• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Dalek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,962
I keep seeing people say "I never played The Last of Us but I'm looking forward to playing Part 2 this week!"

I...I just don't understand. I see this with movies and TV shows too. People who have never watched a tv show that has 5 seasons will ask if they can just skip to the most recent season. Imagine starting Better Call Saul at Season 5. What's the point? The show/game isn't going anywhere-it's not a limited time thing. Play/watch them in order!
 

Deleted member 16908

Oct 27, 2017
9,377
FOMO on participating in the launch hype/discourse
 

LuckyLinus

Member
Jun 1, 2018
1,936
Cant really compare it to jumping seasons ahead on a TV show, in most games its fine to jump ahead. Cant think of many examples where its not.
 

Deleted member 6263

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
9,387
The same reason why I didn't play The Witcher 1 and 2 before playing 3. I didn't have the time and The Witcher 3 ended up doing a great job of telling a story that didn't require 20+ hours of prior knowledge of world history, story beats, and character motivations.

Some sequels are good at it, hopefully LoU2 will do that as well. Plus you can't compare 1 game to 5 seasons of a show. Plus you can watch recaps easily, if needed.
 

Halbrand

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,616
Because the predecessors have aged too much or the game can stand on its own well enough.

I played The Witcher 3 before the other two games and I loved being introduction to the Witcher world that way.

Also played Half-Life 2 without ever playing the first one and it was totally fine.
 

Tomo815

Banned
Jul 19, 2019
1,534
Because time is limited and one has to decide how to spend his time/effort?

Look, its not guaranteed that I will like part 2, and right now I dont feel like I want to commit to play through part 1 yet. If the second game impresses me, then sure, I will go play part 1 and all the uncharted games and even the naughty dogs games they made before they became big.

I mean, have you ever experienced this in other mediums? discovered an actor/author/director last work and felt the desire to go watch their earlier works and see what the fuss was all about?
 
Oct 24, 2019
6,560
It's quite easy now to pull up story summaries for most games on youtube anyway.

but why would you is the question? Reading a summary of a game doesn't give you any real understanding of its nuances or the specialness of the experience.

I personally wouldn't be able to enjoy jumping into the middle of a story without having experienced the beginning of it all
 
OP
OP
Dalek

Dalek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,962
My in laws never watched Fellowship of the Ring or Two Towers but they went to see Return of the King on opening night because "they just wanted to see how it ends." It bugs me to this day.
 

reKon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,739
Fortunately, TLoU 1 is a game that you can beat in 15 hours and has been on sale for $10 15,000 times
 
OP
OP
Dalek

Dalek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,962
Because time is limited and one has to decide how to spend his time/effort?

Look, its not guaranteed that I will like part 2, and right now I dont feel like I want to commit to play through part 1 yet. If the second game impresses me, then sure, I will go play part 1 and all the uncharted games and even the naughty dogs games they made before they became big.

I mean, have you ever experienced this in other mediums? discovered an actor/author/director last work and felt the desire to go watch their earlier works and see what the fuss was all about?

Do you do this with books as well? Do you start with Chapter 7 to make sure you'll like the book and then maybe later go back and read Chapter 1–and then jump ahead and read the final chaptet just to save time? If you can just read a summary on Wikipedia then what's the big deal? Who cares for nuance when you can just read a synopsis and be up to date?
 

BoxManLocke

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,158
France
You're telling us you've never ever failed to start a franchise from the first entry ?

It's not a direct sequel, there's a fair bit of representation in this game, people just want to experience the new hotness like everybody else... there are plenty of possible reasons, and nothing wrong with any of them.
 

BasilZero

Member
Oct 25, 2017
36,346
Omni
If its not story exact like Final Fantasy - its fine.

I dont understand on story centric games like....say you start Mass Effect 2 without playing Mass Effect 1..like what?
 
OP
OP
Dalek

Dalek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,962
You're telling us you've never ever failed to start a franchise from the first entry ?

It's not a direct sequel, there's a fair bit of representation in this game, people just want to experience the new hotness like everybody else... there are plenty of possible reasons, and nothing wrong with any of them.

Something like NBA Jam-sure there no loss. But if it's a story based game or show-then why skip the first chapter?
 

Halbrand

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,616
Do you do this with books as well? Do you start with Chapter 7 to make sure you'll like the book and then maybe later go back and read Chapter 1–and then jump ahead and read the final chaptet just to save time? If you can just read a summary on Wikipedia then what's the big deal? Who cares for nuance when you can just read a synopsis and be up to date?
It's not the same thing at all. Individual games' narratives should be able to standalone as a complete story.
 

Mechaplum

Enlightened
Member
Oct 26, 2017
18,827
JP
but why would you is the question? Reading a summary of a game doesn't give you any real understanding of its nuances or the specialness of the experience.

I personally wouldn't be able to enjoy jumping into the middle of a story without having experienced the beginning of it all

Lack of time and/or access? I did that with the Witcher 3. I also know many who skipped the first Mass effect and go straight into the second.
 

GJ

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,792
The Netherlands
To me The Last of Us kind of differentiates itself from other sequels by the way it's been titled. The Last of Us Part 2 makes it clear it's the second part of the same story. It's not The Last of Us 2, it's not The Last of Us: Whatever, it's The Last of Us Part 2. Part 2 of the same story. That's different from let's say Assassin's Creed 2, where outside of the overarching minor storyline it's entirely it's own thing. It's a continuation of the same story, so yeah, it's best to have played the first part. A summary or recap video won't do the experience justice in this case.
 

Spyware

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,455
Sweden
You can't compare a video game to four seasons of a TV-series.
But I am also one of the people that think TLoU was nothing special.
Reading a summary of the story is absolutely enough. Very little "nuances" and whatever. You go there, do this, the people do X for Y reason. Done.
What you miss is directly filled in by the characters in the second game showing what they are and have become.


Do you do this with books as well? Do you start with Chapter 7 to make sure you'll like the book and then maybe later go back and read Chapter 1–and then jump ahead and read the final chaptet just to save time? If you can just read a summary on Wikipedia then what's the big deal? Who cares for nuance when you can just read a synopsis and be up to date?
An even worse comparison! If it's like chapter 7 of a book it should be released as free DLC for the first game or sold as a season pass like episodic games. Are you saying the first game in incomplete?

If this game doesn't work as a stand-alone experience, it's a failure.
 

BoxManLocke

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,158
France
Something like NBA Jam-sure there no loss. But if it's a story based game or show-then why skip the first chapter?

Because plenty of entries in big franchises are newcomer friendly.

The Witcher 3 is one of my favorite games of all time and I've never played the first one. Tried to play the second a bunch of times and lost interest.

Hell, if a franchise is known for being impossible to grasp unless you play all entries, I'm more likely to stay away from it altogether.
 

Tomo815

Banned
Jul 19, 2019
1,534
Do you do this with books as well? Do you start with Chapter 7 to make sure you'll like the book and then maybe later go back and read Chapter 1–and then jump ahead and read the final chaptet just to save time? If you can just read a summary on Wikipedia then what's the big deal? Who cares for nuance when you can just read a synopsis and be up to date?

With books I do it this way: I read the book everybody is talking about right now, and if I like it well enough, I will go look for older works by the same author. I read Haruki Murakami´s Dance Dance Dance first, and then went looking for A Wild Sheep Chase later because I enjoyed it so much.

it makes no sense to invest yourself into something before you even know if you are going to like it.
 

Milk

Prophet of Truth
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
3,819
??? Who cares? Why get so upset at someone just wanting to play a game lmao

Playing older games in a series is not a mandatory prerequisite.
 

BoxManLocke

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,158
France
For Contra and Super Contra-sure.

For Last of Us 1 and 2 it's pretty vital.

Not really. If the writing is good enough it should stand on its own. Especially for a sequel that takes place five years later.

Newcomers might miss some things, sure. But if they like the game, then they'll find the drive to play the first one and everybody wins.

Also people who started a franchise in a different order might have a new outlook on things, which makes for some interesting discussions.
 

Tomo815

Banned
Jul 19, 2019
1,534
For Contra and Super Contra-sure.

For Last of Us 1 and 2 it's pretty vital.

Look, lets be real here. The way storytelling and narrative go, there are only two ways a story can go in the sequel:

1. more of the same. The hero fights new enemies in a new location (this to me is basically all videogame sequels lol)

2. you either die a hero or live to become the villain (this is TLOU2 lol)

So you know, even before your play/watch/read something, what you are going to get, more or less.
 

Deleted member 1722

User requested account closure
Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,058
You can easily find multiple videos on YouTube doing a great job at explaining the plot of TLOU. The beat by beat plot is not exactly that hard to sum up.
Yeah, especially with a series as rote as TLOU. Sometimes the videos are even better! That 5 hour Destiny documentary, or VaatiVidya's Dark Souls work come to mind.
 

Giga Man

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
21,227
If it was me, I'd watch a full playthrough of The Last of Us Part 1 on youtube before I played Part II.
 

JCH!

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
1,171
Tenerife
I'm not playing TLOU2 anytime soon. But I can definitely understand people not playing the first game.

I gave it a shot last year and while the premise was interesting, I felt the gameplay has not aged well at all. Couldn't get halfway through before I got frustrated and gave up. Was just not having fun.

I'll give it another shot and try to plow through in the future because I feel TLOU2 will address most of my complaints with the first one, though.

You could easily just read up/watch a plot summary and be fine.
 

dock

Game Designer
Verified
Nov 5, 2017
1,370
Gotta say, the more I look back at The Last of Us 1 the more I think it was a lot of nicely made cinematics driving to the next set of zombie combat.

I don't think there are any Naughty Dog games that require you to know the history of the characters, and we can expect plenty of thickly laden exposition between the combat arenas.
 

jman1954goat

Linked the Fire
Member
May 9, 2020
12,427
P.S.A part 1 is still on sale for only 10 dollars on psn if you want the full experience
 

sredgrin

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
12,276
You're gonna get a lot of snotty replies from people that didn't play Witcher 1 or 2 in this thread.

Sometimes it's just a time investment thing, and sometimes in games especially, shit just ages badly. I love Baldur's Gate 2 but I'm not gonna shit on anyone that just plays 3, even if the story was a direct sequel. Sometimes people just wanna go "ooh Monster's Inc!" without investing 400 hours in the leadup to KH3.
 

kirby_fox

Member
Oct 29, 2017
5,733
Midwest USA
It's all about investing your time into something and not wanting to get spoiled later. If you just spoil everything before you can still understand the story.

I also feel like games are not often seen by a lot of people as telling a linear story.
 

Jotakori

Teyvat Traveler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,184
Normally I'm the type who has to personally consume everything in a series in order, but if a game can easily be consumed as a stand alone and I haven't gotten around to playing the previous entries, impatience and wanting to participate in release cycle hype will get the best of me. (Experienced this with Nier:Automata, for example.)

In the case of The Last of Us, well, I actually only "discovered" the game about a couple of months back. I had ran out of things to watch so randomly put on a playthrough of it from a streamer I liked and, omg, fell in love. I haven't played it on my own partially cuz I just haven't gotten around to it but mostly because I'm kinda sorta a big wimp when it comes to actually playing through scary games myself (jump scares get me every god damn time lol). I've been debating back and forth with myself constantly this past week on if I wanna pick up TLOU2 or not cuz of it. Like, I super wanna be able to experience the continuation of the story for myself and through my own actions, but idk if I'll be able to actually play it jklf;dsafd.

I couldn't imagine jumping into a story heavy game sequel without at least watching some kind of recap or play through of the first parts, though. The whole only playing story games for the gameplay thing is completely beyond me.
 

Pau

Self-Appointed Godmother of Bruce Wayne's Children
Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,847
If it's a video game, I probably won't really care about experience the story. So if the sequel has better gameplay and I expect to only play one game in the series, sure, I'll jump in at part two or three. If I like it enough, maybe I'll go back.
 

Jane

Member
Oct 17, 2018
1,263
Because time is limited and one has to decide how to spend his time/effort?

Look, its not guaranteed that I will like part 2, and right now I dont feel like I want to commit to play through part 1 yet. If the second game impresses me, then sure, I will go play part 1 and all the uncharted games and even the naughty dogs games they made before they became big.

I mean, have you ever experienced this in other mediums? discovered an actor/author/director last work and felt the desire to go watch their earlier works and see what the fuss was all about?
Wouldn't you rather do this the other way around, though? As in, try the first one, and if you like it, then play the second. Especially considering TLoU1 can be had for very cheap nowadays.
 

MrConbon210

Member
Oct 31, 2017
7,649
Wouldn't you rather do this the other way around, though? As in, try the first one, and if you like it, then play the second. Especially considering TLoU1 can be had for very cheap nowadays.
TLOU2 is the newest big thing. Many people want it just because of how big it will be. Hype is contagious.
 

Shoichi

Member
Jan 10, 2018
10,456
Launch hype. Seeing people enjoy the first enough to want to play the sequel.

i couldn't do that to myself. Needed to speed my way through part 1. It's like watch a second season of something without knowing the build up