Same. Even though I'm a teacher and teach in the building (not right now in NYC), I wouldn't jump at the chance right away.Nope. I'm fine staying at home for a few more months until they work out all the kinks.
Not surprised by that vote. A lot more "vaccine hesitancy"/anti vax on era than people might think. Despite 2 high profile clinically trialled highly effective vaccines, 1 in 5 here wouldn't take it 🤦♂️
I wouldn't worry about it in this case, but I wouldn't say that's a good line of thinking as a general rule since the immune system is very complex. One example would be choosing a target that might be close to something also found in healthy tissues, risking the induction of an autoimmune response. There's a reason testing for safety is so extensive and important.It does provoke an immune response either way (basically giving your body training for the real thing) so even if it was a rushed vaccine I wouldn't be worried it would be based on anything dangerous
I might wait a month or two just to see how things shake out in the general populace but for the most part yeah absolutely.
My wife's an RN and she's a little hesitant on it because she says vaccines usually take years and years of research and clinical trials to study long term effects while this one's been developed in the span of, I don't know, 8 months or so? She feels like it's really being rushed. We're very much a pro-vax family so it's not like that, but anyone have some knowledge on that particular point I can share with her?
Yeah that's another part too, we discussed that, or at least to the extent of our own knowledge about vaccines. That they've always been DNA based or something and this one targets mRNA that puts it even more into uncharted territory and 'how did they do all this in the span of months?', etc.This vaccine is based on entirely different technology (mRNA) than traditional vaccine research. That's a big part of why they've been able to develop it so quickly. Of course they still will not have run the same number of trials a traditional vaccine would but the late stage clinical trials were extremely promising in terms of side effects.
This. I've never left home without a mask to go out into public spaces. I don't stop and chat with folks. I don't loiter.Nope. I'm fine staying at home for a few more months until they work out all the kinks.
This is a wild take. Extremely presumptuous. Suffice to say, disagree with it.The 'let others test it' rhetoric is dangerous, too. That sort of thinking can catch on like wildfire, and is not much different than anti-vax. Because lo and behold, you'll start seeing 'my kid got the vaccine and he has autism!' shit popping up, and some of those 'wait and see' people will say 'see! I told you!' and continue to refuse the vaccine.
Part of those "years and years" of research isn't actually research and safety testing, it's manufacturing and production.I might wait a month or two just to see how things shake out in the general populace but for the most part yeah absolutely.
My wife's an RN and she's a little hesitant on it because she says vaccines usually take years and years of research and clinical trials to study long term effects while this one's been developed in the span of, I don't know, 8 months or so? She feels like it's really being rushed. We're very much a pro-vax family so it's not like that, but anyone have some knowledge on that particular point I can share with her?
Reuters Graphics gives you an overview about the vaccine technologies:Yeah that's another part too, we discussed that, or at least to the extent of our own knowledge about vaccines. That they've always been DNA based or something and this one targets mRNA that puts it even more into uncharted territory and 'how did they do all this in the span of months?', etc.
No, I don't. I live in Canada, and I've already heard from several friends and family here that they'll be 'waiting' to get theirs, and letting others 'test it' for them. What do people expect to learn in a couple months? Will they be satisfied that the vaccine is safe enough when everyone is still alive and well? Or will they dig deep and go down the classic anti-vax rabbit hole of looking for bullshit articles and reports of adverse effects by a miniscule number of people to justify holding off on it longer?This is a wild take. Extremely presumptuous. Suffice to say, disagree with it.
Do you live in the USA?
Hoping for a queso variant.
Much appreciated.Part of those "years and years" of research isn't actually research and safety testing, it's manufacturing and production.
Most of the Big Players already started to build factories for their COVID-vaccines before they had the approval to use it, they are basically waiting/hoping that it works out.
Another thing: These studies usually have to wait until someone actually gets the illness you are fighting against, you can't just give them COVID. Imagine how long a HIV-trial takes until someone actually contracts it randomly. But COVID is everywhere, therefore the propability that someone contracts it is pretty high and you can test everything faster (efficacy / safety)
All that said, long term safety is still up in the air (like some side effects that occur years after you take the vaccine, but I actually don't know if this is even a thing)
Reuters Graphics gives you an overview about the vaccine technologies:
Vaccine bootcamp
The global race to develop a COVID-19 vaccine is on. Here are the different types of vaccines and how your body uses them to develop immunity.graphics.reuters.com
Regarding mRNA-vaccines, basically: mRNA acts as blueprint for cells, it usually has the instructions that tell your cells to produce a certain protein.
The mRNA-vaccine injects mRNA into your cells that has the instructions to produce the spike protein of the COVID-virus. The mRNA naturally dissolves after this, it's a bit fragile anyway. (important: mRNA doesn't enter the nucleus of the cell, it can't mess around with your DNA).
Your immune system scans your cells and notices that your cells are not how they should be and creates antibodies based on that spike protein and attacks it (one reason why you can feel shitty after getting a vaccine). If the real virus enters your system, you already trained your immune system to attack the spike protein of the virus and that's how your body kills it.
Part of those "years and years" of research isn't actually research and safety testing, it's manufacturing and production.
Most of the Big Players already started to build factories for their COVID-vaccines before they had the approval to use it, they are basically waiting/hoping that it works out.
Another thing: These studies usually have to wait until someone actually gets the illness you are fighting against, you can't just give them COVID. Imagine how long a HIV-trial takes until someone actually contracts it randomly. But COVID is everywhere, therefore the propability that someone contracts it is pretty high and you can test everything faster (efficacy / safety)
All that said, long term safety is still up in the air (like some side effects that occur years after you take the vaccine, but I actually don't know if this is even a thing)
Reuters Graphics gives you an overview about the vaccine technologies:
Vaccine bootcamp
The global race to develop a COVID-19 vaccine is on. Here are the different types of vaccines and how your body uses them to develop immunity.graphics.reuters.com
Regarding mRNA-vaccines, basically: mRNA acts as blueprint for cells, it usually has the instructions that tell your cells to produce a certain protein.
The mRNA-vaccine injects mRNA into your cells that has the instructions to produce the spike protein of the COVID-virus. The mRNA naturally dissolves after this, it's a bit fragile anyway. (important: mRNA doesn't enter the nucleus of the cell, it can't mess around with your DNA).
Your immune system scans your cells and notices that your cells are not how they should be and creates antibodies based on that spike protein and attacks it (one reason why you can feel shitty after getting a vaccine). If the real virus enters your system, you already trained your immune system to attack the spike protein of the virus and that's how your body kills it.
I'd wait, but that's not a "no." Just a "not right now." I feel voting no is a stern response against the vaccine. I'm not.
My concerns would be of an administration or a company hot shotting this. While the worries of the former appears to be not an issue anymore, it's the latter I worry about. I do not doubt the current assertions of its effectiveness, but we're talking about a vaccine that needs to be delivered on a scale never before seen, to a virus we're still learning more about. I imagine there's some risk, however little it may be, that there are variables outside of the testing trials that could play a role. That's what I'm waiting on. We also have to consider priority groups due to its distribution, as we're all probably unconsciously aware at present that America will look like a caste system as soon as this vaccine is distributed.
At present, my only social interactions are with stray cats outside, so this isn't me saying no while engaging in a way that puts others at risk. If that was the case I'd probably jump on board sooner despite my reservations. I'd wait at the worst, six months, but that was my take when Trump was hotshotting this as a panacea to normalcy (we're never getting our terrible normal back anyway y'all) so my views probably haven't changed shape as he's not out of office at this moment in time. I wouldn't even be surprised if it's because of his attitude that I've conditioned myself to be so withdrawn about it, and I am probably not alone in that collective brain rot.