It seems to be a "not my Luke Skywalker" type thing.
The Luke and Yoda thing was pretty goofy, if I cared much about those characters I might be against it too.
I mean I guess based on the reaction from some people here I was expecting some abomination of Star Wars and instead I got a Star Wars movie that was strong on character development, especially with adding a new cast of rebels.
I am just baffled that the movie I just watched is what some people apparently take so much issue with. Can somebody explain...
Well summarized.They wanted Luke Skywalker to be not sad and just be a badass and not die and also they don't like women being heroes or appearing while not white and also they wanted Rey to be related to Luke Skywalker because reasons
Just requoting this so more people read it. I don't agree with everything (I honestly think the gender-related stuff is reading into things a bit much) it sheds some light on why film critics and people in the industry tend to love the movie. I'm also glad it pointed out the trend of people who dislike the film throwing around terms like "plot holes" and "bad writing" without understanding what they actually entail.I apologize if this has been posted before. Its a worth a read to understand how Rian Johnson screwed the next movie.
http://scriptshadow.net/is-star-wars-ix-the-most-difficult-screenplay-to-write-in-history/
TLJ has the most passionate detractors AND defenders of any movie in recent memory.
It's a combination of two groups of fans. The first group is those who had their own predetermined head cannon. To them, anything that happened that didn't match up with what was in their heads was going to be trash.
The second group is sexists.
Snoke's backstory not being explained. We didn't know almost anything about the Emperor in the old trilogy either, but he wasn't as much of a prominent character as Snoke and didn't do anything relevant to the plot before he actually appeared on screen.
52 -> Rey got chubbyI'll try to summarize all the problems people had with the film (although I don't agree with any of them, maybe except Canto Blight):
1 -> Rose was annoying and an unnecessary addiction, worse than Jar Jar Binks.
2 -> Rose last line was one of the worst lines of cinema history.
3 -> Leia shouldn't use the force.
4 -> Space Leia was ridiculous.
5 -> Luke drinking blue milk was ridiculous.
6 -> Angry and depressed Luke was disappointing.
7 -> The Luke vs Kylo Ren fight was disappointing.
8 -> Luke shouldn't be dead.
9 -> Rey being nobody doesn't make sense.
10 -> Canto Blight was prequel-level moment
11 -> Rey is still too strong.
12 -> Kylo Ren is a baby cry and doesn't deserve to be the final boss.
13 -> Snoke was killed and nobody knows who is he.
14 -> Holdo was an awful addiction.
15 -> Ackbar should've replaced Holdo.
16 -> Poe was a reckless leader who got away while killing many of his soldiers.
17 -> The hyperspace ram shouldn't happen. It makes everything in the previous films inconsistent.
18 -> The "chase" (although it wasn't a chase) didn't make any sense.
19 -> All the allied plans (Finn, Poe and Rey) leads to failure and therefore nothing happens.
20 -> Finn was disappointing in the movie.
21 -> Finn carrying Rosie to the abandoned base didn't make any sense.
22 -> Humour was handled poorly, Marvel-like.
23 -> Holdo shouldn't keep her plan to herself.
24 -> Rey didn't learn anything from Luke.
25 -> Phasma was wasted once again.
26 -> Hux was wasted once again.
27 -> BB8 way too overpowered KO'ing the guards in Canto Blight and controlling the FO machine.
28 -> Prank call in the beginning.
29 -> "The FIRST ORDER rules the galaxy..." in the beginning.
30 -> Nothing is explained about the state of the galaxy.
31 -> The film hasn't done anything to advance the storyline.
32 -> Old EU was much better than the current cannon.
33 -> Yoda shouldn't have appeared.
34 -> Yoda shouldn't have cast a fucking lightning storm.
35 -> Porgs were an unnecessary addiction.
36 -> Caretakers shouldn't live in Luke's island. He should've been alone.
37 -> Luke didn't gave up on Darth Vader, he gave up on Kylo Ren.
38 -> Del Toro's characters was wasted on.
39 -> Soundtrack was unremarkable.
40 -> The movie subverts expectations because it a cool thing to do.
41 -> It is just a recycling of old ideas (AT-AT's, death star cannon, salt planet x snow planet from ESB, etc)
42 -> Rey parent's being dead in the desert contradict's her vision on episode VII.
43 -> It feels disconnected from its predecessor.
44 -> I don't like a woman being the protagonist.
45 -> The way the force is handled in nothing like in the OT or PT.
46 -> Shirtless Kylo Ren.
47 -> Film's too long.
48 -> Where are the Knight's of Ren?
49 -> Yoda is nothing like the one in OT and PT
50 -> Rey should've allied with Ren.
51 -> It doesn't make sense as a second film of a trilogy
I apologize if this has been posted before. Its a worth a read to understand how Rian Johnson screwed the next movie.
http://scriptshadow.net/is-star-wars-ix-the-most-difficult-screenplay-to-write-in-history/
Dude, you are talking about a franchise that has had MULTIPLE poop jokes MULTIPLE fart jokes MULTIPLE burb jokes and you have your panties in a bunch about Poe trolling Hux?
Really?
REALLY???
Yeah TLJ really ruined Star Wars with its childish humor, in this super serious mature franchise.
It's almost as if there's someone in charge who would write around those references and make it work. Are you arguing that you can't literally chop footage out of the movie? No shit. Their point was that the movie could have been written without all that and it wouldn't been the same (better, even).I don't have the time or inclination to perform a scene-by-scene and shot-by-shot analysis to prove the obvious--that if you remove most of a movie then most of what follows will be rendered nonsensical or awkward because it references (to varying degrees) the cut material.
I'll break it down for you. I don't agree entirely with these points btw because I enjoyed the movie.
There's probably more but that's off the top of my head.
- Difference in how the humor is done
- Luke being depressed cranky old man and not some Jedi God.
- Misogynists still hate Rey
- Snoke got killed without some long winded explanation on his backstory
- Rey is a nobody even though TFA tried to build it up as something more.
- Leia does some force stuff which is apparently bad(misogyny strikes again)
- Canto Blight being out of place and fucking with the movie's pacing (which I agree with)
- Luke dying without actually doing some crazy jedi stuff (even though he did some crazy jedi stuff)
It's almost as if there's someone in charge who would write around those references and make it work. Are you arguing that you can't literally chop footage out of the movie? No shit. Their point was that the movie could have been written without all that and it wouldn't been the same (better, even).
Thing is, with Palpatine, we didn't really need to know more than we knew.
We knew he was the Emperor, that decades before A New Hope he conquered the galaxy in the great Clone Wars, that he knew Vader's true identity and yet kept his own true nature a secret. I don't know if anyone within the Empire besides Palpatine and Vader even knew he could use the Force, let alone that he was more powerful with it than anyone else in the trilogy. We also knew his goal - to continue ruling the galaxy, rooting out and destroying the Rebellion and scheming to replace Vader with Luke.
Do you really need more than that? Comparatively we know nothing about Snoke.
We don't know who he is, what he's been up to for the last 30~50 years, what his goals are, how he became Supreme Leader of the First Order, what the First Order even is, where they got the resources to make a planet that can wipe out entire Star systems and still have enough change to apparently manufacture a fleet large enough to conquer the galaxy within weeks, why he was scared of Luke Skywalker, why he was so interested in Rey...
Do you really need more than that? Comparatively we know nothing about Snoke.
We don't know who he is, what he's been up to for the last 30~50 years, what his goals are, how he became Supreme Leader of the First Order, what the First Order even is, where they got the resources to make a planet that can wipe out entire Star systems and still have enough change to apparently manufacture a fleet large enough to conquer the galaxy within weeks, why he was scared of Luke Skywalker, why he was so interested in Rey...
To be fair, we do know some things about Snoke:
1. He isn't a Sith. He's a powerful dark force user who gained control of the Imperial Remnant.
2. He's powerful and was able to seduce Ben Solo to the dark side.
3. His goal is to end the Jedi, and rule over the galaxy not unlike Palpatine.
In essence, he's a palpatine wannabe who took over the power vacuum resulting from Vader and Sidious' death. The biggest things I think people wanted to know were:
A. How could such a powerful dark side user evade Vader/Palpatine:
Answer: By hiding in the outer rim apparently.
B. How did he seduce Ben to the dark side?
Answer: Awkwardly and because of how inattentive Ben's family were. Once we see Snoke's abilities in regards to his "psychic" abilities with the force, manipulating Ben suddenly seems easy.
I do think the biggest unknown at this point is, what exactly was Kylo Ren and Snoke's relationship with the force? They aren't Sith, so what is there philosophy? The answer is probably that they are Sith in everything but name, but this is awkwardly handled.
This thread continues to reaffirm to me that of the people that liked the movie on this forum, there's a negative correlation between the amount of time they've engaged with the movie's detractors and how much they're able to reproduce their arguments. It's really bizarre.
I could go pretty much scene by scene and see something I hate about it. It starts with space bombers and a prank phone call gag and pretty much only gets worse from there. I could go on, but it would just be a cut and paste of what is in every other thread.
It also doesn't help that it's pretty much devolved into 'you must hate women if you didn't like it' bullshit.
But like we don't need to be told everything. You can infer a lot of this stuff.
There are various reasons why he didn't write Luke actually showing up on Caito Bight, Luke getting blown up being one of them.Well, it's Star Wars. The films don't take itself super seriously because there's always some lucky solution like "Oh the Death Star just happens to have this massive weakness." Or "Oh all the stormtroopers just happen to miss." Or "Oh the ewoks just happen to win."
There's a bunch of ways the final scene could have been written. If they really wanted to keep Luke they could have. The only reason they didn't was because the director became concerned about Luke overshadowing everyone, not because it's impossible for him to survive.
I was clearly talking about the films not the franchise as a whole. Like the film literally establishes what would've happened to Luke, he'd have been killed full stop without ever even getting the chance to light his lightsaber.The lack of self-awareness in this post is staggering. First, you are the one that started off down the hole that "Star Wars is grounded."
This is a star wars film, how are a new hope, empire strikes back, or Return of the jedi even remotely subtle about what they're conveying? If anything there's more showing then telling in this film overall when it comes to the point. Congrats on being old enough to see the messaging compared to when you were a kid.Honestly, I don't share that opinion. I think TLJ absolutely lacks in subtlety and is in fact extremely heavy handed in delivering its "messages". It literally spells out things for you, and the only times when you don't "get it" it's when they don't really make sense.
You don't have to be a misogynist to not be able to handle emasculation. Poe clearly isn't a misogynist, but oh boy is he like a walking talking example of what mansplaining looks like."Let's make a Star Wars movie about a previously fine character becoming a mysoginist who can't handle emasculation, because that's such a deep and interesting message that will certainly add gravitas to the movie?
What was Poe's character in TFA besides cocky pilot? He was barely a character in that film, here he's given much more characterization, and characterization includes flaws.I don't think it's a bad message, but it's something that could have been introduced into the movie without butchering the pace and characters for such a... minor, obvious thing?
Did you miss the part where Holdo's sacrifice literally did nothing but delay the FO? Apparently that point was lot on you but please tell us more about how the messaging of the film is too overt as you constantly miss the point.I mean let's take Rose's words. Don't kill yourself in an attempt to save everyone else by destroying imperial gear in a suicide run. That's not the good thing to do. That's not how we will save the Resistance!
... even it's what Holdo did 5 minutes ago
Uh no they literally don't. Sorry but not following your fan theory doesn't mean they retconned, ignored, or rewrote anything.Scene continuity is not the same as utilizing the foundation of the first film to drive the story arcs of the rest of the trilogy. But thanks for the run down of the first five minutes of a movie that spent the next two and half hours negating, ignoring, rewriting, outright destroying, or intentionally subverting for the sake of subverting nearly every major plot point and half the characters of the first film of the trilogy.
- Luke's character development between the original trilogy and the sequels was not given enough time and therefore for some people it was hard to believe that it was supposed to be the same character. It doesn't help that it's also not what people expected him to be, and even the trailers were misleading, making people believe that Luke's 'it's time for the Jedi to end' line was teasing him coming up with a new philosophy instead of giving up because he failed.
- TFA teased Rey's parentage being important and Luke doing something important on that planet (why would he leave a secret map to his location if he wanted to die alone? TLJ never explains that because clearly that was not the original intent), both of which turned out to be not true (as far as TLJ tells us) and it feels like it was done just to do something unexpected, without actually giving a crap whether it makes sense or not.
- The amount and quality of comedy in the film was subpar to many
- Leia displaying never-before-seen Force techniques despite the fact it was never told or shown that she had any training. Luke was just a farmer kid before he was trained by Obi-Wan, he struggled to pull a lightsaber from a pile of snow in ESB and Leia can fly at high speeds in space?
- Snoke's backstory not being explained. We didn't know almost anything about the Emperor in the old trilogy either, but he wasn't as much of a prominent character as Snoke and didn't do anything relevant to the plot before he actually appeared on screen. Snoke was the reason behind most of the plot in TFA and TLJ, and we didn't get to learn who he even was and how or why he managed to convert Ben Solo. We were just told and shown that he was powerful and did big things.
- Technology and Force powers being shown that were too overpowered not to be used in the original trilogy. Forget about Yoda's lightning, if using lightspeed to make a bomb out of your ship could be a thing then it would trivialize any space battle. Just have a couple of pilots sacrifice in small ships and boom, no more Empire.
- More annoying plot holes, annoying characters and bad writing in general
Or, if you listen to some of the people who liked the movie, all the people who dislike TLJ are sexist basement dwellers who can't let go of their past.
I understand people can like it, I personally don't and many people share my feelings. There are also, unfortunately, pathetic, asshole losers who attack people they think are responsible for 'ruining their childhood', so it's hard to criticize the film without being accused of hating it because it had women and black people in it and not for its actual problems.
In all fairness this technically never happened in the actual story :3 .
"Her SiSteR TotEs ShOUld've been thE chARActER...TOTes HAS NoTHInG To dO WITh How atTrACtiVE i finD EACH ACTreSs."Asian female who isn't a sexy stereotype, you can guess why some crowds got triggered
Real talk though: Anyone who thinks Attack of the Clones was better than The Last Jedi be trippin'
It's funny because if you post a clip in any SW thread of a clip from the prequels they get outright ignored because no one is willing to bother to defend anything besides the base premises of those films because they fail so spectacularly during the vast majority of scenes. And someone a couple pages back legit called the prequel films subtle lmfao.I've seen this argument on Twitter a few times and it never ceases to blow my goddamn mind.
Well the important thing is that you found a way to feel superior to both
Welcome to resetera, buddy. If you disagree with the Approved View TM, you're LITERALLY a nazi.Because it's horribly written and its defense force attempts to hide this by associating the very idea of not enjoying the movie with either alt-right pricks, headcanon-obsessed slimy fans, or both.