The voice line that plays at the beginning of EVERY fight. Can we turn this off? My god it's getting so annoying.
This isn't about trying something new, it's about setting expectations. Doesn't help that all the marketing/images depict an actual group of travelers well...travelling together. When in the actual game it's all useless fluff and doesn't even make sense plot-wise.
So... there is no overarching story in the game? Just the 8 character stories? I'm unclear from reading like 20 pages. Either way, can't wait! Thanks!
There isn't one.So... there is no overarching story in the game? Just the 8 character stories? I'm unclear from reading like 20 pages. Either way, can't wait! Thanks!
My MC guess would be 86. Maybe 85 if one or two clickbait sites screw up.
Man that sucks and in my experience with them the package will be delayed by quite a few days. Glad I went digital on this one.Dammit, PostNL got their systems to malfunction, now odds are my game won't be delivered until after they've fixed it. Currently aren't even accepting new packages. Might have to go digital if they don't quickly get their shit together.
So you've already decided that any website that scores a game you haven't played lower than an "86" is a "clickbait" site that "screw[ed] up."
Gamers!
Is this one of the most bizarre preview threads you have read?So you've already decided that any website that scores a game you haven't played lower than an "86" is a "clickbait" site that "screw[ed] up."
Gamers!
Yall should be good, yall dont give numbers anyway lolSo you've already decided that any website that scores a game you haven't played lower than an "86" is a "clickbait" site that "screw[ed] up."
Gamers!
It's up there. Tomorrow is going to be pandemonium.Is this one of the most bizarre preview threads you have read?
In a good or bad way you think?
So you've already decided that any website that scores a game you haven't played lower than an "86" is a "clickbait" site that "screw[ed] up."
Gamers!
Well it is to me.Is this one of the most bizarre preview threads you have read?
Do you already know some of the scores or something? Do reviewers share that kind of stuff with each other or you just predicting?
They wouldn't catch as much flak since there's no score to lower the precious metacritic, but never underestimate people throwing a stink over any reviews that go against what they believe the game they haven't played should be received!
This isn't about trying something new, it's about setting expectations. Doesn't help that all the marketing/images depict an actual group of travelers well...travelling together. When in the actual game it's all useless fluff and doesn't even make sense plot-wise.
You can turn off all voice acting but not individual battle stuff, I think.The voice line that plays at the beginning of EVERY fight. Can we turn this off? My god it's getting so annoying.
He just means some sites giving unrealistically bad score like 4 or 5 can drastically pull the MC score down.So you've already decided that any website that scores a game you haven't played lower than an "86" is a "clickbait" site that "screw[ed] up."
Gamers!
You pretty much need to get all 8 characters, or be severly underleveled. I mean sure you "can" i guess not get all 8, but thats just doing it for the sake of doing it.Marketing was very clear. It's not useless fluff. It's 8 people on a personal journey. Pretty simple. You can run into other travelers to aid you. Or you cannot.
How can anyone say that a 4 or 5 is an "unrealistically bad score" for a game they haven't played?He just means some sites giving unrealistically bad score like 4 or 5 can drastically pull the MC score down.
So you've already decided that any website that scores a game you haven't played lower than an "86" is a "clickbait" site that "screw[ed] up."
Gamers!
We had two demos. It's not a 4/10 game by any margin.How can anyone say that a 4 or 5 is an "unrealistically bad score" for a game they haven't played?
To be honest if it gets that low then usually that points to broken game design or the game is in a broken state bug wise. I'm 99% sure its not going to score those numbers unless some think the overall game is trash which I doubt.How can anyone say that a 4 or 5 is an "unrealistically bad score" for a game they haven't played?
I think the only games that deserve 1 - 5 out of 10 are ones that are broken to the point that they are almost unplayable with very major bugs imoHow can anyone say that a 4 or 5 is an "unrealistically bad score" for a game they haven't played?
It could be good... in a holy shit these people are crazy let me get the popcorn and watch this train wreck unfold in front of me.I don't think I've ever seen pandemonium used in a "good" way.
But that's your opinion, others can feel differently.We had two demos. It's not a 4/10 game by any margin.
Not expecting a glowing review from the look of your posts though.
Clickity clickbait
So you've already decided that any website that scores a game you haven't played lower than an "86" is a "clickbait" site that "screw[ed] up."
Gamers!
He just means some sites giving unrealistically bad score like 4 or 5 can drastically pull the MC score down.
Is the opposite side of the spectrum also not true? If a nintendo exclusive was truly bad, do you think a site like nintendolife.com will give it a bad score?Dude, that's not what he meant. As a 'journalist,' you know smaller sites purposely post reviews that are hoping to garner clicks by having an opinion that goes against the grain, good or bad.
The "Gamers!" part is really insulting, you need to grow up a little
I don't think I've ever seen pandemonium used in a "good" way.
Seems like you should probably grow up. Who are you to tell any site that their opinion is clickbait? If a smaller site gives it 10/10 is that just clickbait too or do you just dismiss sites with scores you don't like?Dude, that's not what he meant. As a 'journalist,' you know smaller sites purposely post reviews that are hoping to garner clicks by having an opinion that goes against the grain, good or bad.
The "Gamers!" part is really insulting, you need to grow up a little
Dude, that's not what he meant. As a 'journalist,' you know smaller sites purposely post reviews that are hoping to garner clicks by having an opinion that goes against the grain, good or bad.
The "Gamers!" part is really insulting, you need to grow up a little
Dude, that's not what he meant. As a 'journalist,' you know smaller sites purposely post reviews that are hoping to garner clicks by having an opinion that goes against the grain, good or bad.
The "Gamers!" part is really insulting, too. Grow up.
Yet people are dismissing those even before the reviews hitting, there is nothing to question currently.You can still call someones opinion into question. Especially if they do not articulate themselves very well in the review and they don't give justifiable reasons for giving such a low score.