I'm still debating returning the i7 13" for an i5 when I get it. By maybe the extra money wasted will balance out since I'll use the laptop for a very long time.
Do some cinebech tests first.I'm still debating returning the i7 13" for an i5 when I get it. By maybe the extra money wasted will balance out since I'll use the laptop for a very long time.
Issue is I'm leaving the country on August 1st, so I'd have to order one now to get it in time assuming I want the i5. Oh well. Will still be significantly cheaper than what it would cost in Europe.
The thing is, when Notebookcheck tested the 2018 15 inch MBPs, they found out that the cooling solution isn't even strong enough for the TDP, let alone what Intel allows the processors to draw. And that's with the i7, not the i9. Here's a graph showing the power draw among other things (bottom left):Thanks! I think it's pretty interesting to see the progression Intel's chips have taken as Apple's Touch Bar chassis design is decently suited for cooling Intel's previous chips. NotebookCheck's reviews of the 2016 and 2017 Touch Bar MBPs all note that there was no throttling (albeit internally they ran hot) as Skylake to Kaby Lake R operated within Apple's specs: dissapation of… let's say 50 W worth of heat to accommodate 45 W processors. Then Intel gets desperate with the competition from AMD, comes along to OEMs handing them chips that can draw up to 105 W of power! That is far beyond the expectations OEMs had when designing their ever thinner ultrabooks as Intel was supposed to be pursuing lower power expenditures, not all of a sudden be raising them. (There's a nice, detailed technical analysis over on Reddit about all this.)
Source (in German): https://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-Apple-MacBook-Pro-15-2018-2-6-GHz-560X-Laptop.316698.0.html
There were plenty of things wrong at Apple under Jobs, and no sensible person is going to excuse them. But at least there was honest innovation, real engineering prowess, product focus, etc. Those things that are badly missing under Tim Cook.
Innovation, engineering prowess and product focus may not be happening where you want them to be happening but to ignore the iPhone X/FaceID, their ARM chip team, stuff like the T2 in the newest Macs, APFS, the Watch, Swift... is just ignoring what's right in front of you.
They clearly neglected the Mac while trying to rush the Car project. The last year shows they really are returning a lot of effort to the Mac. It's not going to happen overnight. But the engineering prowess at Apple is undeniable.
But the current MBPs use the very same heatsink design as last year's, and those had no problem at all with the same TDP. To me that points to Intel's packaging being worse at dissipating heat towards the top of the die.The thing is, when Notebookcheck tested the 2018 15 inch MBPs, they found out that the cooling solution isn't even strong enough for the TDP, let alone what Intel allows the processors to draw. And that's with the i7, not the i9. Here's a graph showing the power draw among other things (bottom left):
Source (in German): https://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-Apple-MacBook-Pro-15-2018-2-6-GHz-560X-Laptop.316698.0.html
As you can see, mean power draw is 37.54 W, or ~7.5 W below TDP. That's on Apple, not Intel. At least the mean core clock is slightly above its specified 2.6 GHz.
How are the thermals of the other 2018 13" and i7 15" MacBook pros? People seem to only talk about the i9.
I'm still debating returning the i7 13" for an i5 when I get it. By maybe the extra money wasted will balance out since I'll use the laptop for a very long time.
Lol rightGood thing they finally did a quad core on the 13 inch.
Also lol at calling Fortnite a graphic intense game.
I'm still debating returning the i7 13" for an i5 when I get it. By maybe the extra money wasted will balance out since I'll use the laptop for a very long time.
Charging such a premium and offering an i9 when they know it would not perform as advertised is pretty egregious. The Pro in MacBook Pro has lost all meaning since the Jobs days, that much is certain.
I actually really want Apple to get a lot of heat (ha) for this. Sort of to guarantee that they won't screw up in the next redesign.
Of course, that's ignoring the possibility that part of the reason why they didn't change the heatsink is because a complete redesign is on the way for next year.
Do it. i7 are only worth it if you're willing to use the MacBook in the fridge.
I will be moving somewhere cold on the 31st, though, so maybe I'll be fine if I sit outside...Not sure if they allow the config but go i5 + dGPU over an i7.
i5 and i7 performance gap is not worth noting. Better off spending that on better graphics or a bigger SSD.
Also note: barely anyone will ever use over 16GB RAM unless you have your MBP plugged up to external monitors and are doing heavy multitasking. SSD and dGPU are best investments IMO (dGPU only if you game on it though).
Thanks! I think it's pretty interesting to see the progression Intel's chips have taken as Apple's Touch Bar chassis design is decently suited for cooling Intel's previous chips. NotebookCheck's reviews of the 2016 and 2017 Touch Bar MBPs all note that there was no throttling (albeit internally they ran hot) as Skylake to Kaby Lake R operated within Apple's specs: dissapation of… let's say 50 W worth of heat to accommodate 45 W processors. Then Intel gets desperate with the competition from AMD, comes along to OEMs handing them chips that can draw up to 105 W of power! That is far beyond the expectations OEMs had when designing their ever thinner ultrabooks as Intel was supposed to be pursuing lower power expenditures, not all of a sudden be raising them. (There's a nice, detailed technical analysis over on Reddit about all this.)
This most recent generation of ultrabooks is some cynical marketing ploy. Intel knows that they have to remain competitive in the eyes of shareholders and consumers who are looking for Intel to stay ahead of AMD, so Intel decides to shove in 2 extra power hungry cores to stave off the appearence of stagnation. Likewise, Apple has to maintain the appearance of competivieness and provide the "latest and greatest" new processors in their products. Both companies know that their typical customers are not hardware geeks and probably not going to notice the pitfalls of these particular hardware choices. There was no way any laptop manufactuer was going to "regress" to a thicker design as more power efficient chips are right around the corner.
Maybe by then I'll actually be able to afford one.Isn't redesign every 4 years, so we might be waiting until 2020? That would suck to wait for.
Been thinking about getting a new laptop seeing as my Surface is starting to get a little old. Thinking about the lowest tier 13" pro model.
I've never had a MacBook before. How good is OneDrive support on Mac, also would this thing be okay for light gaming for things like WoW and HotS?
Also how difficult would getting a dual boot setup with Win10 on it be?
Why transition to a Mac from Windows?
Lenovo Carbon X1 is a great windows laptop, though pricey.
Been thinking about getting a new laptop seeing as my Surface is starting to get a little old. Thinking about the lowest tier 13" pro model.
I've never had a MacBook before. How good is OneDrive support on Mac, also would this thing be okay for light gaming for things like WoW and HotS?
Also how difficult would getting a dual boot setup with Win10 on it be?
I dunno, I'm due for an upgrade, I have a late 2013 Macbook Pro that still works but some of the keyboard keys are crapping out.
My specs for the 2013 MBP are 15 inch w/2.6 GHz i7 processor, 16GB DDR3, Nvidia GT750M w/2GB, 1TB SSD.
I don't really keep up with Intel CPU and Nvidia/AMD GPU performance increases ... how much more powerful is almost top of the line i7 MBP these days? Would it run circles around my current machine? How about the smaller 13 inch models?
Been thinking about getting a new laptop seeing as my Surface is starting to get a little old. Thinking about the lowest tier 13" pro model.
I've never had a MacBook before. How good is OneDrive support on Mac, also would this thing be okay for light gaming for things like WoW and HotS?
Also how difficult would getting a dual boot setup with Win10 on it be?
Actually just FYI, I got my Dell XPS 15 9570 from Costco for $1799, regular price (6-core i7, 16GB ram, 512GB ssd, 1050 Ti, 4k touchscreen, 2 or 4 year warranty if you have the costco visa). https://www.costco.com/Dell-XPS-15-...D---GeForce-GTX-1050Ti.product.100417754.htmlPersonally speaking I do think macOS offers a better experience than Windows 10 (better high-DPI support, much more coherent design, no annoying ads & promos, great built-in utilities, etc.), though it may take you a while to adjust, especially if you have never used a mac before.
OneDrive support is alright, the app has all the basic features. Light gaming is OK too, I am pretty sure WoW and HotS wouldn't be a problem, though you have to understand that the integrated graphics in the 13-inch models has its limits. Bootcamp offers a better-than-nothing experience to be honest; I do recommend caution if you plan to purchase a mac to run Windows all the time; besides, last time I checked the Bootcamp drivers for 2018 models haven't been released yet.
The real question is, is it wise to make a purchase at this point if you have always been a Windows user? The base 2018 13-inch model costs $1799 (4-core 8th-gen i5, 8GB DDR3, 128GB SSD, Iris Plus 655); with $100 more you can buy an XPS 15 (6-core 8th-gen i7, 16GB DDR4, 256GB SSD, GT1050M w/ 4G DDR5, 15-inch 4K AdobeRGB screen), which is far more powerful than the MacBook. Huawei MateBook X and XPS 13 are good choices too if you have to go with the 13-inch form factor, they are similarly powerful, have good build quality, and costs hundreds of dollars less.
Personally speaking I do think macOS offers a better experience than Windows 10 (better high-DPI support, much more coherent design, no annoying ads & promos, great built-in utilities, etc.), though it may take you a while to adjust, especially if you have never used a mac before.
OneDrive support is alright, the app has all the basic features. Light gaming is OK too, I am pretty sure WoW and HotS wouldn't be a problem, though you have to understand that the integrated graphics in the 13-inch models has its limits. Bootcamp offers a better-than-nothing experience to be honest; I do recommend caution if you plan to purchase a mac to run Windows all the time; besides, last time I checked the Bootcamp drivers for 2018 models haven't been released yet.
The real question is, is it wise to make a purchase at this point if you have always been a Windows user? The base 2018 13-inch model costs $1799 (4-core 8th-gen i5, 8GB DDR3, 128GB SSD, Iris Plus 655); with $100 more you can buy an XPS 15 (6-core 8th-gen i7, 16GB DDR4, 256GB SSD, GT1050M w/ 4G DDR5, 15-inch 4K AdobeRGB screen), which is far more powerful than the MacBook. Huawei MateBook X and XPS 13 are good choices too if you have to go with the 13-inch form factor, they are similarly powerful, have good build quality, and costs hundreds of dollars less.
MBP 13 i5 performs on par with windows ultrabooks of the same size.I was gonna get the 13" i5 model and make the switch from my Windows laptop. But with all this bad press about throttling, I'm not sure anymore. :(
It'd be worth keeping in mind that the lowest-tier 13-inch Pros - so, the ones without the touchbar - still have the second generation Butterfly keyboards, which - even if you can stand typing on them; I can't - are the ones with all the bad press - plus ongoing lawsuit - about dust-related failures.Been thinking about getting a new laptop seeing as my Surface is starting to get a little old. Thinking about the lowest tier 13" pro model.
I've never had a MacBook before. How good is OneDrive support on Mac, also would this thing be okay for light gaming for things like WoW and HotS?
Also how difficult would getting a dual boot setup with Win10 on it be?
We get steady and massively improved (about 20 % more performance!!!!) results in our Cinebench loop when we set the consumption to 45W, which works with macOS as well as Windows. The result (yellow curve) is clearly visible in the following diagram. The cores are more than 500 MHz faster on average, but the temperature is also a bit higher in return, so there is not that much headroom left.
I'm guessing this will have a big impact on battery life (and possibly health due to temps) so I doubt it.https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple...e-performance-with-a-few-clicks.317552.0.html
It's one software update from fixing all the throttling business. But will Apple do it?
It actually runs cooler and faster once you limit the TDP.I'm guessing this will have a big impact on battery life (and possibly health due to temps) so I doubt it.
Apple's philosophy of removing all consumption limitations is clearly counterproductive for the current 2018 MacBook Pro systems. Even very short load periods of ~30 seconds result in massive clock fluctuations, which will affect the performance. We recommend the manual adjustment of the CPU consumption for both model, but the 15-inch MBP in particular. You still get the maximum Turbo Boost when a single core is stressed, and the performance is better and especially steadier under maximum load. We think Apple's engineers should have figured this out and a simple software update would solve the issue, but we know that the manufacturer from Cupertino does not like to admit these things (also see keyboard problems).
Maybe it'll make it impossible to hit the turbo boost listed on the apple website and they'll be sued for false advertising :^)
From notebookcheck's review of 15inch i7 2.6GHz:Maybe it'll make it impossible to hit the turbo boost listed on the apple website and they'll be sued for false advertising :^)
. The processor starts with the full 4.0 GHz on all cores for about 1 second, which immediately results in a CPU temperature of 100 °C. We can see a clock reduction as a result and it starts to fluctuate between 1.8 - 3.5 GHz and the base frequency cannot always be maintained.
Turbo boost.
Actually the idea of learning a new OS sounds fun to me, as weird as that may be. I wouldn't be using Windows all of the time, or maybe even at all, was more just curious about it. I'm not tied to anything on Windows except for OneDrive.
I won't be playing many games on it if at all either, just small silly stuff, I'd rather play games on my TV
"Turbo Boost up to 4.3GHz"
IIRC, that's the single-core turbo boost, so you won't see that for the multicore version of Cinebench.
You can only reach 4.3 GHz in one core.
The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.3 GHz (4.1 with 4 cores, 4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.
I'm just saying if one of the "fixes" was to undervolt and presumably prevent that speed from ever being reached, not its inability to reach it during this benchmark. Was a joke post anyway!!!!IIRC, that's the single-core turbo boost, so you won't see that for the multicore version of Cinebench.
Interesting.
It'd be worth keeping in mind that the lowest-tier 13-inch Pros - so, the ones without the touchbar - still have the second generation Butterfly keyboards, which - even if you can stand typing on them; I can't - are the ones with all the bad press - plus ongoing lawsuit - about dust-related failures.