• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

clmartin

Banned
Apr 1, 2022
435
Some people in this thread have lived some incredibly sheltered lives is all I can guess if words are fine. Would you be fine with somebody mocking an autistic person? Cause I saw what happened when someone did that to my best friends little brother and he got a lot more than a slap out of it.

Genuinely curious, the hell do you expect people to actually do? Like someone sends someone incredibly dear to you into a meltdown and you expect them to ask them nicely not to be a dick? The world is nowhere near that sweet. Or maybe it is cause it was just words right?

Its fucking mind boggling that it's OK to rip on Jada's alopecia and yet people mock the physical shape of Donald Trump and people throw a fit over body shaming. I'm not even saying that's wrong but for fuck sakes at least be consistent
This is a pretty muddled argument.

I don't see too many people arguing that all words are fine.

Being ok with Richard Spencer being belted but not with assaulting a comedian for a dumb joke isn't all that inconsistent. I also don't consider it sheltered to acknowledge that distinction.
 

The Adder

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,093
This is a pretty muddled argument.

I don't see too many people arguing that all words are fine.

Being ok with Richard Spencer being belted but not with assaulting a comedian for a dumb joke isn't all that inconsistent. I also don't consider it sheltered to acknowledge that distinction.
I see you ducking me.
 

Dyno

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
13,256
I don't actually know any of what Dave has been saying, I don't follow his content, I have seen there is controversy over some of his recent shows, but I don't know any of the specifics. All I can really say regarding it is that there is a difference between a joke and hate speech.
There's a difference between a a gram and a tonne too and there's a whole load between you're bypassing there. Attacking people's conditions may not be hate speech, but it also isn't a joke or remotely acceptable.

This is a pretty muddled argument.

I don't see too many people arguing that all words are fine.

Being ok with Richard Spencer being belted but not with assaulting a comedian for a dumb joke isn't all that inconsistent. I also don't consider it sheltered to acknowledge that distinction.
Well it's rather sheltered to frame it as a joke. It's an attack on somebodies medical conditions. Would you consider that a joke? Like if I see you missing a leg, that's not my place to make a joke from right? If we're best friends for years maybe if i know youre comfortable with it, but someone you don't really know close enough for that? Someone you also went at for their part in activism before? That doesn't seem like a joke
 

Empty Your Head

Alt Account
Banned
Feb 1, 2022
1,579
Will Smirh ruined comedy and comedians able to get work. Every night, all comedians are physically attacked and brutalized. He should be paying damages to Comedians unable to work safely, like Patton Oswalt.
 

Violence Jack

Drive-in Mutant
Member
Oct 25, 2017
41,684
I get the feeling this is getting locked soon, just like the rest of these Will Smith slap threads.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
32,047
All I can really say regarding it is that there is a difference between a joke and hate speech.
bender-futurama.gif
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,942
This is a pretty muddled argument.

I don't see too many people arguing that all words are fine.

Being ok with Richard Spencer being belted but not with assaulting a comedian for a dumb joke isn't all that inconsistent. I also don't consider it sheltered to acknowledge that distinction.

It's incredibly inconsistent.

Unless, of course, you want to completely divorce yourself from Black women and the cultural history surrounding their hair.
 

Zarshack

Member
May 15, 2018
541
Australia
There's a difference between a a gram and a tonne too and there's a whole load between you're bypassing there. Attacking people's conditions may not be hate speech, but it also isn't a joke or remotely acceptable.
Chris's joke was absolutely in terrible taste, I already said that. There is a difference between joking about something in poor taste and deliberately demeaning a person or group of people out of a personal dislike or hatred for them.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
32,047
'It was a joke' continues to put in a lot of work covering for bigotry and demeaning remarks. How people continue to think hateful comments become sacrosanct as soon as you put them into a microphone in front of an audience with a smile on your face is beyond me.
 
Last edited:

ak1287

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,935
Chris's joke was absolutely in terrible taste, I already said that. There is a difference between joking about something in poor taste and deliberately demeaning a person or group of people out of a personal dislike or hatred for them.
It's also pretty easy to hide demeaning commentary as a 'joke in poor taste.'
 

Alavard

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
5,299
Chris's joke was absolutely in terrible taste, I already said that. There is a difference between joking about something in poor taste and deliberately demeaning a person or group of people out of a personal dislike or hatred for them.

Does it not go beyond just 'poor taste' though? Chris Rock has himself actually produced a documentary, Good Hair, with the description:

The film focuses on the issue of how Black-American women have perceived their hair and historically styled it. The film explores the current styling industry for Black women, images of what is considered acceptable and desirable for Black-American women's hair in the United States, and their relation to Black American culture
 

clmartin

Banned
Apr 1, 2022
435
He called a woman who has a medical condition that makes it hard for her to grow hair "G.I. Jane".

How the hell is that not mocking her hair issues?
First things first, he didn't know she has alopecia so he wasn't mocking her condition.

He simply saw an actress with a shaved head and lazily equated her with a role famously played by an actress with a shaved head.

I don't blame Jada if she was upset, and I'd like to think that Rock would apologise to her.
 

Dyno

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
13,256
Chris's joke was absolutely in terrible taste, I already said that. There is a difference between joking about something in poor taste and deliberately demeaning a person or group of people out of a personal dislike or hatred for them.
I dont disagree, but this isn't a one time thing for Chris. He gave her shit for her part in the million woman march. He's done a show about hair and culture so he knows there's layers to what he's doing there. He's had a history of making her a target so it kinda seems like more than just a joke in bad taste when it's got a pattern.
 

The Silver

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,711
Chris Rock didn't learn any real lesson, at this point he could repeat the joke in a set and he'd get cheered for it, "defending" the slap on that point is silly.

Will slapping him was the dumbest move possible and he clearly knows it, that moment and joke have now been immortalized. I hope Will can heal, he must be going through some shit if he thought going up to smack Chris in the middle of the Oscars was the correct decision to make in that moment. I hope Rock isn't too deeply affected knowing his history of being bullied, and I hope Jada can move on from a shit show she had nothing to do with.
 

Nepenthe

When the music hits, you feel no pain.
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
20,680
This is a pretty muddled argument.

I don't see too many people arguing that all words are fine.

Being ok with Richard Spencer being belted but not with assaulting a comedian for a dumb joke isn't all that inconsistent. I also don't consider it sheltered to acknowledge that distinction.
People are not saying that all words are fine. They're saying that there is no speech one can say, no matter how abhorrent or inciteful, that can warrant some vague notion of "violence" (and the deliberate vagueness of the violent act in question is the point, because this obfuscated framing allows them an infinite moral high ground to sneer at people who don't give as much of a shit as they do; it's really all about validation at this point, hence certain posters constantly feigning outrage about Era instead of actually talking to people). These are different arguments, and if you think the latter, you cannot be okay with Richard Spencer being clocked regardless, at which that point it becomes an argument about how your principles are upholding white supremacist status quos, which is not surprising given the sociopolitical make-up of this forum but I digress.

Do I think that Chris Rock said anything as harmful as Spencer did? Of course not. Because like with violence, I can differentiate between different levels of harmful speech. But there are posters here who, for one reason or another, literally think a slap is as much the end all be all as anything other physical violation you can do to a person.
 

Deleted member 4353

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,559
First things first, he didn't know she has alopecia so he wasn't mocking her condition.

He simply saw an actress with a shaved head and lazily equated her with a role famously played by an actress with a shaved head.

I don't blame Jada if she was upset, and I'd like to think that Rock would apologise to her.

Chris Rock has been attacking Jada for years. He literally made a movie about black womens hair. What are you even talking about?
 

clmartin

Banned
Apr 1, 2022
435
People are not saying that all words are fine. They're saying that there is no speech one can say, no matter how abhorrent or inciteful, that can warrant some vague notion of "violence"

Fair enough. I disagree with those people.
But there are posters here who, for one reason or another, literally think a slap is as much the end all be all as anything other physical violation you can do to a person.
I also disagree with those people.
 

The Adder

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,093
First things first, he didn't know she has alopecia so he wasn't mocking her condition.

He simply saw an actress with a shaved head and lazily equated her with a role famously played by an actress with a shaved head.

I don't blame Jada if she was upset, and I'd like to think that Rock would apologise to her.
I see you continuing to duck me. As a reminder:
Holy shitty straw man batman!
Not a Strawman when people are saying it.
Dave shouldve gotten tackled either. Why are people saying this shit is okay?

(And before you try, that "shouldve" is a typo by this user as they are arguing he should not have been)
And
Equating a dude continuing to pick at a target he's been picking at for 25 years to "a joke someone doesn't like" is a shitty straw man.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
32,047
Even if you were somehow ignorant to the context of Black women and hair, which Chris certainly isn't, most people have the most basic appreciation that if you see a woman with a shaved head you don't start using it as a focal point in your mocking of them. For a host of reasons. Not if it's intended to be playful and not offensive and mean spirited.

Basic shit.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
52,951
First things first, he didn't know she has alopecia so he wasn't mocking her condition.

He simply saw an actress with a shaved head and lazily equated her with a role famously played by an actress with a shaved head.

I don't blame Jada if she was upset, and I'd like to think that Rock would apologise to her.
Okay now you are showing how uninformed you are on the topic. Rock had been insulting her for literally YEARS. And her condition was not some deeply held secret. It was a known issue for her. Rock also made an entire documentary about black women, their hair, and the cultural significance of it for them.


Stop defending someone that does not deserve it. Especially if you don't know what you are talking about.
 

clmartin

Banned
Apr 1, 2022
435
Okay now you are showing how uninformed you are on the topic. Rock had been insulting her for literally YEARS. And her condition was not some deeply held secret. It was a known issue for her. Rock also made an entire documentary about black women, their hair, and the cultural significance of it for them.


Stop defending someone that does not deserve it. Especially if you don't know what you are talking about.

Nah I know the history. He's made what 3 jabs at her in 25 years? As a comic, how may other people has he taken shots at multiple times over that period? And like I said, I don't blame her for being pissed.

The only defence I'm making of Rock is that he didn't deserve to be assaulted on stage for making that dumb joke.
 

Zarshack

Member
May 15, 2018
541
Australia
Does it not go beyond just 'poor taste' though? Chris Rock has himself actually produced a documentary, Good Hair, with the description:
Honestly, I am not familiar with this documentary. Or if there is a history between Chris and Jada, I did see some comments earlier that lead me to believe that there is more to it beyond just the incident at the Oscars. Chris should apologize to Jada for the joke.

It's also pretty easy to hide demeaning commentary as a 'joke in poor taste.'

I agree, which makes it harder to determine a comics intention, e.g., one of my favorite comedians is Jim Jeffries, he made a lot of misogynistic jokes in some of his shows. Does he hate women? or does he just think it's funny to make those kinds of jokes? (He has toned them down over the years though as a result of backlash). My ex HATED him, but my current girlfriend really enjoys his shows.

It appears more difficult to find the line, I have autism (so does Jim Jeffries), so my interpretation of some issues is going to be different to others. I personally think that you should be able to joke about anything but the attitude towards the joke and intent is important to consider.

I completely understand the opposing view to this position though, or why jokes about minorities should only be made by someone in that minority group.

At the end of the day, I think that comedy is a tricky area to judge based on just the words that are used, intent and the general tone are very important.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
52,951
Nah I know the history. He's made what 3 jabs at her in 25 years? As a comic, how may other people has he taken shots at multiple times over that period? And like I said, I don't blame her for being pissed.

The only defence I'm making of Rock is that he didn't deserve to be assaulted on stage for making that dumb joke.
It's more than a "dumb joke" though. That is the point people are trying to make to you. It went WAY past "just a joke".

You continuing not to get that despite it being explained to you over and over just proves my point.
 

clmartin

Banned
Apr 1, 2022
435
It's more than a "dumb joke" though. That is the point people are trying to make to you. It went WAY past "just a joke".

You continuing not to get that despite it being explained to you over and over just proves my point.
I choose to believe he didn't know about her alopecia and that he wasn't deliberately mocking a medical condition.

He saw an actress with a shaved head and said she could play the role of a woman with a shaved head. It was a dumb joke.
 

lvl 99 Pixel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,652
First things first, he didn't know she has alopecia so he wasn't mocking her condition.

I highly doubt the guy behind Good Hair would intentionally do so. He still fucked up monumentally and hasn't really said much since.
I know Chris dealt with bullying and apparently has a social disorder and while its not an excuse for the shit he's said on more than one occasion its unsettling that he's been deemed iredeemable.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
52,951
I choose to believe he didn't know about her alopecia and that he wasn't deliberately mocking a medical condition.

He saw an actress with a shaved head and said she could play the role of a woman with a shaved head. It was a dumb joke.
So you choose to believe a fantasy instead of just admitting that you're wrong?


That is....something.
 

Flame Lord

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,796
Okay now you are showing how uninformed you are on the topic. Rock had been insulting her for literally YEARS. And her condition was not some deeply held secret. It was a known issue for her. Rock also made an entire documentary about black women, their hair, and the cultural significance of it for them.


Stop defending someone that does not deserve it. Especially if you don't know what you are talking about.

Does anyone have any proof of this besides that YT video that showed him jabbing her on his show, and then two other times over a span of 30 years? Everyone also keeps mentioning his documentary, but again, how was he supposed to know she had a condition? It's not exactly rare for some women to have their hair shaved, how can you prove he knew she had a condition besides the existence of an interview she had about it that I doubt Chris Rock even saw?
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
52,951
You dont prove negatives...
- Her medical condition was public knowledge.

- Whole articles were written about it and she talked about how self conscious she was about it.

- Rock and the Smiths have been in the same social circles for years and years

- Rock made an entire documentary about black women and their hair.



Are you seriously going to sit there and say that Rock didn't know? Really?