There's no need to correct you because you are wrong and your whole thread is wrong.Are you going to attempt to correct us or just gonna continue to be snarky about it?
There's no need to correct you because you are wrong and your whole thread is wrong.Are you going to attempt to correct us or just gonna continue to be snarky about it?
LMFAO "commercially bombed"
Fuck, all you guys did not read the OP.
I could definitely see EA prioritise it's successful annual/service franchises in the next gen ahead of standalone AAA titles like Dragon Quest, OP.
Edit:Dragon Age smartasses
Always.
The bottom line those titles you mentioned, as successful as they are, are much more expensive, a lot riskier and less profitable than FIFA and Madden.The name of the thread is "Will EA Leave the AAA" and they makes statements like " cant imagine this star wars deal has been very profitable for them outside of battlefront 1." Battlefront sold 23 million copies between two games (14 million for 1; 9 million for 2). As for the other titles, they calls them "Bombs". Titanfall 2 is estimated to have sold 4 million. No it's not the 9 to 10 million they wanted, but it probably didn't lose them money (personally, 10 million from a 5.5 hour campaign fps not called Call of Duty was a dumb expectation). For the other titles, we have no idea what they sold, only EA knows.
It was a poorly thought out thread.
lol is all i got to say about this.I hope the micro transaction and loot box bubble bursts, and takes down all these scummy companies.
The bottom line those titles you mentioned, as successful as they are, are much more expensive, a lot riskier and less profitable than FIFA and Madden.
Or Nintendo going 3rd partyYes. At the same time MS is leaving the gaming business. Any day now.
They have 1 new IP coming out next month, and another being made by EA Motive, I wouldn't say they have the same problems as Activision in that department?No!
They don't have any business ventures outside of gaming like Konami, all that will happen is over time their catalogue of games will diminish as they chase the gaas gold rush like Activision.
I've never seen a thread backfire so hilariously before. I mean, you have seen how popular games like Fifa, Star Wars, and Madden are, right? All AAA games and all incredibly successful, even if one of them falls a bit short of expectations
Ubisoft games consistently sell the most every year and get little traction here. The bubble is very real.
No!
They don't have any business ventures outside of gaming like Konami, all that will happen is over time their catalogue of games will diminish as they chase the gaas gold rush like Activision.
That PS+ money is real sweet and recurring.
You come from one of those outrage r/gaming channels right?
Right.
There's a lot of that too. I'm not into EA at all and they're not talked about too much on the bubble that is Era but you'd have to be smoking something incredible to suggest that their AAA days are numbered. Stuff like Fifa and whatnot continue to be big because of how well EA has handled them overall, regardless of how we might feel about certain elementsToo many people want them to fail; it clouds their rationality.
I could live without EA, as there are enough good games out there these days and the past to always fall back on...but they're like junk food.
I crave and enjoy them from time to time and I'd say most of their games are good, but not great. And there will always be a market for them.
Yes. At the same time MS is leaving the gaming business. Any day now.