The comparisons will be pretty interesting. Pretty much everything but his face is different/adjusted.
The comparisons will be pretty interesting. Pretty much everything but his face is different/adjusted.
Don't, it's horrible, you can see the clashing styles of the 2 directors, after Zack left the project to deal with family issue, Joss Whedon was brought on to finish the movie and you can see WB execs forcing Avengers style into the movie...
I really don't think ZS cares about trying to turn anyone around on his workmy dude, they could've chosen any shot to try and make this movie appealing, or to curb the negativity around Snyder's vision of this character.
They chose Superman-with-a-murder-face.
Comparisons will definitely be a riot:The comparisons will be pretty interesting. Pretty much everything but his face is different/adjusted.
I mean, why not? I think it's an interesting interpretation. We've already had multiple movies in the past with "baseline Superman, both good and bad. I think it's awesome that he's been given a three-film arc showing his evolution into the character we all know, especially with the more "grounded" approach.All of which kind of begs the question, why does it take 9+ hours (or 12 hours, if we're counting a hypothetical follow-up to JL) over the course of several years just to get to baseline Superman? Just seems like an excessive amount of time to form the most basic elements of the character, and doesn't leave much time to actually do something with the character of Superman himself, instead spending all this time on the pre-Superman version.
It's also imo unnecessary because I felt like Man of Steel, by the end, had kind of already gotten there. The ending already feels like, "and here's Superman!"
There
You're happy ?
Smiling non cgi supe with man of steel ost.
Instantly superior to anything in the whedon cut.
Yeah, maybe that could have worked if Man of Steel and BvS didn't also feature a miserable, wreckless Superman whose only moments of heroism or positivity were an excuse for hackneyed Jesus imagery, and if this film would actually get a sequel (though believe me, I'm certainly not complaining that it won't) but dude is long overdue for some optimism and this:THE JUNKIEXL TRACK IS GODLIKE TOO WTF
Also for people wondering why Superman seems dark. Snyder the plan was to have him be darker after death and get brighter than ever little by little. Culminating in him being classic supe in the sequel.
He said he didnt want to rush it so in this film it definitely wont be joking Supe like the whedon version.
But the plan was always to get there after this film. It ends like that in fact with the shirt RIP. ( that was snyder not whedon )
ain't it. His inevitable fifteen minutes of decency in the four hour film won't cut it.
I mean, why not? I think it's an interesting interpretation. We've already had multiple movies in the past with "baseline Superman, both good and bad. I think it's awesome that he's been given a three-film arc showing his evolution into the character we all know, especially with the more "grounded" approach.
If they gave us a MoS2 with a fully-formed Superman after this, that'd be amazing.
The original Justice League I think is pretty okay, and at the very least it's an interesting exercise to see a Frankenstein film where the stitches are so obvious. At this point though, if you haven't seen it, I don't know if I would necessarily bother.Never saw the original Justice League. Should I even bother at this point to watch it before the Snyder cut so I can better appreciate the additions? Or should I just want the Snyder Cut at take that as the only version that exists?
Well like I said, I think it's spending an enormous amount of time on someone who isn't yet really Superman. It would be like if the Dark Knight trilogy was mainly focused on ninja Bruce, and the "I'm Batman" portion of the story didn't happen until halfway through TDKR. Or if the first season of Daredevil had aired across a period of 5-6 years rather than dropped all at once.I mean, why not? I think it's an interesting interpretation. We've already had multiple movies in the past with "baseline Superman, both good and bad. I think it's awesome that he's been given a three-film arc showing his evolution into the character we all know, especially with the more "grounded" approach.
If they gave us a MoS2 with a fully-formed Superman after this, that'd be amazing.
I mean, since people keep bringing it up, let's just share a transcript of the opening scene of the theatrical cut of Justice League without the CGI mustache and let others decide whether it's well or badly written dialogue for Superman:He's Superman. He's not meant to be grounded. Clark is meant to choose to be humble and selfless in spite of how ridiculously powerful he is. He's meant to be this larger than life, inspirational figure that teaches the importance of doing the right thing because it's the right thing to do not because you feel like you have to.
Podcast Kid 2 : [camera phone POV of Superman with police, firefighters and paramedics after a heroic deed] There he is!
Podcast Kid 1 : Shh! Shh! C'mon, let's go.
[to Superman]
Podcast Kid 1 : Superman! Superman! Can we ask you some questions?
Podcast Kid 2 : It's for our podcast.
Superman : Well, in that case...
Podcast Kid 1 : How many people that you saved - have you saved?
Superman : I...
Podcast Kid 1 : Never mind. Does your thing really stand for "hope"?
Superman : Yes, it does.
Podcast Kid 2 : But it looks like an "S".
Superman : Yes, it's meant to. It's meant to wind... like a river. It comes and goes. My f -
[pause]
Superman : A man I knew used to say that hope was like your car keys: easy to lose, but if you dig around, it's usually close by.
Podcast Kid 2 : Did you ev - ever fight a hippo?
Podcast Kid 1 : [whispering to Podcast Kid 2, as Superman smiles] Shh! No, that's not it!
Podcast Kid 2 : [whispering to Podcast Kid 1] But hippos are the most deadly!
Podcast Kid 1 : [to Superman] Um... What is, uh... What's the best thing about Planet Earth?
[Superman ponders the question, then smiles as he's about to answer the question when the podcast abruptly ends]
HBO Max version is in color. He's doing a black and white IMAX release at a later date.
He's Superman. He's not meant to be grounded. Clark is meant to choose to be humble and selfless in spite of how ridiculously powerful he is. He's meant to be this larger than life, inspirational figure that teaches the importance of doing the right thing because it's the right thing to do not because you feel like you have to.
Careful. Snyder movie trailers are always great.Well, those twenty seconds are better than the whole JL movie, so maybe it'll be okay?
Well like I said, I think it's spending an enormous amount of time on someone who isn't yet really Superman. It would be like if the Dark Knight trilogy was mainly focused on ninja Bruce, and the "I'm Batman" portion of the story didn't happen until halfway through TDKR. Or if the first season of Daredevil had aired across a period of 5-6 years rather than dropped all at once.
And again, I think spending that amount of time and story real estate on what's essentially a protracted origin story is redundant. Man of Steel already felt like it ended with Superman formed. Why does it take another 7 hours (at least) after that to continue forming him?
Well, those twenty seconds are better than the whole JL movie, so maybe it'll be okay?
It's 2021 and people are still falling for Zach Snyder trailers.
yeah that's what Man of Steel was aboutHe's Superman. He's not meant to be grounded. Clark is meant to choose to be humble and selfless in spite of how ridiculously powerful he is. He's meant to be this larger than life, inspirational figure that teaches the importance of doing the right thing because it's the right thing to do not because you feel like you have to.
It's a curiosity watch at least, hopefully more but still effectively the middle film in an arc that will never be concluded.
Interesting - since I've been followed this whole saga tangentially, I didn't realize there was "supposed" to be a third movie.Let me put it this way:
There is no way that this movie can end up worse than what was put out in theaters four years ago. Zero chance. And this is coming from someone who thinks that Snyder has made more bad movies than good ones.
He lost his daughter to suicide you think this is tasteful or funny ?
You people are gross, for real
Comics are cheap as fuck and have a million varieties,yeah that's what Man of Steel was about
superhero comics have always portrayed these characters with a vast range of tonal sensibilities
there's no reason superhero films shouldn't have a similar range
this exact logic would have convinced Snyder to 100% go for his vision. why not, if the next opportunity to see something like it (instead of half-baked Superman Returns style retreads of Donner Superman) could be 40 years away?Comics are cheap as fuck and have a million varieties,
Superman hasn't even had a baseline/decent movie in 40 years.
How about we at least get the character right before making the opposite of the very nature of the character.
Batman at least had multiple variations of good/enjoyable adaptations before the Snyder atrociousness hit.
He's getting 70+ million dollars to complete reshoots on a shitty movie he didn't originally complete, after two previous movies whose reception ranged from 'mixed-at-best' to 28% on Rotten Tomatoes. With his work before this being fucking Sucker Punch.
"Underdog"
I'd rather have half baked Donner retreads than what Snyder has done with the character. Superman Returns is still a better movie than any of the Snyder-made DCU movies.this exact logic would have convinced Snyder to 100% go for his vision. why not, if the next opportunity to see something like it (instead of half-baked Superman Returns style retreads of Donner Superman) could be 40 years away?
yeah that's what Man of Steel was about
superhero comics have always portrayed these characters with a vast range of tonal sensibilities
there's no reason superhero films shouldn't have a similar range
Man, even in the "fixed" version, they manage to shit on Papa Kent by making Clark call him "a man I knew."I mean, since people keep bringing it up, let's just share a transcript of the opening scene of the theatrical cut of Justice League without the CGI mustache and let others decide whether it's well or badly written dialogue for Superman:
I'd rather have half baked Donner retreads than what Snyder has done with the character. Superman Returns is still a better movie than any of the Snyder-made DCU movies.
I'd also be okay with alternate takes on Superman if they were made by someone who understands subtext and isn't a 90's edgelord fan
Earthly condoms are no match for Super SemenI still can't believe the best Supes movie we've had in the past 35 years is the one where he doesn't know what the pull-out method is...
Yup, movie was boring as hell but i'd easily take it.I'd rather have half baked Donner retreads than what Snyder has done with the character. Superman Returns is still a better movie than any of the Snyder-made DCU movies.
Question to the "zacktivated" fans:
What if my primary reason for disliking Zack's movies isn't so much of the tone themselves but because I think he just absolutely sucks at trying to utilize those tones?
Like someone brought up "but it's just like Injustice!" and like
you guys do realize the Injustice games very rapidly switched gears into doing the whole "prime timeline gets caught up with the bad timeline as they get to witness a future where things go horribly wrong", right?
Because Netherrealm was pretty aware of how much you should actually dunk the audience into darkness and how long they should be in it before you pull them back and start going "now here's how the version of the heroes as you know them try to avert this dark fate"?
like I'm just staring at that post going "why not nine to twelve hours to build up on this?" and I'm just wondering if I'm from some bizarro universe where most people have a limit for how much of that particular style of content they can take
Reshoots happen. That's the nature of making a movie, especially a big exposition/FX/action-heavy movie.He didn't complete reshoots. Where is this coming from? The only added additional photography amounts to like 4 minutes of the 4 hour runtime of the movie.
Yes I understand that reshoots happen. I'm saying that of the four hour length of this new movie, the only added additional photography that Snyder has shot since before he left the project in 2017 amounts to about 4 minutes. Most likely most of the 4 minutes is mainly one scene in the Knightmare sequence with Jared Leto's Joker.Reshoots happen. That's the nature of making a movie, especially a big exposition/FX/action-heavy movie.
When Snyder left/was removed, whatever, there were still reshoots to be done. That was always the case. Except those allotted couple weeks turned into months under Whedon/WB's directional shift. Zack's cut, whatever shape it was in, still needed to have that additional photography done (plus whatever the fuck else they decided to add upon announcing this thing).
Imagine thinking Zack Snyder and this movie are an underdog story.
Snyder is like the literal definition of white guy falling upwards.
I don't even get what this movie is. Is it like an extended directors cut but with a change of directors or something?