• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Deleted member 34725

User-requested account closure
Banned
Nov 28, 2017
1,058
I was looking for some Dark Souls related lore videos just a few days ago and saw one with millions of views and clicked. A little way into the video he begins to refer to the player character as a male and instantly says somehing like "I KNOW it can be a male or a female, but I'm going to refer to them as a male in this video! How about this: I'll refer to them as a female in some other video so you SJWs can calm down now!" in a super snarky voice. I promptly looked for a different lore video.

I just don't understand the attitude. He obviously realized the problem with only referring to the player character as a male, but instead of addressing it like an adult he acted like a middle schooler.
 

Ganransu

Member
Nov 21, 2017
1,270
While the "white boys wants white men protagonists" explanation works, it doesn't really explain why that there are non-white in the mix.

As someone coming home to a Chinese community only very recently, I can say that, at least in the online-sphere, there a lot of anti-SJW here. But why...

I think, just as everywhere else, you have a few in the mix:

You have the white boys/manchildren doing their work.

You have the straight boys/manchildren that identify with the straight men part of the white straight men.

You have those that would believe anything they read, likely because they once done one of these "gamer's action" that is now deemed offensive. Or has always been offensive, but who could've known n-er was a bad word when they used it the entire time intended to insult? Self-defence really, I mean why learn from your mistake when you can act like a sore fucking prick?

Then you have those "in the lulz" assholes who have a broken moral compass, or lacked one from the start.

They're a mix of defensive snowflakes who may or may not have a goal, but all of them have managed to convince themselves that they're the oppressed victims in all this, so they're the good guys.
 

Masterspeed

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,825
England
To me, the best thing about gaming is playing as many different races, genders and personalities.

Having unique characters make a game for me.

What they want is just so boring.
 

Loxley

Prophet of Truth
Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,620
I forget where on YouTube I saw this, but a while back on the old forums someone posted a great video explaining how video games - despite being inherently gender-neutral like all other art forms - became viewed as a boys-only hobby. Basically, back during the NES days - before video game consoles were considered general consumer electronics - they were categorized as toys, and were always put in the "boy" section of toy stores. As a result, across the 80s, 90s, and 2000s they grew to become categorized as a boys-only passtime. Because of that, games were largely made for and marketed exclusively to one gender. It's also largely why many women for the longest time never bothered to go into game development either. It was seen as a "boys-only" club.

As a result, a chunk of an entire generation of young men grew up believing video games were all theirs - which is a large part of why so many of them are so damn insecure about the industry embracing women and more diverse voices in general - both in game development and the games themselves. When an entire industry has been pushing for years that video games are developed by men and largely only tell the stories of <white> men, some folks grow a woefully misguided sense of ownership over every aspect of gaming culture. Now they feel like they're "losing" that ownership.

The comic book industry is currently going through a slightly less-visible but very similar circus. Comics were stereotyped into being a nerdy male hobby for decades, but now the industry is making more legitimate attempts to diversify - both on the creative side and in terms of the stories they tell - and a certain sector of the comics "fandom" are losing their minds over it.
 

StuBurns

Self Requested Ban
Banned
Nov 12, 2017
7,273
I forget where on YouTube I saw this, but a while back on the old forums someone posted a great video explaining how video games - despite being inherently gender-neutral like all other art forms - became viewed as a boys-only hobby. Basically, back during the NES days - before video game consoles were considered general consumer electronics - they were categorized as toys, and were always put in the "boy" section of toy stores. As a result, across the 80s, 90s, and 2000s they grew to become categorized as a boys-only passtime. Because of that, games were largely made for and marketed exclusively to one gender. It's also largely why many women for the longest time never bothered to go into game development either. It was seen as a "boys-only" club.

As a result, a chunk of an entire generation of young men grew up believing video games were all theirs - which is a large part of why so many of them are so damn insecure about the industry embracing women and more diverse voices in general - both in game development and the games themselves. When an entire industry has been pushing for years that video games are developed by men and largely only tell the stories of <white> men, some folks grow a woefully misguided sense of ownership over every aspect of gaming culture. Now they feel like they're "losing" that ownership.

The comic book industry is currently going through a slightly less-visible but very similar circus. Comics were stereotyped into being a nerdy male hobby for decades, but now the industry is making more legitimate attempts to diversify - both on the creative side and in terms of the stories they tell - and a certain sector of the comics "fandom" are losing their minds over it.
Sounds like it might be Foldable Human's Gamergate video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VtjZHC5Qyk
 

Genesius

Member
Nov 2, 2018
15,549
Because if video games get taken away from them as a scapegoat for why women don't like them, that would force them to think about the fact that it's because they're repugnant assholes, not because they're "nerds", and they don't have the fortitude for that kind of self-reflection

Same thing with superheroes
 

RM8

Member
Oct 28, 2017
7,906
JP
Some people like myself just don't want to deal with social or political issues in games at all, and like games to be an escape from this stuff. It isn't so much that it being in the game is a bother, but more so the discussion of it. Oddly, I rarely ever care what's in the game itself, so if I end up playing as a girl, a black person, or a pink bunny, it really doesn't matter to me. The problem is when people like me want to go discuss it, we either get plunged on a forum that is racist and sexist, or on a forums that seek to find offense in anything or demand progress in everything. Everything has to become a 'we need to discuss' or a demand of inclusiveness, and it's exhausting.

I'd always prefer to play as Sonic and I wouldn't care if Mega Man had black skin, I also have played probably hundreds of games starring women, I literally do not care who or what I play as, and just prefer to discuss the game for what it is. You used to be able to do that but it really is hard to find a happy middle these days. People are becoming obsessed with defending their horrible ways while others are becoming obsessed with their progressive ways, one is better than the other but it's emotionally exhausting for sure.

When you put Mario under the gun because he rescues a princess, you need to take a step back in my mind and look at what you're doing. Not everything needs to be 'progressive', if it SHOULD be then by all means, games that allows selections or customization as example, should always be pressed on this stuff. I just wonder if the people who always obsess over these issues, are they really happy people in their daily lives, or are they like the guy I ran into the other day who was on a date while yelling about 'that bitch AOC!!' during his entire dinner, that just seems like a miserable way to live, to never be able to just extract joy out of something without worrying about what it isn't doing.
This is not reality. Go to the NSMBUDX thread and find me one post "putting the game under a gun". Regular discussion of games happens all the time on all kinds of platforms, avoiding the political side of it is not difficult at all.
 

Deleted member 721

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,416
I forget where on YouTube I saw this, but a while back on the old forums someone posted a great video explaining how video games - despite being inherently gender-neutral like all other art forms - became viewed as a boys-only hobby. Basically, back during the NES days - before video game consoles were considered general consumer electronics - they were categorized as toys, and were always put in the "boy" section of toy stores. As a result, across the 80s, 90s, and 2000s they grew to become categorized as a boys-only passtime. Because of that, games were largely made for and marketed exclusively to one gender. It's also largely why many women for the longest time never bothered to go into game development either. It was seen as a "boys-only" club.

As a result, a chunk of an entire generation of young men grew up believing video games were all theirs - which is a large part of why so many of them are so damn insecure about the industry embracing women and more diverse voices in general - both in game development and the games themselves. When an entire industry has been pushing for years that video games are developed by men and largely only tell the stories of <white> men, some folks grow a woefully misguided sense of ownership over every aspect of gaming culture. Now they feel like they're "losing" that ownership.

The comic book industry is currently going through a slightly less-visible but very similar circus. Comics were stereotyped into being a nerdy male hobby for decades, but now the industry is making more legitimate attempts to diversify - both on the creative side and in terms of the stories they tell - and a certain sector of the comics "fandom" are losing their minds over it.
i remember that video it also talked briefly about atari and the crash, i cant find it though
 

Deleted member 721

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,416
Sounds like it might be Foldable Human's Gamergate video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VtjZHC5Qyk
I forget where on YouTube I saw this, but a while back on the old forums someone posted a great video explaining how video games - despite being inherently gender-neutral like all other art forms - became viewed as a boys-only hobby. Basically, back during the NES days - before video game consoles were considered general consumer electronics - they were categorized as toys, and were always put in the "boy" section of toy stores. As a result, across the 80s, 90s, and 2000s they grew to become categorized as a boys-only passtime. Because of that, games were largely made for and marketed exclusively to one gender. It's also largely why many women for the longest time never bothered to go into game development either. It was seen as a "boys-only" club.

As a result, a chunk of an entire generation of young men grew up believing video games were all theirs - which is a large part of why so many of them are so damn insecure about the industry embracing women and more diverse voices in general - both in game development and the games themselves. When an entire industry has been pushing for years that video games are developed by men and largely only tell the stories of <white> men, some folks grow a woefully misguided sense of ownership over every aspect of gaming culture. Now they feel like they're "losing" that ownership.

The comic book industry is currently going through a slightly less-visible but very similar circus. Comics were stereotyped into being a nerdy male hobby for decades, but now the industry is making more legitimate attempts to diversify - both on the creative side and in terms of the stories they tell - and a certain sector of the comics "fandom" are losing their minds over it.
found it
 

SturokBGD

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,414
Ontario
I was once told in all earnest a few years ago that I couldn't possibly know the difference between a good game and a bad game because having children had altered my judgement (?!).

It was at that point I realised "Capital G Gamers" were pathetic losers that were impossible to take seriously.
 

Deleted member 35077

Self-requested ban
Banned
Dec 1, 2017
3,999
As someone coming home to a Chinese community only very recently, I can say that, at least in the online-sphere, there a lot of anti-SJW here. But why...
In my group of black and mexican friends it has more to do with censorship. They are all left-leaning when it comes to politics, but when it comes to censorship they feel like it shouldn't happen when it comes to arts, and that it should stay the same as the original Japanese version.

Ouch, the comments aren't surprising, but moreso the like/dislike ration. Really shows how popular the dislike opinion is.
 

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446
In my group of black and mexican friends it has more to do with censorship. They are all left-leaning when it comes to politics, but when it comes to censorship they feel like it shouldn't happen when it comes to arts, and that it should stay the same as the original Japanese version.

Ouch, the comments aren't surprising, but moreso the like/dislike ration. Really shows how popular the dislike opinion is.

I consider myself pretty liberal but I'm the same way. I do not like it when a Japanese game is changed from the Japanese version for "western sensibilities." if they wanna make it like that in the FIRST place for all versions, thats fine, no issues there, but if the Japanese version is different than the Western one, that annoys me.
 

Platy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
27,704
Brazil
I think it's best to not feed the entire topic of "sjw" as seen by the recent movement in far right corners of the gaming community.

I love the word. When someone uses in the "Why women criticize objectified character designs" thread you always know you are in for a threat... a rush to type the answer before the person is banned
 

Famassu

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,186
As long as it doesn't involve a princess being saved right? See that's the thing, if you go on a date with a woman who is respectable and were to talk to her about games, and she recalled thinking it was cute that Mario saves the princess, what do you do? Do you harp on her and ruin the date or do you just go, yeah that was cute.

The intensity of people here is often truly exhausting, when something like a 2 second event in a Mario game that most adults think almost nothing of, is something worth fighting, that's the problem. Women won't have the course of their lives altered because of princess peach, that to me means its just a relatively harmless thing in a silly videogame.

It's different versus if you have a game like, Farcry, and it were to include racism and things of that nature, at least to me anyways. I just don't take these games designed to be played by children that seriously. Unfortunately I assumed this could become a dog pile which is pretty typical here, you simply have to go along with the echo chamber on all points, or else it becomes a blood bath. It's a shame that people here seem less and less capable of civil discussion even with people that are basically on their side. People who post on this site are probably all within the same 20 percent range of progressive, but if you're not in the exact range to the most extreme cutoff, you're an enemy.

I'd like to continue to discuss but I have to prepare for bed.
You know, you should really read about logical fallacies because your posts in this thread touch upon & exhaust almost all of them. Inventing these very specific real-life situations that support your own arguments but have very little basis in reality. Acting like the victim when mean old progressives "pile" on you when you make dumb arguments. Like, yeah, there would be nothing wrong with your hypothetical, real-life flesh & bone son liking the colour pink. That has ZERO relevancy to the arguments made by progressives about the harmfulness of tropes like Damsel In Distress (it a widely know name even outside progressive circles because it's such a common one, it's not just Mario) or how shitty it is that we do so much gender-exclusive marketing & gender-coded crap IN FICTION.

But sure, let's take your silly arguments at face value...

If such a highly unlikely discussion came up on a date about Princess Peach being a damsel in distress, then yeah, I'd criticize the trope even if my date was all into that. I wouldn't "harp on her" or publicly try to humiliate her, but I'd say that I think it's just another tired example of sexist attitudes towards women I find really tired & annoying. Not that this kind of discussion would ever happen with any of the women I know in my life but, like, if it were to happen, I wouldn't just be all "YEAH YOU'RE RIGHT THAT'S TOTALLY COOL" if that wasn't what I actually thought, just because they are a woman. I'd assume they are strong enough to handle differing opinions.

And if your girlfriend made a Girly Game with Girly things where you control Girly Girls who do Girly stuff like Brush Their Girly Hair and Girlily Gossip About Girly Things and wear Girly Colours like Pink and Go take Girly mani-pedis, sure, it would be worthy of some criticism of pushing that kind of content just because they are making something aimed at girls. A lot of girls & women like mani-pedis and make-up and doing stuff to their hair and there's absolutely nothing wrong or shameful about that, but that doesn't mean a game aimed at them has to be exclusively about that. Like, you could have those kinds of elements in your game (basically, a character creator), but it'd be a pretty poor game if all you did was that.



And, again, it's not that a SINGLE game will cause anything. It's when it's a LARGE SCALE, COMMON, REGULAR THING that is in tons of games, books, movies, tv series etc. it becomes problematic. "Damsel In Distress" IS still a very common plot-device. It's not even just that it's a harmful plot device, it's that it's a BORING, black & white, one-sided plot device. If you're gonna have a woman be kidnapped, do it like 10 Cloverfield Lane where the kidnapped "princess" shows some initiative and tries to escape herself through the usage of all the tools & opportunities she gets. Give them agency, give them wit, give them a fighting spirit. You can have a man even rescue them but let the kidnapped woman have a role in the saving operation/escape as well, not just be carried off by the hero.


Just because YOU turned out not to be a raging misogynistic ass who can't handle any women in his games doesn't mean it's not a larger issue. Anecdotal experiences are worthless. There are actual studies about these things. About how women view themselves after being exposed to certain kind of content in society. How women shape their behaviour due to certain expectations put on them by society at large. Not all women but enough for there to be a need for a paradigm shift. And boys learn harmful behavioural patterns from movies, hardcore porn etc. that have very little to do with how to interact with real girls/women and everything to do with wish-fulfillment & toxic attitudes by men for men. The world will lose absolutely nothing if we don't have a make-up game ever again and there's, again, EVERYTHING to be gained by giving girls more varied, more meaningful & more thoughtful experiences through gaming, when it comes to what kind of roles they can take & how they are portrayed.

There was just a topic the other day about a guy who sunk a 30k deal because his idiot client made sexist remarks. If that isn't a strange way to navigate a social situation I don't know what is. It's fine to be angry, but that just seems insane to me.
And what if that guy had said "I hope you don't hire any niggers, they are all lazy, worthless criminals"? You'd be ok with keeping working with a person like that? Being assosiated with someone like that?

I just don't take these games designed to be played by children that seriously. Unfortunately I assumed this could become a dog pile which is pretty typical here, you simply have to go along with the echo chamber on all points, or else it becomes a blood bath.
L
O
L

@

acting like the victim of some kind of horrible blootbath. Get a fucking grip. You're not a victim here. You're spouting nonsense, making some really logically unsound arguments that have no relation to the topic at hand and undermining real problematic stuff in your entertainment just because you don't think they matter because you didn't turn into a GGer. Even if it's something as "small" as women being princesses to rescue.
 

Sinder

Banned
Jul 24, 2018
7,576
This sort of pertains to the recent announcement of Bloodlines 2. Time and time again, when a major upcoming title starts releasing details before launch, the anti sjw types throw a shit-fit over something having to do with representation or sensitivity towards certain marginalized groups. I see it all over social media and youtube.

"Keep your politics out of my games!"

"This is total SJW nonsense!"

"Muh representation!"

What the hell do these people want exactly? For every game to feature straight white dudes exclusively? Because it seems like every time a new game is announced to veer away from that, it's written off as "SJW". Getting triggered over representation in games seems like a total waste of time to me, yet it's practically it's own YouTube genre. It feels like we're getting less hyped for games anymore because we're ready to point fingers all the time.

Do you think this will change in the future?

Short answer is they just want straight white dudes in their games and go through a bunch of mental gymnastics to frame it as if its not just about that, even when it clearly is.
 

Hey Please

Avenger
Oct 31, 2017
22,824
Not America
While the "white boys wants white men protagonists" explanation works, it doesn't really explain why that there are non-white in the mix.

As someone coming home to a Chinese community only very recently, I can say that, at least in the online-sphere, there a lot of anti-SJW here. But why...

I think, just as everywhere else, you have a few in the mix:

You have the white boys/manchildren doing their work.

You have the straight boys/manchildren that identify with the straight men part of the white straight men.

You have those that would believe anything they read, likely because they once done one of these "gamer's action" that is now deemed offensive. Or has always been offensive, but who could've known n-er was a bad word when they used it the entire time intended to insult? Self-defence really, I mean why learn from your mistake when you can act like a sore fucking prick?

Then you have those "in the lulz" assholes who have a broken moral compass, or lacked one from the start.

They're a mix of defensive snowflakes who may or may not have a goal, but all of them have managed to convince themselves that they're the oppressed victims in all this, so they're the good guys.

Yep. In EU & NA, there is the added element of race but anti-SJW people litter the eastern Asian gaming domain as well. It is rife with toxic masculinity. Evidence of it has been seen in prior threads pertaining to SK game development and feminism.
 
Oct 28, 2017
472
I see a lot of people saying they're trolls.
They're not, these people are genuinely convinced of their beliefs and aren't saying this to troll people, they are genuinely upset.
I also see people saying that it's mostly kids.
They're not.
There are a lot of kids who think like that but most of these people are at least over 20.
It's crazy how hypocritical these people seem to be.
A lot of them get their kicks of off "triggering" soy boys, SJWs, Cucks or whatever edgy buzzword they use now, but most of the time it's them fucking losing their shit.
Are they really that unaware of that?
I know a lot of people like that and its mostly edgy teenage and childish thoughts that most regular people seem to wise up on after growing up and experiencing how things are in the real world.
Not these guys, they stay in their circles like 4chan and likeminded individuals failing to realize they're all just a bunch of crazy people feeding off themselves.
Lastly, It's not gamers specifically there is an overlap but you see it everywhere. Movies for instance and even cultural events can bring these people out of the woodworks cause its a specific group of people, not gamers, not geeks just alt-right assholes.
This problem isn't gamer specific, its people in general.
 

Sailent

Member
Mar 2, 2018
1,591
I always find funny how much they use the "triggered" meme, yet they are the easiest people to trigger.

I see a lot of people saying they're trolls.
They're not, these people are genuinely convinced of their beliefs and aren't saying this to troll people, they are genuinely upset.
I also see people saying that it's mostly kids.
They're not.
There are a lot of kids who think like that but most of these people are at least over 20.
It's crazy how hypocritical these people seem to be.
A lot of them get their kicks of off "triggering" soy boys, SJWs, Cucks or whatever edgy buzzword they use now, but most of the time it's them fucking losing their shit.
Are they really that unaware of that?
I know a lot of people like that and its mostly edgy teenage and childish thoughts that most regular people seem to wise up on after growing up and experiencing how things are in the real world.
Not these guys, they stay in their circles like 4chan and likeminded individuals failing to realize they're all just a bunch of crazy people feeding off themselves.
Lastly, It's not gamers specifically there is an overlap but you see it everywhere. Movies for instance and even cultural events can bring these people out of the woodworks cause its a specific group of people, not gamers, not geeks just alt-right assholes.
This problem isn't gamer specific, its people in general.

Thanks for this comment. Do not mislabel stupidity with hate. (sometime they go hand in hand tho)

Like some people calling the murderer of Christchurch "crazy".
 

Death Penalty

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
3,308
As a white man myself, it's because they're a bunch of babies and are completely unable to take criticism. Shining a light on the negative effects of a lot of common dispositions in nerd culture towards minorities and women feels like a personal attack. It totally infringes on their own narcissism (a trait that's unfortunately very common in nerd circles) and asks them to sacrifice some of their own self-esteem and reflect in a critical way on themselves and their hobby. This is pretty hard for a narcissist, it's way easier to resist change with a bunch of pseudo-intellectual bullshit. That coupled with the fact that supposed "SJWs" are trying to push for things in the industry that don't cater exclusively to white men, and you get a bunch of people who think you're trying to take their toys away.

Even as someone who would probably be labeled an SJW it doesn't feel great being told that white guys are the root of a lot of big problems in the industry. But if you can't see past your own ego and have a little empathy for fellow human beings, you're a snowflake as far as I'm concerned. Gaming should not be a safe space for people like that, but it tragically often is.
 

texhnolyze

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,184
Indonesia
They're dumb people. You can safely ignore them. It's quite easy to identify them, if they:

- talk about an LGBT agenda
- talk about how they're against forced LGBT romance
- mention Feminism as to why some game fails
- use SJW unironically
- or say "keep politics out of my games"

You can tune them out without nothing of value being lost.
By these characteristics, I feel like we're surrounded by them even here in Era.
 

Dr. Caroll

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
8,111
Gaming has this awkward relationship with themes and politics in general. The catch-cry of "It's not political" is partially at attempt to keep the peace at any cost. A lot of people in the gaming community suck at emotionally coping with a game telling them things they don't want to hear. Unfortunately, when people talk about wanting games to be more political, they typically mean politics they agree with. It's a self-defeating mentality. The language is broken. People don't say what they really mean. There's this awkward sense of people really just wanting games to reinforce their own political beliefs, and they want political games that they don't agree with "fixed" or suppressed.

Side A: If a game reinforces my beliefs it "isn't political". If it challenges my beliefs, it's a preachy SJW piece of shit.
Side B: If a game reinforces my beliefs it's political. If it challenges my beliefs, it's a problematic piece of shit.

The gaming community as a whole never gained the skills necessary to discuss controversial topics in a calm and reasonable manner in part because gaming became so tied up in toy culture via consoles. Superficial products. Gamers do not appreciate their views being challenged. There are cases where gamers will bend over backwards to either pretend a game has no message, or to misunderstand its message. This is a coping mechanism. I like a game, but I don't like what it is telling me. Solution? Pretend it isn't telling me anything.
 

Icemonk191

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,814
You know, you should really read about logical fallacies because your posts in this thread touch upon & exhaust almost all of them. Inventing these very specific real-life situations that support your own arguments but have very little basis in reality. Acting like the victim when mean old progressives "pile" on you when you make dumb arguments. Like, yeah, there would be nothing wrong with your hypothetical, real-life flesh & bone son liking the colour pink. That has ZERO relevancy to the arguments made by progressives about the harmfulness of tropes like Damsel In Distress (it a widely know name even outside progressive circles because it's such a common one, it's not just Mario) or how shitty it is that we do so much gender-exclusive marketing & gender-coded crap IN FICTION.

But sure, let's take your silly arguments at face value...

If such a highly unlikely discussion came up on a date about Princess Peach being a damsel in distress, then yeah, I'd criticize the trope even if my date was all into that. I wouldn't "harp on her" or publicly try to humiliate her, but I'd say that I think it's just another tired example of sexist attitudes towards women I find really tired & annoying. Not that this kind of discussion would ever happen with any of the women I know in my life but, like, if it were to happen, I wouldn't just be all "YEAH YOU'RE RIGHT THAT'S TOTALLY COOL" if that wasn't what I actually thought, just because they are a woman. I'd assume they are strong enough to handle differing opinions.

And if your girlfriend made a Girly Game with Girly things where you control Girly Girls who do Girly stuff like Brush Their Girly Hair and Girlily Gossip About Girly Things and wear Girly Colours like Pink and Go take Girly mani-pedis, sure, it would be worthy of some criticism of pushing that kind of content just because they are making something aimed at girls. A lot of girls & women like mani-pedis and make-up and doing stuff to their hair and there's absolutely nothing wrong or shameful about that, but that doesn't mean a game aimed at them has to be exclusively about that. Like, you could have those kinds of elements in your game (basically, a character creator), but it'd be a pretty poor game if all you did was that.



And, again, it's not that a SINGLE game will cause anything. It's when it's a LARGE SCALE, COMMON, REGULAR THING that is in tons of games, books, movies, tv series etc. it becomes problematic. "Damsel In Distress" IS still a very common plot-device. It's not even just that it's a harmful plot device, it's that it's a BORING, black & white, one-sided plot device. If you're gonna have a woman be kidnapped, do it like 10 Cloverfield Lane where the kidnapped "princess" shows some initiative and tries to escape herself through the usage of all the tools & opportunities she gets. Give them agency, give them wit, give them a fighting spirit. You can have a man even rescue them but let the kidnapped woman have a role in the saving operation/escape as well, not just be carried off by the hero.


Just because YOU turned out not to be a raging misogynistic ass who can't handle any women in his games doesn't mean it's not a larger issue. Anecdotal experiences are worthless. There are actual studies about these things. About how women view themselves after being exposed to certain kind of content in society. How women shape their behaviour due to certain expectations put on them by society at large. Not all women but enough for there to be a need for a paradigm shift. And boys learn harmful behavioural patterns from movies, hardcore porn etc. that have very little to do with how to interact with real girls/women and everything to do with wish-fulfillment & toxic attitudes by men for men. The world will lose absolutely nothing if we don't have a make-up game ever again and there's, again, EVERYTHING to be gained by giving girls more varied, more meaningful & more thoughtful experiences through gaming, when it comes to what kind of roles they can take & how they are portrayed.

And what if that guy had said "I hope you don't hire any niggers, they are all lazy, worthless criminals"? You'd be ok with keeping working with a person like that? Being assosiated with someone like that?


L
O
L

@

acting like the victim of some kind of horrible blootbath. Get a fucking grip. You're not a victim here. You're spouting nonsense, making some really logically unsound arguments that have no relation to the topic at hand and undermining real problematic stuff in your entertainment just because you don't think they matter because you didn't turn into a GGer. Even if it's something as "small" as women being princesses to rescue.

You with this post:
2wvcmf.jpg
 

ZiZ

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,716
Not only were video games a boys only club, for a long time games were considered for "nerds" and often associated with being a virgin or a loser (basically incels). many of these same people believed it and thought of it as theirs. But then the women who in their eyes were same people who mocked their games, who made them incels to begin with, came to their holy land of gaming and began "ruining" it. It started when they removed the nudity they craved. Now even in their fantasy worlds they can't be the hero that saves the damsel in distress, even imaginary girls won't be submissive to them. Then, not only are they being denied their due, other "lesser" people are being catered to with developers bending over backwards to please them. "I don't get to see my gratuitous nudity, but I have to endure this icky gayness/colored skin?" and so they declared a holy war, to protect their holy land of gaming and anything that isn't 100% catered to them is in fact the work of the enemy and meant to destroy gaming.
 

Revolsin

Usage of alt-account.
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,373
I think people's problem is 'change' in an existing thing more than it is a hate for different races. That's why movies like Coco are so universally loved despite no focus on white people.

"The fact that you're changing means you're catering to them. Why does my video game have to be anything but normal?".

The problem is of course that the mentality is flawed to begin with. Why is it that 'normal' is white males exclusively?

That's the question no one of that side really thinks about or considers, and oddly it's not something asked of them either.

The people on this side are similarly more concerned with shoving the fact that the other side is stupid down their throats rather than actually trying to make them question their beliefs, and, you know, change them. This topic's replies are easy proof of that.

Why would you ever be willing to listen to someone who wants to prove you're dumb for thinking what you think? You wouldn't listen to them, and in fact you'd fight against them.

Myself, I was on that 'anti-sjw' end for a few years, and I hated everyone on this side telling me I was the stupid one for some reason.
The only real way I was able to change was by pure coincidence. One of the big sites I got gaming news on happened to be left-oriented, and I finally got an actual perspective of their views that wasn't them just shouting at me for being stupid. I got an actual reasonable perspective, and realized, "Oh, these people aren't wrong. They're actually coming from a good place"

And when I got that perspective is exactly when I started to change. That's the only real way people do change, and that's something we as a community need to understand if we want to make any progress with this movement.
 
Last edited:

Baphomet

Member
Dec 8, 2018
17,009
Boys start playing games because it's something they can master and feel dominant in. That's enticing because people don't typically feel masterful or dominant in most things, especially in relationships with other people. So when those other people come along and say, "gaming is for us, too." Those boys feel threatened.
great post , I agree with this.
 

Deleted member 1041

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,725
I feel it's mainly people create their identity over media they consume and when people dare criticize that media, they take it as personal attacks.
 

Rust

Member
Jan 24, 2018
1,225

This was a great episode, although I wish the clip didn't end so sharply. (I would've edited before the tantrum joke personally.)

I highly recommend seeking it out - the last act goes into a bit more detail, plus it has a few mini quotes from the creators of Journey.
 

KnightimeX

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
877
I think they want a video game without anyone from any group complaining about anything.
So like if the dev has something in the game that might offend someone then whatever. It is what it is.
Those people don't want the game's influence changed in any way.
I don't see an issue with this at all.
Personally, I like the purity of it.
 

litebrite

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
21,832
It's part of a larger cultural clash where a certain group of people feel they're losing a certain reality where they were the center of the universe and most things pandered specifically to them, but now since it's only some things being pandered specifically to them than they are "victims" of this nefarious plot of being inclusive, diverse, welcoming, and thoughtful to all groups of people.
 

Naphu

Member
Apr 6, 2018
729
I think the in-road was 4chan and the catalyst was gamergate. I'm just not sure how it got so big and seems to continue to grow. Whatever happened since gamergate, you can bet it wasn't organic.
 

caff!!!

Member
Oct 29, 2017
3,031
Ouch, the comments aren't surprising, but moreso the like/dislike ration. Really shows how popular the dislike opinion is.
Honestly, the ratio is busted the second the video makes rounds in such circles. For an example, a video on well thought out reasons that at the very least, we should have more diverse game development teams gets ~27% dislikes and yikes comments boosted to the top. I wish it could be easy to show them that actually, such beliefs aren't from a good place but it's quickly drained out by spin or just ignoring such arguments altogether
 

Melkezadek

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,168
Anti SJWs have almost ruined gaming for me, tbh. You can't even have a PoC or LGBT person on screen without some idiot talking about them pandering to SJWs this and that.

I wish game developers took a stand against them but I think it's obvious that many are genuinely afraid of the retaliation at this point.

Gaming was always an outlet for me to get away from the realities of being a black man in America. Now I can't even have that. It's really wearing on my mental health
 

ridaxan

Member
Oct 29, 2017
240
Cape Town, South Africa
It's the internet, people get upset about everything.

Personally I don't put much stake in any supposed "agenda" that someone might be pushing in a game. I play the game and if it's a good game, it's a good game. Politics and identity politics is not going to influence my experience of whether or not a game is good or not.
 

louis89

Member
Jun 11, 2018
69
Tokyo
User Banned (2 Weeks): Dismissing Concerns on Representation and Inclusivity Over a Series of Posts; Account in Junior Phase
oh please do enlighten us
I am absolutely not white and I am absolutely anti-SJWification of video games and other media. I grew up in the 90s playing video games when this was never a topic of discussion and never felt marginalised; now people (who aren't even my race) want to shoehorn people of my race into games to score points, make a statement, appease a small but vocal minority of people who care about this, and appeal to... me? But, it in fact has the exact opposite effect on me. Put a black character in a game because you want that particular character; not to push an agenda. FFVII had a very prominent black character and FFXIII's main character was female - despite the fact that not a single person at the Japanese company Square gives a single shit about """"representation"""". They simply thought that would be cool, and it was. The fact that this has now turned into who can be the most woke (see: BFV, TLOU2) and shoehorn the most women/ethnic minorities/homosexual people into their games (and moves, and comic books, etc...) is really ridiculous.
 

Nightbird

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
3,780
Germany


The guy who made this would go on to make Night in the Woods.


Man, I love this video.

But yeah, the ones crying about Politics in videogames are mostly the same people that wouldn't bat an eye if you were tasked with killing a ton of black people or woman in a videogame.

But once you're supposed to play as one, all hell breaks loose.

Just look at how "Gamers" talk about Life is strange. It's such a beautiful and touching game, yet it's treated as if it's the height of "SJW" agenda.
I myself avoided the game for a long time because I was told it's the "worst of Tumblr in game Form". The idiot that I was didn't asked what that was supposed to mean, thus fell for it.


It's not exclusively a "white straight male" thing but it has been highly influenced and shaped by it.