Lol. Random people. You know nothing about them. No baby Hitler either
This is a news thing relating to audience sympathy for 'people like us'. This article is relevant to the point in the thread, as it covers both overseas deaths and children.What always gets me is when you are watching the news and they announce a tragedy that took place in another country (eg plane crash/terrorism, etc). And they announce that a certain number of victims were from the same country as you.
Is it now supposed to be more of a tragedy because those people are from the same country? The phrasing of it always rubbed me the wrong way -- if something is a tragedy then it is a tragedy regardless of nationality.
...but kids losing their lives I definitely get though, there is something particularly sad about kids losing their life before they've had a chance to truly live any of it.
It is also more likely that the adult would be like "wtf are you doing save my kid"No. I'd be more likely to try and save the child, but not because it would be more of a tragedy if they died. The adult is more likely to be able to help themselves, more likely to be able to wait for more help for a little longer, in any scenario I can think of. There is a chance if I go for the child that both can be saved, in some scenarios.
But regardless of who is helped, if the other one dies the "level" of tragedy is the same to me.
Not what they *could* be - if they were literally the baby Hitler.
Obviously it would be some sort of Quantum Leap scenario or something.
Blows my fucking mind how dense some people are.Some of you posters have fucked up morals. Of course it makes sense to feel more for children even if you don't share any dna. I just can't.
I'm morbidly curious to know the answer to the Sandy Hook question.
Talk about condesending. Bring a parent doesn't make you some enlightened being you know?
I am putting words in their mouth put reading OP's post, they would think that Sandy Hook is a tragedy but ask why for example is it more tragic than the Vegas shooting. It is pretty clear why most people would think that one is more tragic than the other.I am too, but I'm not sure if my brain could handle the answer because I am still just amazed that the dude is doubling down on the ignorance after it he has had 4 pages of people trying to point out why he is wrong.
Like a kid with his fingers in his ears at this point.
Where is the backfire? I asked a question and people are giving me their answers. This is exactly what I expected.
You expected to somehow top the "would you yell to save a child" thread?
Apparently it's normal to not be more sad when children die thoughChildren are literally to continuation of our species. Its hardwired into us to protect them above all else. Of course we find it more tragic when kids die.
I still think "why do people have children is it vanity or selfishness" is still untouched for Threads From Bizzaro World
3 year old and a copy of Panzer Dragoon Saga in mint condition?
40 is the cut off? I didn't hit my true stride until 40.I guess but the majority of people under 40 are still in a position where they have untapped potential and can do something great.
I mean this is what professional philosophers do and it has its place. OP just isn't doing it as well.OP is not a psychopath. He's just trying too hard to be Mr. Rational here.
I....Apparently it's normal to not be more sad when children die though
I still think "why do people have children is it vanity or selfishness" is still untouched for Threads From Bizzaro World
When I asked whether or not you'd save a child over a 50 year old, I was literally asked if it's baby Hitler.