And if there was a thread title keyword ignore option (please admins...), these would be my first rules:
*can we agree that*
*it's [year] and*
*in the year [year]*
(I don't like threads that insist on telling me what year it is. I find it patronizing).
I support this initiativeSomeone needs to make a cover of the "Become as Gods" song from Nier Automata and have it go:
"Become as Mods! Become as Mods!"
I think the ignore user function shouldn't exist. Bad posts get moderated, bad posters eventually get banned. So, in the end, you're only banning people who you disagree with.
I think the ignore user function shouldn't exist. Bad posts get moderated, bad posters eventually get banned. So, in the end, you're only banning people who you disagree with.
If the post is acceptable by forum standarts, than I think it's more important to give everyone a voice. Many users annoy me, but I think it's important that I take their opinions in consideration. The best thing about forums is the diversity of opinions.There are times that someone may post something that may not be necessarily within the bounds of moderation, but could still be upsetting to a user. Reasons like that are why the function exists.
I think the ignore user function shouldn't exist. Bad posts get moderated, bad posters eventually get banned. So, in the end, you're only banning people who you disagree with.
Yes. I have had somebody in this very thread circumvent my ignore list by becoming a mod.If you ignore a user, who then ascends to Modhood, do they smash themselves from the shackles of everyone's ignore lists?
Bingo.
I have never ignored anyone, and I don't intend to.
Bad posts get reported, and bad folks get warned or banned.
I have been warned three times for pointing out fanboys being fanboys, but two out of those three folks I pointed out once upon a time are now banned for good so, the mods do do their job you expect them to do (most of the time).
p.s. I will say that somebody could inadvertently upset someone due to their belief/faith/gender/sexuality so, the ignore option is a worthwhile one for those folks.
I think the ignore user function shouldn't exist. Bad posts get moderated, bad posters eventually get banned. So, in the end, you're only banning people who you disagree with.
I agree with the bolded 100%. It's why I think we have such a great community. But there are some subjects (or even avatars) that could be triggering to some people and we want to give those people the ability to enjoy the forum.If the post is acceptable by forum standarts, than I think it's more important to give everyone a voice. Many users annoy me, but I think it's important that I take their opinions in consideration. The best thing about forums is the diversity of opinions.
Well, the great thing about Twitter is that you choose who to follow. Still sometimes replies and likes bubble on my feed of stuff I don't care to read.Yeah that's probably what it is, it takes alot to get me annoyed. I guess i'm used to people's nonsense from spending too much time on Twitter lol, Era is pretty tame in comparison to other places on the internet.
my least favorite threads areAnd if there was a thread title keyword ignore option (please admins...), these would be my first rules:
*can we agree that*
*it's [year] and*
*in the year [year]*
(I don't like threads that insist on telling me what year it is. I find it patronizing).
And if there was a thread title keyword ignore option (please admins...), these would be my first rules:
*can we agree that*
*it's [year] and*
*in the year [year]*
(I don't like threads that insist on telling me what year it is. I find it patronizing).
I've tried asking mods for a ban request but no one seems to get back to me, lol.
That's what the report feature is for, for us to help the mods. Yes, most of the times miss won't agree with you, but you can only do your best to make this forum a better place.Sometimes mods miss some. Sometimes problematic posters are subtle enough to skirt the rules over time. There are mod/community summits for a reason and while staff (thankfully) evolves and improves their sensitivity and criteria over time, it's nice to have the agency to stave off exposure to toxicity on the interim.
Then report the guy and don't reply to him. It's what I do. I can ignore people without literally making their posts invisible.definitely not always the case. a lot of folk here trot the line of just not being considered trolling.
beyond that, just a lot of consistently negative folk out here i wouldn't want to deal with regularly.
i dont wanna name names but there's one user in particular a lot of us know that seems to go into topics just for their ultra hot takes and derail accordingly. yeah, i ain't dealing with that.
That's what the report feature is for, for us to help the mods. Yes, most of the times miss won't agree with you, but you can only do your best to make this forum a better place.
that's cool it works for you. do you.That's what the report feature is for, for us to help the mods. Yes, most of the times miss won't agree with you, but you can only do your best to make this forum a better place.
Then report the guy and don't reply to him. It's what I do. I can ignore people without literally making their posts invisible.
That's what the report feature is for, for us to help the mods. Yes, most of the times miss won't agree with you, but you can only do your best to make this forum a better place.
Then report the guy and don't reply to him. It's what I do. I can ignore people without literally making their posts invisible.
I agree with this, and I'll add that ignoring people can also lead to topics losing their sense of discussion due to ignored posts getting lost in the shuffle. You're trying to catch on a debate but can't due to missing information that could or could not be important.I think the ignore user function shouldn't exist. Bad posts get moderated, bad posters eventually get banned. So, in the end, you're only banning people who you disagree with.
He has proof of Transistor's massive Collection of Bugsnax eroticaThe more important question here: why isn't this thread closed yet? Does jon bones have something on the mods? if so can you please share it? thank you.
For real. It's not our job to convince you to like or buy some random game.my least favorite threads are
"Convince me that _____"
like, nahhhh. just feels like an absurd waste of time. it's okay that you don't like FF7 Remake or whatever. it's OKAY.
One of the worst title trends. So obnoxious.I would add *am I the only* to that list. Yes, you are the only one that thinks/feels whatever the topic is about in the entire world. Goodbye.
lol. it is hard for some people, though.
Hmm, yes, I guess some people could have a really hard time ignoring stuff that triggers them. And you're right about avatars, they are hard to "unsee", like that guy with that creepy ass Momo girl as his avatar, I swear I can't even read his posts.I agree with the bolded 100%. It's why I think we have such a great community. But there are some subjects (or even avatars) that could be triggering to some people and we want to give those people the ability to enjoy the forum.
that's cool it works for you. do you.
But why do you have a problem with other users using a forum feature? bizarre.
Most of the people I ignore are not posting problematic things. They just annoy me lol.
The subject matter of this forum is video games. I'm here for entertainment. Unpleasant people are a waste of my time. That's the way I see it.The ignore user feature has never been a good addition to this site. Its the digital equivalence of putting your fingers in your ears and going "LA LA LA LA LA~"
I am curious how many people have me on ignore though lmaooo
Did I say I have a problem with people using a forum feature? No, I didn't. I'm just saying i don't see the point of said feature. Or more that it causes more harm than good. If you use the feature, it's your problem, not mine.that's cool it works for you. do you.
But why do you have a problem with other users using a forum feature? bizarre.
Most of the people I ignore are not posting problematic things. They just annoy me lol.
Let me ask you a question? Do you engage in every conversation IRL? I doubt it. Boundaries are not a bad thing. The ignore list is that in digital form.The ignore user feature has never been a good addition to this site. Its the digital equivalence of putting your fingers in your ears and going "LA LA LA LA LA~"
I am curious how many people have me on ignore though lmaooo
There are times that someone may post something that may not be necessarily within the bounds of moderation, but could still be upsetting to a user. Reasons like that are why the function exists.
He has proof of Transistor's massive Collection of Bugsnax erotica
Mickey Mouse wants my ripe ass hole, how can i ignore this inevitability?
If the post is acceptable by forum standarts, than I think it's more important to give everyone a voice. Many users annoy me, but I think it's important that I take their opinions in consideration. The best thing about forums is the diversity of opinions.
I agree with the bolded 100%. It's why I think we have such a great community. But there are some subjects (or even avatars) that could be triggering to some people and we want to give those people the ability to enjoy the forum.
LOL.The real problem is the ignore list is only limited to 1000 people.
I mean, that's not even a secret.He has proof of Transistor's massive Collection of Bugsnax erotica
it's the real life equivalent to "I don't want to be your friend or talk to you. bye" lol.The ignore user feature has never been a good addition to this site. Its the digital equivalence of putting your fingers in your ears and going "LA LA LA LA LA~"
I am curious how many people have me on ignore though lmaooo
I'm not sure about that.The ignore user feature has never been a good addition to this site. Its the digital equivalence of putting your fingers in your ears and going "LA LA LA LA LA~"
I am curious how many people have me on ignore though lmaooo