Ahhh yes that makes sense! Thanks for explaining.Higher densities are more sustainable, as they occupy less land and require less resources to distribute services (like utilities and garbage collection), while making public transport more efficient and reducing car dependency.
Suburbs and urban sprawling are very unsustainable. It's a very inefficient way of using land; in the space taken by two detached single family homes (each one with its yard in typical suburban fashion) where two families would live, you can house several times that number with a medium-sized apartment building (four to five stories high, two families per story).
Yep. This is me right here.City all the way. Even as an introvert, I prefer being close to the centre of things; restaurants, events, museums, etc. I much prefer using public transit and reducing my environmental footprint, that kind of thing is easier in a city.
Also I don't want to live in a house and have to worry about mowing my lawn, shovelling my drive and general home maintenance.
I can't imagine why anyone would want to live in a small place in the city. I can live in a nearby suburb, get more (and nicer) house for my money, and anything I'd want to do in the city is only a few minutes away.
Obviously i'm gonna carry my 20 bags of groceys on the bus and down the block to the house myself. I live in the south suburbs of Chicago and i could take the bus to the grocery store but again 10-20 bags of groceys plus bus times makes it pointless.Alot, especially for US suburbs where public transit is nonexistent. People in this thread declaring they want/need all this open space is mind-boggling. When your suburb living requires you to take a car to a freagin' grocery store that's a problem.
Obviously i'm gonna carry my 20 bags of groceys on the bus and down the block to the house myself. I live in the south suburbs of Chicago and i could take the bus to the grocery store but again 10-20 bags of groceys plus bus times makes it pointless.
Yes suburbs are inefficent but until you fix the problems that make them necessary or make people want them then saying that is pointless.
Obviously i'm gonna carry my 20 bags of groceys on the bus and down the block to the house myself. I live in the south suburbs of Chicago and i could take the bus to the grocery store but again 10-20 bags of groceys plus bus times makes it pointless.
Yes suburbs are inefficent but until you fix the problems that make them necessary or make people want them then saying that is pointless.
I like space.
People constantly pouring on top of each other just to go out isn't a life I'd enjoy.
I prefer suburbs for that reason. To be fair NYC is my example. So smaller/less dense cities may work but since I don't live there oh well.
Its a dense urban area.