No one knows.Is the more powerful version docked only? If it is, than I'll pass. I play my Switch almost always in handheld mode.
No one knows.Is the more powerful version docked only? If it is, than I'll pass. I play my Switch almost always in handheld mode.
This seems about what I think and I could getGuys don't expect too much, mainly it should be a revision fixing existing issues.
Better Bluetooth (Joycon connectivity issues) and WiFi Module (2.4Ghz connection issues), ever wondered why the Switch doesn't have BT Headset support?
Possibly Tegra X2 (16nm) cheaper production than the Tegra X1 (20nm) costs by now. But you do get a performance and battery boost from it, so it's an upgrade or evolution.
They would also fix the Switch Curved Screen feature and the currently unfixable hardware exploit of the current revision.
Possibly better screens, Switch is already 2 years on the market.
Maybe a more professional dock with additional fan and ethernet Port.
But stay realistic for the Pro version, or get disappointed.
I still think a portable only model is kind of a mistake. But whatever let's see how Nintendo handles it.
I'm sure it's been asked already, but what will need to be done if buying a new console if you have a lot of titles purchased digitally?
Guys don't expect too much, mainly it should be a revision fixing existing issues.
Better Bluetooth (Joycon connectivity issues) and WiFi Module (2.4Ghz connection issues), ever wondered why the Switch doesn't have BT Headset support?
Possibly Tegra X2 (16nm) cheaper production than the Tegra X1 (20nm) costs by now. But you do get a performance and battery boost from it, so it's an upgrade or evolution.
They would also fix the Switch Curved Screen feature and the currently unfixable hardware exploit of the current revision.
Possibly better screens, Switch is already 2 years on the market.
Maybe a more professional dock with additional fan and ethernet Port.
But stay realistic for the Pro version, or get disappointed.
You would think there wouldn't be any meltdowns but there are some people so against a mini version that I wouldn't be surprised.There wouldn't be much meltdowns.
People categorically against it would mellow out as soon as Nintendo would show them a good-looking piece of hardware in one of those Switch concept trailers/commercials.
I was originally pretty opposed to the hybrid idea, but the Switch trailer sold me on it pretty hard.
In this case, it would be straight up innocous as it would be only one of the multiple devices on offer and in no way the flagship model.
I'm sure it's been asked already, but what will need to be done if buying a new console if you have a lot of titles purchased digitally?
So it's sounding more and more like the Switch "Pro" is twice as much in terms of Specs. it sounds like there is a newer CPU being used, likely A72/A73. Tegra Mariko seems to reach at least double the current Switch's performance when docked, Mariko's profile in Switch firmware also has 8GB ram and a 4GB profile, possibly for the 2 different models... based on the SNK leaker's info, the specs did change after his overclocked X2 stuff, that is natural as they moved on to Mariko from Parker.
What is a Tegra Mariko? Next announced Tegra revision is the Tegra Orin from everything I know. Also the name Mariko doesn't come up on any Nvidia roadmaps I could find.
A smaller Switch kinda has to have better hardware in order to run the same games in a more difficult thermal envelope.I have to imagine both models will be a straight upgrade over the OG switch
Or at least the smaller one being identical
I still think a portable only model is kind of a mistake. But whatever let's see how Nintendo handles it.
an A72/75 at 1.5GHz and 256 cuda cores at 1GHz docked and 50GB/s bandwidth is gonna make more of a difference than most people realizeSo it's sounding more and more like the Switch "Pro" is twice as much in terms of Specs. it sounds like there is a newer CPU being used, likely A72/A73. Tegra Mariko seems to reach at least double the current Switch's performance when docked, Mariko's profile in Switch firmware also has 8GB ram and a 4GB profile, possibly for the 2 different models... based on the SNK leaker's info, the specs did change after his overclocked X2 stuff, that is natural as they moved on to Mariko from Parker.
I'd also suggest that the cheaper model probably uses the same chip at a lower clock speed, so that when portable, both devices run games with a similar spec to the current Switch when docked, though possibly with faster CPU and RAM, allowing for games to target these new devices, especially after the first 2 years, would allow them to more seemlessly leave generational hardware in the past and embrace a more natural dev cycle, where iterations on hardware allow relevant performance levels going forward.
All the kids right now don't have control over the TV and they're all playing their Switches in bed.I still think a portable only model is kind of a mistake. But whatever let's see how Nintendo handles it.
Why? Especially when the leading theory is for the portable only one being cheaper.I have to imagine both models will be a straight upgrade over the OG switch
Or at least the smaller one being identical
For games that don't use cloud saves (like splatoon) is there a way to do a system transfer to move over save files to a new system?
The main feature of interest I would have in a pro unit is Bluetooth headset compatibility
Again, article clearly says that it won't be like a Vita. Nowhere I'm saying it shouldn't be cheaper or aimed at hand-held audience, I just don't see how that means removing the joy-cons.They saying that but referring to a current Switch and current controllers, not that revision will have Joy Cons, just that will not have HD rumble like OG Switch has.
Being 3DS successor means low price point offer and focus on handheld play, also, you can bet that HD Rumble will not be only cuted feature.
That can mean anything, like totally different form factor, does not mean that will have Joy Cons.
In both cases above you reaching, like that proves your point, but it doesnt,
on other hand I reffer to very clear informations like "that Nintendo sees as a successor to its aging hand-held 3DS device" and past Nikkes article also said "low price revision with focus on handheld play with cuted features".
You missing clear fact that families already have Switch model for itself, they dont need cut nothing from current model, they have full experience and to use it like they want. Again, when we talk about this "successor to its aging hand-held 3DS device" point is about handheld only users that want low price offer.
No one said that Pro is for kids, like I wrote parents/kids can choose between current Switch and low price offer Switch that will be focused on handheld play.
What is a Tegra Mariko? Next announced Tegra revision is the Tegra Orin/Pegasus from everything I know. Also the name Mariko doesn't come up on any Nvidia roadmaps I could find.
Edit:
Cheaper or not, it has to have more capable innards if it is to run the same games.Why? Especially when the leading theory is for the portable only one being cheaper.
Again, article clearly says that it won't be like a Vita. Nowhere I'm saying it shouldn't be cheaper or aimed at hand-held audience, I just don't see how that means removing the joy-cons.
What is a Tegra Mariko? Next announced Tegra revision is the Tegra Orin/Pegasus from everything I know. Also the name Mariko doesn't come up on any Nvidia roadmaps I could find.
Edit:
it was not the name of the Switch revision, it was the name of the custom chip that the Switch firmware had built into it's official code. Somewhere there are devices using a chip called Tegra Mariko, that have 8GB of RAM and run the Switch OS. Nintendo has updated this firmware in 6.0 and 7.0 and Mariko is still there and I believe it's even been updated.That Mariko was the name for the Switch revision that was shown in the code for the 5.0.0 Switch update in 2018
Mariko (aka T214) is a chip referenced within Switch's firmware for about a year now. The Tegra chips above are Nvidia's automotive chips, whereas Mariko is almost certainly a custom SoC for Nintendo.
I could see them doing a revision of the existing Switch to fix some of the hardware & software shortcomings of the original. Unless they plan on putting the Switch Pro at the OG Switch's price point ($300), there's room for it to co-exist with the cheaper & more expensive options.also, I don't think the current switch will continue to exist. they can't have these upgrades while keeping the current switch as it is, so I wouldn't expect a price drop for them, but a fire sale to get rid of them
Why? Especially when the leading theory is for the portable only one being cheaper.
I would wager neither, most Nintendo hardware revisions just get a trailer and press release out of the blueAre we thinking E3 for a reveal or its own Direct/Presentation???
an A72/75 at 1.5GHz and 256 cuda cores at 1GHz docked and 50GB/s bandwidth is gonna make more of a difference than most people realize
Custom chip between Nintendo and nvidiaWhat is a Tegra Mariko? Next announced Tegra revision is the Tegra Orin/Pegasus from everything I know. Also the name Mariko doesn't come up on any Nvidia roadmaps I could find.
Edit:
I know. I remember buying a cell phone once and it was locked up right out the box. Just displayed the damn clock. ;)I too enjoy the screens on my devices to be real. I used stickers for a while but it's just not the same.