You know, we have been off-topic for a while now, but after being back on topic now... I think I preferred that.
Fearing being off-topic and derails is the cowards path. Lets talk about Hinamatsuri.
This has to be a parody. It's a like a point by point post of everything this thread has refuted time and again.
Anybody fans of Claymore in here? Like no woman gets sexualized in that. Same can mostly be said about Black Lagoon as well. Revy, Roberta and Balalaika are all about that female empowerment...even if they're all massively fucked up.
You "don't think I've been refuted by just that" because you're literally dismissing the experiences of so many people who are just sick and tired of being denigrated in this manner.I'm open to having my mind changed, and I enjoy discussion on this topic. That's why I replied with my opinion in the first place.
I read the original post, I don't think I've been refuted by just that.
Stuff like that makes sense in context and really isn't what the show is about though. Any woman with a name though for the most part takes no shit from anybody unless it's Greenback Jane. Tell me more about Angel Densetsu?I mean, Black Lagoon also has plenty of sexualized women for the background characters, like that pimp scene had a bunch of topless women. Though yeah, it's very good for that...shame the author cannot keep a schedule to save his life.
Also, Claymore is good but personally I really like Angel Densetsu over it.
That's... a bit of a stretch and a low blow, especially for this forum.You "don't think I've been refuted by just that" because you're literally dismissing the experiences of so many people who are just sick and tired of being denigrated in this manner.
You have no empathy and I do not have the capacity to teach you how to empathize. I can only suggest imagining yourself in her shoes for once, but I doubt you're even capable of that much.
That's literally all you did in your initial... *ahem* "argument".I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do. Being dismissive of others isn't a form of argumentation.
Anybody fans of Claymore in here? Like no woman gets sexualized in that. Same can mostly be said about Black Lagoon as well. Revy, Roberta and Balalaika are all about that female empowerment...even if they're all massively fucked up.
Claymore is a good example of the difference between showing nudity and sexualizing charactersAnybody fans of Claymore in here? Like no woman gets sexualized in that. Same can mostly be said about Black Lagoon as well. Revy, Roberta and Balalaika are all about that female empowerment...even if they're all massively fucked up.
Complaining about sexualized <x> isn't helpful and is pretty close to screaming into the void (or preaching to the choir, depending on where you are). Straight men have always been attracted to sexy straight women, and straight women have always been attracted to sexy straight men, and sexy everything has been attracted to sexy anything (LGBQ and the rest). There's nothing wrong with any of that.
The earliest art pieces in history feature rather voluptuous female figures - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_figurines. Again, there's nothing wrong with that. People are attracted to whatever they're attracted to, and you can't stop that from happening unless you want to go full 1984.
If you want to attack sexy character designs, you'll also have to attack:
The list goes on and on.
- Magazine covers (men and women)
- Raunchy novels (men and women)
- Sexy actors and actresses (men and women)
Dick jiggle physics were featured on Beowulf from Skullgirls. Also, it's a big disingenuous to say that the only sexualized men are the ones with dick physics. There are countless male characters who feature everything from rippling abs (countless) to Snake's perfectly sculpted asscheeks. Sexualization affects both sexes, not just women.
People enjoy what they enjoy - that's literally how entertainment works. Videogames are an entertainment medium like any other. Who are you to say that people aren't allowed to enjoy X or Y? Surely they have the right to enjoy what you don't enjoy?
As an example, I strongly support LGBQ rights, and have numerous close friends who are either gay or trans. However, having attended multiple gay pride parades, I strongly think that dressing up as sexual costumes in said parades damages the Gay Pride movement in general. Anti-LGBQ ideology views gay men as sexual deviants (which is quite incorrect), but dressing up as sexual deviants to shove it to the homophobes.... I don't think it solves anything.
Even so, if gay men find dressing as as such enjoyable for themselves and others... who am I to judge? Anti-gay ideology is falling over time, and I'm happy about that.
There are plenty of strong female characters in games. How they dress has no effect on how they play or what their personalities are. Just off the top of my head - Bayonetta, Siege, Automata - they feature both sexy and strong women.
After all this - the core of your arguments regarding feminism in gaming - do you think "sexism" in videogames affects sexism IRL? If yes... I think Jack Thompson would like a word with you. If no, then why does it matter?
Anybody fans of Claymore in here? Like no woman gets sexualized in that. Same can mostly be said about Black Lagoon as well. Revy, Roberta and Balalaika are all about that female empowerment...even if they're all massively fucked up.
Stuff like that makes sense in context and really isn't what the show is about though. Any woman with a name though for the most part takes no shit from anybody unless it's Greenback Jane. Tell me more about Angel Densetsu?
Putting aside the fact that this topic is for discussing female video game characters and not other forms of media, these have all been criticized. Feminists have been critiquing filmmakers for decades around how women are framed by cameras, treated by the writers in terms of plot relevance, and how actresses feel more pressure to lose weight and/or have cosmetic procedures.If you want to attack sexy character designs, you'll also have to attack:
- Magazine covers (men and women)
- Raunchy novels (men and women)
- Sexy actors and actresses (men and women)
If you're being vaguely serious I recommend checking out the threadmark, it answers quite a few of your questions.That's... a bit of a stretch and a low blow, especially for this forum.
If I didn't want to empathize, surely I wouldn't post in the first place? I wrote my opinions on the matter and would like to talk about the topic at hand. Three users so far have given unhelpful, condescending replies.
I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do. Being dismissive of others isn't a form of argumentation.
Black Lagoon definitely requires being in a certain mindset. There is a very specific feeling needed to sit through it.I started Black Lagoon but have yet to continue it... I guess I just have to be in the mood for it. I'll get to that. It's a bit older, but I also absolutely adore Armitage III. Her design is a bit on the skimpy side, but she is such a badass and having a mixed race couple in an anime was and still is super fantastic. Oh, and again I love the setting. Dirty sci-fi was the best.
My avatar is Neferpitou from Hunter x Hunter, I checked Google images and I can't even find the source anymore.
been meaning to ask for FOREVER... but I'mma need a source for that picture (or character name?), the art style looks lovely
It's very hard to sexualize Ophelia...Claymore is a good example of the difference between showing nudity and sexualizing characters
At some point I'm buying the manga box set. I have the anime on blu ray which was faithful till the last 4 eps or something. I read a good amount passed the anime ending, but never finished. Miria was my favorite. I think they denied Claire's abilities because she honestly was a statistical anomaly, her feats were way greater than what her ranking dictated should be possible. I think they even tried to half ass recreate her and it didn't work. Black Lagoon requires a lot of tolerance for dark nihilism, but it's good, just messed up.That made me laugh. Thanks.
Claymore is fantastic through and through, and I wish the anime could have been much longer than it wound up being. Read all of the manga instead and would have loved had it never stopped. My only annoyance was them constantly denying Claire's abilities despite her various feats. That made absolutely no sense to me.
I started Black Lagoon but have yet to continue it... I guess I just have to be in the mood for it. I'll get to that. It's a bit older, but I also absolutely adore Armitage III. Her design is a bit on the skimpy side, but she is such a badass and having a mixed race couple in an anime was and still is super fantastic. Oh, and again I love the setting. Dirty sci-fi was the best.
Complaining about sexualized <x> isn't helpful and is pretty close to screaming into the void (or preaching to the choir, depending on where you are). Straight men have always been attracted to sexy straight women, and straight women have always been attracted to sexy straight men, and sexy everything has been attracted to sexy anything (LGBQ and the rest). There's nothing wrong with any of that.
The earliest art pieces in history feature rather voluptuous female figures - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_figurines. Again, there's nothing wrong with that. People are attracted to whatever they're attracted to, and you can't stop that from happening unless you want to go full 1984.
If you want to attack sexy character designs, you'll also have to attack:
The list goes on and on.
- Magazine covers (men and women)
- Raunchy novels (men and women)
- Sexy actors and actresses (men and women)
Dick jiggle physics were featured on Beowulf from Skullgirls. Also, it's a big disingenuous to say that the only sexualized men are the ones with dick physics. There are countless male characters who feature everything from rippling abs (countless) to Snake's perfectly sculpted asscheeks. Sexualization affects both sexes, not just women.
People enjoy what they enjoy - that's literally how entertainment works. Videogames are an entertainment medium like any other. Who are you to say that people aren't allowed to enjoy X or Y? Surely they have the right to enjoy what you don't enjoy?
As an example, I strongly support LGBQ rights, and have numerous close friends who are either gay or trans. However, having attended multiple gay pride parades, I strongly think that dressing up as sexual costumes in said parades damages the Gay Pride movement in general. Anti-LGBQ ideology views gay men as sexual deviants (which is quite incorrect), but dressing up as sexual deviants to shove it to the homophobes.... I don't think it solves anything.
Even so, if gay men find dressing as as such enjoyable for themselves and others... who am I to judge? Anti-gay ideology is falling over time, and I'm happy about that.
There are plenty of strong female characters in games. How they dress has no effect on how they play or what their personalities are. Just off the top of my head - Bayonetta, Siege, Automata - they feature both sexy and strong women.
After all this - the core of your arguments regarding feminism in gaming - do you think "sexism" in videogames affects sexism IRL? If yes... I think Jack Thompson would like a word with you. If no, then why does it matter?
I'll take a crack at this.
So often polarizing images that have been proven to be excludatory in nature when it comes to over the top default objectification are fine..."because girls like guys who like girls?" That's actually done. That's 90's beer bikini model dumb. Allowing bad behavior simply because it's the status quo is how we became numb to school shootings and sexual assaults, and refusing to even discuss the issue is nothing short of foolhardy. Even if you're into the idealized status quo of beauty, that doesn't make our societal reliance on such traditional beauty immune to criticism. And again, keep in mind, these two 60,000 posts threads aren't demanding that these pinup bodied characters go away, they simply bring up when they are silly or repealing. Everyone will have an opinion on them, no one is speaking for other people, that's the crux of this discussion.
We are not coming to take away your titties. We don't have the power to do that.
These forms of media have been criticized since their inception, of course we need to talk about the overbearing objectification of women in other forms of media to. This is not unique to video games by any means. But this is a video game forum so...we talk about video games.
But yes, in the greater discussion of female representation and objectification, other forms of media and artwork are rife with poor behavior, most often drive by the idea that men are so dumb, if you put a product next to an attractive scantly clad woman, they will buy it simply because it was near an attractive, scantly clad woman. Men should feel just as insulted to that 90's style advertising as women do, but the power of boners is strong.
Mike Z and the Skullgirls team also removed quite a few frames depicting the cast in more scandulous positions as well. The art team on Skullgirls made a point that there is a line that's too much for them to cross. And no one is saying that swaying dick physics will solve the problem, it's just a response to the over the top standard of jiggling breast physics that exists in a lot of video games. It really solves nothing and there is an argument to be made about the sexualization and objectification of men in video games.
But this isn't the thread to do that. We've tried making that thread, it didn't go well.
People are allowed to enjoy what they enjoy, sure. If people decide to get really into Princess Crown or Senran Kagura or DOAX, we can't really say "No your bad for liking that". What I, personally, would like though is for those people who like those things to be like, "yes this is the smut I like. These are not reasonable representations of girls and women, these are out their fantasies that don't exist in reality and I should have expectations for women to treat me like these imaginary women do." God knows men sure as hell were saying that when twilight was new. Remember the concept of the dad-bod? A marketing campaign that was championing the slightly too tubby, out of shape body of the common mid 30 year old as a sex symbol? Meanwhile you have media saying if a woman is over 32, she's over the hill. That's the kind of thing we'll shit on all day, and if you're defending that shit with "people can't enjoy X? that's just wrong!", you're an asshole.
I think pride isn't for us. I'd rather let the people who pride belongs to decide those things. As an ally of multiple LGBTQ+, when pride comes around, I stay away and let them do them.
Now count on your fingers how many strong female protagonists you can think of that don't have at least 10 minutes of on screen time devoted purely to their butt. It's hard. Even overwatch, which is a bastion of inclusiveness, works it's sex appeal up to the nines.
If your argument is "I know women who play games and they're fine with it so what are you even talking about?" You should pay more attention. Inclusion comes in many forms, and making every girl in your game basically walk around in a thong and a corset is not the best way to attract female attention. Games in general need to stop being a boys club. THAT'S the problem. You can have attractive characters in any brand of media and still not be demeaning to the sexes. Fuck man, how many games are there that trot their women around in pasties and t-backs, but are SCARED TO DEATH to even think about talking about the act of sex? I'm all for more games talking about actual sex, because it brings up greater conversations about what relationships are, when they're healthy, when they're not, what makes a partner a good fit, when people should go their separate ways.
But video games don't wanna do that. Video games spend all of their time trying to meaninglessly titillate the audience because most developers think you're so dumb that if you see a girl with her tits hanging out, you'll buy the game no questions asked. That's garbage and you shouldn't champion that shit because "people like pretty people."
I'll take a crack at this.
So often polarizing images that have been proven to be excludatory in nature when it comes to over the top default objectification are fine..."because girls like guys who like girls?" That's actually done. That's 90's beer bikini model dumb. Allowing bad behavior simply because it's the status quo is how we became numb to school shootings and sexual assaults, and refusing to even discuss the issue is nothing short of foolhardy. Even if you're into the idealized status quo of beauty, that doesn't make our societal reliance on such traditional beauty immune to criticism. And again, keep in mind, these two 60,000 posts threads aren't demanding that these pinup bodied characters go away, they simply bring up when they are silly or repealing. Everyone will have an opinion on them, no one is speaking for other people, that's the crux of this discussion.
We are not coming to take away your titties. We don't have the power to do that.
These forms of media have been criticized since their inception, of course we need to talk about the overbearing objectification of women in other forms of media to. This is not unique to video games by any means. But this is a video game forum so...we talk about video games.
But yes, in the greater discussion of female representation and objectification, other forms of media and artwork are rife with poor behavior, most often drive by the idea that men are so dumb, if you put a product next to an attractive scantly clad woman, they will buy it simply because it was near an attractive, scantly clad woman. Men should feel just as insulted to that 90's style advertising as women do, but the power of boners is strong.
Mike Z and the Skullgirls team also removed quite a few frames depicting the cast in more scandulous positions as well. The art team on Skullgirls made a point that there is a line that's too much for them to cross. And no one is saying that swaying dick physics will solve the problem, it's just a response to the over the top standard of jiggling breast physics that exists in a lot of video games. It really solves nothing and there is an argument to be made about the sexualization and objectification of men in video games.
But this isn't the thread to do that. We've tried making that thread, it didn't go well.
People are allowed to enjoy what they enjoy, sure. If people decide to get really into Princess Crown or Senran Kagura or DOAX, we can't really say "No your bad for liking that". What I, personally, would like though is for those people who like those things to be like, "yes this is the smut I like. These are not reasonable representations of girls and women, these are out their fantasies that don't exist in reality and I should have expectations for women to treat me like these imaginary women do." God knows men sure as hell were saying that when twilight was new. Remember the concept of the dad-bod? A marketing campaign that was championing the slightly too tubby, out of shape body of the common mid 30 year old as a sex symbol? Meanwhile you have media saying if a woman is over 32, she's over the hill. That's the kind of thing we'll shit on all day, and if you're defending that shit with "people can't enjoy X? that's just wrong!", you're an asshole.
I think pride isn't for us. I'd rather let the people who pride belongs to decide those things. As an ally of multiple LGBTQ+, when pride comes around, I stay away and let them do them.
Now count on your fingers how many strong female protagonists you can think of that don't have at least 10 minutes of on screen time devoted purely to their butt. It's hard. Even overwatch, which is a bastion of inclusiveness, works it's sex appeal up to the nines.
If your argument is "I know women who play games and they're fine with it so what are you even talking about?" You should pay more attention. Inclusion comes in many forms, and making every girl in your game basically walk around in a thong and a corset is not the best way to attract female attention. Games in general need to stop being a boys club. THAT'S the problem. You can have attractive characters in any brand of media and still not be demeaning to the sexes. Fuck man, how many games are there that trot their women around in pasties and t-backs, but are SCARED TO DEATH to even think about talking about the act of sex? I'm all for more games talking about actual sex, because it brings up greater conversations about what relationships are, when they're healthy, when they're not, what makes a partner a good fit, when people should go their separate ways.
But video games don't wanna do that. Video games spend all of their time trying to meaninglessly titillate the audience because most developers think you're so dumb that if you see a girl with her tits hanging out, you'll buy the game no questions asked. That's garbage and you shouldn't champion that shit because "people like pretty people."
Even though that was way more effort then that dude even deserved, this was a really good post. Thank you for it.
Complaining about sexualized <x> isn't helpful and is pretty close to screaming into the void (or preaching to the choir, depending on where you are). Straight men have always been attracted to sexy straight women, and straight women have always been attracted to sexy straight men, and sexy everything has been attracted to sexy anything (LGBQ and the rest). There's nothing wrong with any of that.
The earliest art pieces in history feature rather voluptuous female figures - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_figurines. Again, there's nothing wrong with that. People are attracted to whatever they're attracted to, and you can't stop that from happening unless you want to go full 1984.
If you want to attack sexy character designs, you'll also have to attack:
The list goes on and on.
- Magazine covers (men and women)
- Raunchy novels (men and women)
- Sexy actors and actresses (men and women)
Dick jiggle physics were featured on Beowulf from Skullgirls. Also, it's a big disingenuous to say that the only sexualized men are the ones with dick physics. There are countless male characters who feature everything from rippling abs (countless) to Snake's perfectly sculpted asscheeks. Sexualization affects both sexes, not just women.
People enjoy what they enjoy - that's literally how entertainment works. Videogames are an entertainment medium like any other. Who are you to say that people aren't allowed to enjoy X or Y? Surely they have the right to enjoy what you don't enjoy?
As an example, I strongly support LGBQ rights, and have numerous close friends who are either gay or trans. However, having attended multiple gay pride parades, I strongly think that dressing up as sexual costumes in said parades damages the Gay Pride movement in general. Anti-LGBQ ideology views gay men as sexual deviants (which is quite incorrect), but dressing up as sexual deviants to shove it to the homophobes.... I don't think it solves anything.
Even so, if gay men find dressing as as such enjoyable for themselves and others... who am I to judge? Anti-gay ideology is falling over time, and I'm happy about that.
There are plenty of strong female characters in games. How they dress has no effect on how they play or what their personalities are. Just off the top of my head - Bayonetta, Siege, Automata - they feature both sexy and strong women.
After all this - the core of your arguments regarding feminism in gaming - do you think "sexism" in videogames affects sexism IRL? If yes... I think Jack Thompson would like a word with you. If no, then why does it matter?
Similarly, same goes for the suicide posters that go "what about the violence?" But never, ever once actually create a topic on video game violence.
Them: "What about the violence?!?!"
Also them: "Check out the receipt I got at gamestop for my MK11 preorder!"
Also them: "Why doesn't jade have her titties out anymore?"
::Sigh:: Back to the Cohen testimony for me.
Occassionally they come up, threads have been made about things like the torture scene in GTAV, Lara's death scenes in the Tomb Raider Reboot, or Mortal Kombat fatalities being too graphic....I haven't been keeping up with that. That sounds like a wild ride...
There probably should be a thread on violence but I think one of the big problems is that it would devolve real quickly with trolls.
That got me good! XD
As a late bloomer to Era I guess I haven't been around for that one - care to tell me a bit what happened?It really solves nothing and there is an argument to be made about the sexualization and objectification of men in video games.
But this isn't the thread to do that. We've tried making that thread, it didn't go well.
Yeah, and at the end of the day this was what the argument boiled down to. Great response.That's garbage and you shouldn't champion that shit because "people like pretty people."
It's kinda sad, to be honest. If I see something that's good I'll try to PM you, especially if it's sci-fi, Static_VoidHey thanks everyone for the anime recommendations. I will definitely give them a try! But to be frank, from what I see I doubt modern anime and me can become good friends. Most of them are too gross :(
It's kinda sad, to be honest. If I see something that's good I'll try to PM you, especially if it's sci-fi, Static_Void
I mean, I can't help but giggle when I hear it. It's just so stupid.
I mean, I can't help but giggle when I hear it. It's just so stupid.
https://www.dailydot.com/parsec/gamergate-boner-culture-mortal-kombat-11/
Even that's hard sometimes when you got people arguing that women who do that stuff exist. Like that one guy in the DoA thread arguing that there are women who like to fondle each other's breasts. I mean, yeah, there's probably women out there who do that. Just like there's probably women who don't mind have their heads petted like a dog. That doesn't mean it isn't demeaning when an anime depicts men doing that as some cute, affectionate moment.What I, personally, would like though is for those people who like those things to be like, "yes this is the smut I like. These are not reasonable representations of girls and women, these are out their fantasies that don't exist in reality and I should have expectations for women to treat me like these imaginary women do." God knows men sure as hell were saying that when twilight was new.
A tweet I took from that article. Wow...
This guy cannot be a functioning adult.
People are allowed to enjoy what they enjoy, sure. If people decide to get really into Princess Crown or Senran Kagura or DOAX, we can't really say "No your bad for liking that". What I, personally, would like though is for those people who like those things to be like, "yes this is the smut I like. These are not reasonable representations of girls and women, these are out their fantasies that don't exist in reality and I should have expectations for women to treat me like these imaginary women do."
That's extremely fair. I hesitate to say that the majority of games have that sex venier coating it in order to be fair to games that are doing things well...but just like anime has a weird creepy streak running though most of it when it comes to how...women in general are treated, games tend to paint themselves with the same 1 note sexed up brush strokes tends to push people away or make people uncomfortable than doing the opposite.Like, Ill happily say "This is the smut I enjoy" but I dont want to have to say it about Xenoblade 2, if that makes sense.
Even that's hard sometimes when you got people arguing that women who do that stuff exist. Like that one guy in the DoA thread arguing that there are women who like to fondle each other's breasts. I mean, yeah, there's probably women out there who do that. Just like there's probably women who don't mind have their heads petted like a dog. That doesn't mean it isn't demeaning when an anime depicts men doing that as some cute, affectionate moment.
Black Lagoon is a great example of framing, male gaze, and all that good stuff. Revy is running around in a tank top and daisy dukes, but never feels like she's just eye candy. Even Shenhua, giving all the leg she has to give, keeps it tasteful. And Balalaika and Roberta are just badasses. Even Dutch is a rarity in anime. He's a black American with a good design, who's a shrewd, level headed leader. He's still super cool despite not being at the center of the action.Anybody fans of Claymore in here? Like no woman gets sexualized in that. Same can mostly be said about Black Lagoon as well. Revy, Roberta and Balalaika are all about that female empowerment...even if they're all massively fucked up.
That's extremely fair. I hesitate to say that the majority of games have that sex venier coating it in order to be fair to games that are doing things well...but just like anime has a weird creepy streak running though most of it when it comes to how...women in general are treated, games tend to paint themselves with the same 1 note sexed up brush strokes tends to push people away or make people uncomfortable than doing the opposite.
Dutch also knows when he's outmatched. That man never wants to be within a 50 mile radius of Balalaika and Roberta. Shenhua is great, tons of leg, but never sexualized., same with Eda. Black Lagoon smartly plays with tropes and doesn't use them for exploitative reasons.Black Lagoon is a great example of framing, male gaze, and all that good stuff. Revy is running around in a tank top and daisy dukes, but never feels like she's just eye candy. Even Shenhua, giving all the leg she has to give, keeps it tasteful. And Balalaika and Roberta are just badasses. Even Dutch is a rarity in anime. He's a black American with a good design, who's a shrewd, level headed leader. He's still super cool despite not being at the center of the action.
Dutch also knows when he's outmatched. That man never wants to be within a 50 mile radius of Balalaika and Roberta. Shenhua is great, tons of leg, but never sexualized., same with Eda. Black Lagoon smartly plays with tropes and doesn't use them for exploitative reasons.
Garcia's attraction to her? A bit yes.
An even bigger problem on top of everything being "sexy" is when the shoehorned in sexy female character(s) have less personality and character than the blow up doll collectables in Saints Row 4.This is exactly where I am, sexy things belong in sexy games. The problem is the thin veneer of sex plastered all over 90% of games made. Jiggle physics isnt the problem, every game having it is the problem. Bikini armor isnt the problem, EVERYONE wearing bikini armor in EVERYTHING is the problem. Ideally we would have more DOAs and HuniePops, but at the same time the scales tip and the more standard, mass market games like your Dotas and whathaveyous tone everything down.
Like, Ill happily say "This is the smut I enjoy" but I dont want to have to say it about Xenoblade 2, if that makes sense.
It's going to need a really good OP as well to help keep away the usual arguments....I haven't been keeping up with that. That sounds like a wild ride...
There probably should be a thread on violence but I think one of the big problems is that it would devolve real quickly with trolls.
Witch Hunter Robin's a really cool action show from the same era.
Also, if you haven't already, check out the dub of Land of the Lustrous.
edit: I feel like when I'm in this thread the discussion almost always ends up, "wow, remember when anime wasn't a complete and utter fucking shit show? Remember when video games from Japan weren't a complete and utter fucking shit show? Those were the days."
I can't tell if this is just pessimism, nostalgia, regression, or simply hyperawareness of media due to the internet, but whatever it is things have definitely changed and it really doesn't feel like things are moving the right direction. =/
Interestingly, a Pew Research article actually reinforces this, at least as general Japanese views on the current state of things, even as confidence in their economy is increasing: http://www.pewglobal.org/2018/11/12...nd-them-and-say-children-face-a-bleak-future/
Ultimately this is the issue. Men get cool armor, women get bikinis. And yes, in-game we're at war, but for some reason, equally protective. What makes it even more stark is when some women are dressed practically and others are dressed in ridiculous clothes, and in some cases it gets even worse when it becomes part of the discourse (XC2, ironically enough, is actually a good example of this).That's extremely fair. I hesitate to say that the majority of games have that sex venier coating it in order to be fair to games that are doing things well...but just like anime has a weird creepy streak running though most of it when it comes to how...women in general are treated, games tend to paint themselves with the same 1 note sexed up brush strokes tends to push people away or make people uncomfortable than doing the opposite.
We talked about this like a month ago but Okami is a game I adore, but man, Sakuya and Rao's designs are embarrassing AF and are kind of a big stain on an otherwise amazing game.
That's true. People need to get it out of their heads that just because they know someone who likes something doesn't mean all people like it. The transitive property does not work on an emotional level.
Someone needs to tell this to Hirohiko Araki.Ultimately this is the issue. Men get cool armor, women get bikinis. And yes, in-game we're at war, but for some reason, equally protective. What makes it even more stark is when some women are dressed practically and others are dressed in ridiculous clothes, and in some cases it gets even worse when it becomes part of the discourse (XC2, ironically enough, is actually a good example of this).
A few things:
1) Nobody wears heels to a gun fight. Or any fight.
2) Armor is made to protect, which means if you're wearing armor, it COVERS YOUR ENTIRE FUCKING BODY. Otherwise, you're not wearing armor. You're wearing clothes. Or rags. Or bikinis. The last two are probably the same to most character designers.
3) No armor is skin-tight. It does not exist, stop it with that shit, people gotta breathe.
4) People have spines. They cannot bend that way.
5) I shouldn't have to tell you this, because you should understand basic cinematography, but stop with the slow-motion and panning shots of every woman's tits and ass. It's creepy.
It makes total sense. I agree with your post 100%.This is exactly where I am, sexy things belong in sexy games. The problem is the thin veneer of sex plastered all over 90% of games made. Jiggle physics isnt the problem, every game having it is the problem. Bikini armor isnt the problem, EVERYONE wearing bikini armor in EVERYTHING is the problem. Ideally we would have more DOAs and HuniePops, but at the same time the scales tip and the more standard, mass market games like your Dotas and whathaveyous tone everything down.
Like, Ill happily say "This is the smut I enjoy" but I dont want to have to say it about Xenoblade 2, if that makes sense.