• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Ryan.

Prophet of Truth
The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
12,876
Why would he be bitter? His response to the firing was anything but bitter. Also, Guardians was a very personal project and he just finished the script on it and was probably going to begin filming in a few months. I'm returning would be tough, but I doubt this would be something he'd no longer want to do.

That's true. Although I'd imagine there would have been some frustration from the whole thing that might make him think about it even if he wants to come back.

With that said, I do want him to come back to finish his trilogy.
 

Nathan_Drake

Member
Nov 6, 2017
431
Full disclosure I am the dreaded Libertarian that Era despises. Socially liberal (pro gay rights/marriage, racial equality, drug legalization) and fiscally conservative (low taxes, pro gun, pro military).

I signed the petition early on and think redemption is a virtue.

Here is what I think most are upset about and it's not the movie. How does the left plan to win elections when an apologetic and redeemed ally of the left gets treated like this? It is a microcosm of the current political world we live in. The Right literally elected a President that said grab them by the pussy and had affairs and a ton of other horrible shit but their agenda is more important than the man. The left will eat their own. They will disavow those that aren't perfect (I don't want to use Putiry or Virtue test) or dont have pasts that align with their terms and conditions.

That is not a fair fight. He didn't hide or run from his past. He evolved and apologized. He fought the lefts fight. He supported movements and his movies showed that same growth. The world is messy and so are people. There is Grey in the world. This attitude is what should make the Left very scared about their political climate. The alt right can do this because the left allows it.
 

Chicken Wing

Banned
Apr 17, 2018
695
Facts came out a long time ago, like you know, when he posted them. Some alt-right pieces of trash bumping it back up into the news should have little effect.

And Disney might be for kids, but they hired Gunn. They likely knew about this before he even started with the original GOTG. And they kept RDJ around despite his history with drugs and alcohol. People can change, become better. That's what Gunn did, and he deserves to be praised for maturing into a respectable adult, not reprimanded.
Come on man, you know what people mean when they say facts just came out, let's not play that naive game. I don't doubt Disney knew but again, they have a rep. Further, using RDJ, his problems were personal in the sense he wasn't bringing up kids/rape/pedo. And IIRC didn't Iron Man begin PP before Disney bought Marvel? Doesn't really matter just a thought. People can definitely change and I don't think he should be lynched but it's just not a good look for Disney, a company catering to kids, even more so nowadays than in the past.

But people keep telling you, and they've even linked stuff, that people like Gunn are still working for Disney, and are still associated with them. Sarah Silverman, Bobcat, Johnny Depp (who's an outright abuser, not just joker), James Woods, hell they even still make money off of the film of a child abuser.

Not to mention Lassiter, who's an actual sexual abuser and STILL hasn't been let go.

Doing this to Gunn over jokes with the "we're family friendly" excuse is bullshit. Everyone knew who Gunn was when Disney hired him. There was a campaign AGAINST them hiring him when they originally did. They still went with him, regardless.

This is double jeopardy, and he didn't even commit a crime.
I thought they cut ties with James Woods a while ago and the only thing he does is KH which is more on SEs plate? I don't think any of those peoples transgressions were kid/rape/pedo related either, sadly not that it makes it any better, but I get why Disney went about this like this, Do I agree? Eh, do I understand, yep. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. And I think the others should be shitcanned to as any form of abuse is fucked. This is lesser in comparison since he's just talking but again, Disney = Kids, thats just the way the cookie crumbles.
 

Alice

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
5,867
I thought they cut ties with James Woods a while ago and the only thing he does is KH which is more on SEs plate? I don't think any of those peoples transgressions were kid/rape/pedo related either, sadly not that it makes it any better, but I get why Disney went about this like this, Do I agree? Eh, do I understand, yep. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. And I think the others should be shitcanned to as any form of abuse is fucked. This is lesser in comparison since he's just talking but again, Disney = Kids, thats just the way the cookie crumbles.

You're very ill informed on Silverman. She's joked about everything. And she's in Wreck it Ralph 2 soon. Disney is being a bunch of hypocrites with bullshit reasoning.

Nothing Gunn did was a crime. Nothing Silverman and Bobcat did were either. But if we suddenly start criminalizing jokes? Half of Hollywood would be gone.
 

mugurumakensei

Elizabeth, I’m coming to join you!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,320
I thought they cut ties with James Woods a while ago and the only thing he does is KH which is more on SEs plate? I don't think any of those peoples transgressions were kid/rape/pedo related either, sadly not that it makes it any better, but I get why Disney went about this like this, Do I agree? Eh, do I understand, yep. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. And I think the others should be shitcanned to as any form of abuse is fucked. This is lesser in comparison since he's just talking but again, Disney = Kids, thats just the way the cookie crumbles.

KH is actually on Disney's turf as far as voice acting goes. Also, Disney never officially cut ties with Woods. The only person who has officially on the record cut ties with woods is his agent.
 

b-dubs

That's some catch, that catch-22
General Manager
Oct 25, 2017
32,721
Quick reminder: While it is possible for people to grow and change and ask forgiveness, that does not mean that everyone is required to forgive. The role of hate groups in this incident should not be overlooked, but simply feeling that Gunn's tweets were unforgivable does not make someone a member or sympathizer of said groups.
 

Prine

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,724
Quick reminder: While it is possible for people to grow and change and ask forgiveness, that does not mean that everyone is required to forgive. The role of hate groups in this incident should not be overlooked, but simply feeling that Gunn's tweets were unforgivable does not make someone a member or sympathizer of said groups.

Thank you. Its a ridiculous oversimplification of people issue with Gunn.
 

Natiko

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,263
I think everyone should probably take a deep breath. Those that feel Gunn cannot be forgiven have every right to take that hardline stance. I'm sure they're all actively petitioning for every comedian that has ever made a dark joke to no longer get work as well. I'm sure they bring consistency to the table in their approach since they're so stringent with their morals.
 

AWizardDidIt

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,461
I don't mind if people don't forgive Gunn for his jokes, but I hope they show consistency and take a look at every comedian who was in The Aristocrats and also espouse for them to all get fired as well. The list was posted above.
 

Deleted member 15326

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,219
By the same token maybe people could stop insinuating that Gunn is a closeted pedo or that anyone who sympathizes with him is just a fanboy who loves "kiddie movies"
 
Oct 26, 2017
1,439
Quick reminder: While it is possible for people to grow and change and ask forgiveness, that does not mean that everyone is required to forgive. The role of hate groups in this incident should not be overlooked, but simply feeling that Gunn's tweets were unforgivable does not make someone a member or sympathizer of said groups.


Does this strictly apply to posters on this forum, or does it apply to tweets/social media posts/etc?

Also, while I'm asking questions, is this part of a larger initiative to prevent accusations of being alt-right, or does this just apply to the Gunn affair?

I appreciate the clarification!
 

mugurumakensei

Elizabeth, I’m coming to join you!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,320
I don't mind if people don't forgive Gunn for his jokes, but I hope they show consistency and take a look at every comedian who was in The Aristocrats and also espouse for them to all get fired as well. The list was posted above.

Oh. The liberal comedians on that list will probably get fired. Paul Joseph Watson has already started the harassment campaign on Sarah Silverman for her joke about pedophilia on Twitter. Larry Miller will probably fine cause he won't be the target of an alt-right campaign designed to weaponize social media outrage.
 

Chicken Wing

Banned
Apr 17, 2018
695
You're very ill informed on Silverman. She's joked about everything. And she's in Wreck it Ralph 2 soon. Disney is being a bunch of hypocrites with bullshit reasoning.

Nothing Gunn did was a crime. Nothing Silverman and Bobcat did were either. But if we suddenly start criminalizing jokes? Half of Hollywood would be gone.
I can't recall anything of the top of my head similar from Silverman aside from the above, which i think is also fucked. Further, has she done anything similar on a highly visible platform in this new "age"? I know, it sounds dumb to me too but people have to adjust to the new lay of the land that is the present. Disney is different from even 5 years ago, they don't want this look, that's really the end of it.

KH is actually on Disney's turf as far as voice acting goes. Also, Disney never officially cut ties with Woods. The only person who has officially on the record cut ties with woods is his agent.
That's completely fucked. IIRC it's SE that can veto cast.
 

b-dubs

That's some catch, that catch-22
General Manager
Oct 25, 2017
32,721
Does this strictly apply to posters on this forum, or does it apply to tweets/social media posts/etc?

Also, while I'm asking questions, is this part of a larger initiative to prevent accusations of being alt-right, or does this just apply to the Gunn affair?

I appreciate the clarification!
As far as enforcement is concerned, it's about not assuming the worst of your fellow members.

We have made no policy statements on other topics.
 

Chicken Wing

Banned
Apr 17, 2018
695
User banned (1 week): Linking to a website associated with the alt-right as a source
mod edit: removed link
All these are fucked and I wouldn't have any qualms if they were treated the same as this incident.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BankaiZaraki

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
632
Pedophilia jokes are never okay based on past experiences with me personally. I hope he never lands another directorial movie. It upsets me theres even this change.com petition. But i guess there's a defense force for everything.
 

mugurumakensei

Elizabeth, I’m coming to join you!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,320
That's completely fucked. IIRC it's SE that can veto cast.

Nope Disney's contracts are iron-clad. The voice actors have rights of first refusal recording their roles unless said actors contract is nullified by Disney themselves. That is, unless Disney buys outs Woods, Disney could get sued if Woods is refused the role when he wants it.
 

Thunder

Alt-Account
Banned
Jan 11, 2018
314
I don't mind if people don't forgive Gunn for his jokes, but I hope they show consistency and take a look at every comedian who was in The Aristocrats and also espouse for them to all get fired as well. The list was posted above.

Not forgiving Gunn for allot of people goes deeper than its just a joke sentiment. You cant be 1 dimensional in these situations
 

stupei

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,801
God I wonder what source might be digging up all these old tweets by outspoken liberal leaning figures. Hmmmm.

mod edit: removed link
All these are fucked and I wouldn't have any qualms if they were treated the same as this incident.

Wait, sorry, you're linking to an article that's praising Cernovich unironically?

Mike Cernovich, who has been instrumental in exposing these Tweets plans to call for Congress to begin an investigation into Hollywood's "casting couch and child grooming practices.

And then it asks if a Congressional investigation should be launched into all of these actors.

Really?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

AWizardDidIt

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,461
Pedophilia jokes are never okay based on past experiences with me personally. I hope he never lands another directorial movie. It upsets me theres even this change.com petition. But i guess there's a defense force for everything.

I for one will never be ashamed to be a 'defense force' for something as simple and fundamental as the idea that a person can change and become better and that we have a responsibility as a society to encourage that.
 

stupei

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,801
Hey mods are we allowed to question whether or not someone is in favor of the alt right when they directly link to an article praising an alt right figurehead and directly pushing his agenda?
 

Natiko

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,263
Pedophilia jokes are never okay based on past experiences with me personally. I hope he never lands another directorial movie. It upsets me theres even this change.com petition. But i guess there's a defense force for everything.
For virtually ever joke ever told there's likely a person out there that could be offended by it due to their own personal experience. How do you think this should be resolved? If you feel the courtesy on what's okay to be joked about should extend to you then I'm sure you think the same courtesy should be extended to everyone else.
 

Deleted member 176

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
37,160
For virtually ever joke ever told there's likely a person out there that could be offended by it due to their own personal experience. How do you think this should be resolved? If you feel the courtesy on what's okay to be joked about should extend to you then I'm sure you think the same courtesy should be extended to everyone else.
It's not an issue of what it's okay to joke about, the tweets are reprehensible. What matters is what he did in the 10 years after making them.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,927
mod edit: removed link
All these are fucked and I wouldn't have any qualms if they were treated the same as this incident.
What the heck kind of site is this?

Like, there's an article saying that the transgender superhero in Supergirl is a ratings ploy and edgy desperation, another talking about how much the internet hates She-Ra because she looks too mannish, and another that is in praise of a comic book campaign targeting a woman (including a shoutout to a tweet that "succinctly" puts it by complain against Anita Sarkeesian)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Einchy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
42,659
As far as enforcement is concerned, it's about not assuming the worst of your fellow members.

We have made no policy statements on other topics.
I'm not gonna assume they're alt-right but it's clear to me that they're willingly being played for fools by the alt-right. They're both helping out horrible human beings while encapsulating the worst expects of the left, the ones that expect lifetime wide purity tests and who derive nothing but pleasure from seeing a person fired for things they did a decade ago. Who want nothing but to say show how high their horse is even if it means stepping over allies.
 

Natiko

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,263
It's not an issue of what it's okay to joke about, the tweets are reprehensible. What matters is what he did in the 10 years after making them.
Everything is relative - unless you're arguing the tweets weren't jokes which is another matter entirely. If you feel they were jokes then what is okay to one person may not be okay to another. If we want to start policing comedy based on whether it fits with every single person's sensibilities then we may as well just end comedy overall. My main issue with this whole outcry is the lack of consistency. If you feel an offensive joke is worthy of being derided then that net you're about to cast can reach far, far wider than this topic. Even mundane topics could cause someone to be offended.
 

stupei

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,801
What the heck kind of site is this?

Like, there's an article saying that the transgender superhero in Supergirl is a ratings ploy and edgy desperation, another talking about how much the internet hates She-Ra because she looks too mannish, and another that is in praise of a comic book campaign targeting a woman (including a shoutout to a tweet that "succinctly" puts it by complain against Anita Sarkeesian)

The article linked is acting like Cernovich is some kind of a hero for unearthing this Hollywood pedophile ring, so I think we know what kind of site it is.
 

mugurumakensei

Elizabeth, I’m coming to join you!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,320
What the heck kind of site is this?

Like, there's an article saying that the transgender superhero in Supergirl is a ratings ploy and edgy desperation, another talking about how much the internet hates She-Ra because she looks too mannish, and another that is in praise of a comic book campaign targeting a woman (including a shoutout to a tweet that "succinctly" puts it by complain against Anita Sarkeesian)

The type of site that pretty much describes the mind set of the person linking it.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,927
The article linked is acting like Cernovich is some kind of a hero for unearthing this Hollywood pedophile ring, so I think we know what kind of site it is.

The type of site that pretty much describes the mind set of the person linking it.

Like, this is legit being posted as a question on the site:

"Do you think a criminal investigation should be opened into James Gunn to determine the veracity of the accusations being made against him?"

"journalists like Jack Posobiec"

Who is that, you ask?

From Wikipedia:
"John Michael Posobiec III (/pəˈsoʊbɪk/ pə-SOH-bik; born 1985) is an American alt-right[1][2][3] internet troll[4] and conspiracy theorist[5] known primarily for his controversial and pro-Donald Trump comments on Twitter. He has promoted fake news, including the debunked Pizzagate conspiracy theory that high-ranking Democratic Party officials were involved in a child sex ring.[6] He has been retweeted by Donald Trump.[7] He works for the pro-Trump channel One America News Network.[8]"

Edit: An article about a woman getting beaten at comiccon and someone stopping in to help as this:
"It definitely appears the situation is more complicated than you might originally think. It looks like both the woman and the man were in the wrong as the woman was throwing objects at the man, and he in turn was kicking her."

Another article angry someone was called a white supremacist "without any proof!"

Another article about how Apu is totally ok. I could go on, but I'm going to stop now since the link was removed and this has been dealt with.

EDIT: I LIED ONE MORE FOR THE ROAD

Article about how unfair it is for Ubisoft for banning players for "toxicity", which is actually because they were using the n-word in the chat. Cool site that got posted.
 
Last edited:

stupei

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,801
Posting that link was some amazing comedic timing

Man, they were really active in that thread before dropping that link. Weird how they just up and vanished now.

I guess it is a little hard to defend.

It's either "I agree with the thing I linked" or "I didn't bother to read the thing I linked."
 

Deleted member 176

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
37,160
Everything is relative - unless you're arguing the tweets weren't jokes which is another matter entirely. If you feel they were jokes then what is okay to one person may not be okay to another. If we want to start policing comedy based on whether it fits with every single person's sensibilities then we may as well just end comedy overall. My main issue with this whole outcry is the lack of consistency. If you feel an offensive joke is worthy of being derided then that net you're about to cast can reach far, far wider than this topic. Even mundane topics could cause someone to be offended.
Jokes can hurt people, and it's pretty easy to see why that kind of joke in particular could hurt people. They're offensive and wrong, something Gunn himself realized. I think he managed to make up for the harm he caused however, and I don't like the idea that a person should be forever held accountable for a joke, even a harmful one.