Series X won't cost more than PS5. No way they are doing that again after this gen. I think they both retail for either $400 or $450. Both companies are prepared to take a $50-$100 loss on the hardware.
Ok then I guess my thoughts stand.Competing against Sony.
=> See disastrous Xbox One launch that was mostly "due to price and not lack of games".
Sorry but how is all the customization they did "brute force"? As I see it both analyzed game load and made a lot of adjustments to make their console better. It sounds like Microsoft went to best buy and built a PC while Sony changed everything which is neither true nor honest with the information at hand.
Both should be congratulated to build machines that go beyond what a PC can do in terms of customization.
Agreed. I think MS are certainly willing to take the hit, just so they can have the strongest start for the system. They have the hardware, services, games and studios. A high price would probably be the only downer for many, so getting that price parity in would be great for everyone involved.Series X won't cost more than PS5. No way they are doing that again after this gen. I think they both retail for either $400 or $450. Both companies are prepared to take a $50-$100 loss on the hardware.
No one knows what Lockhart really is though. Nothing 100% concrete on it, just rumors and smoke.
Sony has done many things that will result in a lower BOM.
The APU is much smaller because of 36 vs 52CUs.
No one knows what Lockhart really is though. Nothing 100% concrete on it, just rumors and smoke.
I mean, Phil said in one of the interviews they have only a few more hardware things but from now on it's going to be focusing on games. Maybe a Lockhart announcement is in there, but I agree I think they will drop the budget console after Series X has been out for a year or two like the new Switch Lite.I think even if Lockhart exists, it doesn't launch until 2021...
Instead of a Series X price drop, just introduce Lockhart and start the buzz over again.
399-449. Bundle in a game, xbox live and Gamepass for 3 months. Boom.
Thats the funny thing. MS don't need to bundle games, just GPU. If Halo launches same day, everyone gets it, probably a day or so before thanks to New Zeland.399-449. Bundle in a game, xbox live and Gamepass for 3 months. Boom.
True.I mean all you really have to do is bundle in GP...you'd get Infinite (if it doesn't get delayed) at launch.
That's ridiculous value.
:)Thats the funny thing. MS don't need to bundle games, just GPU. If Halo launches same day, everyone gets it, probably a day or so before thanks to New Zeland.
BOM estimates are terrible and I wish people would stop paying them so much mind. Sony and Microsoft are in long term contracts with their parts vendors and have much better pricing that anyone would think. They also know they will lower costs over time, hopefully in time for a lower cost model right as the sales momentum starts to kick in.Pretty much, I think that even Albert Penello basically stated here that they were expecting a 8-9TF from Sony at 399$ when he was still working at MS. The fact that PS5 has a 10.3TF GPU and an I/O solution at twice the speed of theirs probably was not expected.
About 399$ not being a lock anymore for Sony... well probably it was the target price when they designed the system but if the Bloomberg estimate of their BOM is true, Sony will need to deal with a close to 100$ loss to be covered by games and subscriptions (Plus and other services) to be able to sell PS5 at 399$.
It's possible if they want sales to be steady and plan to cut their costs quickly but locked? I don't know. 449$ seems a way more comfortable price point for them financially.
BOM estimates are terrible and I wish people would stop paying them so much mind. Sony and Microsoft are in long term contracts with their parts vendors and have much better pricing that anyone would think. They also know they will lower costs over time, hopefully in time for a lower cost model right as the sales momentum starts to kick in.
Much smaller, but much higher clocks, so Microsoft will almost certainly be getting better yields than Sony.
How much better, we don't know, but there's probably not as much of a price difference there as first appears.
I... didnt say that? I was just saying how Sony was taking a different approach to squeezing power out of their hardware where MS was just going with the traditional method of putting in more CU's. That could affect price, how much it can is up for debate
I mean all you really have to do is bundle in GP...you'd get Infinite (if it doesn't get delayed) at launch.
That's ridiculous value.
Even in the best case scenario, I doubt MS believes they can surpass Sony in console sales next gen, however there's no question they believe they can increase their console market share more next gen than this gen, and their overall market share and revenue in the video game industry through multiple ways of accessing the Xbox ecosystem that they've been investing into for years will finally pay off.This might be the generation where Xbox catches up to, or maybe even surpasses Playstation. They have superior features, services, infrastructure and hardware. Now we see if they can actually challenge when it comes to exclusives.
They'll bundle in three months of Game Pass, and Halo Infinite will arrive four months after launch. Genius!
Maaan you really need to stop pushing this. It's bull.The results are pretty close, but their methods of getting to that point are very different and MS chose a traditional "brute force" approach. The wildcard here would be PS5's cooling solution.
Series X won't cost more than PS5. No way they are doing that again after this gen. I think they both retail for either $400 or $450. Both companies are prepared to take a $50-$100 loss on the hardware.
They came very close to matching the sales of PS3 with the 360, so I dont see it as entirely unlikely. As I said, they have Sony beat in everything but exclusives, which itself is no small matter obviously, but I think it might end up counting for a lot in the long run. Just look at the whole BC situation, which I think is a microcosm of a lot of this. MS is a juggernaught when it comes to software & services and infrastructure, and they have enormous resources to draw from. Its far from clear cut this gen to me.Even in the best case scenario, I doubt MS believes they can surpass Sony in console sales next gen, however there's no question they believe they can increase their console market share more next gen than this gen, and their overall market share and revenue in the video game industry through multiple ways of accessing the Xbox ecosystem that they've been investing into for years will finally pay off.
Things are different from 2005-6 to 2020. Sony has built up deserved loyalty to their brand over this generation that MS will have to compete against. MS knows they'll have to slowly chip away at that in order to gain more and more ground over time in the console space. Obviously their investments from years ago and learned lessons have put them in a fantastic place to start off next generation on the right foot.They came very close to matching the sales of PS3 with the 360, so I dont see it as entirely unlikely. As I said, they have Sony beat in everything but exclusives, which itself is no small matter obviously, but I think it might end up counting for a lot in the long run. Just look at the whole BC situation, which I think is a microcosm of a lot of this. MS is a juggernaught when it comes to software & services and infrastructure, and they have enormous resources to draw from. Its far from clear cut this gen to me.
xsx: $499
PS5: $399 (assuming all the proprietary tech doesn't drive up cost)
This gen is definitely going to be more interesting than last.
MS seems to really want it this gen. Can you imagine if they are just waiting for Sony to announce the PS5 price so they can match it or even undercut it?
Things are different from 2005-6 to 2020. Sony has built up deserved loyalty to their brand over this generation that MS will have to compete against. MS knows they'll have to slowly chip away at that in order to gain more and more ground over time in the console space. Obviously their investments from years ago and learned lessons have put them in a fantastic place to start off next generation on the right foot.
Right, and Playstation brand loyalty is certainly one of the challenges Xbox has to face, but I wouldnt say that loyalty is any stronger now than it was entering the 7th console generation. Sony were fresh of the PS2, which still is the best selling console of all time. They were flying just as high back then, even if they did screw up a lot leading up to the release of the PS3.Things are different from 2005-6 to 2020. Sony has built up deserved loyalty to their brand over this generation that MS will have to compete against. MS knows they'll have to slowly chip away at that in order to gain more and more ground over time in the console space. Obviously their investments from years ago and learned lessons have put them in a fantastic place to start off next generation on the right foot.
Sony's PS3 launch was a fuck up of epic proportion. Despite launching much sooner, being cheaper AND having third party games perform better, Microsoft only got a tie last gen. That's how strong Playstation brand is.What? Lol. The largest factor in the struggle of the Xbox One was their abysmal launch. The PS3 and Xbox 360 were so damn close in sales at the end of the generation and Microsoft fumbled going into the Xbox One generation. That was the biggest thing of all.
When we are talking purely marketing if Microsoft have the more powerful console and they even match the price of the PS5 they've already won the optics of the more attractive launch console. More power for same price is a win no matter how you look at it. Microsoft can also throw in any duration of time of free Game Pass and every person who buys the console just got Halo Infinite for free.
You're simplifying things by using the past as evidence but aren't considering how different and unique the situations were at each time and how they will be in 2020 and once again Sony's brand loyalty earned this generation especially with their output of AAA games like Spider-man, Horizon Zero Dawn, God of War, and there upcoming blockbuster in The Last of Us 2 are major things Xbox will have to contend with regardless of price and power.In gaming Brand loyalty doesn't really matter maybe for a part of the sold units, but not much.
Just look at the past:
PS2 to PS3
Or Wii to Wii U.
AT LAUNCH price and console power matters more.
launch lineups are generally speaking mediocre anyway.
just look at the PS4 Launch lineup. Was there any great PS4 exclusive game? not really.
It was the Price and Power that swayed people from Xbox 360 to PS4.
It's stronger now than it's ever been due to Sony's investment in first party paying off this generation. Sony's PS1 and PS2 were built off of third party games that were either exclusive to or debuted on those consoles. Also Sony's strong Japanese support helps with their brand loyalty.Right, and Playstation brand loyalty is certainly one of the challenges Xbox has to face, but I wouldnt say that loyalty is any stronger now than it was entering the 7th console generation. Sony were fresh of the PS2, which still is the best selling console of all time. They were flying just as high back then, even if they did screw up a lot leading up to the release of the PS3.
The console that needs ludicrous cooling for its 36CU GPU to hit 10TF is the one brute forcing power.The results are pretty close, but their methods of getting to that point are very different and MS chose a traditional "brute force" approach. The wildcard here would be PS5's cooling solution.
I dont really think the mainstream can tell the difference between whats first party and whats third, it seems far more likely that they are interested only in the titles themselves. As I said, Sony still has an advantage there, but all the other factors do add up for Xbox to mount a serious challenge. Im still not at all convinced that brand loyalty is stronger now than it was leading up from ps2 to ps3. If anything the amount of exclusives are fewer than ever due to how gaming has evolved.It's stronger now than it's ever been due to Sony's investment in first party paying off this generation. Sony's PS1 and PS2 were built off of third party games that were either exclusive to or debuted on those consoles. Also Sony's strong Japanese support helps with their brand loyalty.
There's no doubt I believe Xbox will do better next gen than last. However you have to be realistic to the situation in 2020 and no matter how well Xbox's consoles sell, I don't believe even MS thinks it will sell more than PS5. They're not relying on that either hence them expanding Xbox beyond consoles. They're looking at capturing more of the overall market share in the video game industry in multiple ways.I dont really think the mainstream can tell the difference between whats first party and whats third, it seems far more likely that they are interested only in the titles themselves. As I said, Sony still has an advantage there, but all the other factors do add up for Xbox to mount a serious challenge. Im still not at all convinced that brand loyalty is stronger now than it was leading up from ps2 to ps3. If anything the amount of exclusives are fewer than ever due to how gaming has evolved.
Im not saying that the situations are identical, and I never did say that, but we are allowed to look at history to at least in to some degree inform our discussions about the present and future. What Im saying is that I dont think brand loyalty, while important, is as rigid as you make it out to be, nor do I think that it is stronger now in favor of Playstation compared where it was during the PS2 to PS3 transition. I think MS is in a better position now than ever before to seriously challenge Sony.There's no doubt I believe Xbox will do better next gen than last. However you have to be realistic to the situation in 2020 and no matter how well Xbox's consoles sell, I don't believe even MS thinks it will sell more than PS5. They're not relying on that either hence them expanding Xbox beyond consoles. They're looking at capturing more of the overall market share in the video game industry in multiple ways.
Why are you making comparisons to other generations without also acknowledging how unique and different the situations were. Xbox 360 came out a year earlier, was cheaper, third party games performed better, and was generally looked at as having the better exclusives throughout most of the gen.
See, I disagree with believing the PS brand was stronger during the PS2 to PS3 transition than it is now. The internet was not what it was now and the mind share on social media and YouTube today has a huge impact. I think we're at the height of brand loyalty/console warriors. LOLIm not saying that the situations are identical, and I never did say that, but we are allowed to look at history to at least in to some degree inform our discussions about the present and future. What Im saying is that I dont think brand loyalty, while important, is as rigid as you make it out to be, nor do I think that it is stronger now in favor of Playstation compared where it was during the PS2 to PS3 transition. I think MS is in a better position now than ever before to seriously challenge Sony.
It's not just the price and power but the narrative that it was the best place to play games without all the tv, sports, 2nd hand selling(lending games) and surveillance camera shenanigans in the way. Xbox has the best plan on services going forward so it's definitely a step up from this gen. Lastly it will be the promise of upcoming games that will sway people who aren't interested in power, price or services of which I think Xbox is doing great with all the new studios. Time will tell though especially with 2020 being shitty as it is.Did you Watch the Video? They would match the price of the PS5. That's for sure.
In gaming Brand loyalty doesn't really matter maybe for a part of the sold units, but not much.
Just look at the past:
PS2 to PS3
Or Wii to Wii U.
AT LAUNCH price and console power matters more.
launch lineups are generally speaking mediocre anyway.
just look at the PS4 Launch lineup. Was there any great PS4 exclusive game? not really.
It was the Price and Power that swayed people from Xbox 360 to PS4.
I've actually been thinking the same thing. Sony can't really afford to take a loss on each PS5 sold. I mean, they can, but I bet they really really don't want to. Sony as a company is reliant on the PlayStation business to drive revenue. Xbox is just a smaller piece of Microsoft as a company.All this repeated talk about not getting beaten on price, and price being critical. It's almost like Phil is daring PS to go lower because he knows he's got the most capital, can match any price, and can withstand the losses much better than Sony can. Cold blooded.