H:ZD2 might do it. I don't care about GoW (which is weird, because I'm writing about the Norse Jötnar)...As a PC and PS4 user, there would only be a few games that would force me to get a PS5 at launch. Something like a new God of War and maybe Horizon Zero Dawn 2. Playing the entire PS4 library with performance enhancements out the box would be a big part of my day one purchase too. For me this is a nice to have, however my 4 year old son has started to want to play games on PS4, to have to buy or rebuy a load of games for him to mess about with would make me hold off my purchase.
Did you skip PS4 Pro or Xbox One X? I only got an X—I swear to God—because I wanted to play multiplatform games again (my PS4 was home and I was on travel assignment with only a Switch) and I wanted to play Mass Effect 2&3 on a modern console.For me, no true exclusives takes away some of the fun of getting a next gen console.
They aren't going to be cheap either, so it takes away some of the value of dropping a lot of money on one. If all games are available on the old consoles, I have no need to rush out and get a new one on day 1.
An instant library of games for $10/month and most current gen games will look and perform better. New games will scale up to the new hardware.Absolutely! Why would I buy a new system if I can play all those games on my current gen console? For the graphical bump? Games look already so great on PS4 and Xbox One that buying the new FIFA or Call of Duty on a new console that I can still play on my current console is not going to add so much more value.
If the PS5 has some interesting exclusives then the new Xbox is going to sell a lot slower in the beginning. I can't understand the strategy behind not wanting to bring exclusives in the first year.
Really, someone explain why that is a smart strategy? Do they really expect people are going to throw 500 dollar to a new console if there aren't exclusives ...?
Most of the PC gamers can be called hardcore. A more casual gamer that plays a handful of games each year won't play on PC, let even alone bother to upgrade gaming PC.An instant library of games for $10/month and most current gen games will look and perform better. New games will scale up to the new hardware.
Why does anyone ever upgrade their gaming PC? I don't think they do it for exclusives.
An instant library of games for $10/month and most current gen games will look and perform better. New games will scale up to the new hardware.
Why does anyone ever upgrade their gaming PC? I don't think they do it for exclusives.
Did you skip PS4 Pro or Xbox One X? I only got an X—I swear to God—because I wanted to play multiplatform games again (my PS4 was home and I was on travel assignment with only a Switch) and I wanted to play Mass Effect 2&3 on a modern console.
I was so pro-Sony, but it turns out, it was for stuff like Persona, Ys, and some other quirky Japanese things (and indies.) I want Trails of Cold Steel 3, Nioh 2, and FFVII:R from PlayStation and that's all.
And now Phantasy Star Online is coming to Xbox? What planet is this? And the Yakuza games are coming to GamePass? All the FFs?
To the extent I'm an Xbox fan, it's mostly because of GamePass. I've tried so many things I never would have otherwise.
If Sony put out skateboarding, snowboarding, or something less middle-aged-white-dudes-are-fathers-now type games, I'm sure I'd be right back in that camp again.
All that is beside the point, though. Because there won't be great Sony exclusives till 2021—probably late 2021.
This.You'd miss out on some tech demos masquerading as average games.
No. You're saying this year will be different than every other PlayStation launch. With zero proof.
History doesn't guarantee future performance, but it's vastly better than arguing against history with absolutely zero evidence to back it up. You're right. I haven't seen a single exclusive for next gen, but neither have you. What I know is that this is the same damned argument made for the last two PlayStation launches that just wasn't backed up by reality.
There is no reason to believe exclusive PS5 games will make a damned bit of difference within the first year or more. I say they won't based on history.
You say they might based on the exact same hype cycle we've already seen so many times that hasn't accurately reflected reality.
Also, I'm not arguing that Microsoft has been much stronger with new console generations. Halo was an interesting launch game, but I don't recall anything like that for the Xbox360 and certainly nothing jawdropping for the Xbox One.
Stadia is correlation, but is it causation?Don't be obtuse. You don't need proof for this. It's common sense. History isn't inherently cyclical nor does it repeat itself. Unless there's some new found law of physics that has just recently been discovered that I don't know about.
What argument exactly?
That history doesn't repeat itself?
That first party next-gen exclusives at launch don't need to be GoTY to be worthwhile?
It's not really clear what you're arguing here because it seems you're insisting on arguing a strawman that "Sony needs to produce a BoTW-tier game at launch in order to prove that next-gen exclusives are worthwhile". It's an absurd, incoherent and frankly untenable position that I have no idea why you're continuing to die on this hill.
Really?!? No reason at all?
Even that every single Playstation launch bar one has outsold the competition and gone on to allow them to absolutely dominate the market, following a launch that included first and third party games exclusive to PS and exclusive to the new generation of hardware.
In fact, given that not a single console had launched to date without any new console gen exclusive games (except Stadia and see how that turned out), it seems precisely the opposite of what you're trying to argue is in fact true...
...i.e. there is simply no logical or rational reason to believe that next-gen exclusive games don't contribute significantly to the success of a new generation console.
I don't understand what this sentence is trying to communicate.
The point is, it doesn't matter how you or I assess the subjective quality of launch games for any historical console. The fact is the importance of having next-gen exclusive launch games is proven by history because only one platform has dared launch without them, i.e. Stadia, and it was an unmitigated disaster of a launch.
That would be when there's a new console gen and the minimum requirements go up. Or to get higher fps/framerate/settings.
Are you game for an improved Switch ofnit comes soon?PC and Switch will keep me busy until PS5 Slim is possibly announced. I always get the Slim since PS2.
Currently not interested in X but in a couple of years,who knows how I'll feel.
So for me even in this reality, no purchase at launch.
Of those, I'm only interested in Cyberpunk, and they've already said they don't have plans to release on next gen.I think you will be good next gen: if you're a little patient you can get Cyberpunk. Or you can pickup updated versions of TLoU2 and GoT. Then there's the BluePoint game which is more or less a confirmed PS5 exclusive. Or you can pickup AC again.
Of those, I'm only interested in Cyberpunk, and they've already said they don't have plans to release on next gen.