K not being the chosen one was great, but completely dropping the story regarding the uprising is my issue. I don't mind not seeing it, but it's never mentioned again whatsoever. A simple line about how the replicants are doing anything from K to Deckard would've solved that, but they never bother. The only thing they say is that he frowned with the rest so that they can't find him, but nothing else. It's just completely dropped and never mentioned again. I still think the film is great, and having the humans vs replicants story is interesting. But personally, I don't think it's developed enough as is.
I bought the CD straight after leaving the screening, since I thought some tracks were really good. Hearing it on its own, it's alright at best, but the Sea Wall though. Damn that's a mighty fine piece and crazy bass booming at you.The Vangelis score alone makes the original better. The new movie tries to do some interesting things and creates some great visuals, but the side plot with Joi was kinda stupid/meaningless and the score was uninteresting.
Huh, to me 2049 was the very definition of bloated and slow. I mean, I liked it, but man was it overly long, it droned on.. and not in a good way. Long, slow movies can be great, but 2049 was not great at that part of it all.I watched the original only a little before last seeing 2049. Even though I think the original is probably one of Scott's few great movies, Villenueve shows in 2049 that he can even produce sequel film that is superior in pretty much every single way. Pacing, story-telling, direction: I felt it was all superior to the original. The original felt too slow and oddly enough, the story wasn't memorable for me. It would be unfair to deny that the advances to tech helped the new film with establishing amazing visuals, although the work of the original, the matte paintings and models, are still fantastic.
I'm biased. My opinion of Ridley Scott has fallen as far as it can since his total shitter, Robin Hood.
2049 Voters: I liked the story and characters better.
Original Voters: People just like the sequel because it was recent. VANGELIS!
lol
I want someone to edit the Sicario soundtrack on top of 2049 just to see what we missed out on.Shame we never got to hear the original planned soundtrack, I'll forever be curious how that sounded instead of the painfully Vangelis recreation of some of the tracks.
I cannot see this at all. There is nothing about 2049 that the word "obligation" fits with in way you describe it. There's nothing that feels "fan service" about it to me, either. The first film feels more lived in, but the world in BR 2049 is sparse on purpose and it works. They compliment each other with the way the world evolves between the films.2049 is like very good fanfiction. A sequel of obligation, making the plot so heavy and elevating simple things from the first film and turning them into busy fan service.
What Blade Runner does well doesn't seem to exist in movies anymore. It feels real, lived in. 2049 is like playing a future playstation game.
Watching it, I got the idea that they were angling to save this development for a sequel. Which, as it turns out, may never happen.K not being the chosen one was great, but completely dropping the story regarding the uprising is my issue. I don't mind not seeing it, but it's never mentioned again whatsoever. A simple line about how the replicants are doing anything from K to Deckard would've solved that, but they never bother. The only thing they say is that he frowned with the rest so that they can't find him, but nothing else. It's just completely dropped and never mentioned again. I still think the film is great, and having the humans vs replicants story is interesting. But personally, I don't think it's developed enough as is.
Got a favorite between them?😊Fuck it. Gonna reserve some time to watch both these historical movies back-to-back. 5 hours of pure historical cinematic bliss.
Nope! I voted for 'equal'.
Had to vote for equal, because they're both very similar but also incredibly different.
What I sort of prefer of the original is it feeling more contained and personal, whereas 2049 felt more bombastic and 'epic'. (If that makes sense lol)
Despite all that, both movies are incredibly important pieces of cinema and both are in my top 10 favourite movies of all time.
But it succeeds in doing so2049 tries too hard to make each camera shot worthy of being put up on a wall
Also a correct answer.Well one has Ana de Armas and one doesn't so it's an easy choice.
I'm inclined to agree!
That's because you have fantastic taste! It's people like us that are going to make the future a better place.
😂That's because you have fantastic taste! It's people like us that are going to make the future a better place.
Our righteousness is only fueled by the fact that 2049 is a far from perfect film.
Have you seen the 4K Blade Runner Final Cut?It's incredible that we not only got a sequel to a movie that seems almost impossible to build upon but that it was also great in its own right. I was very skeptical going in, but I was blown away by 2049. Very happy to have watched it in a theater. My main regret was passing up on watching it again in the cinema! It's a stellar home movie but that first time watching it was an experience unto itself. Brilliant sound work.
Have you seen the 4K Blade Runner Final Cut?
The detail and crispness of the visuals/color is sublime and the Dolby Atmos sound mix is incredible😲