So why did Sony make their own storage for the Vita? And Microsoft their own HDDs for the 360? This probably isn't as "custom" as you think. From the specs, it looks like some mid-range NAND chips with an average controller on a 2x PCIe4 bus. It's not that complicated.Making extra hardware sucks, I doubt its a straight money grab.
Then they don't need the proprietary connector, and you should unhappy with that decision. Even if they mean well, it's still a dumb move in the long run.I agree that others should be able to sell their versions of expendable storage as long as it meets the criteria of Microsoft.
Agree. I just meant the Vita's short analog stick throw necessitates the additional method of input.Well, I don't mind it on portable systems but when I'm sitting in my chair playing on a TV, I don't like having to keep my hands in a certain position. With portable games you have to do that anyways to see the screen.
Por que no los dos?
he do this on every Xbox threadResponding to Hoo-Doo is playing right into his hands. He comes into threads like this, ejaculates his take, and swiftly departs. Very infrequently does he return to address the rebuttals. He knows exactly what he's doing and now, so do you, newly-and-duly-informed reader.
2.5gb for the system. 13.gb for games.Yeah. 6GB for the system would make sense given the nature of quick resume means keeping the game stored in RAM so it can be easily and quickly retrieved by the OS.
The reveal is cool and all but what about sound? Wasn't there supposed to be dedicated audio hardware?
Regardless, it's quite the machine. Glad to see MS incorporating software tricks/solution taking advantage of their forte as a company.
The HDMI connector is capable of it. The one on the One X is capable of 4K60 too. That doesn't mean many developers will take advantage of it though.
Oh yes but Gears 5 really is just an example of what support for already released games will look like. Similar to X or Pro enhanced patches.Everything I've seen is nice, but I'm really feeling the lack of dedicated software. Even the dashboard looks the same as my X. Still interested, but Gears 5 is old news even if it's prettier.
The HDMI connector is capable of it. The one on the One X is capable of 4K60 too. That doesn't mean many developers will take advantage of it though.
Yeah. 6GB for the system would make sense given the nature of quick resume means keeping the game stored in RAM so it can be easily and quickly retrieved by the OS.
Edit: Disregard. 13.5GB/2.5GB split. It'll be interesting to see how spreading a game across both pools can affect performance.
Different situation though, with performance held back in many areas by the base consoles. I'm willing to bet that most games will be 4K30 next gen.I have faith. Xbox One X is already damn close to 4K/60 on most titles
So why did Sony make their own storage for the Vita? And Microsoft their own HDDs for the 360? This probably isn't as "custom" as you think. From the specs, it looks like some mid-range NAND chips with an average controller on a 2x PCIe4 bus. It's not that complicated.
Then they don't need the proprietary connector, and you should unhappy with that decision. Even if they mean well, it's still a dumb move in the long run.
Quick Resume is stored on SSD, not RAM. RAM storage was last generation's approach.
It wasn't a mistake, it made money.Because sony and ms both made huge mistakes.
But that exactly my point, why make a custom connector and packaging in this day and age without an actual technical reason. The connector was actually why I thought there might not be a controller on the cart, btw.
Fuck it's so beefy
I feel like my RTX2080 + 3700x won't be able to play next gen games at 60fps (that are 30fps on console)
Because sony and ms both made huge mistakes.
But that exactly my point, why make a custom connector and packaging in this day and age without an actual technical reason. The connector was actually why I thought there might not be a controller on the cart, btw.
So why did Sony make their own storage for the Vita? And Microsoft their own HDDs for the 360? This probably isn't as "custom" as you think. From the specs, it looks like some mid-range NAND chips with an average controller on a 2x PCIe4 bus. It's not that complicated.
Then they don't need the proprietary connector, and you should unhappy with that decision. Even if they mean well, it's still a dumb move in the long run.
What is the reddit 2019 leak again?It's crazy how accurate the reddit 2019 and github leaks have been. God I can't wait for the next gen to hit, this console looks unreal.
It was a mistake in that is was unnecessary and especially for the vita damaging to the ecosystem, and the core of it was it was to make money first, not as a solution to a technical problem.It wasn't a mistake, it made money.
Again, wrt. a controller being present or not, we'll see when they announce pricing.
Something approaching this trailer please:
Please show me the technical problem this solves.It was a mistake in that is was unnecessary and especially for the vita damaging to the ecosystem, and the core of it was it was to make money first, not as a solution to a technical problem.
Link? I have no idea what you're talking about. But I don't immediately see how a proprietary connector is going to help much in that regard.Ohhh, I just thought of another reason - and it may have to do with security and NVME (if you look back at that security presentation)
Please show me the technical problem this solves.
Link? No idea what you're talking about. But I don't immediately see how a proprietary connector is going to help much in that regard.
If Sampler Feedback Streaming can't be used on PC, PC ports will need significantly more VRAM / RAM.
I'll watch it and come back.Guarding Against Physical Attacks: The Xbox One Story - Tony Chen, Microsoft - Platform Security Summit 2019
Conference on composable software supply chain integrity and hardware-assisted platform security, with OpenEmbedded, OpenXT and other ecosystemswww.platformsecuritysummit.com
My thinking: proprietary connector because the SSD is not connecting direct to NVME(edit: sorry, this was to be pcie), it also has to go to a controller on the motherboard. USB has a ton of layers on it already, but NVME has DMA (direct memory access) and other nice things that could make it a security nightmare.
No if they want 3+ GB for their OS again
well they are using 2.5gb for the OS, so its all good.