Looking at their lineup for next year how does Dreams, Predator, Mlb: the show or Iron Man VR fit exactly into that? Most of the games Sony publishes are not "cinematic, marketable, artistically sophisticated" which btw seems to be some of the best critically and commercially successful games on the market.It sucks when you aspire actually profound and inspiring concepts but you produce shallow things like "Robot Dinosaur RPG" and "The Road: The Game" and Death Stranding.
...Okay, I don't hate TLoU or DS (I do hate Horizon), or God of War, but it's so obvious to me that they greenlight those gameplay prototypes based on what delivers the best trailer material and the best cinematic content with much less care for how innovative or engaging they are simply to play. All Sony's releases except maybe Days Gone have been absolutely on par with the standard for streamlined Third- and First Person gameplay formats... but it's all so derivative too. Nothing Sony's first parties did this gen is on par with what Zelda did with the Far Cry ideas or what Microsoft's used to do with Halo for the shooter. Sony used to greenlight weirder games and huge variety of concepts in the PS3 days even, but this gen everything fits into their 'box' of "cinematic, marketable, artistically sophisticated" crap.
I forgot about Ori. MS lineup looking pretty good for next year.Microsoft. As much as I'm looking forward to Last of Us 2, the sheer amount of variety led by Halo, Ori, Wasteland 3 and Gears Tactics is pretty crazy coming from one publisher.
Well, come on now, that's not Nintendo's image, but rather it speaks to that missing variety I ascribe to Sony.I could equally say fire emblem and xenoblade and stuff like that is waifu hentai bait covered with rpg mechanics, but I don't. It's just different tastes. It doesn't mean games are bad.
That's fair. They just want to focus on what is the most popular. They tried with some stuff like gravity rush and the games bombed. No different to nintendo dropping series that don't do good.Well, come on now, that's not Nintendo's image, but rather it speaks to that missing variety I ascribe to Sony.
I dunno. Gravity Rush didn't seem like a game that got the most support or budget either. Sony has been ignoring its japanese roots since the fall of the Vita. it's Sony over-concentrating on what they believe is the future, which is these "cinematic, artistic" games because TLoU1 was a record-breaking new IP launch that they think they can mimic.They tried with some stuff like gravity rush and the games bombed. No different to nintendo dropping series that don't do good.
Well GoW and Horizon were huge hits. Uncharted always was. Days gone slightly less but still really big. You can't blame them when it seems like the majority wants this. I'm not a fan of jrpgs and style action games, so a lot of nintendo stuff does nothing for me. Just how it goes.I dunno. Gravity Rush didn't seem like a game that got the most support or budget either. Sony has been ignoring its japanese roots since the fall of the Vita. it's Sony over-concentrating on what they believe is the future, which is these "cinematic, artistic" games because TLoU1 was a record-breaking new IP launch that they think they can mimic.
This for me
there's xenoblade but that's an enhanced re-release. and i guess there's also brain age. other than that no, i don't think so.Do we actually have any internally devolped title confirmed for 2020 beyond Animal Crossing in March?
You dont play sonys smaller games that are different to the ones you listed. The bigger marketing budgets go to stuff that will potentially sell really well. Apart from dumb platform war baiting here try more of their games than third person ones action adventure ones? If people were as reductive as you they would say all nintendo has been creating are mario titles where you have been jumping around the same for decades or its the same guy hero in green suit with a sword trying to save his princess story... How stupid that sounds you realize that?Well, come on now, that's not Nintendo's image, but rather it speaks to that missing variety I ascribe to Sony.
Did I also miss episodes ?Sega has Persona 5 Royal and Project Sakura Wars next year remember. Both way more exciting than Sonic at the Olympics.
Edit - I don't even remember what Humankind is.
Nintendo has nothing to do with NMH III
Oh, I thought they were publishing the packaged version overseas like TSA.
I agree they're being overly reductive on Sony, but even if you only pay attention to tentpoles you'll probably find more general diversity at Nintendo.Looking forward to sony, ms and ubisoft next year most. I dont think botw2 will hit 2020
You dont play sonys smaller games that are different to the ones you listed. The bigger marketing budgets go to stuff that will potentially sell really well. Apart from dumb platform war baiting here try more of their games than third person ones action adventure ones? If people were as reductive as you they would say all nintendo has been creating are mario titles where you have been jumping around the same for decades or its the same guy hero in green suit with a sword trying to save his princess story... How stupid that sounds you realize that?
Paradox
Crusader Kings III is gonna be my game of forever, lol.