Not in the OP you didn't, and there are multiple Berkeley's around the world.
Is this thread going how you hoped?
I mean I could care less about trolls. So...?
Not in the OP you didn't, and there are multiple Berkeley's around the world.
Is this thread going how you hoped?
arreesting you without cause is a crime on their part and self defense is allowed... in theory.
cocolina feels safe around the police because he's not-American. and if he was, hes middle class and white, so he'd feel ok either way?
didn't you?Never said that. Never commented on the cops in this thread at all.
Why would you want to film it if you didn't think there was something shady going on, some routine police business? You saw police arresting some people and thought it was worth filming or asking what was going on, why?
going back and reading your posts in this thread it seems like you are commenting against OP's "assumptions", and doing it in defense of the police.
going back and reading your posts in this thread it seems like you are commenting against OP's "assumptions", and doing it in defense of the police.
those are some amazing gymnastics. you're quite flexible. but how is your digestive health? Are you regular?
i mean you come in here making multiple posts finding fault with his argument, and asserting that he is making false assumptions against the police. but you're not defending the police.
dunno how that works, but perhaps you're full of it?
it looks like you are assuming the OP wanted to catch some police wrongdoing, instead of just assuring the safety of those being detained. Since you're so focused on evidence and if someone has the right to question police.Not false assumptions, just assumptions because they can't be proved either way. Much to OPs chagrin apparently.
it looks like you are assuming the OP wanted to catch some police wrongdoing, instead of just assuring the safety of those being detained. Since you're so focused on evidence and if someone has the right to question police.
despite you are clearly ignoring (intentionally?) context by applying the "done something" with the things he said he could have done a few lines above that. the "Done something" in this situation is record, inquire the reason or just sit there and be a witness. None of these 3 things is actually interfering once the situation is handled i.e. the 3 people are sitting down, and the cops are relaxed enough to be laughingWhy do you feel like you should have "done something" to intervene with police doing their job?
tell that to the people killed by the police's right doingSafety of someone being detained and police wrongdoing are the same thing. If the police were rightdoing there would be no need to assume that the suspects were in danger.
you're defending the police with your forward assumptions again.Safety of someone being detained and police wrongdoing are the same thing. If the police were rightdoing there would be no need to assume that the suspects were in danger.
you're defending the police with your forward assumptions again.
you act like its a fallacy when we know that not only wrong doing exists, but it's professionally concealed, and a lot more common than previously thought.
And in this situation is it an assumption or not that wrongdoing was taking place? Is it an assumption to think the suspects might be in harm?
Try to remind me of where I said that the cops did anything wrong or right in this situation. It may be hard because I never did.
Safety of someone being detained and police wrongdoing are the same thing. If the police were rightdoing there would be no need to assume that the suspects were in danger.
Then answer the question I asked, that you quoted and still didn't answer.
Why should OP do it when you just ignored my question blatantly?Because we're having a conversation. Did OP make an assumption about what was happening? I say yes, who says no...
Safety of someone being detained and police wrongdoing are the same thing. If the police were rightdoing there would be no need to assume that the suspects were in danger.
Just catching up with this...
You have been paying attention to how the Police handle things with PoC in the US, right?
There's a very good reason why a PoC would feel the way OP felt in this situation.
So none of things are really necessary.None of these 3 things is actually interfering once the situation is handled i.e. the 3 people are sitting down, and the cops are relaxed enough to be laughing
I'm ignoring your question blatantly because it has nothing to do with whether OP assumed or not and to entertain that question does not go how youd thing.
Thats because your question answers for the OP in the positive. Yes, he did assume because there's a good reason.
the op had a question about the safety of the detained. is that the same as assuming that the officers are committing wrong doing? no it is not.And in this situation is it an assumption or not that wrongdoing was taking place? Is it an assumption to think the suspects might be in harm?
So? If you were a police officer you'd want all the back up you could get for safety reasons
not really. see that body cam footage of the 3 cops casually planning and planting evidence that was blowing up last year
So?
Police have a long, long history of over responding to situations where they're not required in that number. All over the world.
They also have a long, long history of violence against PoC.
"So?" should be obvious.
Yeah putting myself into the shoes of a minority seeing that go down I can understand the desire for clarification or even precaution.not really. see that body cam footage of the 3 cops casually planning and planting evidence that was blowing up last year
It doesn't seem strange in the slightest given the context of the country and history of violence against PoC committed by their police force, no.OP doesn't even know what happened, seems strange to make a thread about the number of police involved