The OLED defense force have that mentality that there is no way that Burn In can happen and yet we have owners that do have it and they get shouted down for some reason. It is great that fans of OLED want it to be successful, but downplaying what people are experiencing makes me wonder what their motives are.
Here is an interesting fact. The majority of retailers that sell extended warranties for TV's DO NOT cover burn in. If Burn In does not happen, why would the majority of retailers specifically call out that burn in is not covered?
I am not an anit-oled person. I owned the E7 LG which was a great set but I just wanted something that had a higher brightness in HDR gaming. I did have some banding and temporary IR mainly from the Cup Head logo on the Xbox One dashboard. Outside of that I think it was a fantastic set. I am currently using a 75" Samsung QLED Q9FN and 90% of my use is for gaming and it has been fantastic with excellent HDR gaming performance.
The one thing that irks me and I know fan boys will be fan boys is when some OLED fanatics state that nothing else is worth it and that OLED is the best of the best and nothing comes close. While many reviews gives overall higher scores to OLED sets, there are other sets like the Q9Fn or some of the Sony sets that get very close. I posted this a few pages back but I think some missed it. RTings posted a story last week where they rate the best HDR gaming sets and the Q9FNwas rated the best for HDR gaming.
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/best/by-usage/hdr-gaming
I am not posting that to gloat or anything like that...I mainly posted it for those that think or try to tell everyone that OLED is the end all be all of TV's. and that nothing comes remotely close. For those that know me here, you know I buy a new TV on a yearly basis of if we take 2018 as an example I bought 2 TV's last year. I am currently eyeing the 2019 OLED's by LG as the features they are adding really sound spectacular.