I don't think any non-concierge folk (let alone people not bought-in to the game at all) are authorised to know.No one is asking the important questions. Was the food tasty? Was it an open bar? A fondue fountain?
I don't think any non-concierge folk (let alone people not bought-in to the game at all) are authorised to know.No one is asking the important questions. Was the food tasty? Was it an open bar? A fondue fountain?
It's an example of people being surprised that game development takes a lot of money and a very long time especially for ambitious titles. Like there have been delays ofc but they've also delivered on a lot of things they said they'd implement. The game feels completely different to play than it did years ago. And a lot of what they want to do will inevitably take a long time to implement.Honest question:
I haven't followed this game very closely. I know I've read a lot of posts saying that the game is "a scam" and all that, but is that really true or is it a bunch of jokes? What are the odds that this game is actually a scam? What, exactly, makes it seem like a scam?
You can keep repeating "it's only been in development for five years", but, uh, Chris Roberts of 2012 would disagree with you.
Chris: Basically I've been working with a small team over the course of the past year to get the early prototyping and production done. The team has varied in scale from just me, essentially, to about 10 people. That's just the actual work though.
"Another concept ship built around a gameplay style that has yet to be implemented."
Let's list the backlog for the fun of it; mine-laying, medical, farming, colonization, news reporting, exploration, science, piracy, docking, bounty hunting, research, information warfare, refining, refuelling, and orgs. Add to that the underlying online technologies, and that the jobs that are in the game are mostly in their first pass.
It's not a scam considering they do constant updates on what they have been working on (with footage, so it's not just empty words) and eventually add those to a build that is playable by anyone at this moment. It's mostly just its funding model that is scummy and its lengthy dev time that hasn't been without its issues that get people frustrated & negative towards the game.Honest question:
I haven't followed this game very closely. I know I've read a lot of posts saying that the game is "a scam" and all that, but is that really true or is it a bunch of jokes? What are the odds that this game is actually a scam? What, exactly, makes it seem like a scam?
To be fair, as shitty as this funding model is, they are developing not one but two games and both are pretty much on the higher echelon of video games in terms of what they are trying to achieve technically & visually. Especially the (online) space sim part is probably one of the most ambitious singular game projects ever to exist, considering what they are trying to achieve. It's a really not all that unreasonable that it has taken 5 years so far. Much like Red Dead Redemption 2 took forever (and that's with, like, 1000+ developers at R*, someone mentioned Star Citizen is "only" 500). The original date was maybe for 2014 but with super successful Kickstarters, that leads to expanding on the scope & quality of the project, so we are still within somewhat reasonable timeframe for a project as massive as this.
You have stated that you expect to have an Alpha up and going in about 12 months, with a beta roughly 10 months after that and then launch. For a game of this size and scope, do you think you can really be done in the next two years?
Really it is all about constant iteration from launch. The whole idea is to be constantly updating. It isn't like the old days where you had to have everything and the kitchen sink in at launch because you weren't going to come back to it for awhile. We're already one year in - another two years puts us at 3 total which is ideal. Any more and things would begin to get stale.
Speaking of constant updates, you've stated that you would like to roll out updates on a weekly or bi-weekly basis. How sustainable is that vision and what kind of investment of resources do you foresee that taking?
Obviously we would scale up the staff over time until, once live, we have about 20-30 people generating content, not counting high-level development of new features. The idea is to set up a structure for the players to use and add in new content as the spice, where the player-generated content is the meat. Eve Online does this very well. You don't want to be like [Star Wars] The Old Republic, where all your content is heavily scripted.
The game hasn't officially launched. It's still in development. They've spent years building the technology, workflow, studios, etc. and it really shows, compare footage of the game fives years ago to today.Almost sounds like he either doesn't know what the fuck he's doing or he at some point just decided to grift, hmmmmm
Most threads about this game on Era lean into the "it's a scam" rhetoric, instead of keeping up with the updates.In fact, I don't get why everyone is constantly so upset by this game
Really recommend everyone interested in this crazy situation to watch the Sunk Cost Galaxy series you linked. As a KS backer I'm not really upset (too much) that the game I thought I was backing is no where to be seen, but all the manipulation and bullshit does piss me off.It's worse than that. To be concierge, you need to have previously spent... $1000, I think, to be eligible.
Concierge is a special 'status' for high spenders within the Star Citizen community, giving them exclusive access both in- and out- of the game. There's a good youtube series that covers it and more. Can't remember which part dives into concierge specifically, though.
whoaYou can keep repeating "it's only been in development for five years", but, uh, Chris Roberts of 2012 would disagree with you.
That is a nice menu.
The game hasn't officially launched. It's still in development. They've spent years building the technology, workflow, studios, etc. and it really shows, compare footage of the game fives years ago to today.
Yea it's almost like the scope of the game changed and they had to spend a lot of time building the technology and staff or something. It's almost like game development isn't a linear process and plans can change as a result of varying factors.
Endless feature creep is generally seen as a bad thing.Yea it's almost like the scope of the game changed and they had to spend a lot of time building the technology and staff or something. It's almost like game development isn't a linear process and plans can change as a result of varying factors.
Isn't it more like one side is doing an Uncharted game and the other side is trying to create an multiplanet, open world MMO with a completely seamless world & space travel.It's not like they are making a 3D plattformer and guitar hero kind of game at the same time they are doing pretty much the same thing as a shooter having a multiplayer and single player component that uses the same assets so that is not a good excuse even.
And the problem is just trying to achieve. They basically missed every deadline they ever set, they constantly add new shit they want to do instead of finishing what was initially promised to backers first and you know the initial release date was 2014. You can try to spin that date how much you like it but that was the date Chris Robert initially said it would be done before this future creep started and now I bet it will ensure this game never lives up to the expectations of anyone.
Yea it's almost like the scope of the game changed and they had to spend a lot of time building the technology and staff or something. It's almost like game development isn't a linear process and plans can change as a result of varying factors.
THIS is what I'm waiting for. I don't really care about the game at all and I hope the backers eventually get something at least close to what they were promised, but I want to see the full story of it's development.I can't wait for the documentary about this game. It'll be better than the game at this rate.
Yea it's almost like the scope of the game changed and they had to spend a lot of time building the technology and staff or something. It's almost like game development isn't a linear process and plans can change as a result of varying factors.
It's almost like the game is at $232 million without a single gameplay loop put on the game, or an interesting planet to play on. Because yeah, Hurston looks good, but there's not much to do. And if they can't do more than a planet in 5 years, how can they deliver 100 solar systems at launch?
As a chef, I am really interested in hearing what level of food was served at an event with such expensive entry requirements.
Those plates better have been immaculate.
Most threads about this game on Era lean into the "it's a scam" rhetoric, instead of keeping up with the updates.
"Most big games take 20 years, it's not that long"Its gonna be funny when in ten years the game continues to be in alpha and its defenders will keep saying "no this is ok did you see the last update"
Red Dead Redemption 2 took, what, 8 years with a team that was eventually at least twice (if not three times) the size of Star Citizen's dev team (if the info I read in this thread is correct). The game's development has had its issues and challenges and will continue to do so. I'll personally give them 2 more years to have something more fleshed out in players' hands. If we still only have one city planet and a huge amount of gameplay systems they've announced by now still aren't added into the game, sure, I'll join the more pessimist side of this argument. As is, I just don't think we are yet beyond some "this game is never coming out" point in development, as shitty as these super expensive digital space ships are.Its gonna be funny when in ten years the game continues to be in alpha and its defenders will keep saying "no this is ok did you see the last update"
This forum literally praised Rockstar for spending nearly a decade on RDR2 and that was with the endless crunch that by my knowledge, isn't happening with SC.
Probably better off comparing it to a dodgy pension fund.Not quite. After all, the kids who went to Fyre Fest figured out that they were being scammed pretty quickly after arrival.