• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

I Don't Like

Member
Dec 11, 2017
14,898
Wow, a smug ignorant atheist. What a novel idea.

I know, we're all so smug and ignorant right?

This has nothing to do with him being an atheist. It has to do with him being a conservative douche-bag and closet racist.

Also, this is the very confused author of that shitty article:

_UtdBV0k_400x400.jpg


He's going to become a darling of the right in no time. "See? Even black guys know it!"
 

EdibleKnife

Member
Oct 29, 2017
7,723
I know, we're all so smug and ignorant right?

This has nothing to do with him being an atheist. It has to do with him being a conservative douche-bag and closet racist.

Also, this is the very confused author of that shitty article:

_UtdBV0k_400x400.jpg


He's going to become a darling of the right in no time. "See? Even black guys know it!"
Yeah I hate this shit. All the black men and women who've written and spoken countless times since Antebellum till today about race and racism and oppression and abuse of black Americans all backed up with facts, research, documentation etc. are all just wrong in their eyes while this random article that parrots ancient bullshit slave owners were saying is actually the untapped, hidden truth in their eyes. So damn transparent. Their agenda is to find minorities willing to ignore history to use to help them oppress more. It's so damn frustrating to watch fellow minorities feed into white supremacy so blatantly,
 
Last edited:

Slayven

Never read a comic in his life
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
93,051
It's kinda both. The South overspecialised its economy towards slave-based agriculture, to the point where Southern states discouraged industrialisation and things associated with it, such as railroads; Georgia and the Virginias were an exception to this, as both Atlanta and Richmond became key industrial towns. Meanwhile, New England and Mid-Atlantic mills began using cotton from the South to make textiles, thus benefiting economically from the system of slavery. When the Civil War was over, the South lost its main system of economic growth plus the loss of much of the few industry it had. Couple this with the North's industrial infrastructure coming out of the war unscathed, a shit ton of white workers out of jobs working on plantations, already poor farmers and miners in Appalachia who were unlikely to own slaves, and impoverished freeman entering the economy and being denied the ability to accumulate wealth after the war, and you have a richer North and a poorer South.
How can you off the cuff make a better article then the dude who probably worked on it for weeks?

21st century phrenologists

That is the perfect term for it
 

4859

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,046
In the weak and the wounded
Kid's a philosophy major. Has he not learned about fallacies yet? Third paragraph in and I can't continue.

But slavery is hardly the root cause of America's prosperity. If it were, then we would expect American states that practiced slavery to be richer than those that did not. Yet we see precisely the opposite. The South, where slavery thrived, was "the poorest and most backward region of the country," according to the economist Thomas Sowell.1 This remains true today. A recent analysis of census data found that Northeastern states, which forbade slavery, "are among the wealthiest," whereas "states in the Southeast are among the poorest."

What the fuck? This is idiotic. Thomas Sowell wasn't born until 1930, he would be in his 20's in the 50's, long after slavery, the de facto major economic driving force if the confederacy economy ended, crippling the southern economy. In his time the south WAS poor. Not during slavery, obviously.

In 1860, when the confederacy was still full swing slave labor economy, had you considered it it's own independent country, it would be the fourth richest country in the world at it's time.
 
Last edited:

EdibleKnife

Member
Oct 29, 2017
7,723
Thanks for this thread
Kevin Bird said:
But we quickly dive into flawed reasoning, arguing if slavery was a cause, southern states would be wealthier. This doesn't follow, the US was a connected economy where material produced in the south fueled Northern commerce. It was the South's greed that did them in. See Du Bois
You'd think this point would be fucking obvious but it's like has been mentioned: Facts like that have to outright be ignored in order to create the narrative this article wants to perpetuate.

More choice quotes from this thread:



History literally shows that black people on top of just being denied opportunity were also literally under threat of death if they attempted to gain wealth in the same ways white people did.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 4461

User Requested Account Deletion
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,010
America grew wealthy from slavery because powerful men in the north and south were raking in money by the literal boatload by purchasing and reselling African slaves, and every business-owning man in the prosperous port cities got a piece of this wealth. These slaves were likewise used to build just about every early infrastructure system in US cities, as well as the colleges and universities that the early American elites used to concentrate their influence. At the same time, the South was seen an impoverished region of the US because it had the worst income distribution; there were fewer businesses that benefited from the presence of slave plantations unlike in the wealthy port cities, even if the overall wealth was higher in many parts of the South. So by handwaving that black Americans were starting off after the conclusion of the Civil War at the bottom of a society already waist-deep in shit economically, and instead going for the "their culture makes them poor" argument, it shows that he really doesn't know what he's talking about. I mean, this:



Is just so facile a ninth grader could unravel it. There are more segments in there (Welfare queens!) that reveal just who we're dealing with here: it's a black libertarian/Reaganite type who turned off his brain half-way through US History and started looking for kudos from the capitalist elite.

It's kinda both. The South overspecialised its economy towards slave-based agriculture, to the point where Southern states discouraged industrialisation and things associated with it, such as railroads; Georgia and the Virginias were an exception to this, as both Atlanta and Richmond became key industrial towns. Meanwhile, New England and Mid-Atlantic mills began using cotton from the South to make textiles, thus benefiting economically from the system of slavery. When the Civil War was over, the South lost its main system of economic growth plus the loss of much of the few industry it had. Couple this with the North's industrial infrastructure coming out of the war unscathed, a shit ton of white workers out of jobs working on plantations, already poor farmers and miners in Appalachia who were unlikely to own slaves, and impoverished freeman entering the economy and being denied the ability to accumulate wealth after the war, and you have a richer North and a poorer South.

Gotcha. Okay, I just about gathered that; thank you for the clear explanations :)
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
Some cultures/societies do place more emphasis on status-symbols that are depreciating assets. Some cultures are more patriachal than others, some are more intolerant than others. All cultures need a degree of introspection. No culture is perfect.

I just think it's foolish and arrogant to dismiss generations of systematic racism, repression and asset dispossesion as not being the primary hindernance to the black community.
"It's black culture that's the problem!" Is just one step removed from the "race realist" argument.
 

demondance

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,808
Self-ID'd skeptics: we're the only ones who demand a rigorous adherence to truth! To the principles of science! Everything must be questioned!

Also self-ID'd skeptics: well this poorly researched undergrad paper confirms my biases, sooooo.....
 

Farmboy

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,145
The Trump thing—he says he doesn't like Trump, and will remind you of that over and over. Every time he brings it up, he also mentions how much he hates Hillary Clinton and goes out of his way to explain how terrible she is as a person. Chastises "the left" as a bunch of fools. Then usually goes on to admit how many of Trump's policies he agrees with, and interviews a Trump supporter.

Ouch. I only heard two podcasts on this: the one with Andrew Sullivan shortly post-election and the one with Sullivan and David Frum. The first had some Clinton-bashing (Sullivan hates them too and they just couldn't help themselves), but they were both very critical of Trump, calling him disastrous.

But I can believe his provocative inclinations have gotten the better of him more than a few times since then. Harris is completely enamored with the idea that when everyone looks left, one should always first look right (Even if just to get a rise out of those looking left).

Also, apparently many of Harris' followers were unpleasantly surprised that he didn't like Trump. So maybe he's started appeasing them.
 

CopperPuppy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,636
Guys like Bill Maher / Sam Harris / Joe Rogan on their show or podcast:

"We have to be able to debate these ideas, they won't go away if we just ignore them."

Reality:

milo_transphobia_bill_maher_by_digi_matrix-dazgak9.gif
 

Azzanadra

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,804
Canada
Harris is a hack.

Though I'l be honest I am surprised how much of Era hates him as well, dude was a Clinton supporter, is a huge Trump critic and Bernie hater- basically the political allegiances most American ERA posters. I used to like him, but either because I've outgrown him and he always sucked or he became a lot more pretentious, I find him insufferable now. Easily the worst of the four horsemen, the others at least have made some significant contributions to academia.
 

Bramblebutt

Banned
Jan 11, 2018
1,858
"It's black culture that's the problem!" Is just one step removed from the "race realist" argument.

I think that's clearly seen when you step into the article's comments and just below the sophistry, navel gazing, and effusive praise is a bunch of "race realists" spouting their usual talking points about hereditarianism, IQ, and genetic destiny.
 

Deleted member 33412

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 16, 2017
516
Tokyo
"It's black culture that's the problem!" Is just one step removed from the "race realist" argument.
But one could also argue that the conditions black people have suffered due to colonialism, slavery...have negativitaly impacted on their culture and that it has been taken advantage of by predatory capitalism. I don't think a culture is incorruptible. Not saying that African American culture is corrupted - one could say it is the defining culture of our time. With that said Im sure a little bit of introspection is not a bad thing.
 

EdibleKnife

Member
Oct 29, 2017
7,723
But one could also argue that the conditions black people have suffered due to colonialism, slavery...have negativitaly impacted on their culture and that it has been taken advantage of by predatory capitalism. I don't think a culture is incorruptible. Not saying that African American culture is corrupted - one could say it is the defining culture of our time. With that said Im sure a little bit of introspection is not a bad thing.
Black oppression isn't a one way street. You say this but don't entertain the idea that maybe committing those acts of rape, slavery, genocide, and oppression negatively impacted "white" culture and maybe it's white America that needs to do the introspection first before pointing the finger at the victims of their centuries of abuse.
 

Deleted member 33412

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 16, 2017
516
Tokyo
Black oppression isn't a one way street. You say this but don't entertain the idea that maybe committing those acts of rape, slavery, genocide, and oppression negatively impacted "white" culture and maybe it's white America that needs to do the introspection first before pointing the finger at the victims of their centuries of abuse.
Oh of course. Obviously.
Edit:Well put.
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
But one could also argue that the conditions black people have suffered due to colonialism, slavery...have negativitaly impacted on their culture and that it has been taken advantage of by predatory capitalism. I don't think a culture is incorruptible. Not saying that African American culture is corrupted - one could say it is the defining culture of our time. With that said Im sure a little bit of introspection is not a bad thing.
I mean yeah but people who typically make this argument don't think this part all the way through and sometimes land on the "race realist" argument.
 

Sub Boss

Banned
Nov 14, 2017
13,441
HAAAARRRIIIS!!!.

well, i disagree with him and his stupid undergraduate.shame, his lectures on other themes were really interesting
 
Oct 26, 2017
8,206
In case anyone needs more proof of Harris awfulness, go check his Twitter and look at who he associates with and retweets:
DP7hLPEUMAARfFv
 

Deepwater

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,349
But one could also argue that the conditions black people have suffered due to colonialism, slavery...have negativitaly impacted on their culture and that it has been taken advantage of by predatory capitalism. I don't think a culture is incorruptible. Not saying that African American culture is corrupted - one could say it is the defining culture of our time. With that said Im sure a little bit of introspection is not a bad thing.

If you set different materials on fire, they might burn differently, but they're still on fire. The lighter here being poverty and the materials being culture. Discussing cultural correlation to socio economic outcomes, as if they are the cause and not a symptom, is hackish.

We know from research that poverty (especially of the generational kind) has shown to negatively affect all kinds of social groups in terms of decision making, health outcomes, etc. The way this manifests may look differently from group to group (things burn differently) but presenting this argument as if black Americans are uniquely or pathologically affected by poverty as a result of their culture is putting the cart in front of the horse. Like asking why a tumor causes cancer. It also begs the question: if the culture is driving or perpetuating poverty, why arent every other group flailing in poverty like us?

And that's a dumb questions cause lots of people in EVERY racial group in America are poor. Look at factors like health, education outcomes, decision making when it comes to money, levels of stress/anxiety, and shit looks bad when you look at poor white, Hispanic, Asian, and native folk. The question then becomes why are there disproportionality between poor people when you look at racial group, and there is ton of literature on why that. But poor people in GENERAL are doing bad. And the culture question is never accounting for that.

Many academics on the subject have already thoroughly debunked the essay.
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
If you set different materials on fire, they might burn differently, but they're still on fire. The lighter here being poverty and the materials being culture. Discussing cultural correlation to socio economic outcomes, as if they are the cause and not a symptom, is hackish.

We know from research that poverty (especially of the generational kind) has shown to negatively affect all kinds of social groups in terms of decision making, health outcomes, etc. The way this manifests may look differently from group to group (things burn differently) but presenting this argument as if black Americans are uniquely or pathologically affected by poverty as a result of their culture is putting the cart in front of the horse. Like asking why a tumor causes cancer. It also begs the question: if the culture is driving or perpetuating poverty, why arent every other group flailing in poverty like us?

And that's a dumb questions cause lots of people in EVERY racial group in America are poor. Look at factors like health, education outcomes, decision making when it comes to money, levels of stress/anxiety, and shit looks bad when you look at poor white, Hispanic, Asian, and native folk. The question then becomes why are there disproportionality between poor people when you look at racial group, and there is ton of literature on why that. But poor people in GENERAL are doing bad. And the culture question is never accounting for that.

Many academics on the subject have already thoroughly debunked the essay.
but bootstraps fam
 

Toxi

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
17,547
Harris is a hack.

Though I'l be honest I am surprised how much of Era hates him as well, dude was a Clinton supporter, is a huge Trump critic and Bernie hater- basically the political allegiances most American ERA posters. I used to like him, but either because I've outgrown him and he always sucked or he became a lot more pretentious, I find him insufferable now. Easily the worst of the four horsemen, the others at least have made some significant contributions to academia.
I think the blatant racism he has exhibited for years has something to do with that.
 

Con_Smith

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
574
I mean he has a point. Has there ever been a time in history where blacks actually came together to lift themselves economically and fasten those bootstraps. It's America I'm sure it would have been applauded by the white community.
 
Oct 30, 2017
762
those cowards are on other forums, passive-aggressively quoting posts here to mock them without really writing a counterargument, secure in the knowledge that their bullshit can't be called out because they're doing it on another platform

We have people defending him in this very thread. Refusing to call him a racist but calling him someone that can sometimes ignore evidence.... Their defence game has evolved.
 

BigDes

Knows Too Much
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,791
I mean he has a point. Has there ever been a time in history where blacks actually came together to lift themselves economically and fasten those bootstraps. It's America I'm sure it would have been applauded by the white community.
I believe there were fireworks

Dropped from planes

Onto the black owned businesses.
 
Oct 26, 2017
8,206
More people need to watch Vox's Explained documentary series on Netflix. The first episode goes into how the black population literally got fucked right after the end of slavery through a fear of "white backlash" and how a lack of wealth can have a negative effect on future generations.
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
More people need to watch Vox's Explained documentary series on Netflix. The first episode goes into how the black population literally got fucked right after the end of slavery through a fear of "white backlash" and how a lack of wealth can have a negative effect on future generations.
That much should be obvious to people. A kid coming from a poor background being raised in a poor environment with poor schools poor employment rates and high crime is likely going to have shittier chances at life than a kid dealing with the inverse. You're basically asking that kid to jump through a burning hoop with out getting burnt without even teaching them gymnastics.
 
Oct 26, 2017
8,206
That much should be obvious to people. A kid coming from a poor background being raised in a poor environment with poor schools poor employment rates and high crime is likely going to have shittier chances at life than a kid dealing with the inverse. You're basically asking that kid to jump through a burning hoop with out getting burnt without even teaching them gymnastics.
To people like Sam Harris they see those obstacles don't exist for some so they think it's the same for all. Hence the "bootstraps" argument and the flawed essay in the OP.
 

Deleted member 8257

Oct 26, 2017
24,586
Isn't that tweet praise for Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson? Since Jihadists are bad and I'm guessing the quote is referring to the fact that the conference would be hell for them...
Its mockery because there is no difference between Harris and Peterson arguing with each other versus drowning in a lake of fire.
 

nsilvias

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,722
funny thing is alot of american companies are as rich as they are because of black culture. maybe black culture is poor because these companies exploit black culture without giving anything back?
 

Con_Smith

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
574
It was bombed by the white community

He does not have a point

I know I'm late but I know my dude. BWS is something I never get a correct response to when white people bring up that blacks should do more than complain about their economic anxiety and do something constructive in their community.