Elden Ring by a lot, like a crater of distance imo, unfortunately even after 100h I never adapted completely like other Souls and Sekiro that were almost instant
Even the easier ones I found harder than any on DSIII besides Friede tbh, but ER only gets really, really hard in the last 3 bosses, they are completely bonkersAll bosses: Sekiro
Non-optional bosses only: Elden Ring
A vast majority of Elden Ring's bosses are optional and way too easy imo.
By that logic BB isn't Souls either haha
Even the easier ones I found harder than any on DSIII besides Friede tbh, but ER only gets really, really hard in the last 3 bosses, they are completely bonkers
Bloodborne isn't either then. Of course ER and BB are Souls games.
Ah I meant the story ones sorry hahaReally? You thought Random Catacomb Watchdog #13 was harder than Nameless King?
Sekiro is not a Souls game.Coming to this thread to say Sekiro because it should be on the poll because Bloodborne and Ring are, and you knew this would happen.
I mean if you can't tell the difference btw them, if you wish.I one or two shot most of BB and Demon's Souls bosses so they are the easiest to me.
I haven't finished Elden but they are hard. Sekiro has the hardest IMO. Lady Butterfly was ferocious.
Bloodborne isn't either then.
It's not about the name lol
I'm so shocked that people are saying Bloodborne, it's BY FAR AND AWAY the easiest game for me. Guess it's more suited for my play style.
FromSoft has said that Sekiro is not a Souls games , so it doesn't count.
Doesn't have Souls in the name, take that /sElden Ring is an obvious Souls games, there are people that think otherwise?
Booo
While you can take many routes and overlevel, in the endgame that isn't really an option, those enemies are a gigantic jump from the prior areas and are scaled for like level 160 or soDon't really understand how people are saying Elden Ring here. There are so many routes to take, so you can never really get 'stuck' on a boss. And by the time you reach a story boss you're usually a bit overleveled.
Also I feel like you need to factor in the run to the boss, which is basically non existant in Elden Ring. This was often a huge pain in the ass in other souls games.
And then there are the Ashes, which make boss fights MUCH easier.
To me Sekiro had the most consistent hard bosses, also because there were barely any possibilities to do upgrades or do side stuff. You just had to get good.
If we are not counting that one, then DS3 for me. DS3 bosses were awesome
So wait can I have different builds and weapons in it? Because my understanding (and the reason I haven't played it) is because I thought it didn't.
Because its not a SOuls game ;)
it's totally a Souls game.
The most different of From's slate but still one of them
But you'd be wrong :P
Did they claim Bloodborne and Elden Ring WERE Souls games?FromSoft has said that Sekiro is not a Souls games , so it doesn't count.
I am not sure on that , but they specifically said that Sekiro was its own thing and not part of the Souls Series , and really , BB and Elden play exactly (in BB's case mostly) like Souls games , BB, ER and Souls have same mechanics and play very similar. Sekiro is not similar to Souls at all except that they both have bonfires.
I am not talking about Sekiro , so I didn't include it , Poll is fine as it is.Poll should be remade, call it which game under the Miyazaki umbrella had the hardest bosses instead or w/e the hell. Sekiro is not a Souls game proper, but it should be in the conversation, because had the most consistently challenging bosses of any of his games. I can't be convinced people who played everything of his would genuinely vote for DS1 or something.
It has some pretty similar UI, uses the same engine....... that's about it lolOther than being developed by From, what does Sekiro have in common with Souls games?
I don't mind , I have nothing else to do today :p, especially when I am right.If you are going to argue with every person that brings up sekiro in this topic, you are going to be here awhile