• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

fanboi

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,702
Sweden
Per title.

Two Three scenarios:

  1. Would we be able to, depending when we find it, deflect it so it wouldn't hit earth?
  2. Would we be able to build bunker deep enough to withstand the impact?
  3. If we survive the impact would we survive the aftermath?
Of course, most of it depends when we see it of course.
 
Last edited:
Oct 26, 2017
7,299
Per title.

Two scenarios:

  1. Would we be able to, depending when we find it, deflect it so it wouldn't hit earth?
  2. Would we be able to build bunker deep enough to withstand the impact?
Of course, most of it depends when we see it of course.

1. If early enough, possibly.
2. Withstanding the impact is easy unless you're around where it hits. Surviving a winter for decades is less so.
 
Oct 31, 2017
10,039
It depends on how long. We might well be able to alter the orbit of an incoming rock given 20 or 30 years. If it hit the planet people would survive it for a while, but surviving the global effects? Nah
 

Fat4all

Woke up, got a money tag, swears a lot
Member
Oct 25, 2017
92,580
here
the asteroid didnt kill all the dinosaurs all at once

the impact fucked over the ecosystem in a massive way, which fucked over plant growth, which fucked over herbivores, which fucked over carnivores
 

Boy

Member
Apr 24, 2018
4,556
I think so. Just shoot a shuttle out into space and wait for the event to happen, then land back on earth after the impact.

Even if the asteroid wiped out the crops/food. We'll find ways around it with growing food in artificial lighting and solar power. Besides they already have bunkers and vaults with variety of seeds just incase if some kind of catastrophe happens.
 
Last edited:

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,511
The meteor impact itself didn't kill (most of) the dinosaurs. It was the planet-wide climate shift generated by the sheer amount of junk the meteor flooded the atmosphere with. It got much colder and the reptiles mostly died out. The ones that didn't evolved into smaller more heat-conscious forms, hence birds.
 

Nigel Tufnel

Member
Mar 5, 2019
3,146
1. I think we are a long way away from the tech needed to divert/destroy a large asteroid even with tons of warning
2. Some would survive the initial impact event even without bunkers, the problem is that the entirety of the planet would be pretty grim for a long time. It took 30k years for critters to return in large numbers following the KT extinction event. Even if something humanoid survived the extinction event, and the ensuing dark period- I don't think what came out the other side could be properly considered 'human' any more.
 

smurfx

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,578
billlions of humans might die due to starvation but we would survive. it would likely be a miserable existence but humans would have to adapt.
 

Owl

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,091
California
Impact is easy enough o survive for anyone not in the immediate impact zone. I think mankind would survive in some form from the decades long winter, but the majority would die from starvation probably
 

VariantX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,880
Columbia, SC
Probably a handful would survive. If we can't grow food or have access to clean water then most of us are dying off from starvation. And we still could be wiped out afterwards due to disease and lack of genetic diversity.
 
Oct 27, 2017
7,466
1) No. Bill Bryson told me that the chances are we wouldn't even see it before it hit and even if you did we apparently don't have the tech to send up nukes or teams of miners in a shuttle to deflect or destroy.
2) Probably. Fallout style?

Here's the bit from A Short History of nearly everything;

An asteroid or comet traveling at cosmic velocities would enter the Earth's atmosphere at such a speed that the air beneath it couldn't get out of the way and would be compressed, as in a bicycle pump. As anyone who has used such a pump knows, compressed air grows swiftly hot, and the temperature below it would rise to some 60,000 Kelvin, or ten times the surface temperature of the Sun. In this instant of its arrival in our atmosphere, everything in the meteor's path—people, houses, factories, cars—would crinkle and vanish like cellophane in a flame. One second after entering the atmosphere, the meteorite would slam into the Earth's surface, where the people of Manson had a moment before been going about their business. The meteorite itself would vaporize instantly, but the blast would blow out a thousand cubic kilometers of rock, earth, and superheated gases. Every living thing within 150 miles that hadn't been killed by the heat of entry would now be killed by the blast. Radiating outward at almost the speed of light would be the initial shock wave, sweeping everything before it. For those outside the zone of immediate devastation, the first inkling of catastrophe would be a flash of blinding light—the brightest ever seen by human eyes—followed an instant to a minute or two later by an apocalyptic sight of unimaginable grandeur: a roiling wall of darkness reaching high into the heavens, filling an entire field of view and traveling at thousands of miles an hour. Its approach would be eerily silent since it would be moving far beyond the speed of sound. Anyone in a tall building in Omaha or Des Moines, say, who chanced to look in the right direction would see a bewildering veil of turmoil followed by instantaneous oblivion. Within minutes, over an area stretching from Denver to Detroit and encompassing what had once been Chicago, St. Louis, Kansas City, the Twin Cities—the whole of the Midwest, in short—nearly every standing thing would be flattened or on fire, and nearly every living thing would be dead. People up to a thousand miles away would be knocked off their feet and sliced or clobbered by a blizzard of flying projectiles. Beyond a thousand miles the devastation from the blast would gradually diminish. But that's just the initial shockwave. No one can do more than guess what the associated damage would be, other than that it would be brisk and global. The impact would almost certainly set off a chain of devastating earthquakes. Volcanoes across the globe would begin to rumble and spew. Tsunamis would rise up and head devastatingly for distant shores. Within an hour, a cloud of blackness would cover the planet, and burning rock and other debris would be pelting down everywhere, setting much of the planet ablaze. It has been estimated that at least a billion and a half people would be dead by the end of the first day. The massive disturbances to the ionosphere would knock out communications systems everywhere, so survivors would have no idea what was happening elsewhere or where to turn. It would hardly matter. As one commentator has put it, fleeing would mean "selecting a slow death over a quick one. The death toll would be very little affected by any plausible relocation effort, since Earth's ability to support life would be universally diminished
 

hordak

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,532
Anaheim, CA
you would need time to build an underground bunkers that can sustain life for hundreds, or even thousands of years.

if we had advance warning we can possibly get like thousands of embryos frozen for future fertlization. There's already a doomsday seed bank in norway that the survivors can possibly use but i dont know if you can grow shit if there's no sunlight

 

Alucrid

Chicken Photographer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,413
we would need to teach astronauts how to drill or drillers how to astronaut, which ever one is easier
 

Z-Beat

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
31,837
Probably. Would be rough but possible. Severity depends a lot on where it hits though
 

MarioW

PikPok
Verified
Nov 5, 2017
1,155
New Zealand
Yes. But society as we know it would collapse, and the impact on the environment would mean it would take hundreds, maybe thousands, of year to recover to our present population, if we could even recover at all given how inhospitable the planet would be and incompatible to how our current tech and processes work.
 

Goldbob

Member
Sep 21, 2020
392
Dinosaurs didn't have subterranean bunkers all over the globe, afaik.

Humanity will survive, even if it's just the political elite and wealthy.
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,957
Germany
Some people would, even if the sun is darkened for decades, some people would survive making energy from fossil fuel and growing food from artificial light. Maybe the air would need to be filtered or worse as well.

How many would survive? Idk
 

Freezasaurus

Member
Oct 25, 2017
56,963
Bruh, we can barely survive a pandemic which only requires us to act like adults. Prepare for asteroid parties.
 

Aranjah

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,185
I think "humans" would survive but "humanity", with all the bonus connotations that carries, probably wouldn't.
 
OP
OP
fanboi

fanboi

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,702
Sweden
If I had to select a apocalyptic scenario I think it would be a massive meteor I think.

Would be an impressive view.
 

dhlt25

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,814
Nope, prob pocket of people would survive but civilization as we know it would be over
 

impingu1984

Member
Oct 31, 2017
3,413
UK
1. No chance... We'd barely make a dent in it.

2. Some people would survive the initial blast and destruction.

3. Survival of the complete and total change and fucking over the entire planets ecosystem and climate into a effective nuclear winter, along with killing off many other animals and plants... I'm 50/50 on that one.. it's far from a certain thing, in truth most if all would be in for a long slow death... Civilisation as we know it would be altered beyond what we know today...
 

Deleted member 16516

User requested account closure
Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,427
With current technology levels, not a chance. With science fiction level of technology, most probably. See
The Expanse, Nemesis Games onwards.
 
OP
OP
fanboi

fanboi

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,702
Sweden
With current technology levels, not a chance. With science fiction level of technology, most probably. See
The Expanse, Nemesis Games onwards.

Ah you mean more grounded scifi? Yeah.

I read somewhere they are theorising that you could but sails on it or engines that would move it very slowly over a long period of time.
 
Oct 31, 2017
10,039
Ah you mean more grounded scifi? Yeah.

I read somewhere they are theorising that you could but sails on it or engines that would move it very slowly over a long period of time.

Given enough time you could even change an orbit by putting a lump of mass near the rock. We could also attach a low thrust high isp engine. A mass driver would work, but that would be way more complicated.
 

iksenpets

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,484
Dallas, TX
If it were identified more than a decade away from impact, and the odds of impact were deemed high enough (if the initial reports were like 30% chance of impact, I think people probably roll the dice on a miss), I think you could muster some kind of mission to try to deflect its path. But you'd have pretty high chance of failure.

If it did hit, the rapid climate change would take down the agriculture system, and modern civilization with it. But humans are pretty adaptable, and have obviously dealt with Ice Age conditions before, so you'd probably have some small percentage survive and eke out a hunting and foraging existence on the far side of the world from wherever the impact occurred, and eventually something would probably redevelop from there, though you may never get back to modern technology with most of the easy fossil fuel energy already used up.
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,118
Bruh, we can barely survive a pandemic which only requires us to act like adults. Prepare for asteroid parties.
We are not "barely" surviving Covid-19. It's killed 1.3 million, a fraction of the 20-50m deaths from the 1918 flu and 70-80m lost in WW2. It's a horrific loss, no doubt, and the loss of lives could have been reduced by people acting like adults, but we will make it through Covid-19.