I'm just saying a full year delay is already really extreme
They cant just keep throwing millions at a bad Halo game hoping it will magically get good
I would hope that 343 needed like 6 months and they just gave them a year to be safe and give it another holiday release
It hasn't been and there aren't? Key aspects of the Glassdoor reviews were corroborated by official reporting and several key creative leads have left the project part-way through. There have been (and probably still are) issues with 343 - and it stems from management. A delay doesn't solve those particular problems, it just helps them deal with what they have for longer.Because people like to think it's in development hell because people want to think there's issues with 343, when it's basically a complete game now and just being refined and polished in response to people whining about the graphics.
That would go down so well ... and certainly set the right signal for people concerned about the impact of Gamepass on game development. I don't think they will do something like that if they care about their reputation. A delay to 2022 would actually be more wise.
Ouch!
Tim counter betting that Infinite may score below a 70 was some eye opening shit.Kinda Funny isn't a place you should expect to see reasonable discussion on Xbox.
All of our launch content is in-game and being played daily but it takes a strong effort to get something from 90% to a full 100% ship quality. So, we are pushing hard to squash bugs and tune our toys so they are in a good spot as we get closer and closer to launch (and public flighting before that).
Tim counter betting that Infinite may score below a 70 was some eye opening shit.
Do you understand the monumental disaster Infinite would need to be in order to score below a 70???? And don't get me started on Greg's nonsensical Halo opinions.. His first Halo 1 playthrough was on Legendary and he apparently refused to use the Pistol. How can you respect that? Then he goes on to trash it on various shows lol, even saying it's dated, that even Uncharted 1 aged better and was flabbergasted as to how anyone could think otherwise.
I was watching the Kinda Funny podcast this morning, and in their 2021 predictions I was confronted with an idea I've seen commonly: Halo Infinite will be delayed until 2022. Then, I watched a list from Watchmojo of games we most likely won't see in 2021 and again they put Halo at the top of the list, outright stating they wouldn't be surprised if development is restarted. Why does this keep popping up?
Yes, the game missed the launch of the Series X, yes the first showing left some things to be desired, yes there were creative changes, but the game is content complete and has been for a year now. 343 has been very clear on this, and Staten played the campaign from start to finish. People seem to forget that Infinite is a platform game with several expansions planned, so a changing of the guard makes sense for future content. If the game needs to be delayed to 2022 then by all means do so, but why do people almost keep implying it like it is a done deal. It's not just those aforementioned two videos either, I've been seeing this often.
It's content complete with the extra year just for polish and any adjustments Staten thinks is needed. I don't think it gets delayed any more. However, if somehow it's needed, I think 343 would be given that additional time.
If Staten is happy with Infinite, then I trust it'll be ready and really good. He's earned that.
How about you tell us why people believe propaganda from the company themselves who have a vested interest in not being truthful?
I'm not part of the Halo community but I have been following this game's development. CDPR doing whatever they did doesn't mean other studios will. I also don't understand the comparison; CDPR decided to launch the game as it was, and people are speculating about 343 delaying more to polish it more. They already confirmed all the content is in the game, so it won't be rebooted. It was scheduled to be released last November, so it has been content-ready for a while. However, I can't imagine them showing it before the visual part is fully done.Covid, a creative director loss + switch, a major engine / visual overhaul, and the fact that *developers do lie about the status of their game* (see: Cyberpunk 2077) make it more than a valid guess that the game will miss 2021. Throw in the fact that the last time people saw it they literally laughed it out of the room, you gotta wonder, does it maybe need some of that time just to be removed from public consciousness so it can kind of 'start fresh'?
Anyway, it's very possible that some part of it (MP) does launch in 2021. I know they had discussed that possibility, and maybe they return to it.
What else he gonna say about the game though? Not like they gonna publish a blog with him saying its in rough shape. haha
What vested interest? If Cyberpunk has shown anything, it's that misleading the public about the status of the game can cause harm in the long-run. I genuinely have a difficult time believing a game prepped for launch until 3 months beforehand is not content complete, especially as the last few months are often the polishing stage.How about you tell us why people believe propaganda from the company themselves who have a vested interest in not being truthful?
How about you tell us why people believe propaganda from the company themselves who have a vested interest in not being truthful?
I'm not part of the Halo community but I have been following this game's development. CDPR doing whatever they did doesn't mean other studios will. I also don't understand the comparison; CDPR decided to launch the game as it was, and people are speculating about 343 delaying more to polish it more. They already confirmed all the content is in the game, so it won't be rebooted. It was scheduled to be released last November, so it has been content-ready for a while. However, I can't imagine them showing it before the visual part is fully done.
Fair enough. The only thing I'd say is that "content complete" doesn't mean it isn't buggy, just that it's playable from beginning to end. Did CDPR add content during the last year of development, or was it bug fixing? I'd be very surprised if 343 were adding content to ship with the game at launch, as I imagine it was already content complete by the time they showed it in August.The comparison mostly (and only) stems from the fact that they are both AAA studios, and one of them -- arguably in the worst possible fashion -- made the claim they were 'content complete' when in fact they were so far from it they needed a year delay (or possibly more). According to some reports, things were changing at a breakneck speed during the final year, and the fact is, they have partly sunk their company with the mess of a game. So, I'm not trying to draw any undue comparisons here: the two companies are not at all similar, except that, they're both AAA studios, and studios do tell fibs about their games timeline.
Basically, there can be HUGE gap between 'we're close!' and 'we're done', and I think CDPR is the most egregious example in recent memory of that being destructively terrible. As far as anything else untoward that CDPR has done, or their reputation in general, I wouldn't draw any comparisons there. I'm not a member of the Halo community, though, except to say that I play the titles as they come, so the general claim that 'companies fib' -- well, mileage may vary there.
If it was in rough shape they wouldn't say anything, and they wouldn't have given it a new release date.What else he gonna say about the game though? Not like they gonna publish a blog with him saying its in rough shape. haha
How about you tell us why people believe propaganda from the company themselves who have a vested interest in not being truthful?
That's how I've learned to treat anything a dev says over the years lol. I generally don't believe anything coming out of a developers mouth until I see it happen. Following the gaming industry for a long time has made me fairly cynical though lol.
Lol companies have a vested interest in their business, but that doesn't mean they necessarily have a vested interest in lying. The two concepts aren't mutually exclusiveHow about you tell us why people believe propaganda from the company themselves who have a vested interest in not being truthful?
Fair enough. The only thing I'd say is that "content complete" doesn't mean it isn't buggy, just that it's playable from beginning to end. Did CDPR add content during the last year of development, or was it bug fixing? I'd be very surprised if 343 were adding content to ship with the game at launch, as I imagine it was already content complete by the time they showed it in August.
A lot of games coming out this year do not have release dates.1. Already had a giant delay
2. COVID will slow development
3. It has no concrete release date
Fair enough. The only thing I'd say is that "content complete" doesn't mean it isn't buggy, just that it's playable from beginning to end. Did CDPR add content during the last year of development, or was it bug fixing? I'd be very surprised if 343 were adding content to ship with the game at launch, as I imagine it was already content complete by the time they showed it in August.
A lot of games coming out this year do not have release dates.
It hasn't been and there aren't? Key aspects of the Glassdoor reviews were corroborated by official reporting and several key creative leads have left the project part-way through. There have been (and probably still are) issues with 343 - and it stems from management. A delay doesn't solve those particular problems, it just helps them deal with what they have for longer.
I can't imagine all that must have gone wrong with the game to go from launch title one day to maybe not even releasing in 2021 the next day after a simple unveiling of the gameplay.