• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

FantasyFreak07

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
1,234
I don't get it. The left were complaining about the tweets and the right and yet now the left are mad at the right for being mad at something they'd be mad at if they found it... lol

For the most part, those in the right continue to post shitty things on Twitter and make no effort to better themselves. In Gunn's case, he has acknowledged and apologized for his tweets; moreover, he has made an effort to better himself (as far as I know).
 
Feb 3, 2018
1,130
Yeah, literally that's all they needed to do. It is a bit off how fast they moved on this. And the fact it came from Alan Horn makes me wonder if Feige/Marvel was even involved in the decision.

I also wonder if maybe it has anything to do with the impending Fox acquisition and Disney not wanting -anything- to fluctuate their stock right now.

I think this the biggest reason for them cutting him off so fast
 

CrichtonKicks

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,284
Disney could either sue Pratt for breach of contract, or choose not to enforce it and let him leave. The latter seems unlikely since GOTG is a cash cow, but the former doesn't exactly make for good PR either.

IIRC usually they just agree to a role swap or something to avoid a nasty legal battle. ie Chris Pratt walks from Guardians but agrees to headline another movie for Disney sometime in the next several years.

I believe Ed Norton only did The Italian Job way back when because he owed it to Paramount as settlement for a breach of contract on a different movie.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,677
I'm so sick and tired with arguing this. This sets a horrible precedent. Alt Right gamergating neo Nazis will not go digging into anyone's past to find something that use to do that's fucked up. Are we to judge people in the present that have grown and changed for the sins of their past forever?
I think alt-right Gamergating neo-Nazis were going to dig up whatever shit they could find on anyone not aligned with their agenda regardless of what Disney did here.
 

Jombie

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,392
I think if the cast felt uncomfortable working with him that Gunn would respect that and move on.
 

Nappuccino

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
13,123

broncobuster

Member
Oct 26, 2017
8,139
Then he should have been fired the first time the tweets came to light.

Small bit of information that tends to be left out about the 2012 petition and subsequent apology is that they weren't over Twitter posts. They were over his blog posts from 2011. Link to the old petition and original articles,

https://www.change.org/p/marvel-studios-remove-james-gunn-from-guardians-of-the-galaxy-movie

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/marvels-guardians-galaxy-director-draws-395184

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796

This is the first time the old Tweets drew attention. So, yeah. While he deleted the blog post, Twitter was unrelated and he didn't think to delete those as well. But that said, the blog is not out of character with those old Tweets. If Disney was aware of these petitions and such, it should've clued them in.

To be honest, I don't remember how prolific Twitter was in 2011 or earlier that people would understand the repercussions of what's out there.



He was hired before the petition. That's why the petition happened.
 

TDLink

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,411
The real power player here would be Feige. His contract is up soon so he's got serious leverage. I kind of doubt he would be willing to go out on a limb for this but it would depend on how important Gunn and the Guardians were to Phase 4. My expectation is that the Russos/Marcus/McFeely would take a breather after A3 and A4 and the next big "event" would be Guardians and Cosmic focused with Gunn as the primary creative force.

It depends. Most people in the world still have no idea who Feige is. He is very valuable to Disney but I'm not sure Disney sees him as indispensable. It's not the same thing as the very well-known celebrity stars standing up.

We also have no idea how much Feige was or wasn't involved with this decision and has or hasn't been fighting about it internally anyway.

The cast might speak up, but they won't walk out or threaten, let's not create fantasies. I mean, I guess there's no harm, but it won't happen.
You're probably right, but unless they do he's not coming back. That's all I'm saying.
Yeah, he was only fired because there was controversy and I certainly don't think they expected the near universal backlash on this.

Zoe Saldana is really good friends with James Gunn from what I've seen too.
Yes. If Chris and Zoe stand up and say something it might do something. But they'd probably have to back up what they're saying with some sort of threat. Like what Batista said is great but if he's going to do GotG 3 regardless it doesn't have a lot of weight.

They might also be contractually obligated to fulfil the remaining films in their contracts as well. So they might not be able to resign even if they want to, without breaching of contracts.

Yes, they can breach their contracts. Which they would have to pay for monetarily, but all of those actors are pretty good for it. It's a significant hypothetical anyways though because I don't think Disney would want to appear to be going against all of their principals which are major public figures and/or actually get into a dispute with them. They'd be tanking their billion dollar franchise.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,677
Or they could rehire Gunn.
Ha, well yeah that's an option too. But if that were to happen, I imagine it'd be months from now.

It's also possible that Gunn would ask the rest of the cast not to protest and walk from the movie on his behalf too, but who knows.

IIRC usually they just agree to a role swap or something to avoid a nasty legal battle. ie Chris Pratt walks from Guardians but agrees to headline another movie for Disney sometime in the next several years.

I believe Ed Norton only did The Italian Job way back when because he owed it to Paramount as settlement for a breach of contract on a different movie.
Huh, interesting.
 

Nappuccino

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
13,123
Small bit of information that tends to be left out about the 2012 petition and subsequent apology is that they weren't over Twitter posts. They were over his blog posts from 2011. Link to the old petition and original articles,

https://www.change.org/p/marvel-studios-remove-james-gunn-from-guardians-of-the-galaxy-movie

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/marvels-guardians-galaxy-director-draws-395184

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796

This is the first time the old Tweets drew attention. So, yeah. While he deleted the blog post, Twitter was unrelated and he didn't think to delete those as well. But that said, the blog is not out of character with those old Tweets. If Disney was aware of these petitions and such, it should've clued them in.

To be honest, I don't remember how prolific Twitter was in 2011 or earlier that people would understand the repercussions of what's out there.




He was hired before the petition. That's why the petition happened.
His apology seems to be for all of his social media presence. I'm happy to include the tweets as I'm sure Disney was aware of them, or at least very similar content. I could be wrong about that, I suppose.
 

Cipherr

Member
Oct 26, 2017
13,495
The cutoff would be the point where he apologized about his offensive jokes and stopped making them. Why is this confusing?

Because people who catch shit for saying dumb stuff on social media pretty universally apologize for their prior behaviour. Which is then mostly looked at as "Oh, she's sorry she got caught". It's interesting that the answer changes person to person. There's clearly no real line. It just differs person to person. But I know its not apologies. We get those from people all the time and noone starts screaming about leaving these people alone.
 

Deleted member 176

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
37,160
Because people who catch shit for saying dumb stuff on social media pretty universally apologize for their prior behaviour. Which is then mostly looked at as "Oh, she's sorry she got caught". It's interesting that the answer changes person to person. There's clearly no real line. It just differs person to person. But I know its not apologies. We get those from people all the time and noone starts screaming about leaving these people alone.
He's spent the past 6 years making good on that apology. That's why he was targeted by the worst people on the Internet in the first place.
 
Oct 27, 2017
720
If you're someone they don't like, alt-righters posting on this forum will try to dox you on other sites. The other poster is saying don't give out identifying info or say dumb shit.

That feels slightly paranoid to me. I mean posting who you really are and your occupation on a mostly anonymous forum is dumb in any case, if there are alt-righters here why not identify them to the staff?
 

Nappuccino

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
13,123
Because people who catch shit for saying dumb stuff on social media pretty universally apologize for their prior behaviour. Which is then mostly looked at as "Oh, she's sorry she got caught". It's interesting that the answer changes person to person. There's clearly no real line. It just differs person to person. But I know its not apologies. We get those from people all the time and noone starts screaming about leaving these people alone.
I mean, as it should. Different levels of offensive deserve different levels of apology and behavior following the apology. There's no binary here, as simple as that would be.
 

CrichtonKicks

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,284
It depends. Most people in the world still have no idea who Feige is. He is very valuable to Disney but I'm not sure Disney sees him as indispensable. It's not the same thing as the very well-known celebrity stars standing up.

Doesn't matter how much the public knows. Disney execs (and everyone else in Hollywood) damn well know how valuable Feige is. Everyone in town has been falling down for the past five years just trying to recreate the success of The Avengers from 2012 and meanwhile Feige keeps one upping himself and making it look easy.

We also have no idea how much Feige was or wasn't involved with this decision and has or hasn't been fighting about it internally anyway.

That's true.
 
Oct 27, 2017
720
Because people who catch shit for saying dumb stuff on social media pretty universally apologize for their prior behaviour. Which is then mostly looked at as "Oh, she's sorry she got caught". It's interesting that the answer changes person to person. There's clearly no real line. It just differs person to person. But I know its not apologies. We get those from people all the time and noone starts screaming about leaving these people alone.

I feel like there's a massive difference between a half handed apology the moment you got caught and apologizing for something as innocuous as dumb jokes years before they became a news headline.
 

Kayla

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,316
He's spent the past 6 years making good on that apology. That's why he was targeted by the worst people on the Internet in the first place.

What did he do for 6 years other than make marvel movies people like? Did he donate to any sexual abuse charities? The guy voiced support for NAMBLA, mocked people with AIDS, joked about raping his friend, joked about children having facials, used disgusting language.

Is it really hard to see why some people wouldn't want to give the guy the benefit of the doubt when hollywood has a pretty shitty track record of sexual assault and abuse. I dont find his jokes funny, i wont necessarily cheer on his firing, but i wont lose sleep over it.
 

Cipherr

Member
Oct 26, 2017
13,495
I feel like there's a massive difference between a half handed apology the moment you got caught and apologizing for something as innocuous as dumb jokes years before they became a news headline.

Who determines if the apology is half handed? Is it solely the amount of time that passes? An apology for something 3 years or more ago is genuine, but if you apologize on something that was just revealed today its half handed?
 

Deleted member 176

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
37,160
What did he do for 6 years other than make marvel movies people like? Did he donate to any sexual abuse charities? The guy voiced support for NAMBLA, mocked people with AIDS, joked about raping his friend, joked about children having facials, used disgusting language.

Is it really hard to see why some people wouldn't want to give the guy the benefit of the doubt when hollywood has a pretty shitty track record of sexual assault and abuse. I dont find his jokes funny, i wont necessarily cheer on his firing, but i wont lose sleep over it.
He's one of the most outspoken allies on Twitter. Again, that's why he was targeted.

His shitty track record ended over 6 years ago.
 

Odesu

Member
Oct 26, 2017
5,558
Small bit of information that tends to be left out about the 2012 petition and subsequent apology is that they weren't over Twitter posts. They were over his blog posts from 2011. Link to the old petition and original articles,

https://www.change.org/p/marvel-studios-remove-james-gunn-from-guardians-of-the-galaxy-movie

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/marvels-guardians-galaxy-director-draws-395184

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796

This is the first time the old Tweets drew attention. So, yeah. While he deleted the blog post, Twitter was unrelated and he didn't think to delete those as well. But that said, the blog is not out of character with those old Tweets. If Disney was aware of these petitions and such, it should've clued them in.

To be honest, I don't remember how prolific Twitter was in 2011 or earlier that people would understand the repercussions of what's out there.




He was hired before the petition. That's why the petition happened.

It's pretty clear to me he's talking in general about his past behaviour and jokes, but even if he didn't, he talked a lot about his jokes and apoligized for them in other interviews, too. This one is from Buzzfeed, 2017. He even starts talking about it completely unprovoked.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/adambvary/...f-the-galaxy?utm_term=.swAkQP2e0g#.vv4PRV64kX
DimSXQQWAAUpoE1.jpg


Also, thanks for all the feedback to the previous post. I'm not sure how I feel about all of this because I don't just want to be another of those guys crying about "outrage culture". I think it's REALLY important to call out destructive and hurtful behaviour. I think it's really important not to give PewDiePie a Pass the 52nd time he shouts the N-word. I think it's really important to take women seriously and believe them when they talk about their experiences thanks to metoo and be outraged and demand consequences. So...it's just a weird place to find myself in, to feel like that but to also feel like there is definitely something going on here with the way some in this thread handle their outrage and how their approach is equally as destructive and hurtful.
 
Oct 27, 2017
720
Who determines if the apology is half handed? Is it solely the amount of time that passes? An apology for something 3 years or more ago is genuine, but if you apologize on something from years ago that was just revealed today its half handed?

That's not my point. The biggest problems with those apologies, like the infamous Kevin Spacey one, is they don't really sound like apologies as much as excuses. The added factor of only doing so when it's a national news headline makes it all the more transparent.
 

TDLink

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,411
Doesn't matter how much the public knows. Disney execs (and everyone else in Hollywood) damn well know how valuable Feige is. Everyone in town has been falling down for the past five years just trying to recreate the success of The Avengers from 2012 and meanwhile Feige keeps one upping himself and making it look easy.
That's true but generally with things like this corporations care most about public perception. That is the only reason Gunn was fired anyway. The head of Paramount TV was just canned yesterday. No one is untouchable. Not that Feige isn't much more important and powerful than Amy Powell, but anything could happen. Feige isn't going to be around forever regardless of what happens and he's far from the only person who has made Marvel's films so successful.
 
Feb 6, 2018
794
User Banned (Permanent): Being dismissive towards and downplaying doxxing, attacking other members, history of infractions.
This is a good time to remember that we have plenty of alt-right people here as well. Be careful about sharing too much personal info or making spicy posts, especially if you've revealed your occupation or workplace.

Some of these performative "progressives" are waiting for slip-ups
Look at this FUD right here. I mean seriously...
 

Froli

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,707
Philippines
Small bit of information that tends to be left out about the 2012 petition and subsequent apology is that they weren't over Twitter posts. They were over his blog posts from 2011. Link to the old petition and original articles,

https://www.change.org/p/marvel-studios-remove-james-gunn-from-guardians-of-the-galaxy-movie

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/marvels-guardians-galaxy-director-draws-395184

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guardians-galaxy-director-james-gunn-395796

This is the first time the old Tweets drew attention. So, yeah. While he deleted the blog post, Twitter was unrelated and he didn't think to delete those as well. But that said, the blog is not out of character with those old Tweets. If Disney was aware of these petitions and such, it should've clued them in.

To be honest, I don't remember how prolific Twitter was in 2011 or earlier that people would understand the repercussions of what's out there.




He was hired before the petition. That's why the petition happened.

Any chance you know when he started deleting the 10k old tweets? I found this post on reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/com...rs_ties_with_guardians_of_the_galaxy/#e2qq5in
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,789
PR is no longer a cut and paste job. Distancing yourself is no longer a viable strategy. It's interesting how these things evolve.

Also interesting how POTUS isn't even held to that standard. What a strange thing we've created, is it good to be pure or handicapping? Perhaps those lacking nuance will settle on some.
 

Cipherr

Member
Oct 26, 2017
13,495
User Banned (1 Day): Disingenuous comparison involving a serious matter
He apologized for it in 2012, vowed to stop, and kept the vow.

So the line would be having apologize for the specific offense prior. I can see that being reasonable, as long as we extend it to everyone. Speaking to a previous post; if Kevin Spacey started getting roles again, but was by all reports on his best behaviour, then I would expect the community to be welcoming to him and extend him the chance to improve himself going forward; and not sneer and deride the fact that he got another chance at all. As long as that's the case it seems pretty reasonable to me.
 

arkay

Member
Nov 8, 2017
459
Posting tweets to explain why you feel that way doesn't make you right, you know? And it doesn't make me right either. What's okay for someone may not be okay for another. And that's perfectly okay, unless you feel everyone you be exactly the same and feel exactly the same on what is acceptable to joke about or not.

I can find something funny, you may not, and vice versa. And that's okay. We don't all have to feel thya same way about it or find the same things funny.

Some things are universal. Saying weird creepo things with children involved is generally off-limits to every human being on this planet. Now you can have a clever joke and still touch on the subject but you see absolutely none of that from those tweets. There isn't subjectivity in "I like when little boys touch me in my silly place". How in the flying fuck is that funny?
 

Neutra

Member
Oct 27, 2017
988
NYC
remember when the outrage squad had Nolan Bushnell's GDC award revoked because Atari's work culture was ~problematic~ in the 80s?

there's no expiration date on "bad behavior" if the target is a bad guy who "deserves" it.
 

Deleted member 15326

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,219
That's not FUD at all. There are sites like Kiwi Farms that literally keep tabs on members of forums. Even going as far as coding scripts that record any posts a specific target makes.

There's also neofag on Voat and the Bore

Some people don't even bother to use different avatars or usernames because it's all forgive and forget over here lol
 

Sblargh

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,926
So the line would be having apologize for the specific offense prior. I can see that being reasonable, as long as we extend it to everyone. Speaking to a previous post; if Kevin Spacey started getting roles again, but was by all reports on his best behaviour, then I would expect the community to be welcoming to him and extend him the chance to improve himself going forward; and not sneer and deride the fact that he got another chance at all. As long as that's the case it seems pretty reasonable to me.

I think - and I said this before - that Kevin Space will - and should - get roles again, eventually, if he has truly shown to be a different person. This discussion happened before with other people. It's just that this kind of calling out with actual repercussions is kind of recent and we don't have many example of people who walked the walk.
James Gunn walked the walk and, as the poster you are responding to is saying, is one of the reasons why he is being targeted.
 

Deleted member 176

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
37,160
So the line would be having apologize for the specific offense prior. I can see that being reasonable, as long as we extend it to everyone. Speaking to a previous post; if Kevin Spacey started getting roles again, but was by all reports on his best behaviour, then I would expect the community to be welcoming to him and extend him the chance to improve himself going forward; and not sneer and deride the fact that he got another chance at all. As long as that's the case it seems pretty reasonable to me.
I think it should be an apology followed by actions that show you mean the apology and make up for your past transgressions. This is why you can't believe people whom immediately apologize after being caught, they haven't had the time to prove themselves yet. Rosanne went back to her racist self immediately for example.

I think using his influence to speak against the worst sort of people makes up for once being that kind of person himself, and he kept his word for years. I don't think Kevin Spacey can make up for raping a bunch of people.
 
Oct 25, 2017
12,214
Look at this FUD right here. I mean seriously...
I have seen veiled threats about people on here towards verified members. Shit isn't FUD. I'm a nobody, but even with that I never fully detail where I live. People know I'm a teacher from the Houston area, but hell nah if you think I would raise a flag and give my exact district.

The broader point that you don't seem to get or don't care about is context/time. This stuff was nearly a decade ago, he was making edgelord jokes and now he is being buried as a means of revenge.
 

Froli

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,707
Philippines
This is a good time to remember that we have plenty of alt-right people here as well. Be careful about sharing too much personal info or making spicy posts, especially if you've revealed your occupation or workplace.

Some of these performative "progressives" are waiting for slip-ups

You guys should take this post seriously. Just be careful, there is a handful of other websites that despise this place.
 
Feb 6, 2018
794