working for Disney, and are still associated with them. Sarah Silverman, Bobcat, Johnny Depp (who's an outright abuser, not just joker), James Woods, hell they even still make money off of the film of a child abuser.
Not to mention Lassiter, who's an actual sexual abuser and STILL hasn't been let go.
Doing this to Gunn over jokes with the "we're family friendly" excuse is bullshit. Everyone knew who Gunn was when Disney hired him. There was a campaign AGAINST them hiring him when they originally did. They still went with him, regardless.
This is double jeopardy, and he didn't even commit a crime.
Does it bother anyone how badly written the petition is? They even used the wrong "there". I wish someone who was more capable at writing a constructive piece would have made the petition. But i signed regardless.
I thought they cut ties with James Woods a while ago and the only thing he does is KH which is more on SEs plate? I don't think any of those peoples transgressions were kid/rape/pedo related either, sadly not that it makes it any better, but I get why Disney went about this like this, Do I agree? Eh, do I understand, yep. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. And I think the others should be shitcanned to as any form of abuse is fucked. This is lesser in comparison since he's just talking but again, Disney = Kids, thats just the way the cookie crumbles.
I thought they cut ties with James Woods a while ago and the only thing he does is KH which is more on SEs plate? I don't think any of those peoples transgressions were kid/rape/pedo related either, sadly not that it makes it any better, but I get why Disney went about this like this, Do I agree? Eh, do I understand, yep. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. And I think the others should be shitcanned to as any form of abuse is fucked. This is lesser in comparison since he's just talking but again, Disney = Kids, thats just the way the cookie crumbles.
Quick reminder: While it is possible for people to grow and change and ask forgiveness, that does not mean that everyone is required to forgive. The role of hate groups in this incident should not be overlooked, but simply feeling that Gunn's tweets were unforgivable does not make someone a member or sympathizer of said groups.
Quick reminder: While it is possible for people to grow and change and ask forgiveness, that does not mean that everyone is required to forgive. The role of hate groups in this incident should not be overlooked, but simply feeling that Gunn's tweets were unforgivable does not make someone a member or sympathizer of said groups.
I don't mind if people don't forgive Gunn for his jokes, but I hope they show consistency and take a look at every comedian who was in The Aristocrats and also espouse for them to all get fired as well. The list was posted above.
I can't recall anything of the top of my head similar from Silverman aside from the above, which i think is also fucked. Further, has she done anything similar on a highly visible platform in this new "age"? I know, it sounds dumb to me too but people have to adjust to the new lay of the land that is the present. Disney is different from even 5 years ago, they don't want this look, that's really the end of it.You're very ill informed on Silverman. She's joked about everything. And she's in Wreck it Ralph 2 soon. Disney is being a bunch of hypocrites with bullshit reasoning.
Nothing Gunn did was a crime. Nothing Silverman and Bobcat did were either. But if we suddenly start criminalizing jokes? Half of Hollywood would be gone.
That's completely fucked. IIRC it's SE that can veto cast.KH is actually on Disney's turf as far as voice acting goes. Also, Disney never officially cut ties with Woods. The only person who has officially on the record cut ties with woods is his agent.
As far as enforcement is concerned, it's about not assuming the worst of your fellow members.Does this strictly apply to posters on this forum, or does it apply to tweets/social media posts/etc?
Also, while I'm asking questions, is this part of a larger initiative to prevent accusations of being alt-right, or does this just apply to the Gunn affair?
I appreciate the clarification!
I don't mind if people don't forgive Gunn for his jokes, but I hope they show consistency and take a look at every comedian who was in The Aristocrats and also espouse for them to all get fired as well. The list was posted above.
mod edit: removed link
All these are fucked and I wouldn't have any qualms if they were treated the same as this incident.
Mike Cernovich, who has been instrumental in exposing these Tweets plans to call for Congress to begin an investigation into Hollywood's "casting couch and child grooming practices.
Pedophilia jokes are never okay based on past experiences with me personally. I hope he never lands another directorial movie. It upsets me theres even this change.com petition. But i guess there's a defense force for everything.
It all comes down to not caring what a person does to change, or at the very least not believing that years of changed behavior excuses offensive tweets.Not forgiving Gunn for allot of people goes deeper than its just a joke sentiment. You cant be 1 dimensional in these situations
As far as enforcement is concerned, it's about not assuming the worst of your fellow members.
We have made no policy statements on other topics.
For virtually ever joke ever told there's likely a person out there that could be offended by it due to their own personal experience. How do you think this should be resolved? If you feel the courtesy on what's okay to be joked about should extend to you then I'm sure you think the same courtesy should be extended to everyone else.Pedophilia jokes are never okay based on past experiences with me personally. I hope he never lands another directorial movie. It upsets me theres even this change.com petition. But i guess there's a defense force for everything.
Report it.Hey mods are we allowed to question whether or not someone is in favor of the alt right when they directly link to an article praising an alt right figurehead and directly pushing his agenda?
It's not an issue of what it's okay to joke about, the tweets are reprehensible. What matters is what he did in the 10 years after making them.For virtually ever joke ever told there's likely a person out there that could be offended by it due to their own personal experience. How do you think this should be resolved? If you feel the courtesy on what's okay to be joked about should extend to you then I'm sure you think the same courtesy should be extended to everyone else.
What the heck kind of site is this?mod edit: removed link
All these are fucked and I wouldn't have any qualms if they were treated the same as this incident.
Savage and accurate, lol
I'm not gonna assume they're alt-right but it's clear to me that they're willingly being played for fools by the alt-right. They're both helping out horrible human beings while encapsulating the worst expects of the left, the ones that expect lifetime wide purity tests and who derive nothing but pleasure from seeing a person fired for things they did a decade ago. Who want nothing but to say show how high their horse is even if it means stepping over allies.As far as enforcement is concerned, it's about not assuming the worst of your fellow members.
We have made no policy statements on other topics.
It's only an obvious flaw to assume Disney is moronic and incompetent enough to not know to check his social media. You aren't fooling anyone.Just pointing out your obvious flaw in the "Disney knew!" angle.
Everything is relative - unless you're arguing the tweets weren't jokes which is another matter entirely. If you feel they were jokes then what is okay to one person may not be okay to another. If we want to start policing comedy based on whether it fits with every single person's sensibilities then we may as well just end comedy overall. My main issue with this whole outcry is the lack of consistency. If you feel an offensive joke is worthy of being derided then that net you're about to cast can reach far, far wider than this topic. Even mundane topics could cause someone to be offended.It's not an issue of what it's okay to joke about, the tweets are reprehensible. What matters is what he did in the 10 years after making them.
What the heck kind of site is this?
Like, there's an article saying that the transgender superhero in Supergirl is a ratings ploy and edgy desperation, another talking about how much the internet hates She-Ra because she looks too mannish, and another that is in praise of a comic book campaign targeting a woman (including a shoutout to a tweet that "succinctly" puts it by complain against Anita Sarkeesian)
What the heck kind of site is this?
Like, there's an article saying that the transgender superhero in Supergirl is a ratings ploy and edgy desperation, another talking about how much the internet hates She-Ra because she looks too mannish, and another that is in praise of a comic book campaign targeting a woman (including a shoutout to a tweet that "succinctly" puts it by complain against Anita Sarkeesian)
mod edit: removed link
All these are fucked and I wouldn't have any qualms if they were treated the same as this incident.
Are you unironically posting a site that's blatantly pro-comicsgate?mod edit: removed link
All these are fucked and I wouldn't have any qualms if they were treated the same as this incident.
The article linked is acting like Cernovich is some kind of a hero for unearthing this Hollywood pedophile ring, so I think we know what kind of site it is.
The type of site that pretty much describes the mind set of the person linking it.
Friendly reminder Mike Cernovich was charged with rape in 2003 and supported Roy Moore.
These attacks aren't about morality, they're political.
No, no, please. Keep digging.mod edit: removed link
All these are fucked and I wouldn't have any qualms if they were treated the same as this incident.
Jokes can hurt people, and it's pretty easy to see why that kind of joke in particular could hurt people. They're offensive and wrong, something Gunn himself realized. I think he managed to make up for the harm he caused however, and I don't like the idea that a person should be forever held accountable for a joke, even a harmful one.Everything is relative - unless you're arguing the tweets weren't jokes which is another matter entirely. If you feel they were jokes then what is okay to one person may not be okay to another. If we want to start policing comedy based on whether it fits with every single person's sensibilities then we may as well just end comedy overall. My main issue with this whole outcry is the lack of consistency. If you feel an offensive joke is worthy of being derided then that net you're about to cast can reach far, far wider than this topic. Even mundane topics could cause someone to be offended.